Main Web site
Contributing Guide
Please see the contributing guide
Requirements
LiquidHaskell requires (in addition to the cabal dependencies)
- SMTLIB2 compatible solver
How To Clone, Build and Install
See install instructions
How To Run
To verify a file called foo.hs
at type
$ liquid foo.hs
How to Run inside GHCi
To run inside ghci
e.g. when developing do:
$ stack ghci liquidhaskell
ghci> :m +Language.Haskell.Liquid.Liquid
ghci> liquid ["tests/pos/Abs.hs"]
See this file for instructions on running inside a custom nix
-shell.
How To Run Regression Tests
$ stack test
To use threads to speed up the tests
$ make THREADS=30 test
Or your favorite number of threads, depending on cores etc.
You can directly extend and run the tests by modifying
tests/test.hs
To run the regression test and the benchmarks run
$ make all-test
How to Profile
-
Build with profiling on
$ make pdeps && make prof
-
Run with profiling
$ time liquid range.hs +RTS -hc -p
$ time liquid range.hs +RTS -hy -p
Followed by this which shows the stats file
$ more liquid.prof
or by this to see the graph
$ hp2ps -e8in -c liquid.hp
$ gv liquid.ps
etc.
How to Get Stack Traces On Exceptions
-
Build with profiling on
$ make pdeps && make prof
-
Run with backtraces
$ liquid +RTS -xc -RTS foo.hs
Working With Submodules
-
To update the liquid-fixpoint
submodule, run
cd ./liquid-fixpoint
git fetch --all
git checkout <remote>/<branch>
cd ..
This will update liquid-fixpoint
to the latest version on <branch>
(usually master
) from <remote>
(usually origin
).
-
After updating liquid-fixpoint
, make sure to include this change in a
commit! Running
git add ./liquid-fixpoint
will save the current commit hash of liquid-fixpoint
in your next commit
to the liquidhaskell
repository.
-
For the best experience, don't make changes directly to the
./liquid-fixpoint
submodule, or else git may get confused. Do any
liquid-fixpoint
development inside a separate clone/copy elsewhere.
-
If something goes wrong, run
rm -r ./liquid-fixpoint
git submodule update --init
to blow away your copy of the liquid-fixpoint
submodule and revert to the
last saved commit hash.
-
Want to work fully offline? git lets you add a local directory as a remote.
Run
cd ./liquid-fixpoint
git remote add local /path/to/your/fixpoint/clone
cd ..
Then to update the submodule from your local clone, you can run
cd ./liquid-fixpoint
git fetch local
git checkout local/<branch>
cd ..
Command Line Options
LiquidHaskell supports several command line options, to configure the
checking. Each option can be passed in at the command line, or directly
added to the source file via:
{-@ LIQUID "option-within-quotes" @-}
for example, to disable termination checking (see below)
{-@ LIQUID "--notermination" @-}
You may also put command line options in the environment variable
LIQUIDHASKELL_OPTS
. For example, if you add the line:
LIQUIDHASKELL_OPTS="--diff"
to your .bashrc
then, by default, all files will be
incrementally checked unless you run with the overriding
--full
flag (see below).
Incremental Checking
LiquidHaskell supports incremental checking where each run only checks
the part of the program that has been modified since the previous run.
$ liquid --diff foo.hs
Each run of liquid
saves the file to a .bak
file and the subsequent
run
+ does a diff
to see what has changed w.r.t. the .bak
file
+ only generates constraints for the [CoreBind]
corresponding to the
changed top-level binders and their transitive dependencies.
The time savings are quite significant. For example:
$ time liquid --notermination -i . Data/ByteString.hs > log 2>&1
real 7m3.179s
user 4m18.628s
sys 0m21.549s
Now if you go and tweak the definition of spanEnd
on line 1192 and re-run:
$ time liquid -d --notermination -i . Data/ByteString.hs > log 2>&1
real 0m11.584s
user 0m6.008s
sys 0m0.696s
The diff is only performed against code, i.e. if you only change
specifications, qualifiers, measures, etc. liquid -d
will not perform
any checks. In this case, you may specify individual definitions to verify:
$ liquid -b bar -b baz foo.hs
This will verify bar
and baz
, as well as any functions they use.
If you always want to run a given file with diff-checking, add
the pragma:
{-@ LIQUID "--diff" @-}
Full Checking (DEFAULT)
To force LiquidHaskell to check the whole file (DEFAULT), use:
$ liquid --full foo.hs
to the file. This will override any other --diff
incantation
elsewhere (e.g. inside the file.)
If you always want to run a given file with full-checking, add
the pragma:
{-@ LIQUID "--full" @-}
Specifying Different SMT Solvers
By default, LiquidHaskell uses the SMTLIB2 interface for Z3.
To run a different solver (supporting SMTLIB2) do:
$ liquid --smtsolver=NAME foo.hs
Currently, LiquidHaskell supports
To use these solvers, you must install the corresponding binaries
from the above web-pages into your PATH
.
You can also build and link against the Z3 API (faster but requires more
dependencies). If you do so, you can use that interface with:
$ liquid --smtsolver=z3mem foo.hs
Short Error Messages
By default, subtyping error messages will contain the inferred type, the
expected type -- which is not a super-type, hence the error -- and a
context containing relevant variables and their type to help you understand
the error. If you don't want the above and instead, want only the
source position of the error use:
--short-errors
Short (Unqualified) Module Names
By default, the inferred types will have fully qualified module names.
To use unqualified names, much easier to read, use:
--short-names
Totality Check
LiquidHaskell proves the absence of pattern match failures.
For example, the definition
fromJust :: Maybe a -> a
fromJust (Just a) = a
is not total and it will create an error message.
If we exclude Nothing
from its domain, for example using the following specification
{-@ fromJust :: {v:Maybe a | (isJust v)} -> a @-}
fromJust
will be safe.
Use the no-totality
flag to disable totality checking.
liquid --no-totality test.hs
Termination Check
By default a termination check is performed on all recursive functions.
Use the no-termination
option to disable the check
liquid --no-termination test.hs
In recursive functions the first algebraic or integer argument should be decreasing.
The default decreasing measure for lists is length and Integers its value.
The user can specify the decreasing measure in data definitions:
{-@ data L [llen] a = Nil | Cons (x::a) (xs:: L a) @-}
Defines that llen
is the decreasing measure (to be defined by the user).
For example, in the function foldl
foldl k acc N = acc
foldl k acc (Cons x xs) = foldl k (x `k` acc) xs
by default the second argument (the first non-function argument) will be
checked to be decreasing. However, the explicit hint
{-@ Decrease foo 3 @-}
tells LiquidHaskell to instead use the third argument.
Apart from specifying a specific decreasing measure for an Algebraic Data Type,
the user can specify that the ADT follows the expected decreasing measure by
{-@ autosize L @-}
Then, LiquidHaskell will define an instance of the function autosize
for L
that decreases by 1 at each recursive call and use autosize
at functions that recurse on L
.
For example, autosize L
will refine the data constructors of L a
with the autosize :: a -> Int
information, such that
Nil :: {v:L a | autosize v = 0}
Cons :: x:a -> xs:L a -> {v:L a | autosize v = 1 + autosize xs}
Also, an invariant that autosize
is non negative will be generated
invariant {v:L a| autosize v >= 0 }
This information is all LiquidHaskell needs to prove termination on functions that recurse on L a
(on ADTs in general.)
To disable termination checking for foo
that is, to assume that it
is terminating (possibly for some complicated reason currently beyond the
scope of LiquidHaskell) you can write
{-@ Lazy foo @-}
Some functions do not decrease on a single argument, but rather a
combination of arguments, e.g. the Ackermann function.
ack m n
| m == 0 = n + 1
| m > 0 && n == 0 = ack (m-1) 1
| m > 0 && n > 0 = ack (m-1) (ack m (n-1))
In all but one recursive call m
decreases, in the final call m
does not decrease but n
does. We can capture this notion of "x
normally decreases, but if it does not, y will" with an extended
annotation
{-@ Decrease ack 1 2 @-}
An alternative way to express this specification is by annotating
the function's type with the appropriate numeric decreasing expressions.
As an example, you can give ack
a type
{-@ ack :: m:Nat -> n:Nat -> Nat / [m,n] @-}
stating that the numeric expressions [m, n]
are lexicographically decreasing.
Decreasing expressions can be arbitrary refinement expressions, e.g.,
{-@ merge :: Ord a => xs:[a] -> ys:[a] -> [a] / [(len xs) + (len ys)] @-}
states that at each recursive call of merge
the sum of the lengths
of its arguments will be decreased.
When dealing with mutually recursive functions you may run into a
situation where the decreasing parameter must be measured across a
series of invocations, e.g.
even 0 = True
even n = odd (n-1)
odd n = not $ even n
In this case, you can introduce a ghost parameter that orders the functions
even 0 _ = True
even n _ = odd (n-1) 1
odd n _ = not $ even n 0
thus recovering a decreasing measure for the pair of functions, the
pair of arguments. This can be encoded with the lexicographic
termination annotation {-@ Decrease even 1 2 @-}
(see
tests/pos/mutrec.hs for the full example).
Total Haskell
LiquidHaskell provides a total Haskell flag that checks both totallity and termination of the program,
overriding a potential no-termination flag.
liquid --total-Haskell test.hs
Lazy Variables
A variable can be specified as LAZYVAR
{-@ LAZYVAR z @-}
With this annotation the definition of z
will be checked at the points where
it is used. For example, with the above annotation the following code is SAFE:
foo = if x > 0 then z else x
where
z = 42 `safeDiv` x
x = choose 0
By default, all the variables starting with fail
are marked as LAZY, to defer
failing checks at the point where these variables are used.
No measure fields
When a data type is refined, Liquid Haskell automatically turns the data constructor fields into measures.
For example,
{-@ data L a = N | C {hd :: a, tl :: L a} @-}
will automatically create two measures hd
and td
.
To deactivate this automatic measure definition, and speed up verification, you can use the no-measure-fields
flag.
liquid --no-measure-fields test.hs
Prune Unsorted Predicates
Consider a measure over lists of integers
sum :: [Int] -> Int
sum [] = 0
sum (x:xs) = 1 + sum xs
This measure will translate into strengthening the types of list constructors
[] :: {v:[Int] | sum v = 0 }
(:) :: x:Int -> xs:[Int] -> {v:[Int] | sum v = x + sum xs}
But what if our list is polymorphic [a]
and later instantiate to list of ints?
The hack we do right now is to strengthen the polymorphic list with the sum
information
[] :: {v:[a] | sum v = 0 }
(:) :: x:a -> xs:[a] -> {v:[a] | sum v = x + sum xs}
But for non numeric a
s, expressions like x + sum xs
is unsorted causing the logic to crash.
We use the flag --prune-unsorted
to prune away unsorted expressions (like x + sum xs
) in the logic.
liquid --prune-unsorted test.hs
Case Expansion
By default LiquidHaskell expands all data constructors to the case statements.
For example,
if F = A1 | A2 | .. | A10
,
then LiquidHaskell will expand the code
case f of {A1 -> True; _ -> False}
to case f of {A1 -> True; A2 -> False; ...; A10 -> False}
.
This expansion can lead to more precise code analysis
but it can get really expensive due to code explosion.
The no-case-expand
flag prevents this expansion and keeps the user
provided cases for the case expression.
liquid --no-case-expand test.hs
Higher order logic
The flag --higherorder
allows reasoning about higher order functions.
Restriction to Linear Arithmetic
When using z3
as the solver, LiquidHaskell allows for non-linear arithmetic:
division and multiplication on integers are interpreted by z3
. To treat division
and multiplication as uninterpreted functions use the linear
flag
liquid --linear test.hs
Counter examples (Experimental!)
When given the --counter-examples
flag, LiquidHaskell will attempt to produce
counter-examples for the type errors it discovers. For example, see
tests/neg/ListElem.hs
% liquid --counter-examples tests/neg/ListElem.hs
...
tests/neg/ListElem.hs:12:1-8: Error: Liquid Type Mismatch
12 | listElem _ [] = False
^^^^^^^^
Inferred type
VV : {VV : Bool | VV == True}
VV = True
not a subtype of Required type
VV : {VV : Bool | Prop VV <=> Set_mem ?b (listElts ?a)}
In Context
?a : {?a : [a] | len ?a >= 0}
?a = [1]
?b : a
?b = 0
The --counter-examples
flag requires that each type in the context be
an instance of GHC.Generics.Generic
or Test.Targetable.Targetable
(provided as part of LiquidHaskell). LiquidHaskell cannot generate
counter-examples for polymorphic types, but will try (naively) to
instantiate type variables with Int
(as seen in the example above).
Writing Specifications
Modules WITHOUT code
When checking a file target.hs
, you can specify an include directory by
liquid -i /path/to/include/ target.hs
Now, to write specifications for some external module Foo.Bar.Baz
for which
you do not have the code, you can create a .spec
file at:
/path/to/include/Foo/Bar/Baz.spec
See, for example, the contents of
Note:
- The above directories are part of the LH prelude, and included by
default when running
liquid
.
- The
.spec
mechanism is only for external modules* without code,
see below for standalone specifications for internal or home modules.
Modules WITH code: Data
Write the specification directly into the .hs or .lhs file,
above the data definition. See, for example, tests/pos/Map.hs
{-@
data Map k a <l :: k -> k -> Prop, r :: k -> k -> Prop>
= Tip
| Bin (sz :: Size)
(key :: k)
(value :: a)
(left :: Map <l, r> (k <l key>) a)
(right :: Map <l, r> (k <r key>) a)
@-}
data Map k a = Tip
| Bin Size k a (Map k a) (Map k a)
You can also write invariants for data type definitions
together with the types. For example, see tests/pos/record0.hs
{-@ data LL a = BXYZ { size :: {v: Int | v > 0 }
, elems :: {v: [a] | (len v) = size }
}
@-}
Finally you can specify the variance of type variables for data types.
For example, see tests/pos/Variance.hs, where data type Foo
has four
type variables a
, b
, c
, d
, specified as invariant, bivariant,
covariant and contravariant, respectively.
data Foo a b c d
{-@ data variance Foo invariant bivariant covariant contravariant @-}
Modules WITH code: Functions
Write the specification directly into the .hs or .lhs file,
above the function definition. For example
{-@ incr :: x:{v: Int | v > 0} -> {v: Int | v > x} @-}
incr :: Int -> Int
incr x = x + 1
Modules WITH code: Type Classes
Write the specification directly into the .hs or .lhs file,
above the type class definition. For example
{-@ class Sized s where
size :: forall a. x:s a -> {v:Int | v = (size x)}
@-}
class Sized s where
size :: s a -> Int
Any measures used in the refined class definition will need to be
generic (see Specifying Measures).
As an alternative, you can refine class instances.
For example
instance Compare Int where
{-@ instance Compare Int where
cmax :: Odd -> Odd -> Odd
@-}
cmax y x = if x >= y then x else y
When cmax
method is used on Int
, liquidHaskell will give it
the refined type Odd -> Odd -> Odd
.
Note that currently liquidHaskell does not allow refining instances of
refined classes.
Modules WITH code: QuasiQuotation
Instead of writing both a Haskell type signature and a
LiquidHaskell specification for a function, the lq
quasiquoter in the LiquidHaskell
module can be used
to generate both from just the LiquidHaskell specification.
module Nats (nats) where
{-@ nats :: [{v:Int | 0 <= v}] @-}
nats :: [Int]
nats = [1,2,3]
can be written as
{-# LANGUAGE QuasiQuotes #-}
module Nats (nats) where
import LiquidHaskell
[lq| nats :: [{v:Int | 0 <= v}] |]
nats = [1,2,3]
and the lq
quasiquoter will generate the plain nats :: [Int]
when GHC
compiles the module.
Refined type aliases (see the next section) can also be written inside lq
; for
example:
{-# LANGUAGE QuasiQuoters #-}
module Nats (Nat, nats) where
[lq| type Nat = {v:Int | 0 <= v} |]
[lq| nats :: [Nat] |]
nats = [1,2,3]
Here, the lq
quasiquoter will generate a plain Haskell
type synonym for Nat
as well as the refined one.
Note that this is still an experimental feature, and
currently requires that one depend on LiquidHaskell
as a build dependency for your project; the quasiquoter
will be split out eventually into an independent,
dependency-light package. Also, at this time, writing
a type inside lq
which refers to a refined type alias
for which there is not a plain Haskell type synonym of the
same name will result in a "not in scope" error from GHC.
Standalone Specifications for Internal Modules
Recall that the .spec
mechanism is only for modules whose
code is absent; if code is present then there can be multiple,
possibly conflicting specifications. Nevertheless, you may want,
for one reason or another, to write (assumed) specifications
outside the file implementing the module.
You can do this as follows.
Lib.hs
module Lib (foo) where
foo a = a
now, instead of a .spec
file, just use a haskell module, e.g. LibSpec.hs
module LibSpec ( module Lib ) where
import Lib
-- Don't forget to qualify the name!
{-@ Lib.foo :: {v:a | false} -> a @-}
and then here's Client.hs
module Client where
import Lib -- use this if you DON'T want the spec
import LibSpec -- use this if you DO want the spec, in addition to OR instead of the previous import.
bar = foo 1 -- if you `import LibSpec` then this call is rejected by LH
Refinement Type Aliases
Predicate Aliases
Often, the propositions in the refinements can get rather long and
verbose. You can write predicate aliases like so:
{-@ predicate Lt X Y = X < Y @-}
{-@ predicate Ge X Y = not (Lt X Y) @-}
and then use the aliases inside refinements, for example
{-@ incr :: x:{v:Int | (Pos v)} -> { v:Int | ((Pos v) && (Ge v x))} @-}
incr :: Int -> Int
incr x = x + 1
See Data.Map for a more substantial
and compelling example.
Syntax: The key requirements for type aliases are:
- Value parameters are specified in uppercase:
X
, Y
, Z
etc.
Type Aliases
Similarly, it is often quite tedious to keep writing
{v: Int | v > 0}
Thus, LiquidHaskell supports refinement-type aliases of the form:
{-@ type Gt N = {v: Int | N < v} @-}
{-@ type GeNum a N = {v: a | N <= v} @-}
or
{-@ type SortedList a = [a]<{\fld v -> (v >= fld)}> @-}
or
{-@ type OMap k a = Map <{\root v -> v < root}, {\root v -> v > root}> k a @-}
or
{-@ type MinSPair a = (a, OSplay a) <\fld -> {v : Splay {v:a|v>fld} | 0=0}> @-}
and then use the above in signatures like:
{-@ incr: x: Int -> GeNum Int x @-}
or
{-@ incr: x: Int -> Gt x @-}
and:
{-@ assert insert :: (Ord a) => a -> SortedList a -> SortedList a @-}
see tests/pos/ListSort.hs
and:
{-@ assert insert :: (Ord k) => k -> a -> OMap k a -> OMap k a @-}
see tests/pos/Map.hs
Syntax: The key requirements for type aliases are:
- Type parameters are specified in lowercase:
a
, b
, c
etc.
- Value parameters are specified in uppercase:
X
, Y
, Z
etc.
Infix Logic Operators
You can define infix operators in logic, following [Haskell's infix notation](Build in Haskell ops https://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/decls.html#fixity).
For example, if (+++) is defined as a measure or reflected function, you can use it infix by declaring
{-@ infixl 9 +++ @-}
Note: infix operators cannot contain the dot character .
.
Specifying Measures
Can be placed in .spec file or in .hs/.lhs file wrapped around {-@ @-}
Value measures: include/GHC/Base.spec
measure len :: forall a. [a] -> GHC.Types.Int
len ([]) = 0
len (y:ys) = 1 + len(ys)
Propositional measures: tests/pos/LambdaEval.hs
{-@
measure isValue :: Expr -> Bool
isValue (Const i) = true
isValue (Lam x e) = true
isValue (Var x) = false
isValue (App e1 e2) = false
isValue (Plus e1 e2) = false
isValue (Fst e) = false
isValue (Snd e) = false
isValue (Pair e1 e2) = ((? (isValue(e1))) && (? (isValue(e2))))
@-}
Raw measures: tests/pos/meas8.hs
{-@ measure rlen :: [a] -> Int
rlen ([]) = {v | v = 0}
rlen (y:ys) = {v | v = (1 + rlen(ys))}
@-}
Generic measures: tests/pos/Class.hs
{-@ class measure size :: a -> Int @-}
{-@ instance measure size :: [a] -> Int
size ([]) = 0
size (x:xs) = 1 + (size xs)
@-}
{-@ instance measure size :: Tree a -> Int
size (Leaf) = 0
size (Node x l r) = 1 + (size l) + (size r)
@-}
Note: Measure names do not have to be the same as
field name, e.g. we could call the measure sz
in the above
as shown in tests/pos/Class2.hs.
Haskell Functions as Measures (beta): tests/pos/HaskellMeasure.hs
Inductive Haskell Functions from Data Types to some type can be lifted to logic
{-@ measure llen @-}
llen :: [a] -> Int
llen [] = 0
llen (x:xs) = 1 + llen xs
The above definition
- refines list's data constructors types with the llen information, and
- specifies a singleton type for the haskell function
llen :: xs:[a] -> {v:Int | v == llen xs}
If the user specifies another type for llen, say
llen :: xs:[a] -> {v:Int | llen xs >= 0}
then the auto generated singleton type is overwritten.
Self-Invariants
Sometimes, we require specifications that allow inner components of a
type to refer to the outer components, typically, to measure-based
properties of outer components. For example, the following invariant
about Maybe
values
{-@ type IMaybe a = {v0 : Maybe {v : a | ((isJust v0) && v = (fromJust v0))} | 0 = 0 } @-}
states that the inner a
enjoys the property that the outer container
is definitely a Just
and furthermore, the inner value is exactly the same
as the fromJust
property of the outer container.
As another example, suppose we have a measure:
measure listElts :: [a] -> (Set a)
listElts([]) = {v | (? Set_emp(v))}
listElts(x:xs) = {v | v = Set_cup(Set_sng(x), listElts(xs)) }
Now, all lists enjoy the property
{-@ type IList a = {v0 : List {v : a | (Set_mem v (listElts v0)) } | true } @-}
which simply states that each inner element is indeed, a member of the
set of the elements belonging to the entire list.
One often needs these circular or self invariants to connect different
levels (or rather, to reify the connections between the two levels.) See
this test for a simple example and hedgeUnion
and
Data.Map.Base for a complex one.
Abstract and Bounded Refinements
This is probably the best example of the abstract refinement syntax:
Unfortunately, the best documentation for these two advanced features
is the relevant papers at
The bounds correspond to Horn implications between abstract refinements,
which, as in the classical setting, correspond to subtyping constraints
that must be satisfied by the concrete refinements used at any call-site.
Dependent Pairs
Dependent Pairs are expressed by binding the initial tuples of the pair. For example
incrPair
defines an increasing pair.
{-@ incrPair :: Int -> (x::Int, {v:Int | x <= v}) @-}
incrPair i = (i, i+1)
Internally dependent pairs are implemented using abstract refinement types.
That is (x::a, {v:b | p x})
desugars to (a,b)<\x -> {v:b | p x}>
.
Invariants
LH lets you locally associate invariants with specific data types.
For example, in tests/pos/StreamInvariants.hs every
list is treated as a Stream. To establish this local invariant one can use the
using
declaration
{-@ using ([a]) as {v:[a] | (len v > 0)} @-}
denoting that each list is not empty.
Then, LiquidHaskell will prove that this invariant holds, by proving that all
calls to List's constructors (ie., :
and []
) satisfy it, and
will assume that each list element that is created satisfies
this invariant.
With this, at the above test LiquidHaskell
proves that taking the head
of a list is safe.
But, at tests/neg/StreamInvariants.hs the usage of
[]
falsifies this local invariant resulting in an "Invariant Check" error.
WARNING: There is an older global invariant mechanism that
attaches a refinement to a datatype globally.
Do not use this mechanism -- it is unsound and about to
deprecated in favor of something that is actually sound
Forexample, the length of a list cannot be negative
{-@ invariant {v:[a] | (len v >= 0)} @-}
LiquidHaskell can prove that this invariant holds, by proving that all List's
constructors (ie., :
and []
) satisfy it.(TODO!) Then, LiquidHaskell
assumes that each list element that is created satisfies
this invariant.
(C)onstants
c := 0, 1, 2, ...
(V)ariables
v := x, y, z, ...
(E)xpressions
e := v -- variable
| c -- constant
| (e + e) -- addition
| (e - e) -- subtraction
| (c * e) -- multiplication by constant
| (v e1 e2 ... en) -- uninterpreted function application
| (if p then e else e) -- if-then-else
(R)elations
r := == -- equality
| /= -- disequality
| >= -- greater than or equal
| <= -- less than or equal
| > -- greater than
| < -- less than
(P)redicates
p := (e r e) -- binary relation
| (v e1 e2 ... en) -- predicate (or alias) application
| (p && p) -- and
| (p || p) -- or
| (p => p) -- implies
| (not p) -- negation
| true
| false
Specifying Qualifiers
There are several ways to specify qualifiers.
By Separate .hquals
Files
You can write qualifier files e.g. Prelude.hquals
If a module is called or imports
Foo.Bar.Baz
Then the system automatically searches for
include/Foo/Bar/Baz.hquals
By Including .hquals
Files
Additional qualifiers may be used by adding lines of the form:
{-@ include <path/to/file.hquals> @-}
to the Haskell source. See, this for example.
In Haskell Source or Spec Files
Finally, you can specifiers directly inside source (.hs or .lhs) or spec (.spec)
files by writing as shown here
{-@ qualif Foo(v:Int, a: Int) : (v = a + 100) @-}
Note In addition to these, LiquidHaskell scrapes qualifiers from all
the specifications you write i.e.
- all imported type signatures,
- measure bodies and,
- data constructor definitions.
Generating HTML Output
The system produces HTML files with colorized source, and mouseover
inferred type annotations, which are quite handy for debugging failed
verification attempts.
-
Regular Haskell When you run: liquid foo.hs
you get a file
foo.hs.html
with the annotations. The coloring is done using
hscolour
.
-
Markdown + Literate Haskell You can also feed in literate haskell files
where the comments are in Pandoc markdown.
In this case, the tool will run pandoc
to generate the HTML from the comments.
Of course, this requires that you have pandoc
installed as a binary on
your system. If not, hscolour
is used to render the HTML.
It is also possible to generate slide shows from the above.
See the slides directory for an example.
Editor Integration
Command Line Options
To see all options, run liquid --help
. Here are some common options:
-
--cabaldir
will automatically find a .cabal file in the ancestor
path from which the target file belongs, and then add the relevant
source and dependencies to the paths searched for by LiquidHaskell.
This means we don't have to manually do -i src
etc. when checking
large projects, which can be tedious e.g. within emacs.
-
--diff
performs differential checking, i.e. only checks those binders
that have transitively affected by edits since the previous check.
Can speed things up greatly during editing.
-
--short-names
prints out non-qualified names i.e. Int
instead of
GHC.Types.Int
for inferred type annotations and error messages.
Pragmas are useful for embedding options directly within the source file,
that is, somewhere in the file (perhaps at the top) put in:
{-@ LIQUID "--diff" @-}
{-@ LIQUID "--short-names" @-}
{-@ LIQUID "--cabaldir" @-}
to have the relevant option be used for that file.
We have set up infrastructure to generate performance reports using Gipeda.
Gipeda will generate a static webpage that tracks the performance improvements
and regressions between commits. To generate the site, first ensure you have the
following dependencies available:
- Git
- Cabal >= 1.18
- GHC
- Make
- Bash (installed at
/bin/bash
)
After ensuring all dependencies are available, from the Liquid Haskell
directory, execute:
cd scripts/performance
./deploy-gipeda.bash
This will download and install all the relevant repositories and files. Next, to
generate the performance report, use the generate-site.bash
script. This script
has a few options:
-s [hash]
: Do not attempt to generate performance reports for any commit
older than the commit specified by the entered git hash
-e [hash]
: Do not attempt to generate performance reports for any commit
newer than the commit specified by the entered git hash
-f
: The default behavior of generate-site.bash
is to first check if logs
have been created for a given hash. If logs already exist, generate-site.bash
will not recreate them. Specify this option to skip this check and regenerate
all logs.
You should expect this process to take a very long time. generate-site.bash
will compile each commit, then run the entire test suite and benchmark suite
for each commit. It is suggested to provide a manageable range to generate-site.bash
:
./generate-site.bash -s [starting hash] -e [ending hash]
...will generate reports for all commits between (inclusive) [starting hash]
and [ending hash].
./generate-site.bash -s [starting hash]
... will generate reports for all commits newer than [starting hash]. This command
can be the basis for some automated report generation process (i.e. a cron job).
Finally, to remove the Gipeda infrastructure from your computer, you may execute:
./cleanup-gipeda.bash
...which will remove any files created by deploy-gipeda.bash
and generate-site.bash
from your computer.
Configuration Management
It is very important that the version of Liquid Haskell be maintained properly.
Suppose that the current version of Liquid Haskell is A.B.C.D
:
-
After a release to hackage is made, if any of the components B
, C
, or D
are missing, they shall be added and set to 0
. Then the D
component of Liquid Haskell shall be incremented by 1
. The version of Liquid Haskell is now A.B.C.(D + 1)
-
The first time a new function or type is exported from Liquid Haskell, if any of the components B
, or C
are missing, they shall be added and set to 0
. Then the C
component shall be incremented by 1
, and the D
component shall stripped. The version of Liquid Haskell is now A.B.(C + 1)
-
The first time the signature of an exported function or type is changed, or an exported function or type is removed (this includes functions or types that Liquid Haskell re-exports from its own dependencies), if the B
component is missing, it shall be added and set to 0
. Then the B
component shall be incremented by 1
, and the C
and D
components shall be stripped. The version of Liquid Haskell is now A.(B + 1)
-
The A
component shall be updated at the sole discretion of the project owners.
Proof Automation
The liquidinstances
automatically generates proof terms using symbolic evaluation. See.
{-@ LIQUID "--automatic-instances=liquidinstances" @-}
This flag is global and will symbolically evaluation all the terms that appear in the specifications.
As an alternative, the liquidinstanceslocal
flag has local behavior. See
{-@ LIQUID "--automatic-instances=liquidinstanceslocal" @-}
will only evaluate terms appearing in the specifications of the function theorem
, in the function theorem
is annotated
for automatic instantiation using the following liquid annotation
{-@ automatic-instances theorem @-}