one-liner-instances
This package uses machinery from one-liner in order to provide default
implementations for methods from Num
, Fractional
, Floating
, Semigroup
,
Monoid
, Bounded
, Eq
, Ord
, and Random
. These will work for any types
(deriving Generic
) whose fields are all instances of that typeclass.
For Num
, Fractional
, Floating
, Semigroup
, and Monoid
, the types also
must have only a single constructor. Random
methods offer variants with
single constructors (for performance) and with multiple constructors.
So, gPlus
(generic addition) will work for:
data Tup1 a b = Tup1 a b -- requires Num a, Num b
data Tup2 a = Tup2 Int a -- requires Num a, Num b
data Tup3 = Tup3 Int Double
data Tup4 a b = Tup4 Int Double -- no constraint on a or b
But not on:
data Tup5 a = Tup2 String a -- String is not an instance of Num
These are implemented by applying the operation to every field.
Newtype wrappers
Similar to WrappedMonoid
and WarppedMonad
from base, some convenient
newtype wrappers are provided that will give free instances of Num
, etc. for
appropriate types:
If a
is a data type (deriving Generic
) with a single constructor whose
fields all have instances of Num
, then GNum a
has a Num
instance (and
same for Fractional
, Floating
, etc.).
If a
is a data type (deriving Generic
) with a single constructor whose
fields all have instances of Semigroup
, then GMonoid a
has a Semigroup
instance (and same for Monoid
).
If a
is a data type (deriving Generic
) whose fields all have instances of
Bounded
, then GBounded a
has a Bounded
instance.
If a
is a data type (deriving Generic
) whose fields all have instances of
Eq
, then GOrd a
has a Eq
instance (and same for
Ord
).
Comparisons
This package provides very similar functionality to generic-deriving.
There are a few major design differences between generic-deriving and
one-liner, the package that this one is built on.
generic-deriving creates a separate "deriving" typeclass for every
typeclass one wants to generalize. So, there is a separate GMonoid
typeclass, a separate GEnum
typeclass, etc.
one-liner instead creates a single typeclass (ADTRecord
and Constraints
)
to unify all generalizable typeclasses. Both the generic Monoid
and generic
Num
instances are built upon the same Constraints
typeclass. From a
usability standpoint, one-liner allows one to easily create generic versions
of their own, custom typeclasses -- something that generic-deriving does not
help with.
one-liner-instances, however, is simply a package using the one-liner
engine to provide generic instances for common classes where it is possible.
The main difference in practical usability between one-liner-instances and
generic-deriving themselves are few, but are mainly:
-
one-liner-instances has generic implementations for
Num
/Fractional
/Floating
, and generic-deriving doesn't. This is a
superficial difference, however, since nothing fundamental is preventing
generic-deriving from adding them in the future.
-
one-liner-instances provides newtype wrappers that can automatically
imbue appropriate types with instances, which can be used with the upcoming
DerivingVia syntax to automatically derive instances, or just used on
their own for convenience purposes.
generic-deriving does not aim to do this at this moment.
-
Integrates with the rest of the one-liner ecosystem, if one is already
using it to provide constraints for custom typeclasses.