Safe Haskell | None |
---|---|
Language | Haskell2010 |
E-class analysis, which allows the concise expression of a program analysis over the e-graph.
An e-class analysis resembles abstract interpretation lifted to the e-graph level, attaching analysis data from a semilattice to each e-class.
The e-graph maintains and propagates this data as e-classes get merged and new e-nodes are added.
Analysis data can be used directly to modify the e-graph, to inform how or if rewrites apply their right-hand sides, or to determine the cost of terms during the extraction process.
References: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.03082.pdf
Documentation
class Eq domain => Analysis domain (l :: Type -> Type) where Source #
An e-class analysis with domain domain
defined for a language l
.
The domain
is the type of the domain of the e-class analysis, that is, the
type of the data stored in an e-class according to this e-class analysis
makeA :: l domain -> domain Source #
When a new e-node is added into a new, singleton e-class, construct a new value of the domain to be associated with the new e-class, by accessing the associated data of the node's children
The argument is the e-node term populated with its children data
Example
-- domain = Maybe Double makeA :: Expr (Maybe Double) -> Maybe Double makeA = case BinOp Div e1 e2 -> liftA2 (/) e1 e2 BinOp Sub e1 e2 -> liftA2 (-) e1 e2 BinOp Mul e1 e2 -> liftA2 (*) e1 e2 BinOp Add e1 e2 -> liftA2 (+) e1 e2 Const x -> Just x Sym _ -> Nothing
joinA :: domain -> domain -> domain Source #
When e-classes c1 c2 are being merged into c, join d_c1 and d_c2 into a new value d_c to be associated with the new e-class c
:: ClassId | Id of class |
-> EGraph domain l | E-graph where class |
-> EGraph domain l | E-graph resulting from the modification |
Optionally modify the e-class c (based on d_c), typically by adding an e-node to c. Modify should be idempotent if no other changes occur to the e-class, i.e., modify(modify(c)) = modify(c)
Example
Pruning an e-class with a constant value of all its nodes except for the leaf values, and adding a constant value node
modifyA cl eg0 = case eg0^._class cl._data of Nothing -> eg0 Just d -> -- Add constant as e-node let (new_c,eg1) = represent (Fix (Const d)) eg0 (rep, eg2) = merge cl new_c eg1 -- Prune all except leaf e-nodes in eg2 & _class rep._nodes %~ S.filter (F.null .unNode)
Instances
Analysis () l Source # | The simplest analysis that defines the domain to be () and does nothing otherwise |
(Language l, Analysis a l, Analysis b l) => Analysis (a, b) l Source # | This instance is not necessarily well behaved for any two analysis, so care must be taken when using it. A possible criterion is: For any two analysis, where That is, if A simple criterion that should suffice for commutativity. If: * The modify function only depends on the analysis value, and * The modify function doesn't change the analysis value Then any two such functions commute. Note: there are weaker (or at least different) criteria for this instance to be well behaved. |