pxsl-tools: Parsimonious XML Shorthand Language--to-XML compiler
The package contains the pxslcc compiler, which converts Parsimonious XML Shorthand Language (PXSL) into XML. PXSL ("pixel") is a convenient shorthand for writing markup-heavy XML documents. It provides XML authors and programmers with a simple, concise syntax that they can use to create XML documents. For more advanced users, PXSL offers customizable shortcuts and sophisticated refactoring tools like functional macros that can markedly reduce the size and complexity of markup-dense XML documents.
[Skip to Readme]
Downloads
- pxsl-tools-1.0.1.tar.gz [browse] (Cabal source package)
- Package description (as included in the package)
Maintainer's Corner
For package maintainers and hackage trustees
Candidates
- No Candidates
Versions [RSS] | 1.0.1 |
---|---|
Dependencies | base, containers, mtl (>=1.0), parsec (>=2.0) [details] |
License | LicenseRef-GPL |
Copyright | 2003-2008 Thomas G. Moertel <tom@moertel.com> |
Author | Tom Moertel <tom@moertel.com> |
Maintainer | Tom Moertel <tom@moertel.com> |
Category | XML |
Home page | http://community.moertel.com/ss/space/PXSL |
Uploaded | by TomMoertel at 2008-08-25T02:47:44Z |
Distributions | NixOS:1.0.1 |
Reverse Dependencies | 1 direct, 0 indirect [details] |
Executables | pxslcc |
Downloads | 1467 total (3 in the last 30 days) |
Rating | (no votes yet) [estimated by Bayesian average] |
Your Rating |
|
Status | Docs not available [build log] Last success reported on 2017-01-03 [all 8 reports] |
Readme for pxsl-tools-1.0.1
[back to package description]____ _ _ ___ __ ( _ \( \/ )/ __)( ) )___/ ) ( \__ \ )(__ (__) (_/\_)(___/(____) PARSIMONIOUS XML SHORTHAND LANGUAGE Updated 2008-02-16 PXSL ("pixel") is a convenient shorthand for writing markup-heavy XML documents. The following document explains why PXSL is needed and shows you how to use it. For additional information, such as the FAQ list, visit the community site: http://community.moertel.com/ss/space/pxsl You'll get more out of this document if you read it from start to finish, but you can stop anywhere after the "Gentle Introduction to PXSL" and be able to take advantage of PXSL in your documents. The later sections explain PXSL's advanced features. If you're willing to invest some time in learning them, you will have at your disposal new and powerful ways to create and refactor XML documents. The advanced features are more complicated to master, but they can greatly reduce the complexity of your documents. * Table of Contents * Getting PXSL * Getting help * License * Getting or building the PXSL tools * Gentle Introduction to PXSL - Why PXSL ? - A closer look at PXSL - Using PXSL documents * Advanced topics - Element defaults provide convenient, customizable shortcuts Using element defaults to create attribute shortcuts Using element defaults to create virtual elements Making and using your own element defaults Built-in element defaults for XSLT stylesheets - Advanced quoting with << >> and <{ }> - Macro facility - Tip: store frequently used macros in reusable .pxsl files - Advanced macros and passing parameters with the <( )> delimiters - More advanced macros and functional programming - Automatic PXSL-to-XML conversion via Make * Reference: pxlscc * Reference: PXSL syntax * Authors * Getting PXSL The most-recent official version of the PXSL tools can always be found here: http://community.moertel.com/pxsl/ The PXSL tools have been also packaged for Debian (thanks Kari Pahula) and Red Hat / Fedora. By the way, you pronounce PXSL like "pixel". * Getting help If you need help with PXSL, there is a discussion site for PXSL users and developers. Feel free to ask questions and leave your comments: PXSL Community Forum http://community.moertel.com/ss/space/pxsl PXSL FAQs http://community.moertel.com/ss/space/PXSL+FAQs * LICENSE Copyright (C) 2003--2008 Thomas Moertel & Bill Hubauer. The PXSL toolkit is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. The text of the GNU GPL may be found in the LICENSE file, included with this software. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. Except as provided for under the terms of the GNU GPL, all rights are reserved worldwide. * Getting or building the PXSL tools If you don't want to build the PXSL tools from source code, you can download one of the pre-built binary packages on the PXSL web site. The PXSL tools have been also packaged for Debian (thanks Kari Pahula) and Red Hat / Fedora. You might want to search your local package repositories before building from source. If a binary package isn't available for your computing platform of choice, you can use the following procedure to build the PXSL tools for your platform. In order to build the tools you will need the following: - A PXSL source tarball (typically named "pxsl-tools-{version}.tar.gz") http://community.moertel.com/pxsl/sources/ - A Haskell compiler supporting the Cabal build system. I use GHC: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ Just uncompress the tarball and build the project using the following commands. If you want to install a personal copy of pxslcc instead of the doing the default, system-wide installation, uncomment the extra command-line flags on the third command. $ tar zxvf pxsl-tools-{version}.tar.gz $ cd pxsl-tools-{version} $ runhaskell Setup.lhs configure # --user --prefix=$HOME $ runhaskell Setup.lhs build $ runhaskell Setup.lhs install (Replace {version} with the version of PXSL that you downloaded.) That's it. You should now have a fully functional version of pxslcc. ** RPMs If you are on a Red Hat or Fedora Linux system (or a similar RPM-based distribution), you can probably find RPMS and SRPMS here: http://community.moertel.com/pxsl/RPMS/ Otherwise, you can build custom RPMs using the cabal-rpm tool: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/cabal-rpm-0.3.2 * Gentle Introduction to PXSL PXSL ("pixel") is a convenient shorthand for writing markup-heavy XML documents. This introduction assumes that you are familiar with XML. If you want a refresher, see the introductions on XML available here: http://xml.coverpages.org/xmlIntro.html ** Why PXSL ? XML is a descendant of the markup language SGML and inherits its ancestor's historical bias toward marking up textual documents. However, XML is becoming an increasingly popular medium for the representation of non-textual information such as metadata (RSS, XSD, RELAX-NG), remote procedure calls (SOAP), and even information that looks much like programming languages (XSLT, SVG, MathML). For these uses, XML's text-centric syntax gets in the way. Consider, for example, this snippet of MathML: MathML in XML <declare type="fn"> <ci> f </ci> <lambda> <bvar><ci> x </ci></bvar> <apply> <plus/> <apply> <power/> <ci> x </ci> <cn> 2 </cn> </apply> <ci> x </ci> <cn> 3 </cn> </apply> </lambda> </declare> Notice something about MathML's structure: There is more markup than text. In fact, the only text in the snippet is "f x x2 x3"; the rest is markup. As you can see above, XML's document-centric style of markup, in which the markup is delimited from the flow of surrounding text, becomes a hindrance when markup is in the majority. PXSL, in contrast, was designed specifically to handle this case well. It makes dense markup easy because it assumes that everything is markup to begin with. You need only delimit the few portions of text that are mixed into the flow of surrounding markup. In other words, PXSL is what you get when you turn XML inside out: XML PXSL <markup>text</markup> markup <<text>> Let's see how this inside-out transformation simplifies our MathML example from above: MathML in XML MathML in PXSL <declare type="fn"> declare -type=fn <ci> f </ci> ci << f >> <lambda> lambda <bvar><ci> x </ci></bvar> bvar <apply> ci << x >> <plus/> apply <apply> plus <power/> apply <ci> x </ci> power <cn> 2 </cn> ci << x >> </apply> cn << 2 >> <ci> x </ci> ci << x >> <cn> 3 </cn> cn << 3 >> </apply> </lambda> </declare> There are two things to notice about the PXSL version in comparison to the XML version. First, the PXSL version is shorter. Second, and most important, PXSL is comparatively free of noisy characters like < > / and ". In PXSL, noise is the exception rather than the rule. ** A closer look at PXSL Writing PXSL is simple. If you know how to write XML, you can write PXSL. In fact, PXSL is XML, just written in a different, inside-out syntax. Let's see how it works by way of comparison. First, every XML document and hence every PXSL document has a root element. Here is a tiny document that has a root element and nothing else: XML PXSL <doc/> doc If the document contains other elements, they are simply placed underneath the root element, but indented to indicate that the root element contains them. In XML this indenting is optional, but most people do it anyway because it is an established practice that makes documents easier to understand. In PXSL however, the indenting is mandatory because indentation determines which elements contain others. (This requirement is what enables PXSL to do away with the closing tags that XML uses to determine containment.) <doc> doc <title/> title <body/> body </doc> If an element has attributes, they are written in the form of -name=value in PXSL. <doc> doc <title/> title <body id="db13"/> body -id=db13 </doc> If an attribute value contains whitespace, it must be quoted within the literal delimiters << and >>. <doc keywords="x y z"> doc -keywords=<<x y z>> <title/> title <body id="db13"/> body -id=db13 </doc> Now let's consider text. If an element contains text, the text is quoted in << and >> delimiters and indented underneath the element that owns the text. <doc keywords="x y z"> doc -keywords=<<x y z>> <title/> title <body id="db13"> body -id=db13 This is text. <<This is text.>> </body> </doc> The << and >> delimiters are powerful. The text within them, including all whitespace, is quoted verbatim. The text can span multiple lines and even stray outside of the outline-like indentation hierarchy. If you place sections of quoted text next to one another <<like>> <<so>> they effectively become one section <<likeso>>. <doc keywords="x y z"> doc -keywords=<<x y z>> <title> title My title <<My title>> </title> body -id=db13 <body id="db13"> <<This is multi- This is multi- line text.>> line text. </body> </doc> If you want to add an XML comment, introduce it with the -- delimiter. The comment extends to the end of the line. <!-- my document --> -- my document <doc keywords="x y z"> doc -keywords=<<x y z>> <title> title My title <<My title>> </title> body -id=db13 <body id="db13"> <<This is multi- This is multi- line text.>> line text. </body> </doc> You can also use the # delimiter, which creates a PXSL comment that is invisible in XML: <!-- my document --> -- my document <doc keywords="x y z"> doc -keywords=<<x y z>> <title> title My title <<My title>> </title> body -id=db13 <body id="db13"> <<This is multi- This is multi- line text.>> line text. </body> # hidden comment, for </doc> # PXSL readers only That's it. You now know everything necessary to create PXSL documents. PXSL lets you do more, however, and if you want to take full advantage of it, read the Advanced Topics section. For now, though, let's consider how to use PXSL documents with your existing XML-based software. ** Using PXSL documents Using PXSL documents is easy because they are really XML documents in disguise. (In fact, you may wish to consider PXSL as a convenient shorthand for writing XML.) Any program that can read XML can handle PXSL. All you need to do is remove the disguise first so that the programs will recognize your documents for what they are. The included tool pxlscc (short for PXSL conversion compiler) performs this task. Just feed it a PXSL document, and it returns the equivalent plain-old XML document: $ pxlscc document.pxsl > document.xml You can then use the returned document in your XML-aware programs. If you know how to use Make or Ant or similar tools, you can easily automate this process so that your PXSL files are automagically converted into XML when needed. NOTE: The pxslcc program expects UTF-8 encoded input and emits UTF-8 encoded output. * Advanced topics The following sections describe the more advanced capabilities of PXSL that can make your life easier. The element defaults, in particular, can significantly reduce markup burdens. ** Element defaults provide convenient, customizable shortcuts Most XML documents conform to established vocabularies. Once you become familiar with your documents' vocabularies, you'll probably find that certain elements and attributes always or often occur together -- to the point where typing them becomes repetitive. For example, in XHTML, almost all img elements take the following form: <img src="..." alt="..." [ additional attributes here ] /> Or, in PXSL: img -src=... -alt=... [ additional attributes here ] So, why should you have to type in the repetitive src="" and alt="" every time you use an img element? With PXSL's element defaults, you don't need to. *** Using element defaults to create attribute shortcuts Element defaults are shortcuts that are defined in a separate file using a simple syntax. (For the specifics of creating and loading these files, see the Reference section on pxslcc.) For example: img = img src alt This shortcut allows you optionally to leave off the -src= and -alt= part whenever you write the PXSL markup for an img element. For example, with this definition in place, all three of these PXSL statements mean the exact same thing: img -src=/images/logo.png -alt=Logo img /images/logo.png -alt=Logo img /images/logo.png Logo All of them convert into the same XHTML: <img src="/images/logo.png" alt="Logo"/> <img src="/images/logo.png" alt="Logo"/> <img src="/images/logo.png" alt="Logo"/> In other words, shortcuts let you pass attribute values by position instead of by the -name=value syntax. You provide only the values, and the shortcut provides the corresponding -name= parts behind the scenes. But there are a couple of restrictions to keep in mind. First, attribute values passed by position must come first, before any values passed using the -name=value syntax, and they must occur in the same order as declared in the shortcut definition. Second, you can only pass values this way if they do not contain whitespace. If a value contains whitespace, you must use the -name=value syntax and quote the value: -name=<<my value>> (There is an advanced feature, the <( )> delimiters, that overcome this restriction. They are described in the section on advanced macros, later in this document.) *** Using element defaults to create virtual elements You can also use the element defaults to create your own virtual elements. If you work in XHTML, you have probably noticed that the <a> element is used to create both hypertext links and anchors. For example: <a name="anchor-name">Anchored text</a> <a href="#anchor-name">Link to anchored text</a> Why not make these two uses more obviously distinct while cutting down on markup at the same time? Let's create virtual "anchor" and "hlink" elements that do just that: anchor = a name hlink = a href Now we can use these elements in PXSL to express the above XHTML more clearly: anchor anchor-name <<Anchored text>> hlink #anchor-name <<Link to anchored text>> (Notice that we used << and >> in an advanced way that lets us put quoted text on the same line as the element that contains it. This is discussed further in the "Advanced quoting" section.) When we convert the above PXSL into XML, it results in exactly the same XHTML that we discussed earlier: <a name="anchor-name">Anchored text</a> <a href="#anchor-name">Link to anchored text</a> *** Making and using your own element defaults Making your own shortcuts is easy. Just create a file that contains lines of this form: element-name = preferred-element-name opt-attr-1 opt-attr-2 ... It's a good idea to extend the file's name with a suffix of ".edf", which is short for "element defaults," but feel free to ignore this convention. (Note: element defaults are *not* PXSL macros. If you want to create a file that contains commonly used macros, just save them in a regular .pxsl file and include it by mentioning it on the command line; the .edf suffix is for element defaults only. See "Tip: store frequently used macros in separate .pxsl files" for more.) For example, we might create a "xhtml-shortcuts.edf" file to capture our shortcuts from above: # File: xhtml-shortcuts.edf anchor = a name hlink = a href (Notice that you can place comment lines in your .edf files by starting them with a "#" character.) To use the shortcuts, tell pxslcc to --add them to the set of active element defaults that are used when processing your PXSL files: $ pxslcc --add=xhtml-shortcuts.edf my-doc.pxsl > my-doc.xhtml You can --add more than one set of defaults, and pxslcc will use them all. *** Built-in element defaults for XSLT stylesheets PXSL was originally created to reduce the verbosity of XSLT stylesheets. As a result, pxslcc has a built-in set of element defaults for XSLT that you can enable by passing the --xslt flag: $ pxslcc --xslt stylesheet.pxsl > stylesheet.xsl The built-in defaults provide two benefits: First, you can use element names from within the XSLT namespace without having to use the xsl: prefix. Second, you can pass common required attributes like "select" and "match" by position. Together, these benefits result in massive markup reductions, making your life as an XSLT author much easier. Compare the following snippet of XSLT in XML <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:for-each select="//*/@src|//*/@href"> <xsl:value-of select="."/> <xsl:text> </xsl:text> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> with the same snippet rewritten in PXSL (using --xslt defaults): template / for-each //*/@src|//*/@href value-of . text << >> Among the many XSLT shortcuts enabled by the --xslt flag, the above PXSL snippet uses the following: template = xsl:template match name for-each = xsl:for-each select xml:space value-of = xsl:value-of select disable-output-escaping text = xsl:text disable-output-escaping To see the complete list of XSLT shortcuts, --export them: $ pxslcc --xslt --export ** Advanced quoting with the << >> and <{ }> delimiters PXSL has two kinds of quoting delimiters that can be used to quote mixed and text-only content. Both are described in this section. *** XML quoting << >> delimiters The << and >> delimiters not only let you insert text into your PXSL documents, but also let you insert raw, full-featured XML. This works great for those times when it's just easier to write a bit of XML than its PXSL equivalent. For example, if you're writing an XSLT stylesheet that generates XHTML output, you'll certainly want to use PXSL to express the markup-dense xsl:stylesheet directives. But, if you need to drop in some XHTML boilerplate that a designer gave you to use in the page footer, just copy-and-paste it using << and >>: << <div class="footer"> Copyright (C) 2003 Blah, Blah, Blah, Inc. <!-- lots more boilerplate ... --> </div> >> Another great use for the << >> delimiters is to drop XML specials like processing instructions into your code: <<<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>>> The above PXSL is equivalent to the following XML: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> Because the << >> delimiters quote XML, you must follow XML's syntactical rules when using them. That means that if you want to include literal less-than "<" and ampersand "&" characters, you must use character entity references: << less-than: < >> << ampersand: & >> *** Verbatim text <{ }> delimiters (CDATA) When copy-and-pasting blocks of text from outside sources, you must be careful to "escape" any literal "<" and "&" characters that may be within. This can be annoying, especially for large blocks of text. Another place where this requirement is burdensome is in mathematical expressions that sometimes occur in XSLT markup: xsl:test -when=<< $i < 5 >> For this reason, PXSL provides the verbatim-text delimiters <{ and }> that perform the same function as XML's more verbose CDATA delimiters: XML PXSL <![CDATA[ toast & jelly ]]> <{ toast & jelly }> Any characters that you place inside of <{ }> will come out as a character literals. PXSL will take care of any escaping that is necessary to prevent XML from misinterpreting your text as markup. For example, we can rewrite the above XSLT snippet more clearly using the verbatim-text delimiters: xsl:test -when=<{ $i < 5 }> These delimiters are especially handy for including examples of XML markup in your documents. Like << >>, <{ }> can handle large blocks of multi-line text and preserves whitespace and indentation. *** Text-content shortcut As you may have noticed from the MathML example at the beginning of this document, if an element contains text, you can declare the text on the same line as the element. This saves space and often reads more easily: NORMAL SHORTCUT h1 h1 <<Chapter 1>> <<Chapter 1>> h2 <{Sections 1 & 2}> h2 <{Sections 1 & 2}> ** Macro facility PXSL has a simple macro facility that you can use to reorganize your markup and "factor out" boilerplate. A macro is defined with a leading comma and a trailing equals sign, like so: ,name = body-of-the-macro where "name" is the name of the macro and "body-of-the-macro" can be any series of elements and text. Macros can be defined at any level of nesting within a PXSL document, but they are only visible (i.e., available for use) at the level where they were defined and at levels nested underneath. (If two macros with the same name are visible at the same time, the deepest one will hide the other, or if both are on the same level, the one defined latest in the document will hide the earlier. In other words, the policy is "the last, deepest one wins.") *** Using macros (i.e., macro expansion) To use a macro, simply refer to it by name anywhere that an element can be used: ,hello = <<Hello!>> html head title ,hello body <<Hello! Again!>> When processed with pxslcc (using the --indent flag), this is the result: <html> <head> <title>Hello!</title> </head> <body>Hello! Again!</body> </html> Note that the macro definition has been removed and that the reference to the macro inside of the "title" element has been replaced by the macro's body. This is called macro expansion. Macros don't need to be defined before they are expanded, as long as they are visible from the sites (locations) where they are expanded. Also, macros can call other macros: ,hello = <<Hello!>> html ,head ,body ,head = head title ,hello ,body = body <<Hello! Again!>> This snippet results in exactly the same XML as the one above. Nevertheless, we have made a number of organizational changes. The "head" and "body" within the "html" element have been factored out into the macros ,head and ,body and relocated within the document. These macros are defined within the "html" element, after the sites where they are expanded. Note that the ,head macro calls upon the ,hello macro that we defined earlier. Although contrived in this small example, factoring out blocks of markup makes the structure of large documents easier to understand and manage because you are free to move them around, subdivide them further, and reuse them in many locations. *** Tip: store frequently used macros in reusable .pxsl files If you use certain macros frequently in your PXSL documents, you might benefit from placing the macros into a separate .pxsl file that you can reuse. For example, you could place your macros into a file macros.pxsl and then use them when processing several documents: $ pxslcc macros.pxsl doc1.pxsl > doc1.xml $ pxslcc macros.pxsl doc2.pxsl > doc2.xml $ pxslcc macros.pxsl doc3.pxsl > doc3.xml *** Parameterized macros Macros can take any number of parameters, which allows you to customize their definitions. **** Using named parameters For example, we could customize the definition of the ,head macro that we used above to accept the title as a parameter: ,make-head my-title = head title ,my-title Now we can use it to create a head element that contains any title that we want: ,make-head -my-title=<<This is my title.>> Note that we pass parameters to a macro just like we pass attributes to an element definition. **** Using the magic, implicit BODY parameter But what if we want to pass more than strings? What if we want to pass large sections of documents as parameters? We can do this using the special BODY parameter that all macros have implicitly: ,make-section title = section -- start of section title ,title ,BODY -- end of section (Note that the BODY parameter must be spelled exactly "BODY" and in all caps.) The BODY parameter accepts any content defined underneath the macro-expansion site (i.e., the body of the macro-expansion invocation): ,make-section -title=<<This is my title>> p <<This is a paragraph.>> p <<And another.>> p <<And so on.>> The result of calling this macro is the following XML: <section> <!-- start of section --> <title>This is my title</title> <p>This is a paragraph.</p> <p>And another.</p> <p>And so on.</p> <!-- end of section --> </section> *** Advanced macros and passing parameters with the <( )> delimiters As we showed earlier, one way of passing document fragments to macros is via the implicit BODY parameter that all macros have. Another is to pass them as normal arguments using the <( )> delimiters, which let you group PXSL document fragments into chunks that you can pass as arguments. For example, let's redefine the make-section macro we defined above to accept the body of the section as a normal parameter: ,make-section title body = section -- start of section title ,title body ,body -- end of section Now we can call it like so: ,make-section -title=<<This is my title>> \ -body=<( p <<This is a paragraph.>> p <<And another.>> p <<And so on.>> )> (Note the use of the backslash in between parameters to continue the parameter list to the next line. This useful trick also works to continue attribute lists when you are creating elements.) Because the <( )> delimiters can be used only to pass arguments, you can use them to "quote" arguments that otherwise could not be passed via position, e.g., a fragment of text that contains whitespace: ,make-section <( <<This is my title>> )> \ <( p <<This is a paragraph.>> p <<And another.>> p <<And so on.>> )> You can even use the <( )> delimiters to pass the results of macro calls to elements and other macros: ,h1 x = -- level one heading h1 ,x ,bang x = ,x <<!>> ,h1 <( <<Hello, >> ,bang World )> The above produces the following XML: <!-- level one heading --> <h1>Hello, World!</h1> *** More advanced macros and functional programming Like functions in functional programming languages, macros in PXSL are first-class values that can be created, bound to parameters, and passed to other macros. While this might initially seem like a programming-language curiosity, it is actually a simple yet immensely powerful tool that you can use to reduce the size and complexity of your XML documents. In particular, this tool lets you "factor out" and reuse common, boilerplate portions of your documents. To see how this works, consider the following XML document that represents an address book: <address-book> <person> <first>Joe</first> <last>Smith</last> <preferred>Joe Smith</preferred> </person> <person> <first>John</first> <last>Doe</last> <preferred>John Doe</preferred> </person> <!-- ... more persons ... --> </address-book> The address book contains a long list of persons, each of which has a first and last name and a "preferred name" that is usually the first and last named joined together (but might be something else). We might write the address book in PXSL like this: address-book person first <<Joe>> last <<Smith>> preferred <<Joe Smith>> person first <<John> last <<Doe>> preferred <<John Doe>> -- ... more persons ... But, seeing how repetitive that is, we might create a ,person macro to make our lives easier: ,person first last = person first ,first last ,last preferred ,first << >> ,last Now, with our new macro, we can simply write address-book ,person Joe Smith ,person John Doe -- ... more persons ... And, indeed, running the above PXSL code through pxslcc, yields the identical XML: <address-book> <person> <first>Joe</first> <last>Smith</last> <preferred>Joe Smith</preferred> </person> <person> <first>John</first> <last>Doe</last> <preferred>John Doe</preferred> </person> <!-- ... more persons ... --> </address-book> Already, we have saved a great deal of work, but let's say that the situation is a little more complicated. Let's say that in addition to the address-book, we also need to make a roster of persons: <roster> <formal>Smith, Joe</formal> <formal>Doe, John</formal> <!-- ... more persons ... --> </roster> and, most important, we need to keep the address-book and roster synchronized. In other words, we have one list of names and we must use it in two places. At this point, we might be tempted to put the list of names in a separate XML document and write a small external program or a couple of XSLT stylesheets to transform the document into the address-book and roster. After all, we don't want to have to keep the address-book and roster synchronized by hand. But we can do this without leaving PXSL. All we have to do is create a macro that builds things out of our list of people: ,build-from-people builder-macro = ,builder-macro Joe Smith ,builder-macro John Doe -- ... more persons ... The interesting thing is that our ,build-from-people macro takes another macro as a parameter and binds it to the name "builder-macro", just like it would any other kind of parameter. It uses this macro to transform a first and last name into something else. What that something else is, is up to us: We simply tailor the ,builder-macro to suit our purpose. For example, to build an address book: address-book ,build-from-people <( , first last = ,person <(,first)> <(,last)> )> or, to build a roster: roster ,build-from-people <( , first last = formal ,last <<, >> ,first )> That's it. We have just built an address book and a roster from our list of people. Now, you may have noticed something new in the above two snippets of PXSL. In each snippet, inside of the outer-most <( )> delimiters, we created a macro on the fly -- an anonymous macro, so called because we didn't give it a name. (It doesn't need a name because we're using it just this one time; nobody else will ever call it.) We simply created it right when we needed it and passed it to the ,build-from-people macro, where it was bound to the name "builder-macro." Then ,build-from-people used it to construct "person" or "formal" elements (depending on how we defined the anonymous macro). It's a pretty neat trick. You can create anonymous macros using the familiar comma syntax -- just don't provide a name. Note the space between the comma and the start of the argument list: , arg1 arg2... = body To call an anonymous macro, of course, you'll first have to bind it to a name. The way you do this is to pass the anonymous macro to another macro, just like we did earlier, causing the anonymous macro to be bound to one of the other macro's parameters: ,some-other-macro <( , arg1 arg2... = body )> Then that other macro can call it via the parameter's name: ,some-other-macro marco-arg = ,macro-arg -arg1=... -arg2=... Here's another example, less practical but illustrative. See if you can figure out how the code works before reading the explanation that follows. ,double str = <{"}> ,str <{"}> ,single str = <{'}> ,str <{'}> ,add-quotes quote-fn str = ,quote-fn <( ,str )> -- let's quote a couple of strings ,add-quotes <( , x = ,double <(,x)> )> -str=<<Quote Me>> << >> ,add-quotes <( , x = ,single <(,x)> )> Please! Pxslcc compiles the above into the following output: <!-- let's quote a couple of strings --> "Quote Me" 'Please!' In this example, the two calls to the ,add-quotes macro each pass in an anonymous macro that performs the desired quoting operation. The anonymous macro is bound to "quote-fn" when the ,add-quotes macro is called and expanded. Thus, when ,add-quotes calls ,quote-fn, it is really calling the anonymous macro that we passed to it. This lets us customize the behavior of ,add-quotes without having to rewrite it. *** Real-world example The examples above are contrived and don't do justice to the usefulness of this tool. This type of refactoring shines when dealing with large, complicated, and repetitive data structures, but such examples are too unwieldy to include in an introduction like this. For this reason, I urge you to take a look at the "xsl-menus-w-macros.pxsl" example, in examples directory. It shows one way that you can use anonymous macros to factor out common code in production XSLT stylesheets. http://community.moertel.com/pxsl/examples/xsl-menus-w-macros.pxsl ** Automatic PXSL-to-XML conversion via Make Most Make utilities allow you to define pattern rules that are then used automatically to convert one class of documents into another. Pattern rules can be used to automate the conversion of PXSL documents into their XML counterparts. For example, if you place the following rule into a makefile (this is for GNU make), %.xml: %.pxsl pxlscc --indent=2 --header $< > $@ Make will automatically generate .xml documents from the corresponding .pxsl documents whenever they are needed. This frees you to substitute .pxsl documents anywhere that your project calls for .xml documents, knowing that make will keep all of the .xml documents up to date, regenerating them as needed when you update your .pxsl documents. * Reference: pxlscc Usage: pxslcc [OPTION...] [file...] -i[NUM] --indent[=NUM] Re-indent XML using NUM spaces per nesting level -h --header Insert edit-the-PXSL-instead header into output XML -x --xslt Add XSLT defaults -a FILE --add=FILE Add the given defaults file --export Export (print) all of the active defaults --dump Dump internal parse format (for debugging) When you list more than one PXSL file on the command line, pxslcc will join the files, in order, into one big PXSL document and process that document. You can use this feature to incorporate commonly used macros into your documents: $ pxslcc macros1.pxsl macros2.pxsl doc.pxsl > doc.xml In the example above, doc.pxsl can use the macros defined in macros1.pxsl and macros2.pxsl. The --header option requires some explanation. It inserts the following header comment into the output XML: <!-- NOTICE: This XML document was generated from PXSL source. If you want to edit this file, you should probably edit the original PXSL source file instead. --> It's a good idea to use the --header option all of the time. This prevents you (or somebody else) from accidentally editing an XML file when you really ought to be editing the PXSL file from which the XML file is generated. [TODO: Expand this section] * Reference: PXSL syntax The PXSL grammar, in EBNF-like notation: pxsl-document ::= statement*, EOF statement ::= pxsl-comment | xml-comment | literal-constructor | element-constructor | macro-def | macro-app pxsl-comment ::= '#', all-text-until-newline, NEWLINE xml-comment ::= "--", all-text-until-newline, NEWLINE literal-constructor ::= mixed-literal | cdata-literal element-constructor ::= xml-name, posn-args, nv-args, children macro-def ::= ',', xml-name?, param-names, '=', macro-body macro-app ::= ',', xml-name, posn-args, nv-args, children xml-name ::= ( LETTER | '_' | ':' ), ( LETTER | DIGIT | '_' | ':' | '.' | '-' )* posn-args ::= expr-list nv-args ::= ( line-continuation?, name-value-pair )* name-value-pair ::= '-', xml-name, '=', expr children ::= statement* /* must be indented */ macro-body ::= children param-names ::= ( line-continuation?, xml-name )* line-continuation ::= '\', newline expr-list ::= ( line-continuation?, arg-expr )* arg-expr ::= expr /* cannot start with '-' */ expr ::= expr-single | NON-WHITESPACE+ expr-single ::= mixed-literal | cdata-literal | pxsl-fragment mixed-literal ::= "<<", all-text-until->>-delimiter, ">>" cdata-literal ::= "<{", all-text-until-}>-delimiter, "}>" pxsl-fragment ::= "<(", statement*, ")>" * Authors Tom Moertel <tom@moertel.com> http://blog.moertel.com/ Bill Hubauer <bill@hubauer.com> * (For Emacs) Local Variables: mode:outline End: