----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- | -- Module : Documentation.SBV.Examples.Queries.FourFours -- Copyright : (c) Levent Erkok -- License : BSD3 -- Maintainer : erkokl@gmail.com -- Stability : experimental -- -- A query based solution to the four-fours puzzle. -- Inspired by <http://www.gigamonkeys.com/trees/> -- -- @ -- Try to make every number between 0 and 20 using only four 4s and any -- mathematical operation, with all four 4s being used each time. -- @ -- -- We pretty much follow the structure of <http://www.gigamonkeys.com/trees/>, -- with the exception that we generate the trees filled with symbolic operators -- and ask the SMT solver to find the appropriate fillings. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-} {-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell #-} {-# LANGUAGE StandaloneDeriving #-} {-# LANGUAGE DeriveDataTypeable #-} {-# LANGUAGE DeriveAnyClass #-} {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} module Documentation.SBV.Examples.Queries.FourFours where import Data.SBV import Data.SBV.Control import Data.List (inits, tails) import Data.Maybe -- | Supported binary operators. To keep the search-space small, we will only allow division by @2@ or @4@, -- and exponentiation will only be to the power @0@. This does restrict the search space, but is sufficient to -- solve all the instances. data BinOp = Plus | Minus | Times | Divide | Expt -- | Make 'BinOp' a symbolic value. mkSymbolicEnumeration ''BinOp -- | Supported unary operators. Similar to 'BinOp' case, we will restrict square-root and factorial to -- be only applied to the value @4. data UnOp = Negate | Sqrt | Factorial -- | Make 'UnOp' a symbolic value. mkSymbolicEnumeration ''UnOp -- | Symbolic variant of 'BinOp'. type SBinOp = SBV BinOp -- | Symbolic variant of 'UnOp'. type SUnOp = SBV UnOp -- | The shape of a tree, either a binary node, or a unary node, or the number @4@, represented hear by -- the constructor @F@. We parameterize by the operator type: When doing symbolic computations, we'll fill -- those with 'SBinOp' and 'SUnOp'. When finding the shapes, we will simply put unit values, i.e., holes. data T b u = B b (T b u) (T b u) | U u (T b u) | F -- | A rudimentary 'Show' instance for trees, nothing fancy. instance Show (T BinOp UnOp) where show F = "4" show (U u t) = case u of Negate -> "-" ++ show t Sqrt -> "sqrt(" ++ show t ++ ")" Factorial -> show t ++ "!" show (B o l r) = "(" ++ show l ++ " " ++ so ++ " " ++ show r ++ ")" where so = fromMaybe (error $ "Unexpected operator: " ++ show o) $ o `lookup` [(Plus, "+"), (Minus, "-"), (Times, "*"), (Divide, "/"), (Expt, "^")] -- | Construct all possible tree shapes. The argument here follows the logic in <http://www.gigamonkeys.com/trees/>: -- We simply construct all possible shapes and extend with the operators. The number of such trees is: -- -- >>> length allPossibleTrees -- 640 -- -- Note that this is a /lot/ smaller than what is generated by <http://www.gigamonkeys.com/trees/>. (There, the -- number of trees is 10240000: 16000 times more than what we have to consider!) allPossibleTrees :: [T () ()] allPossibleTrees = trees $ replicate 4 F where trees :: [T () ()] -> [T () ()] trees [x] = [x, U () x] trees xs = do (left, right) <- splits t1 <- trees left t2 <- trees right trees [B () t1 t2] where splits = init $ tail $ zip (inits xs) (tails xs) -- | Given a tree with hols, fill it with symbolic operators. This is the /trick/ that allows -- us to consider only 640 trees as opposed to over 10 million. fill :: T () () -> Symbolic (T SBinOp SUnOp) fill (B _ l r) = B <$> free_ <*> fill l <*> fill r fill (U _ t) = U <$> free_ <*> fill t fill F = return F -- | Minor helper for writing "symbolic" case statements. Simply walks down a list -- of values to match against a symbolic version of the key. sCase :: (SymWord a, Mergeable v) => SBV a -> [(a, v)] -> v sCase k = walk where walk [] = error "sCase: Expected a non-empty list of cases!" walk [(_, v)] = v walk ((k1, v1):rest) = ite (k .== literal k1) v1 (walk rest) -- | Evaluate a symbolic tree, obtaining a symbolic value. Note how we structure -- this evaluation so we impose extra constraints on what values square-root, divide -- etc. can take. This is the power of the symbolic approach: We can put arbitrary -- symbolic constraints as we evaluate the tree. eval :: T SBinOp SUnOp -> Symbolic SInteger eval tree = case tree of B b l r -> eval l >>= \l' -> eval r >>= \r' -> binOp b l' r' U u t -> eval t >>= uOp u F -> return 4 where binOp :: SBinOp -> SInteger -> SInteger -> Symbolic SInteger binOp o l r = do constrain $ o .== literal Divide ==> r .== 4 ||| r .== 2 constrain $ o .== literal Expt ==> r .== 0 return $ sCase o [ (Plus, l+r) , (Minus, l-r) , (Times, l*r) , (Divide, l `sDiv` r) , (Expt, 1) -- exponent is restricted to 0, so the value is 1 ] uOp :: SUnOp -> SInteger -> Symbolic SInteger uOp o v = do constrain $ o .== literal Sqrt ==> v .== 4 constrain $ o .== literal Factorial ==> v .== 4 return $ sCase o [ (Negate, -v) , (Sqrt, 2) -- argument is restricted to 4, so the value is 2 , (Factorial, 24) -- argument is restricted to 4, so the value is 24 ] -- | In the query mode, find a filling of a given tree shape /t/, such that it evalutes to the -- requested number /i/. Note that we return back a concrete tree. generate :: Integer -> T () () -> IO (Maybe (T BinOp UnOp)) generate i t = runSMT $ do symT <- fill t val <- eval symT constrain $ val .== literal i query $ do cs <- checkSat case cs of Sat -> Just <$> construct symT _ -> return Nothing where -- Walk through the tree, ask the solver for -- the assignment to symbolic operators and fill back. construct F = return F construct (U o s') = do uo <- getValue o U uo <$> construct s' construct (B b l' r') = do bo <- getValue b B bo <$> construct l' <*> construct r' -- | Given an integer, walk through all possible tree shapes (at most 640 of them), and find a -- filling that solves the puzzle. find :: Integer -> IO () find target = go allPossibleTrees where go [] = putStrLn $ show target ++ ": No solution found." go (t:ts) = do chk <- generate target t case chk of Nothing -> go ts Just r -> do let ok = concEval r == target tag = if ok then " [OK]: " else " [BAD]: " sh i | i < 10 = ' ' : show i | True = show i putStrLn $ sh target ++ tag ++ show r -- Make sure the result is correct! concEval :: T BinOp UnOp -> Integer concEval F = 4 concEval (U u t) = uEval u (concEval t) concEval (B b l r) = bEval b (concEval l) (concEval r) uEval :: UnOp -> Integer -> Integer uEval Negate i = -i uEval Sqrt i = if i == 4 then 2 else error $ "uEval: Found sqrt applied to value: " ++ show i uEval Factorial i = if i == 4 then 24 else error $ "uEval: Found factorial applied to value: " ++ show i bEval :: BinOp -> Integer -> Integer -> Integer bEval Plus i j = i + j bEval Minus i j = i - j bEval Times i j = i * j bEval Divide i j = i `div` j bEval Expt i j = i ^ j -- | Solution to the puzzle. When you run this puzzle, the solver can produce different results -- than what's shown here, but the expressions should still be all valid! -- -- @ -- ghci> puzzle -- 0 [OK]: (4 - (4 + (4 - 4))) -- 1 [OK]: (4 / (4 + (4 - 4))) -- 2 [OK]: sqrt((4 + (4 * (4 - 4)))) -- 3 [OK]: (4 - (4 ^ (4 - 4))) -- 4 [OK]: (4 + (4 * (4 - 4))) -- 5 [OK]: (4 + (4 ^ (4 - 4))) -- 6 [OK]: (4 + sqrt((4 * (4 / 4)))) -- 7 [OK]: (4 + (4 - (4 / 4))) -- 8 [OK]: (4 - (4 - (4 + 4))) -- 9 [OK]: (4 + (4 + (4 / 4))) -- 10 [OK]: (4 + (4 + (4 - sqrt(4)))) -- 11 [OK]: (4 + ((4 + 4!) / 4)) -- 12 [OK]: (4 * (4 - (4 / 4))) -- 13 [OK]: (4! + ((sqrt(4) - 4!) / sqrt(4))) -- 14 [OK]: (4 + (4 + (4 + sqrt(4)))) -- 15 [OK]: (4 + ((4! - sqrt(4)) / sqrt(4))) -- 16 [OK]: (4 * (4 * (4 / 4))) -- 17 [OK]: (4 + ((sqrt(4) + 4!) / sqrt(4))) -- 18 [OK]: -(4 + (4 - (sqrt(4) + 4!))) -- 19 [OK]: -(4 - (4! - (4 / 4))) -- 20 [OK]: (4 * (4 + (4 / 4))) -- @ puzzle :: IO () puzzle = mapM_ find [0 .. 20]