f-algebra-gen: Generate a special f-algebra combinator from any data type.

This is a package candidate release! Here you can preview how this package release will appear once published to the main package index (which can be accomplished via the 'maintain' link below). Please note that once a package has been published to the main package index it cannot be undone! Please consult the package uploading documentation for more information.

[maintain] [Publish]

This library provides a function to generate a special f-algebra combinator from any data type (GADTs are not currently supported). This was inspired by the recursion-schemes library where they have a function to automagically generate a base functor. Although, this new base functor data type has custom constructors and to define the *-morphism algebras turns into boring pattern matching. So, this library provides a function called makeCombinator that produces a nice combinator to deal with data types as they were defined in terms of Pairs ( (,) ) and Sums (Either). With this nice combinator we are able to view a data type as its equivalent categorical isomorphism and manipulate it with an interface similar as the either function provided from base.


[Skip to Readme]

Properties

Versions 0.1.0.0, 0.1.0.0, 0.1.0.1, 0.1.0.2
Change log CHANGELOG.md
Dependencies base (>=4.12 && <4.13), template-haskell (>=2.5.0.0 && <2.16) [details]
License MIT
Author Armando Santos
Maintainer armandoifsantos@gmail.com
Category Data
Home page https://github.com/bolt12/f-algebra-gen
Uploaded by bolt12 at 2019-07-18T21:26:29Z

Modules

[Index] [Quick Jump]

Downloads

Maintainer's Corner

Package maintainers

For package maintainers and hackage trustees


Readme for f-algebra-gen-0.1.0.0

[back to package description]

F-Algebra Data Combinator Generator

Generate an f-algebra combinator from any data type.

https://hackage.haskell.org/package/f-algebra-gen-0.1.0.0

Description

This library provides a function to generate a special f-algebra combinator from any data type (GADTs are not currently supported).

This was inspired by the recursion-schemes library where they have a function to automagically generate a base functor. Although, this new base functor data type has custom constructors and to define the *-morphism algebras turns into boring pattern matching.

So, this library provides a function called makeCombinator that produces a nice combinator to deal with data types as they were defined in terms of Pairs ((,)) and Sums (Either). With this nice combinator we are able to view a data type as its equivalent categorical isomorphism and manipulate it with an interface similar as the either function provided from base.

Example

To create this special combinator you just need to call makeCombinator ''<data type name> as in the example below:


-- List type
data List a = Nil | List a (List a)

makeCombinator ''List

This example will generate the following code:

makeCombinator ''ListF
  ======>
    listf f_acw7 f_acw8 Nil = f_acw7 ()
    listf f_acw7 f_acw8 (Cons a_acw9 a_acwa) = f_acw8 (a_acw9, a_acwa)

As you can see it's pretty close as to have the type defined as the set of sums and pairs data List a = Either () (a, List a), which we could then use either function as well as other convinent (,) combinators.

An important note is that the generated function has always the same name as the data type but in low characters and the order of the functions to be applied to the type constructors it's the same order which they were declared.

A simple example on how we can beneficiate from using this special combinator when defining catamorphisms using recursion-schemes:

I recognize that for such a simple data type and catamorphism it's hard to see any gain in readability/implementation. But with this special combinator it's a lot easier to go from paper to code as it's almost a direct translation.

There's a fully working example in the examples folder that uses the recursion-schemes library as well as a nice small program calculus (AoP inspired) combinators library to show how simple and straightforward it is to use it with this new combinator.