{-# LANGUAGE BangPatterns #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ViewPatterns #-}

{-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wno-incomplete-record-updates #-}

{-
(c) The GRASP/AQUA Project, Glasgow University, 1992-1998

************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
\section[OccurAnal]{Occurrence analysis pass}
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************

The occurrence analyser re-typechecks a core expression, returning a new
core expression with (hopefully) improved usage information.
-}

module GHC.Core.Opt.OccurAnal (
    occurAnalysePgm,
    occurAnalyseExpr,
    zapLambdaBndrs, scrutBinderSwap_maybe
  ) where

import GHC.Prelude hiding ( head, init, last, tail )

import GHC.Core
import GHC.Core.FVs
import GHC.Core.Utils   ( exprIsTrivial, isDefaultAlt, isExpandableApp,
                          mkCastMCo, mkTicks )
import GHC.Core.Opt.Arity   ( joinRhsArity, isOneShotBndr )
import GHC.Core.Coercion
import GHC.Core.Predicate   ( isDictId )
import GHC.Core.Type
import GHC.Core.TyCo.FVs    ( tyCoVarsOfMCo )

import GHC.Data.Maybe( isJust, orElse )
import GHC.Data.Graph.Directed ( SCC(..), Node(..)
                               , stronglyConnCompFromEdgedVerticesUniq
                               , stronglyConnCompFromEdgedVerticesUniqR )
import GHC.Types.Unique
import GHC.Types.Unique.FM
import GHC.Types.Unique.Set
import GHC.Types.Id
import GHC.Types.Id.Info
import GHC.Types.Basic
import GHC.Types.Tickish
import GHC.Types.Var.Set
import GHC.Types.Var.Env
import GHC.Types.Var
import GHC.Types.Demand ( argOneShots, argsOneShots )

import GHC.Utils.Outputable
import GHC.Utils.Panic
import GHC.Utils.Panic.Plain
import GHC.Utils.Misc

import GHC.Builtin.Names( runRWKey )
import GHC.Unit.Module( Module )

import Data.List (mapAccumL, mapAccumR)
import Data.List.NonEmpty (NonEmpty (..))
import qualified Data.List.NonEmpty as NE

{-
************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
    occurAnalysePgm, occurAnalyseExpr
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************

Here's the externally-callable interface:
-}

-- | Do occurrence analysis, and discard occurrence info returned
occurAnalyseExpr :: CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
occurAnalyseExpr :: CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
occurAnalyseExpr CoreExpr
expr = CoreExpr
expr'
  where
    (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
_ CoreExpr
expr') = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal OccEnv
initOccEnv CoreExpr
expr

occurAnalysePgm :: Module         -- Used only in debug output
                -> (Id -> Bool)         -- Active unfoldings
                -> (Activation -> Bool) -- Active rules
                -> [CoreRule]           -- Local rules for imported Ids
                -> CoreProgram -> CoreProgram
occurAnalysePgm :: Module
-> (CoreBndr -> Bool)
-> (Activation -> Bool)
-> [CoreRule]
-> CoreProgram
-> CoreProgram
occurAnalysePgm Module
this_mod CoreBndr -> Bool
active_unf Activation -> Bool
active_rule [CoreRule]
imp_rules CoreProgram
binds
  | UsageDetails -> Bool
isEmptyDetails UsageDetails
final_usage
  = CoreProgram
occ_anald_binds

  | Bool
otherwise   -- See Note [Glomming]
  = Bool -> String -> SDoc -> CoreProgram -> CoreProgram
forall a. HasCallStack => Bool -> String -> SDoc -> a -> a
warnPprTrace Bool
True String
"Glomming in" (SDoc -> JoinArity -> SDoc -> SDoc
hang (Module -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr Module
this_mod SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc
colon) JoinArity
2 (UsageDetails -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr UsageDetails
final_usage))
    CoreProgram
occ_anald_glommed_binds
  where
    init_env :: OccEnv
init_env = OccEnv
initOccEnv { occ_rule_act = active_rule
                          , occ_unf_act  = active_unf }

    (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_usage CoreProgram
occ_anald_binds) = OccEnv -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
go OccEnv
init_env CoreProgram
binds
    (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
_ CoreProgram
occ_anald_glommed_binds) = OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> UsageDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalRecBind OccEnv
init_env TopLevelFlag
TopLevel
                                                    ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges
                                                    (CoreProgram -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
forall b. [Bind b] -> [(b, Expr b)]
flattenBinds CoreProgram
binds)
                                                    UsageDetails
initial_uds
          -- It's crucial to re-analyse the glommed-together bindings
          -- so that we establish the right loop breakers. Otherwise
          -- we can easily create an infinite loop (#9583 is an example)
          --
          -- Also crucial to re-analyse the /original/ bindings
          -- in case the first pass accidentally discarded as dead code
          -- a binding that was actually needed (albeit before its
          -- definition site).  #17724 threw this up.

    initial_uds :: UsageDetails
initial_uds = UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs UsageDetails
emptyDetails ([CoreRule] -> VarSet
rulesFreeVars [CoreRule]
imp_rules)
    -- The RULES declarations keep things alive!

    -- imp_rule_edges maps a top-level local binder 'f' to the
    -- RHS free vars of any IMP-RULE, a local RULE for an imported function,
    -- where 'f' appears on the LHS
    --   e.g.  RULE foldr f = blah
    --         imp_rule_edges contains f :-> fvs(blah)
    -- We treat such RULES as extra rules for 'f'
    -- See Note [Preventing loops due to imported functions rules]
    imp_rule_edges :: ImpRuleEdges
    imp_rule_edges :: ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges = (ImpRuleEdges -> ImpRuleEdges -> ImpRuleEdges)
-> ImpRuleEdges -> [ImpRuleEdges] -> ImpRuleEdges
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (([(Activation, VarSet)]
 -> [(Activation, VarSet)] -> [(Activation, VarSet)])
-> ImpRuleEdges -> ImpRuleEdges -> ImpRuleEdges
forall a. (a -> a -> a) -> VarEnv a -> VarEnv a -> VarEnv a
plusVarEnv_C [(Activation, VarSet)]
-> [(Activation, VarSet)] -> [(Activation, VarSet)]
forall a. [a] -> [a] -> [a]
(++)) ImpRuleEdges
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv
                           [ (CoreBndr -> [(Activation, VarSet)])
-> VarEnv CoreBndr -> ImpRuleEdges
forall a b. (a -> b) -> VarEnv a -> VarEnv b
mapVarEnv ([(Activation, VarSet)] -> CoreBndr -> [(Activation, VarSet)]
forall a b. a -> b -> a
const [(Activation
act,VarSet
rhs_fvs)]) (VarEnv CoreBndr -> ImpRuleEdges)
-> VarEnv CoreBndr -> ImpRuleEdges
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$ VarSet -> VarEnv CoreBndr
forall a. UniqSet a -> UniqFM a a
getUniqSet (VarSet -> VarEnv CoreBndr) -> VarSet -> VarEnv CoreBndr
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
                             [CoreExpr] -> VarSet
exprsFreeIds [CoreExpr]
args VarSet -> [CoreBndr] -> VarSet
`delVarSetList` [CoreBndr]
bndrs
                           | Rule { ru_act :: CoreRule -> Activation
ru_act = Activation
act, ru_bndrs :: CoreRule -> [CoreBndr]
ru_bndrs = [CoreBndr]
bndrs
                                   , ru_args :: CoreRule -> [CoreExpr]
ru_args = [CoreExpr]
args, ru_rhs :: CoreRule -> CoreExpr
ru_rhs = CoreExpr
rhs } <- [CoreRule]
imp_rules
                                   -- Not BuiltinRules; see Note [Plugin rules]
                           , let rhs_fvs :: VarSet
rhs_fvs = CoreExpr -> VarSet
exprFreeIds CoreExpr
rhs VarSet -> [CoreBndr] -> VarSet
`delVarSetList` [CoreBndr]
bndrs ]

    go :: OccEnv -> [CoreBind] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBind]
    go :: OccEnv -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
go !OccEnv
_ []
        = UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
initial_uds []
    go OccEnv
env (CoreBind
bind:CoreProgram
binds)
        = UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_usage (CoreProgram
bind' CoreProgram -> CoreProgram -> CoreProgram
forall a. [a] -> [a] -> [a]
++ CoreProgram
binds')
        where
           (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
bs_usage CoreProgram
binds')   = OccEnv -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
go OccEnv
env CoreProgram
binds
           (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_usage CoreProgram
bind') = OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> CoreBind
-> UsageDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalBind OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
TopLevel ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges CoreBind
bind UsageDetails
bs_usage

{- *********************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                IMP-RULES
         Local rules for imported functions
*                                                                      *
********************************************************************* -}

type ImpRuleEdges = IdEnv [(Activation, VarSet)]
    -- Mapping from a local Id 'f' to info about its IMP-RULES,
    -- i.e. /local/ rules for an imported Id that mention 'f' on the LHS
    -- We record (a) its Activation and (b) the RHS free vars
    -- See Note [IMP-RULES: local rules for imported functions]

noImpRuleEdges :: ImpRuleEdges
noImpRuleEdges :: ImpRuleEdges
noImpRuleEdges = ImpRuleEdges
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv

lookupImpRules :: ImpRuleEdges -> Id -> [(Activation,VarSet)]
lookupImpRules :: ImpRuleEdges -> CoreBndr -> [(Activation, VarSet)]
lookupImpRules ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges CoreBndr
bndr
  = case ImpRuleEdges -> CoreBndr -> Maybe [(Activation, VarSet)]
forall a. VarEnv a -> CoreBndr -> Maybe a
lookupVarEnv ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges CoreBndr
bndr of
      Maybe [(Activation, VarSet)]
Nothing -> []
      Just [(Activation, VarSet)]
vs -> [(Activation, VarSet)]
vs

impRulesScopeUsage :: [(Activation,VarSet)] -> UsageDetails
-- Variable mentioned in RHS of an IMP-RULE for the bndr,
-- whether active or not
impRulesScopeUsage :: [(Activation, VarSet)] -> UsageDetails
impRulesScopeUsage [(Activation, VarSet)]
imp_rules_info
  = ((Activation, VarSet) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> [(Activation, VarSet)] -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (Activation, VarSet) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
forall {a}. (a, VarSet) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
add UsageDetails
emptyDetails [(Activation, VarSet)]
imp_rules_info
  where
    add :: (a, VarSet) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
add (a
_,VarSet
vs) UsageDetails
usage = UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs UsageDetails
usage VarSet
vs

impRulesActiveFvs :: (Activation -> Bool) -> VarSet
                  -> [(Activation,VarSet)] -> VarSet
impRulesActiveFvs :: (Activation -> Bool) -> VarSet -> [(Activation, VarSet)] -> VarSet
impRulesActiveFvs Activation -> Bool
is_active VarSet
bndr_set [(Activation, VarSet)]
vs
  = ((Activation, VarSet) -> VarSet -> VarSet)
-> VarSet -> [(Activation, VarSet)] -> VarSet
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (Activation, VarSet) -> VarSet -> VarSet
add VarSet
emptyVarSet [(Activation, VarSet)]
vs VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
`intersectVarSet` VarSet
bndr_set
  where
    add :: (Activation, VarSet) -> VarSet -> VarSet
add (Activation
act,VarSet
vs) VarSet
acc | Activation -> Bool
is_active Activation
act = VarSet
vs VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
`unionVarSet` VarSet
acc
                     | Bool
otherwise     = VarSet
acc

{- Note [IMP-RULES: local rules for imported functions]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We quite often have
  * A /local/ rule
  * for an /imported/ function
like this:
  foo x = blah
  {-# RULE "map/foo" forall xs. map foo xs = xs #-}
We call them IMP-RULES.  They are important in practice, and occur a
lot in the libraries.

IMP-RULES are held in mg_rules of ModGuts, and passed in to
occurAnalysePgm.

Main Invariant:

* Throughout, we treat an IMP-RULE that mentions 'f' on its LHS
  just like a RULE for f.

Note [IMP-RULES: unavoidable loops]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider this
   f = /\a. B.g a
   RULE B.g Int = 1 + f Int
Note that
  * The RULE is for an imported function.
  * f is non-recursive
Now we
can get
   f Int --> B.g Int      Inlining f
         --> 1 + f Int    Firing RULE
and so the simplifier goes into an infinite loop. This
would not happen if the RULE was for a local function,
because we keep track of dependencies through rules.  But
that is pretty much impossible to do for imported Ids.  Suppose
f's definition had been
   f = /\a. C.h a
where (by some long and devious process), C.h eventually inlines to
B.g.  We could only spot such loops by exhaustively following
unfoldings of C.h etc, in case we reach B.g, and hence (via the RULE)
f.

We regard this potential infinite loop as a *programmer* error.
It's up the programmer not to write silly rules like
     RULE f x = f x
and the example above is just a more complicated version.

Note [Specialising imported functions] (referred to from Specialise)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For *automatically-generated* rules, the programmer can't be
responsible for the "programmer error" in Note [IMP-RULES: unavoidable
loops].  In particular, consider specialising a recursive function
defined in another module.  If we specialise a recursive function B.g,
we get
  g_spec = .....(B.g Int).....
  RULE B.g Int = g_spec
Here, g_spec doesn't look recursive, but when the rule fires, it
becomes so.  And if B.g was mutually recursive, the loop might not be
as obvious as it is here.

To avoid this,
 * When specialising a function that is a loop breaker,
   give a NOINLINE pragma to the specialised function

Note [Preventing loops due to imported functions rules]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider:
  import GHC.Base (foldr)

  {-# RULES "filterList" forall p. foldr (filterFB (:) p) [] = filter p #-}
  filter p xs = build (\c n -> foldr (filterFB c p) n xs)
  filterFB c p = ...

  f = filter p xs

Note that filter is not a loop-breaker, so what happens is:
  f =          filter p xs
    = {inline} build (\c n -> foldr (filterFB c p) n xs)
    = {inline} foldr (filterFB (:) p) [] xs
    = {RULE}   filter p xs

We are in an infinite loop.

A more elaborate example (that I actually saw in practice when I went to
mark GHC.List.filter as INLINABLE) is as follows. Say I have this module:
  {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}
  module GHCList where

  import Prelude hiding (filter)
  import GHC.Base (build)

  {-# INLINABLE filter #-}
  filter :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]
  filter p [] = []
  filter p (x:xs) = if p x then x : filter p xs else filter p xs

  {-# NOINLINE [0] filterFB #-}
  filterFB :: (a -> b -> b) -> (a -> Bool) -> a -> b -> b
  filterFB c p x r | p x       = x `c` r
                   | otherwise = r

  {-# RULES
  "filter"     [~1] forall p xs.  filter p xs = build (\c n -> foldr
  (filterFB c p) n xs)
  "filterList" [1]  forall p.     foldr (filterFB (:) p) [] = filter p
   #-}

Then (because RULES are applied inside INLINABLE unfoldings, but inlinings
are not), the unfolding given to "filter" in the interface file will be:
  filter p []     = []
  filter p (x:xs) = if p x then x : build (\c n -> foldr (filterFB c p) n xs)
                           else     build (\c n -> foldr (filterFB c p) n xs

Note that because this unfolding does not mention "filter", filter is not
marked as a strong loop breaker. Therefore at a use site in another module:
  filter p xs
    = {inline}
      case xs of []     -> []
                 (x:xs) -> if p x then x : build (\c n -> foldr (filterFB c p) n xs)
                                  else     build (\c n -> foldr (filterFB c p) n xs)

  build (\c n -> foldr (filterFB c p) n xs)
    = {inline} foldr (filterFB (:) p) [] xs
    = {RULE}   filter p xs

And we are in an infinite loop again, except that this time the loop is producing an
infinitely large *term* (an unrolling of filter) and so the simplifier finally
dies with "ticks exhausted"

SOLUTION: we treat the rule "filterList" as an extra rule for 'filterFB'
because it mentions 'filterFB' on the LHS.  This is the Main Invariant
in Note [IMP-RULES: local rules for imported functions].

So, during loop-breaker analysis:

- for each active RULE for a local function 'f' we add an edge between
  'f' and the local FVs of the rule RHS

- for each active RULE for an *imported* function we add dependency
  edges between the *local* FVS of the rule LHS and the *local* FVS of
  the rule RHS.

Even with this extra hack we aren't always going to get things
right. For example, it might be that the rule LHS mentions an imported
Id, and another module has a RULE that can rewrite that imported Id to
one of our local Ids.

Note [Plugin rules]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conal Elliott (#11651) built a GHC plugin that added some
BuiltinRules (for imported Ids) to the mg_rules field of ModGuts, to
do some domain-specific transformations that could not be expressed
with an ordinary pattern-matching CoreRule.  But then we can't extract
the dependencies (in imp_rule_edges) from ru_rhs etc, because a
BuiltinRule doesn't have any of that stuff.

So we simply assume that BuiltinRules have no dependencies, and filter
them out from the imp_rule_edges comprehension.

Note [Glomming]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RULES for imported Ids can make something at the top refer to
something at the bottom:

        foo = ...(B.f @Int)...
        $sf = blah
        RULE:  B.f @Int = $sf

Applying this rule makes foo refer to $sf, although foo doesn't appear to
depend on $sf.  (And, as in Note [IMP-RULES: local rules for imported functions], the
dependency might be more indirect. For example, foo might mention C.t
rather than B.f, where C.t eventually inlines to B.f.)

NOTICE that this cannot happen for rules whose head is a
locally-defined function, because we accurately track dependencies
through RULES.  It only happens for rules whose head is an imported
function (B.f in the example above).

Solution:
  - When simplifying, bring all top level identifiers into
    scope at the start, ignoring the Rec/NonRec structure, so
    that when 'h' pops up in f's rhs, we find it in the in-scope set
    (as the simplifier generally expects). This happens in simplTopBinds.

  - In the occurrence analyser, if there are any out-of-scope
    occurrences that pop out of the top, which will happen after
    firing the rule:      f = \x -> h x
                          h = \y -> 3
    then just glom all the bindings into a single Rec, so that
    the *next* iteration of the occurrence analyser will sort
    them all out.   This part happens in occurAnalysePgm.

This is a legitimate situation where the need for glomming doesn't
point to any problems. However, when GHC is compiled with -DDEBUG, we
produce a warning addressed to the GHC developers just in case we
require glomming due to an out-of-order reference that is caused by
some earlier transformation stage misbehaving.
-}

{-
************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                Bindings
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************

Note [Recursive bindings: the grand plan]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Loop breaking is surprisingly subtle.  First read the section 4 of
"Secrets of the GHC inliner".  This describes our basic plan.  We
avoid infinite inlinings by choosing loop breakers, and ensuring that
a loop breaker cuts each loop.

See also Note [Inlining and hs-boot files] in GHC.Core.ToIface, which
deals with a closely related source of infinite loops.

When we come across a binding group
  Rec { x1 = r1; ...; xn = rn }
we treat it like this (occAnalRecBind):

1. Note [Forming Rec groups]
   Occurrence-analyse each right hand side, and build a
   "Details" for each binding to capture the results.
   Wrap the details in a LetrecNode, ready for SCC analysis.
   All this is done by makeNode.

   The edges of this graph are the "scope edges".

2. Do SCC-analysis on these Nodes:
   - Each CyclicSCC will become a new Rec
   - Each AcyclicSCC will become a new NonRec

   The key property is that every free variable of a binding is
   accounted for by the scope edges, so that when we are done
   everything is still in scope.

3. For each AcyclicSCC, just make a NonRec binding.

4. For each CyclicSCC of the scope-edge SCC-analysis in (2), we
   identify suitable loop-breakers to ensure that inlining terminates.
   This is done by occAnalRec.

   To do so, form the loop-breaker graph, do SCC analysis. For each
   CyclicSCC we choose a loop breaker, delete all edges to that node,
   re-analyse the SCC, and iterate. See Note [Choosing loop breakers]
   for the details


Note [Dead code]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dropping dead code for a cyclic Strongly Connected Component is done
in a very simple way:

        the entire SCC is dropped if none of its binders are mentioned
        in the body; otherwise the whole thing is kept.

The key observation is that dead code elimination happens after
dependency analysis: so 'occAnalBind' processes SCCs instead of the
original term's binding groups.

Thus 'occAnalBind' does indeed drop 'f' in an example like

        letrec f = ...g...
               g = ...(...g...)...
        in
           ...g...

when 'g' no longer uses 'f' at all (eg 'f' does not occur in a RULE in
'g'). 'occAnalBind' first consumes 'CyclicSCC g' and then it consumes
'AcyclicSCC f', where 'body_usage' won't contain 'f'.

Note [Forming Rec groups]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The key point about the "Forming Rec groups" step is that it /preserves
scoping/.  If 'x' is mentioned, it had better be bound somewhere.  So if
we start with
  Rec { f = ...h...
      ; g = ...f...
      ; h = ...f... }
we can split into SCCs
  Rec { f = ...h...
      ; h = ..f... }
  NonRec { g = ...f... }

We put bindings {f = ef; g = eg } in a Rec group if "f uses g" and "g
uses f", no matter how indirectly.  We do a SCC analysis with an edge
f -> g if "f mentions g". That is, g is free in:
  a) the rhs 'ef'
  b) or the RHS of a rule for f, whether active or inactive
       Note [Rules are extra RHSs]
  c) or the LHS or a rule for f, whether active or inactive
       Note [Rule dependency info]
  d) the RHS of an /active/ local IMP-RULE
       Note [IMP-RULES: local rules for imported functions]

(b) and (c) apply regardless of the activation of the RULE, because even if
the rule is inactive its free variables must be bound.  But (d) doesn't need
to worry about this because IMP-RULES are always notionally at the bottom
of the file.

  * Note [Rules are extra RHSs]
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    A RULE for 'f' is like an extra RHS for 'f'. That way the "parent"
    keeps the specialised "children" alive.  If the parent dies
    (because it isn't referenced any more), then the children will die
    too (unless they are already referenced directly).

    So in Example [eftInt], eftInt and eftIntFB will be put in the
    same Rec, even though their 'main' RHSs are both non-recursive.

    We must also include inactive rules, so that their free vars
    remain in scope.

  * Note [Rule dependency info]
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The VarSet in a RuleInfo is used for dependency analysis in the
    occurrence analyser.  We must track free vars in *both* lhs and rhs.
    Hence use of idRuleVars, rather than idRuleRhsVars in occAnalBind.
    Why both? Consider
        x = y
        RULE f x = v+4
    Then if we substitute y for x, we'd better do so in the
    rule's LHS too, so we'd better ensure the RULE appears to mention 'x'
    as well as 'v'

  * Note [Rules are visible in their own rec group]
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    We want the rules for 'f' to be visible in f's right-hand side.
    And we'd like them to be visible in other functions in f's Rec
    group.  E.g. in Note [Specialisation rules] we want f' rule
    to be visible in both f's RHS, and fs's RHS.

    This means that we must simplify the RULEs first, before looking
    at any of the definitions.  This is done by Simplify.simplRecBind,
    when it calls addLetIdInfo.

Note [TailUsageDetails when forming Rec groups]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The `TailUsageDetails` stored in the `nd_uds` field of a `NodeDetails` is
computed by `occAnalLamTail` applied to the RHS, not `occAnalExpr`.
That is because the binding might still become a *non-recursive join point* in
the AcyclicSCC case of dependency analysis!
Hence we do the delayed `adjustTailUsage` in `occAnalRec`/`tagRecBinders` to get
a regular, adjusted UsageDetails.
See Note [Join points and unfoldings/rules] for more details on the contract.

Note [Stable unfoldings]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
None of the above stuff about RULES applies to a stable unfolding
stored in a CoreUnfolding.  The unfolding, if any, is simplified
at the same time as the regular RHS of the function (ie *not* like
Note [Rules are visible in their own rec group]), so it should be
treated *exactly* like an extra RHS.

Or, rather, when computing loop-breaker edges,
  * If f has an INLINE pragma, and it is active, we treat the
    INLINE rhs as f's rhs
  * If it's inactive, we treat f as having no rhs
  * If it has no INLINE pragma, we look at f's actual rhs


There is a danger that we'll be sub-optimal if we see this
     f = ...f...
     [INLINE f = ..no f...]
where f is recursive, but the INLINE is not. This can just about
happen with a sufficiently odd set of rules; eg

        foo :: Int -> Int
        {-# INLINE [1] foo #-}
        foo x = x+1

        bar :: Int -> Int
        {-# INLINE [1] bar #-}
        bar x = foo x + 1

        {-# RULES "foo" [~1] forall x. foo x = bar x #-}

Here the RULE makes bar recursive; but it's INLINE pragma remains
non-recursive. It's tempting to then say that 'bar' should not be
a loop breaker, but an attempt to do so goes wrong in two ways:
   a) We may get
         $df = ...$cfoo...
         $cfoo = ...$df....
         [INLINE $cfoo = ...no-$df...]
      But we want $cfoo to depend on $df explicitly so that we
      put the bindings in the right order to inline $df in $cfoo
      and perhaps break the loop altogether.  (Maybe this
   b)


Example [eftInt]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Example (from GHC.Enum):

  eftInt :: Int# -> Int# -> [Int]
  eftInt x y = ...(non-recursive)...

  {-# INLINE [0] eftIntFB #-}
  eftIntFB :: (Int -> r -> r) -> r -> Int# -> Int# -> r
  eftIntFB c n x y = ...(non-recursive)...

  {-# RULES
  "eftInt"  [~1] forall x y. eftInt x y = build (\ c n -> eftIntFB c n x y)
  "eftIntList"  [1] eftIntFB  (:) [] = eftInt
   #-}

Note [Specialisation rules]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider this group, which is typical of what SpecConstr builds:

   fs a = ....f (C a)....
   f  x = ....f (C a)....
   {-# RULE f (C a) = fs a #-}

So 'f' and 'fs' are in the same Rec group (since f refers to fs via its RULE).

But watch out!  If 'fs' is not chosen as a loop breaker, we may get an infinite loop:
  - the RULE is applied in f's RHS (see Note [Rules for recursive functions] in GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify
  - fs is inlined (say it's small)
  - now there's another opportunity to apply the RULE

This showed up when compiling Control.Concurrent.Chan.getChanContents.
Hence the transitive rule_fv_env stuff described in
Note [Rules and loop breakers].

------------------------------------------------------------
Note [Finding join points]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's the occurrence analyser's job to find bindings that we can turn into join
points, but it doesn't perform that transformation right away. Rather, it marks
the eligible bindings as part of their occurrence data, leaving it to the
simplifier (or to simpleOptPgm) to actually change the binder's 'IdDetails'.
The simplifier then eta-expands the RHS if needed and then updates the
occurrence sites. Dividing the work this way means that the occurrence analyser
still only takes one pass, yet one can always tell the difference between a
function call and a jump by looking at the occurrence (because the same pass
changes the 'IdDetails' and propagates the binders to their occurrence sites).

To track potential join points, we use the 'occ_tail' field of OccInfo. A value
of `AlwaysTailCalled n` indicates that every occurrence of the variable is a
tail call with `n` arguments (counting both value and type arguments). Otherwise
'occ_tail' will be 'NoTailCallInfo'. The tail call info flows bottom-up with the
rest of 'OccInfo' until it goes on the binder.

Note [Join arity prediction based on joinRhsArity]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In general, the join arity from tail occurrences of a join point (O) may be
higher or lower than the manifest join arity of the join body (M). E.g.,

  -- M > O:
  let f x y = x + y              -- M = 2
  in if b then f 1 else f 2      -- O = 1
  ==> { Contify for join arity 1 }
  join f x = \y -> x + y
  in if b then jump f 1 else jump f 2

  -- M < O
  let f = id                     -- M = 0
  in if ... then f 12 else f 13  -- O = 1
  ==> { Contify for join arity 1, eta-expand f }
  join f x = id x
  in if b then jump f 12 else jump f 13

But for *recursive* let, it is crucial that both arities match up, consider

  letrec f x y = if ... then f x else True
  in f 42

Here, M=2 but O=1. If we settled for a joinrec arity of 1, the recursive jump
would not happen in a tail context! Contification is invalid here.
So indeed it is crucial to demand that M=O.

(Side note: Actually, we could be more specific: Let O1 be the join arity of
occurrences from the letrec RHS and O2 the join arity from the let body. Then
we need M=O1 and M<=O2 and could simply eta-expand the RHS to match O2 later.
M=O is the specific case where we don't want to eta-expand. Neither the join
points paper nor GHC does this at the moment.)

We can capitalise on this observation and conclude that *if* f could become a
joinrec (without eta-expansion), it will have join arity M.
Now, M is just the result of 'joinRhsArity', a rather simple, local analysis.
It is also the join arity inside the 'TailUsageDetails' returned by
'occAnalLamTail', so we can predict join arity without doing any fixed-point
iteration or really doing any deep traversal of let body or RHS at all.
We check for M in the 'adjustTailUsage' call inside 'tagRecBinders'.

All this is quite apparent if you look at the contification transformation in
Fig. 5 of "Compiling without Continuations" (which does not account for
eta-expansion at all, mind you). The letrec case looks like this

  letrec f = /\as.\xs. L[us] in L'[es]
    ... and a bunch of conditions establishing that f only occurs
        in app heads of join arity (len as + len xs) inside us and es ...

The syntactic form `/\as.\xs. L[us]` forces M=O iff `f` occurs in `us`. However,
for non-recursive functions, this is the definition of contification from the
paper:

  let f = /\as.\xs.u in L[es]     ... conditions ...

Note that u could be a lambda itself, as we have seen. No relationship between M
and O to exploit here.

Note [Join points and unfoldings/rules]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
   let j2 y = blah
   let j x = j2 (x+x)
       {-# INLINE [2] j #-}
   in case e of { A -> j 1; B -> ...; C -> j 2 }

Before j is inlined, we'll have occurrences of j2 in
both j's RHS and in its stable unfolding.  We want to discover
j2 as a join point. So 'occAnalUnfolding' returns an unadjusted
'TailUsageDetails', like 'occAnalLamTail'. We adjust the usage details of the
unfolding to the actual join arity using the same 'adjustTailArity' as for
the RHS, see Note [Adjusting right-hand sides].

Same with rules. Suppose we have:

  let j :: Int -> Int
      j y = 2 * y
  let k :: Int -> Int -> Int
      {-# RULES "SPEC k 0" k 0 y = j y #-}
      k x y = x + 2 * y
  in case e of { A -> k 1 2; B -> k 3 5; C -> blah }

We identify k as a join point, and we want j to be a join point too.
Without the RULE it would be, and we don't want the RULE to mess it
up.  So provided the join-point arity of k matches the args of the
rule we can allow the tail-call info from the RHS of the rule to
propagate.

* Note that the join arity of the RHS and that of the unfolding or RULE might
  mismatch:

    let j x y = j2 (x+x)
        {-# INLINE[2] j = \x. g #-}
        {-# RULE forall x y z. j x y z = h 17 #-}
    in j 1 2

  So it is crucial that we adjust each TailUsageDetails individually
  with the actual join arity 2 here before we combine with `andUDs`.
  Here, that means losing tail call info on `g` and `h`.

* Wrinkle for Rec case: We store one TailUsageDetails in the node Details for
  RHS, unfolding and RULE combined. Clearly, if they don't agree on their join
  arity, we have to do some adjusting. We choose to adjust to the join arity
  of the RHS, because that is likely the join arity that the join point will
  have; see Note [Join arity prediction based on joinRhsArity].

  If the guess is correct, then tail calls in the RHS are preserved; a necessary
  condition for the whole binding becoming a joinrec.
  The guess can only be incorrect in the 'AcyclicSCC' case when the binding
  becomes a non-recursive join point with a different join arity. But then the
  eventual call to 'adjustTailUsage' in 'tagRecBinders'/'occAnalRec' will
  be with a different join arity and destroy unsound tail call info with
  'markNonTail'.

* Wrinkle for RULES.  Suppose the example was a bit different:
      let j :: Int -> Int
          j y = 2 * y
          k :: Int -> Int -> Int
          {-# RULES "SPEC k 0" k 0 = j #-}
          k x y = x + 2 * y
      in ...
  If we eta-expanded the rule all would be well, but as it stands the
  one arg of the rule don't match the join-point arity of 2.

  Conceivably we could notice that a potential join point would have
  an "undersaturated" rule and account for it. This would mean we
  could make something that's been specialised a join point, for
  instance. But local bindings are rarely specialised, and being
  overly cautious about rules only costs us anything when, for some `j`:

  * Before specialisation, `j` has non-tail calls, so it can't be a join point.
  * During specialisation, `j` gets specialised and thus acquires rules.
  * Sometime afterward, the non-tail calls to `j` disappear (as dead code, say),
    and so now `j` *could* become a join point.

  This appears to be very rare in practice. TODO Perhaps we should gather
  statistics to be sure.

------------------------------------------------------------
Note [Adjusting right-hand sides]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There's a bit of a dance we need to do after analysing a lambda expression or
a right-hand side. In particular, we need to

  a) call 'markAllNonTail' *unless* the binding is for a join point, and
     the TailUsageDetails from the RHS has the right join arity; e.g.
        join j x y = case ... of
                       A -> j2 p
                       B -> j2 q
        in j a b
     Here we want the tail calls to j2 to be tail calls of the whole expression
  b) call 'markAllInsideLam' *unless* the binding is for a thunk, a one-shot
     lambda, or a non-recursive join point

Some examples, with how the free occurrences in e (assumed not to be a value
lambda) get marked:

                             inside lam    non-tail-called
  ------------------------------------------------------------
  let x = e                  No            Yes
  let f = \x -> e            Yes           Yes
  let f = \x{OneShot} -> e   No            Yes
  \x -> e                    Yes           Yes
  join j x = e               No            No
  joinrec j x = e            Yes           No

There are a few other caveats; most importantly, if we're marking a binding as
'AlwaysTailCalled', it's *going* to be a join point, so we treat it as one so
that the effect cascades properly. Consequently, at the time the RHS is
analysed, we won't know what adjustments to make; thus 'occAnalLamTail' must
return the unadjusted 'TailUsageDetails', to be adjusted by 'adjustTailUsage'
once join-point-hood has been decided and eventual one-shot annotations have
been added through 'markNonRecJoinOneShots'.

It is not so simple to see that 'occAnalNonRecBind' and 'occAnalRecBind' indeed
perform a similar sequence of steps. Thus, here is an interleaving of events
of both functions, serving as a specification:

  1. Call 'occAnalLamTail' to find usage information for the RHS.
     Recursive case:     'makeNode'
     Non-recursive case: 'occAnalNonRecBind'
  2. (Analyse the binding's scope. Done in 'occAnalBind'/`occAnal Let{}`.
      Same whether recursive or not.)
  3. Call 'tagNonRecBinder' or 'tagRecBinders', which decides whether to make
     the binding a join point.
     Cyclic  Recursive case:  'mkLoopBreakerNodes'
     Acyclic Recursive case:  `occAnalRec AcyclicSCC{}`
     Non-recursive case:      'occAnalNonRecBind'
  4. Non-recursive join point: Call 'markNonRecJoinOneShots' so that e.g.,
     FloatOut sees one-shot annotations on lambdas
     Acyclic Recursive case:  `occAnalRec AcyclicSCC{}`  calls 'adjustNonRecRhs'
     Non-recursive case:      'occAnalNonRecBind'        calls 'adjustNonRecRhs'
  5. Call 'adjustTailUsage' accordingly.
     Cyclic Recursive case:   'tagRecBinders'
     Acyclic Recursive case:  'adjustNonRecRhs'
     Non-recursive case:      'adjustNonRecRhs'
-}

data WithUsageDetails a = WithUsageDetails !UsageDetails !a

data WithTailUsageDetails a = WithTailUsageDetails !TailUsageDetails !a

------------------------------------------------------------------
--                 occAnalBind
------------------------------------------------------------------

occAnalBind :: OccEnv           -- The incoming OccEnv
            -> TopLevelFlag
            -> ImpRuleEdges
            -> CoreBind
            -> UsageDetails             -- Usage details of scope
            -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBind] -- Of the whole let(rec)

occAnalBind :: OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> CoreBind
-> UsageDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalBind !OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl ImpRuleEdges
top_env (NonRec CoreBndr
binder CoreExpr
rhs) UsageDetails
body_usage
  = OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> CoreBndr
-> CoreExpr
-> UsageDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalNonRecBind OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl ImpRuleEdges
top_env CoreBndr
binder CoreExpr
rhs UsageDetails
body_usage
occAnalBind OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl ImpRuleEdges
top_env (Rec [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
pairs) UsageDetails
body_usage
  = OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> UsageDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalRecBind OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl ImpRuleEdges
top_env [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
pairs UsageDetails
body_usage

-----------------
occAnalNonRecBind :: OccEnv -> TopLevelFlag -> ImpRuleEdges -> Var -> CoreExpr
                  -> UsageDetails -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBind]
occAnalNonRecBind :: OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> CoreBndr
-> CoreExpr
-> UsageDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalNonRecBind !OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges CoreBndr
bndr CoreExpr
rhs UsageDetails
body_usage
  | CoreBndr -> Bool
isTyVar CoreBndr
bndr      -- A type let; we don't gather usage info
  = UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_usage [CoreBndr -> CoreExpr -> CoreBind
forall b. b -> Expr b -> Bind b
NonRec CoreBndr
bndr CoreExpr
rhs]

  | Bool -> Bool
not (CoreBndr
bndr CoreBndr -> UsageDetails -> Bool
`usedIn` UsageDetails
body_usage)
  = UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_usage [] -- See Note [Dead code]

  | Bool
otherwise                   -- It's mentioned in the body
  = UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails (UsageDetails
body_usage' UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
rhs_usage) [CoreBndr -> CoreExpr -> CoreBind
forall b. b -> Expr b -> Bind b
NonRec CoreBndr
final_bndr CoreExpr
final_rhs]
  where
    WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_usage' CoreBndr
tagged_bndr = TopLevelFlag
-> UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> WithUsageDetails CoreBndr
tagNonRecBinder TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
body_usage CoreBndr
bndr

    -- Get the join info from the *new* decision
    -- See Note [Join points and unfoldings/rules]
    -- => join arity O of Note [Join arity prediction based on joinRhsArity]
    mb_join_arity :: Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity = CoreBndr -> Maybe JoinArity
willBeJoinId_maybe CoreBndr
tagged_bndr
    is_join_point :: Bool
is_join_point = Maybe JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Maybe a -> Bool
isJust Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity

    --------- Right hand side ---------
    env1 :: OccEnv
env1 | Bool
is_join_point    = OccEnv
env  -- See Note [Join point RHSs]
         | Bool
certainly_inline = OccEnv
env  -- See Note [Cascading inlines]
         | Bool
otherwise        = OccEnv -> OccEnv
rhsCtxt OccEnv
env

    -- See Note [Sources of one-shot information]
    rhs_env :: OccEnv
rhs_env = OccEnv
env1 { occ_one_shots = argOneShots dmd }
    -- See Note [Join arity prediction based on joinRhsArity]
    -- Match join arity O from mb_join_arity with manifest join arity M as
    -- returned by of occAnalLamTail. It's totally OK for them to mismatch;
    -- hence adjust the UDs from the RHS
    WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
adj_rhs_uds CoreExpr
final_rhs
      = Maybe JoinArity
-> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
adjustNonRecRhs Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity (WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr)
-> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$ OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
rhs_env CoreExpr
rhs
    rhs_usage :: UsageDetails
rhs_usage = UsageDetails
adj_rhs_uds UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
adj_unf_uds UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
adj_rule_uds
    final_bndr :: CoreBndr
final_bndr = CoreBndr
tagged_bndr CoreBndr -> RuleInfo -> CoreBndr
`setIdSpecialisation` [CoreRule] -> RuleInfo
mkRuleInfo [CoreRule]
rules'
                             CoreBndr -> Unfolding -> CoreBndr
`setIdUnfolding` Unfolding
unf2

    --------- Unfolding ---------
    -- See Note [Join points and unfoldings/rules]
    unf :: Unfolding
unf | CoreBndr -> Bool
isId CoreBndr
bndr = IdUnfoldingFun
idUnfolding CoreBndr
bndr
        | Bool
otherwise = Unfolding
NoUnfolding
    WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
unf_uds Unfolding
unf1 = OccEnv -> Unfolding -> WithTailUsageDetails Unfolding
occAnalUnfolding OccEnv
rhs_env Unfolding
unf
    unf2 :: Unfolding
unf2 = Maybe JoinArity -> Unfolding -> Unfolding
markNonRecUnfoldingOneShots Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity Unfolding
unf1
    adj_unf_uds :: UsageDetails
adj_unf_uds = Maybe JoinArity -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailArity Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity TailUsageDetails
unf_uds

    --------- Rules ---------
    -- See Note [Rules are extra RHSs] and Note [Rule dependency info]
    -- and Note [Join points and unfoldings/rules]
    rules_w_uds :: [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds  = OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)]
occAnalRules OccEnv
rhs_env CoreBndr
bndr
    rules' :: [CoreRule]
rules'       = ((CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails) -> CoreRule)
-> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)] -> [CoreRule]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map (CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails) -> CoreRule
forall a b c. (a, b, c) -> a
fstOf3 [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds
    imp_rule_uds :: UsageDetails
imp_rule_uds = [(Activation, VarSet)] -> UsageDetails
impRulesScopeUsage (ImpRuleEdges -> CoreBndr -> [(Activation, VarSet)]
lookupImpRules ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges CoreBndr
bndr)
         -- imp_rule_uds: consider
         --     h = ...
         --     g = ...
         --     RULE map g = h
         -- Then we want to ensure that h is in scope everywhere
         -- that g is (since the RULE might turn g into h), so
         -- we make g mention h.

    adj_rule_uds :: UsageDetails
adj_rule_uds = ((CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)
 -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails
-> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)]
-> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
add_rule_uds UsageDetails
imp_rule_uds [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds
    add_rule_uds :: (CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
add_rule_uds (CoreRule
_, UsageDetails
l, TailUsageDetails
r) UsageDetails
uds
      = UsageDetails
l UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` Maybe JoinArity -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailArity Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity TailUsageDetails
r UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
uds

    ----------
    occ :: OccInfo
occ = CoreBndr -> OccInfo
idOccInfo CoreBndr
tagged_bndr
    certainly_inline :: Bool
certainly_inline -- See Note [Cascading inlines]
      = case OccInfo
occ of
          OneOcc { occ_in_lam :: OccInfo -> InsideLam
occ_in_lam = InsideLam
NotInsideLam, occ_n_br :: OccInfo -> JoinArity
occ_n_br = JoinArity
1 }
            -> Bool
active Bool -> Bool -> Bool
&& Bool
not_stable
          OccInfo
_ -> Bool
False

    dmd :: Demand
dmd        = CoreBndr -> Demand
idDemandInfo CoreBndr
bndr
    active :: Bool
active     = Activation -> Bool
isAlwaysActive (CoreBndr -> Activation
idInlineActivation CoreBndr
bndr)
    not_stable :: Bool
not_stable = Bool -> Bool
not (Unfolding -> Bool
isStableUnfolding (IdUnfoldingFun
idUnfolding CoreBndr
bndr))

-----------------
occAnalRecBind :: OccEnv -> TopLevelFlag -> ImpRuleEdges -> [(Var,CoreExpr)]
               -> UsageDetails -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBind]
-- For a recursive group, we
--      * occ-analyse all the RHSs
--      * compute strongly-connected components
--      * feed those components to occAnalRec
-- See Note [Recursive bindings: the grand plan]
occAnalRecBind :: OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> UsageDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalRecBind !OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
pairs UsageDetails
body_usage
  = (SCC NodeDetails
 -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram)
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
-> [SCC NodeDetails]
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> SCC NodeDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalRec OccEnv
rhs_env TopLevelFlag
lvl) (UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_usage []) [SCC NodeDetails]
sccs
  where
    sccs :: [SCC NodeDetails]
    sccs :: [SCC NodeDetails]
sccs = {-# SCC "occAnalBind.scc" #-}
           [Node Unique NodeDetails] -> [SCC NodeDetails]
forall key payload.
Uniquable key =>
[Node key payload] -> [SCC payload]
stronglyConnCompFromEdgedVerticesUniq [Node Unique NodeDetails]
nodes

    nodes :: [LetrecNode]
    nodes :: [Node Unique NodeDetails]
nodes = {-# SCC "occAnalBind.assoc" #-}
            ((CoreBndr, CoreExpr) -> Node Unique NodeDetails)
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [Node Unique NodeDetails]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map (OccEnv
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> VarSet
-> (CoreBndr, CoreExpr)
-> Node Unique NodeDetails
makeNode OccEnv
rhs_env ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges VarSet
bndr_set) [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
pairs

    bndrs :: [CoreBndr]
bndrs    = ((CoreBndr, CoreExpr) -> CoreBndr)
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [CoreBndr]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map (CoreBndr, CoreExpr) -> CoreBndr
forall a b. (a, b) -> a
fst [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
pairs
    bndr_set :: VarSet
bndr_set = [CoreBndr] -> VarSet
mkVarSet [CoreBndr]
bndrs
    rhs_env :: OccEnv
rhs_env  = OccEnv
env OccEnv -> [CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
`addInScope` [CoreBndr]
bndrs

adjustNonRecRhs :: Maybe JoinArity -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
-- ^ This function concentrates shared logic between occAnalNonRecBind and the
-- AcyclicSCC case of occAnalRec.
--   * It applies 'markNonRecJoinOneShots' to the RHS
--   * and returns the adjusted rhs UsageDetails combined with the body usage
adjustNonRecRhs :: Maybe JoinArity
-> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
adjustNonRecRhs Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity (WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
rhs_tuds CoreExpr
rhs)
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
rhs_uds' CoreExpr
rhs'
  where
    --------- Marking (non-rec) join binders one-shot ---------
    !rhs' :: CoreExpr
rhs' | Just JoinArity
ja <- Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
markNonRecJoinOneShots JoinArity
ja CoreExpr
rhs
          | Bool
otherwise                = CoreExpr
rhs
    --------- Adjusting right-hand side usage ---------
    rhs_uds' :: UsageDetails
rhs_uds' = Maybe JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailUsage Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity CoreExpr
rhs' TailUsageDetails
rhs_tuds

bindersOfSCC :: SCC NodeDetails -> [Var]
bindersOfSCC :: SCC NodeDetails -> [CoreBndr]
bindersOfSCC (AcyclicSCC NodeDetails
nd) = [NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr NodeDetails
nd]
bindersOfSCC (CyclicSCC [NodeDetails]
ds)  = (NodeDetails -> CoreBndr) -> [NodeDetails] -> [CoreBndr]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr [NodeDetails]
ds

-----------------------------
occAnalRec :: OccEnv -> TopLevelFlag
           -> SCC NodeDetails
           -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBind]
           -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBind]

-- Check for Note [Dead code]
-- NB: Only look at body_uds, ignoring uses in the SCC
occAnalRec :: OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> SCC NodeDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalRec !OccEnv
_ TopLevelFlag
_ SCC NodeDetails
scc (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_uds CoreProgram
binds)
  | Bool -> Bool
not ((CoreBndr -> Bool) -> [CoreBndr] -> Bool
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => (a -> Bool) -> t a -> Bool
any (CoreBndr -> UsageDetails -> Bool
`usedIn` UsageDetails
body_uds) (SCC NodeDetails -> [CoreBndr]
bindersOfSCC SCC NodeDetails
scc))
  = UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_uds CoreProgram
binds

-- The NonRec case is just like a Let (NonRec ...) above
occAnalRec !OccEnv
_ TopLevelFlag
lvl
           (AcyclicSCC (ND { nd_bndr :: NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr = CoreBndr
bndr, nd_rhs :: NodeDetails -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
nd_rhs = WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
wtuds }))
           (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_uds CoreProgram
binds)
  = UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails (UsageDetails
body_uds' UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
rhs_uds') (CoreBndr -> CoreExpr -> CoreBind
forall b. b -> Expr b -> Bind b
NonRec CoreBndr
bndr' CoreExpr
rhs' CoreBind -> CoreProgram -> CoreProgram
forall a. a -> [a] -> [a]
: CoreProgram
binds)
  where
    WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_uds' CoreBndr
tagged_bndr = TopLevelFlag
-> UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> WithUsageDetails CoreBndr
tagNonRecBinder TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
body_uds CoreBndr
bndr
    mb_join_arity :: Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity = CoreBndr -> Maybe JoinArity
willBeJoinId_maybe CoreBndr
tagged_bndr
    WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
rhs_uds' CoreExpr
rhs' = Maybe JoinArity
-> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
adjustNonRecRhs Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
wtuds
    !unf' :: Unfolding
unf'  = Maybe JoinArity -> Unfolding -> Unfolding
markNonRecUnfoldingOneShots Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity (IdUnfoldingFun
idUnfolding CoreBndr
tagged_bndr)
    !bndr' :: CoreBndr
bndr' = CoreBndr
tagged_bndr CoreBndr -> Unfolding -> CoreBndr
`setIdUnfolding` Unfolding
unf'

-- The Rec case is the interesting one
-- See Note [Recursive bindings: the grand plan]
-- See Note [Loop breaking]
occAnalRec OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl (CyclicSCC [NodeDetails]
details_s) (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_uds CoreProgram
binds)
  = -- pprTrace "occAnalRec" (ppr loop_breaker_nodes)
    UsageDetails -> CoreProgram -> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_uds ([(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> CoreBind
forall b. [(b, Expr b)] -> Bind b
Rec [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
pairs CoreBind -> CoreProgram -> CoreProgram
forall a. a -> [a] -> [a]
: CoreProgram
binds)
  where
    all_simple :: Bool
all_simple = (NodeDetails -> Bool) -> [NodeDetails] -> Bool
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => (a -> Bool) -> t a -> Bool
all NodeDetails -> Bool
nd_simple [NodeDetails]
details_s

    ------------------------------
    -- Make the nodes for the loop-breaker analysis
    -- See Note [Choosing loop breakers] for loop_breaker_nodes
    final_uds :: UsageDetails
    loop_breaker_nodes :: [LoopBreakerNode]
    (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_uds [LoopBreakerNode]
loop_breaker_nodes) = OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> UsageDetails
-> [NodeDetails]
-> WithUsageDetails [LoopBreakerNode]
mkLoopBreakerNodes OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
body_uds [NodeDetails]
details_s

    ------------------------------
    weak_fvs :: VarSet
    weak_fvs :: VarSet
weak_fvs = (NodeDetails -> VarSet) -> [NodeDetails] -> VarSet
forall a. (a -> VarSet) -> [a] -> VarSet
mapUnionVarSet NodeDetails -> VarSet
nd_weak_fvs [NodeDetails]
details_s

    ---------------------------
    -- Now reconstruct the cycle
    pairs :: [(Id,CoreExpr)]
    pairs :: [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
pairs | Bool
all_simple = JoinArity
-> VarSet
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
reOrderNodes   JoinArity
0 VarSet
weak_fvs [LoopBreakerNode]
loop_breaker_nodes []
          | Bool
otherwise  = JoinArity
-> VarSet
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
loopBreakNodes JoinArity
0 VarSet
weak_fvs [LoopBreakerNode]
loop_breaker_nodes []
          -- In the common case when all are "simple" (no rules at all)
          -- the loop_breaker_nodes will include all the scope edges
          -- so a SCC computation would yield a single CyclicSCC result;
          -- and reOrderNodes deals with exactly that case.
          -- Saves a SCC analysis in a common case


{- *********************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                Loop breaking
*                                                                      *
********************************************************************* -}

{- Note [Choosing loop breakers]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Step 4 in Note [Recursive bindings: the grand plan]), occAnalRec does
loop-breaking on each CyclicSCC of the original program:

* mkLoopBreakerNodes: Form the loop-breaker graph for that CyclicSCC

* loopBreakNodes: Do SCC analysis on it

* reOrderNodes: For each CyclicSCC, pick a loop breaker
    * Delete edges to that loop breaker
    * Do another SCC analysis on that reduced SCC
    * Repeat

To form the loop-breaker graph, we construct a new set of Nodes, the
"loop-breaker nodes", with the same details but different edges, the
"loop-breaker edges".  The loop-breaker nodes have both more and fewer
dependencies than the scope edges:

  More edges:
     If f calls g, and g has an active rule that mentions h then
     we add an edge from f -> h.  See Note [Rules and loop breakers].

  Fewer edges: we only include dependencies
     * only on /active/ rules,
     * on rule /RHSs/ (not LHSs)

The scope edges, by contrast, must be much more inclusive.

The nd_simple flag tracks the common case when a binding has no RULES
at all, in which case the loop-breaker edges will be identical to the
scope edges.

Note that in Example [eftInt], *neither* eftInt *nor* eftIntFB is
chosen as a loop breaker, because their RHSs don't mention each other.
And indeed both can be inlined safely.

Note [inl_fvs]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Note that the loop-breaker graph includes edges for occurrences in
/both/ the RHS /and/ the stable unfolding.  Consider this, which actually
occurred when compiling BooleanFormula.hs in GHC:

  Rec { lvl1 = go
      ; lvl2[StableUnf = go] = lvl1
      ; go = ...go...lvl2... }

From the point of view of infinite inlining, we need only these edges:
   lvl1 :-> go
   lvl2 :-> go       -- The RHS lvl1 will never be used for inlining
   go   :-> go, lvl2

But the danger is that, lacking any edge to lvl1, we'll put it at the
end thus
  Rec { lvl2[ StableUnf = go] = lvl1
      ; go[LoopBreaker] = ...go...lvl2... }
      ; lvl1[Occ=Once]  = go }

And now the Simplifer will try to use PreInlineUnconditionally on lvl1
(which occurs just once), but because it is last we won't actually
substitute in lvl2.  Sigh.

To avoid this possibility, we include edges from lvl2 to /both/ its
stable unfolding /and/ its RHS.  Hence the defn of inl_fvs in
makeNode.  Maybe we could be more clever, but it's very much a corner
case.

Note [Weak loop breakers]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is a last nasty wrinkle.  Suppose we have

    Rec { f = f_rhs
          RULE f [] = g

          h = h_rhs
          g = h
          ...more... }

Remember that we simplify the RULES before any RHS (see Note
[Rules are visible in their own rec group] above).

So we must *not* postInlineUnconditionally 'g', even though
its RHS turns out to be trivial.  (I'm assuming that 'g' is
not chosen as a loop breaker.)  Why not?  Because then we
drop the binding for 'g', which leaves it out of scope in the
RULE!

Here's a somewhat different example of the same thing
    Rec { q = r
        ; r = ...p...
        ; p = p_rhs
          RULE p [] = q }
Here the RULE is "below" q, but we *still* can't postInlineUnconditionally
q, because the RULE for p is active throughout.  So the RHS of r
might rewrite to     r = ...q...
So q must remain in scope in the output program!

We "solve" this by:

    Make q a "weak" loop breaker (OccInfo = IAmLoopBreaker True)
    iff q is a mentioned in the RHS of any RULE (active on not)
    in the Rec group

Note the "active or not" comment; even if a RULE is inactive, we
want its RHS free vars to stay alive (#20820)!

A normal "strong" loop breaker has IAmLoopBreaker False.  So:

                                Inline  postInlineUnconditionally
strong   IAmLoopBreaker False    no      no
weak     IAmLoopBreaker True     yes     no
         other                   yes     yes

The **sole** reason for this kind of loop breaker is so that
postInlineUnconditionally does not fire.  Ugh.

Annoyingly, since we simplify the rules *first* we'll never inline
q into p's RULE.  That trivial binding for q will hang around until
we discard the rule.  Yuk.  But it's rare.

Note [Rules and loop breakers]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When we form the loop-breaker graph (Step 4 in Note [Recursive
bindings: the grand plan]), we must be careful about RULEs.

For a start, we want a loop breaker to cut every cycle, so inactive
rules play no part; we need only consider /active/ rules.
See Note [Finding rule RHS free vars]

The second point is more subtle.  A RULE is like an equation for
'f' that is *always* inlined if it is applicable.  We do *not* disable
rules for loop-breakers.  It's up to whoever makes the rules to make
sure that the rules themselves always terminate.  See Note [Rules for
recursive functions] in GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify

Hence, if
    f's RHS (or its stable unfolding if it has one) mentions g, and
    g has a RULE that mentions h, and
    h has a RULE that mentions f

then we *must* choose f to be a loop breaker.  Example: see Note
[Specialisation rules]. So our plan is this:

   Take the free variables of f's RHS, and augment it with all the
   variables reachable by a transitive sequence RULES from those
   starting points.

That is the whole reason for computing rule_fv_env in mkLoopBreakerNodes.
Wrinkles:

* We only consider /active/ rules. See Note [Finding rule RHS free vars]

* We need only consider free vars that are also binders in this Rec
  group.  See also Note [Finding rule RHS free vars]

* We only consider variables free in the *RHS* of the rule, in
  contrast to the way we build the Rec group in the first place (Note
  [Rule dependency info])

* Why "transitive sequence of rules"?  Because active rules apply
  unconditionally, without checking loop-breaker-ness.
 See Note [Loop breaker dependencies].

Note [Finding rule RHS free vars]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider this real example from Data Parallel Haskell
     tagZero :: Array Int -> Array Tag
     {-# INLINE [1] tagZeroes #-}
     tagZero xs = pmap (\x -> fromBool (x==0)) xs

     {-# RULES "tagZero" [~1] forall xs n.
         pmap fromBool <blah blah> = tagZero xs #-}
So tagZero's RHS mentions pmap, and pmap's RULE mentions tagZero.
However, tagZero can only be inlined in phase 1 and later, while
the RULE is only active *before* phase 1.  So there's no problem.

To make this work, we look for the RHS free vars only for
*active* rules. That's the reason for the occ_rule_act field
of the OccEnv.

Note [loopBreakNodes]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
loopBreakNodes is applied to the list of nodes for a cyclic strongly
connected component (there's guaranteed to be a cycle).  It returns
the same nodes, but
        a) in a better order,
        b) with some of the Ids having a IAmALoopBreaker pragma

The "loop-breaker" Ids are sufficient to break all cycles in the SCC.  This means
that the simplifier can guarantee not to loop provided it never records an inlining
for these no-inline guys.

Furthermore, the order of the binds is such that if we neglect dependencies
on the no-inline Ids then the binds are topologically sorted.  This means
that the simplifier will generally do a good job if it works from top bottom,
recording inlinings for any Ids which aren't marked as "no-inline" as it goes.
-}

type Binding = (Id,CoreExpr)

-- See Note [loopBreakNodes]
loopBreakNodes :: Int
               -> VarSet        -- Binders whose dependencies may be "missing"
                                -- See Note [Weak loop breakers]
               -> [LoopBreakerNode]
               -> [Binding]             -- Append these to the end
               -> [Binding]

-- Return the bindings sorted into a plausible order, and marked with loop breakers.
-- See Note [loopBreakNodes]
loopBreakNodes :: JoinArity
-> VarSet
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
loopBreakNodes JoinArity
depth VarSet
weak_fvs [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds
  = -- pprTrace "loopBreakNodes" (ppr nodes) $
    [SCC LoopBreakerNode] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
go ([LoopBreakerNode] -> [SCC LoopBreakerNode]
forall key payload.
Uniquable key =>
[Node key payload] -> [SCC (Node key payload)]
stronglyConnCompFromEdgedVerticesUniqR [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes)
  where
    go :: [SCC LoopBreakerNode] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
go []         = [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds
    go (SCC LoopBreakerNode
scc:[SCC LoopBreakerNode]
sccs) = SCC LoopBreakerNode
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
loop_break_scc SCC LoopBreakerNode
scc ([SCC LoopBreakerNode] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
go [SCC LoopBreakerNode]
sccs)

    loop_break_scc :: SCC LoopBreakerNode
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
loop_break_scc SCC LoopBreakerNode
scc [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds
      = case SCC LoopBreakerNode
scc of
          AcyclicSCC LoopBreakerNode
node  -> (CoreBndr -> CoreBndr) -> LoopBreakerNode -> (CoreBndr, CoreExpr)
nodeBinding (VarSet -> CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
mk_non_loop_breaker VarSet
weak_fvs) LoopBreakerNode
node (CoreBndr, CoreExpr)
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
forall a. a -> [a] -> [a]
: [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds
          CyclicSCC [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes  -> JoinArity
-> VarSet
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
reOrderNodes JoinArity
depth VarSet
weak_fvs [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds

----------------------------------
reOrderNodes :: Int -> VarSet -> [LoopBreakerNode] -> [Binding] -> [Binding]
    -- Choose a loop breaker, mark it no-inline,
    -- and call loopBreakNodes on the rest
reOrderNodes :: JoinArity
-> VarSet
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
reOrderNodes JoinArity
_ VarSet
_ []     [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
_     = String -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
forall a. HasCallStack => String -> a
panic String
"reOrderNodes"
reOrderNodes JoinArity
_ VarSet
_ [LoopBreakerNode
node] [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds = (CoreBndr -> CoreBndr) -> LoopBreakerNode -> (CoreBndr, CoreExpr)
nodeBinding CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
mk_loop_breaker LoopBreakerNode
node (CoreBndr, CoreExpr)
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
forall a. a -> [a] -> [a]
: [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds
reOrderNodes JoinArity
depth VarSet
weak_fvs (LoopBreakerNode
node : [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes) [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds
  = -- pprTrace "reOrderNodes" (vcat [ text "unchosen" <+> ppr unchosen
    --                               , text "chosen" <+> ppr chosen_nodes ]) $
    JoinArity
-> VarSet
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
loopBreakNodes JoinArity
new_depth VarSet
weak_fvs [LoopBreakerNode]
unchosen ([(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)])
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
    ((LoopBreakerNode -> (CoreBndr, CoreExpr))
-> [LoopBreakerNode] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map ((CoreBndr -> CoreBndr) -> LoopBreakerNode -> (CoreBndr, CoreExpr)
nodeBinding CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
mk_loop_breaker) [LoopBreakerNode]
chosen_nodes [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
-> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)] -> [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
forall a. [a] -> [a] -> [a]
++ [(CoreBndr, CoreExpr)]
binds)
  where
    ([LoopBreakerNode]
chosen_nodes, [LoopBreakerNode]
unchosen) = Bool
-> NodeScore
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> ([LoopBreakerNode], [LoopBreakerNode])
chooseLoopBreaker Bool
approximate_lb
                                                 (SimpleNodeDetails -> NodeScore
snd_score (LoopBreakerNode -> SimpleNodeDetails
forall key payload. Node key payload -> payload
node_payload LoopBreakerNode
node))
                                                 [LoopBreakerNode
node] [] [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes

    approximate_lb :: Bool
approximate_lb = JoinArity
depth JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
>= JoinArity
2
    new_depth :: JoinArity
new_depth | Bool
approximate_lb = JoinArity
0
              | Bool
otherwise      = JoinArity
depthJoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
+JoinArity
1
        -- After two iterations (d=0, d=1) give up
        -- and approximate, returning to d=0

nodeBinding :: (Id -> Id) -> LoopBreakerNode -> Binding
nodeBinding :: (CoreBndr -> CoreBndr) -> LoopBreakerNode -> (CoreBndr, CoreExpr)
nodeBinding CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
set_id_occ (LoopBreakerNode -> SimpleNodeDetails
forall key payload. Node key payload -> payload
node_payload -> SND { snd_bndr :: SimpleNodeDetails -> CoreBndr
snd_bndr = CoreBndr
bndr, snd_rhs :: SimpleNodeDetails -> CoreExpr
snd_rhs = CoreExpr
rhs})
  = (CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
set_id_occ CoreBndr
bndr, CoreExpr
rhs)

mk_loop_breaker :: Id -> Id
mk_loop_breaker :: CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
mk_loop_breaker CoreBndr
bndr
  = CoreBndr
bndr CoreBndr -> OccInfo -> CoreBndr
`setIdOccInfo` OccInfo
occ'
  where
    occ' :: OccInfo
occ'      = OccInfo
strongLoopBreaker { occ_tail = tail_info }
    tail_info :: TailCallInfo
tail_info = OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo (CoreBndr -> OccInfo
idOccInfo CoreBndr
bndr)

mk_non_loop_breaker :: VarSet -> Id -> Id
-- See Note [Weak loop breakers]
mk_non_loop_breaker :: VarSet -> CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
mk_non_loop_breaker VarSet
weak_fvs CoreBndr
bndr
  | CoreBndr
bndr CoreBndr -> VarSet -> Bool
`elemVarSet` VarSet
weak_fvs = CoreBndr -> OccInfo -> CoreBndr
setIdOccInfo CoreBndr
bndr OccInfo
occ'
  | Bool
otherwise                  = CoreBndr
bndr
  where
    occ' :: OccInfo
occ'      = OccInfo
weakLoopBreaker { occ_tail = tail_info }
    tail_info :: TailCallInfo
tail_info = OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo (CoreBndr -> OccInfo
idOccInfo CoreBndr
bndr)

----------------------------------
chooseLoopBreaker :: Bool                -- True <=> Too many iterations,
                                         --          so approximate
                  -> NodeScore           -- Best score so far
                  -> [LoopBreakerNode]   -- Nodes with this score
                  -> [LoopBreakerNode]   -- Nodes with higher scores
                  -> [LoopBreakerNode]   -- Unprocessed nodes
                  -> ([LoopBreakerNode], [LoopBreakerNode])
    -- This loop looks for the bind with the lowest score
    -- to pick as the loop  breaker.  The rest accumulate in
chooseLoopBreaker :: Bool
-> NodeScore
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> ([LoopBreakerNode], [LoopBreakerNode])
chooseLoopBreaker Bool
_ NodeScore
_ [LoopBreakerNode]
loop_nodes [LoopBreakerNode]
acc []
  = ([LoopBreakerNode]
loop_nodes, [LoopBreakerNode]
acc)        -- Done

    -- If approximate_loop_breaker is True, we pick *all*
    -- nodes with lowest score, else just one
    -- See Note [Complexity of loop breaking]
chooseLoopBreaker Bool
approx_lb NodeScore
loop_sc [LoopBreakerNode]
loop_nodes [LoopBreakerNode]
acc (LoopBreakerNode
node : [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes)
  | Bool
approx_lb
  , NodeScore -> JoinArity
rank NodeScore
sc JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Eq a => a -> a -> Bool
== NodeScore -> JoinArity
rank NodeScore
loop_sc
  = Bool
-> NodeScore
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> ([LoopBreakerNode], [LoopBreakerNode])
chooseLoopBreaker Bool
approx_lb NodeScore
loop_sc (LoopBreakerNode
node LoopBreakerNode -> [LoopBreakerNode] -> [LoopBreakerNode]
forall a. a -> [a] -> [a]
: [LoopBreakerNode]
loop_nodes) [LoopBreakerNode]
acc [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes

  | NodeScore
sc NodeScore -> NodeScore -> Bool
`betterLB` NodeScore
loop_sc  -- Better score so pick this new one
  = Bool
-> NodeScore
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> ([LoopBreakerNode], [LoopBreakerNode])
chooseLoopBreaker Bool
approx_lb NodeScore
sc [LoopBreakerNode
node] ([LoopBreakerNode]
loop_nodes [LoopBreakerNode] -> [LoopBreakerNode] -> [LoopBreakerNode]
forall a. [a] -> [a] -> [a]
++ [LoopBreakerNode]
acc) [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes

  | Bool
otherwise              -- Worse score so don't pick it
  = Bool
-> NodeScore
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
-> ([LoopBreakerNode], [LoopBreakerNode])
chooseLoopBreaker Bool
approx_lb NodeScore
loop_sc [LoopBreakerNode]
loop_nodes (LoopBreakerNode
node LoopBreakerNode -> [LoopBreakerNode] -> [LoopBreakerNode]
forall a. a -> [a] -> [a]
: [LoopBreakerNode]
acc) [LoopBreakerNode]
nodes
  where
    sc :: NodeScore
sc = SimpleNodeDetails -> NodeScore
snd_score (LoopBreakerNode -> SimpleNodeDetails
forall key payload. Node key payload -> payload
node_payload LoopBreakerNode
node)

{-
Note [Complexity of loop breaking]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The loop-breaking algorithm knocks out one binder at a time, and
performs a new SCC analysis on the remaining binders.  That can
behave very badly in tightly-coupled groups of bindings; in the
worst case it can be (N**2)*log N, because it does a full SCC
on N, then N-1, then N-2 and so on.

To avoid this, we switch plans after 2 (or whatever) attempts:
  Plan A: pick one binder with the lowest score, make it
          a loop breaker, and try again
  Plan B: pick *all* binders with the lowest score, make them
          all loop breakers, and try again
Since there are only a small finite number of scores, this will
terminate in a constant number of iterations, rather than O(N)
iterations.

You might thing that it's very unlikely, but RULES make it much
more likely.  Here's a real example from #1969:
  Rec { $dm = \d.\x. op d
        {-# RULES forall d. $dm Int d  = $s$dm1
                  forall d. $dm Bool d = $s$dm2 #-}

        dInt = MkD .... opInt ...
        dInt = MkD .... opBool ...
        opInt  = $dm dInt
        opBool = $dm dBool

        $s$dm1 = \x. op dInt
        $s$dm2 = \x. op dBool }
The RULES stuff means that we can't choose $dm as a loop breaker
(Note [Choosing loop breakers]), so we must choose at least (say)
opInt *and* opBool, and so on.  The number of loop breakers is
linear in the number of instance declarations.

Note [Loop breakers and INLINE/INLINABLE pragmas]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avoid choosing a function with an INLINE pramga as the loop breaker!
If such a function is mutually-recursive with a non-INLINE thing,
then the latter should be the loop-breaker.

It's vital to distinguish between INLINE and INLINABLE (the
Bool returned by hasStableCoreUnfolding_maybe).  If we start with
   Rec { {-# INLINABLE f #-}
         f x = ...f... }
and then worker/wrapper it through strictness analysis, we'll get
   Rec { {-# INLINABLE $wf #-}
         $wf p q = let x = (p,q) in ...f...

         {-# INLINE f #-}
         f x = case x of (p,q) -> $wf p q }

Now it is vital that we choose $wf as the loop breaker, so we can
inline 'f' in '$wf'.

Note [DFuns should not be loop breakers]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's particularly bad to make a DFun into a loop breaker.  See
Note [How instance declarations are translated] in GHC.Tc.TyCl.Instance

We give DFuns a higher score than ordinary CONLIKE things because
if there's a choice we want the DFun to be the non-loop breaker. Eg

rec { sc = /\ a \$dC. $fBWrap (T a) ($fCT @ a $dC)

      $fCT :: forall a_afE. (Roman.C a_afE) => Roman.C (Roman.T a_afE)
      {-# DFUN #-}
      $fCT = /\a \$dC. MkD (T a) ((sc @ a $dC) |> blah) ($ctoF @ a $dC)
    }

Here 'sc' (the superclass) looks CONLIKE, but we'll never get to it
if we can't unravel the DFun first.

Note [Constructor applications]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's really really important to inline dictionaries.  Real
example (the Enum Ordering instance from GHC.Base):

     rec     f = \ x -> case d of (p,q,r) -> p x
             g = \ x -> case d of (p,q,r) -> q x
             d = (v, f, g)

Here, f and g occur just once; but we can't inline them into d.
On the other hand we *could* simplify those case expressions if
we didn't stupidly choose d as the loop breaker.
But we won't because constructor args are marked "Many".
Inlining dictionaries is really essential to unravelling
the loops in static numeric dictionaries, see GHC.Float.

Note [Closure conversion]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We treat (\x. C p q) as a high-score candidate in the letrec scoring algorithm.
The immediate motivation came from the result of a closure-conversion transformation
which generated code like this:

    data Clo a b = forall c. Clo (c -> a -> b) c

    ($:) :: Clo a b -> a -> b
    Clo f env $: x = f env x

    rec { plus = Clo plus1 ()

        ; plus1 _ n = Clo plus2 n

        ; plus2 Zero     n = n
        ; plus2 (Succ m) n = Succ (plus $: m $: n) }

If we inline 'plus' and 'plus1', everything unravels nicely.  But if
we choose 'plus1' as the loop breaker (which is entirely possible
otherwise), the loop does not unravel nicely.


@occAnalUnfolding@ deals with the question of bindings where the Id is marked
by an INLINE pragma.  For these we record that anything which occurs
in its RHS occurs many times.  This pessimistically assumes that this
inlined binder also occurs many times in its scope, but if it doesn't
we'll catch it next time round.  At worst this costs an extra simplifier pass.
ToDo: try using the occurrence info for the inline'd binder.

[March 97] We do the same for atomic RHSs.  Reason: see notes with loopBreakSCC.
[June 98, SLPJ]  I've undone this change; I don't understand it.  See notes with loopBreakSCC.


************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                   Making nodes
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************
-}

-- | Digraph node as constructed by 'makeNode' and consumed by 'occAnalRec'.
-- The Unique key is gotten from the Id.
type LetrecNode = Node Unique NodeDetails

-- | Node details as consumed by 'occAnalRec'.
data NodeDetails
  = ND { NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr :: Id          -- Binder

       , NodeDetails -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
nd_rhs  :: !(WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr)
         -- ^ RHS, already occ-analysed
         -- With TailUsageDetails from RHS, and RULES, and stable unfoldings,
         -- ignoring phase (ie assuming all are active).
         -- NB: Unadjusted TailUsageDetails, as if this Node becomes a
         -- non-recursive join point!
         -- See Note [TailUsageDetails when forming Rec groups]

       , NodeDetails -> VarSet
nd_inl  :: IdSet       -- Free variables of the stable unfolding and the RHS
                                -- but excluding any RULES
                                -- This is the IdSet that may be used if the Id is inlined

       , NodeDetails -> Bool
nd_simple :: Bool      -- True iff this binding has no local RULES
                                -- If all nodes are simple we don't need a loop-breaker
                                -- dep-anal before reconstructing.

       , NodeDetails -> VarSet
nd_weak_fvs :: IdSet    -- Variables bound in this Rec group that are free
                                 -- in the RHS of any rule (active or not) for this bndr
                                 -- See Note [Weak loop breakers]

       , NodeDetails -> VarSet
nd_active_rule_fvs :: IdSet    -- Variables bound in this Rec group that are free
                                        -- in the RHS of an active rule for this bndr
                                        -- See Note [Rules and loop breakers]
  }

instance Outputable NodeDetails where
   ppr :: NodeDetails -> SDoc
ppr NodeDetails
nd = String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"ND" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc
braces
             ([SDoc] -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => [doc] -> doc
sep [ String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"bndr =" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<+> CoreBndr -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr (NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr NodeDetails
nd)
                  , String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"uds =" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<+> TailUsageDetails -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr TailUsageDetails
uds
                  , String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"inl =" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<+> VarSet -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr (NodeDetails -> VarSet
nd_inl NodeDetails
nd)
                  , String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"simple =" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<+> Bool -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr (NodeDetails -> Bool
nd_simple NodeDetails
nd)
                  , String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"active_rule_fvs =" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<+> VarSet -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr (NodeDetails -> VarSet
nd_active_rule_fvs NodeDetails
nd)
             ])
            where WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
uds CoreExpr
_ = NodeDetails -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
nd_rhs NodeDetails
nd

-- | Digraph with simplified and completely occurrence analysed
-- 'SimpleNodeDetails', retaining just the info we need for breaking loops.
type LoopBreakerNode = Node Unique SimpleNodeDetails

-- | Condensed variant of 'NodeDetails' needed during loop breaking.
data SimpleNodeDetails
  = SND { SimpleNodeDetails -> CoreBndr
snd_bndr  :: IdWithOccInfo  -- OccInfo accurate
        , SimpleNodeDetails -> CoreExpr
snd_rhs   :: CoreExpr       -- properly occur-analysed
        , SimpleNodeDetails -> NodeScore
snd_score :: NodeScore
        }

instance Outputable SimpleNodeDetails where
   ppr :: SimpleNodeDetails -> SDoc
ppr SimpleNodeDetails
nd = String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"SND" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc
braces
             ([SDoc] -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => [doc] -> doc
sep [ String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"bndr =" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<+> CoreBndr -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr (SimpleNodeDetails -> CoreBndr
snd_bndr SimpleNodeDetails
nd)
                  , String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"score =" SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<+> NodeScore -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr (SimpleNodeDetails -> NodeScore
snd_score SimpleNodeDetails
nd)
             ])

-- The NodeScore is compared lexicographically;
--      e.g. lower rank wins regardless of size
type NodeScore = ( Int     -- Rank: lower => more likely to be picked as loop breaker
                 , Int     -- Size of rhs: higher => more likely to be picked as LB
                           -- Maxes out at maxExprSize; we just use it to prioritise
                           -- small functions
                 , Bool )  -- Was it a loop breaker before?
                           -- True => more likely to be picked
                           -- Note [Loop breakers, node scoring, and stability]

rank :: NodeScore -> Int
rank :: NodeScore -> JoinArity
rank (JoinArity
r, JoinArity
_, Bool
_) = JoinArity
r

makeNode :: OccEnv -> ImpRuleEdges -> VarSet
         -> (Var, CoreExpr) -> LetrecNode
-- See Note [Recursive bindings: the grand plan]
makeNode :: OccEnv
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> VarSet
-> (CoreBndr, CoreExpr)
-> Node Unique NodeDetails
makeNode !OccEnv
env ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges VarSet
bndr_set (CoreBndr
bndr, CoreExpr
rhs)
  = DigraphNode { node_payload :: NodeDetails
node_payload      = NodeDetails
details
                , node_key :: Unique
node_key          = CoreBndr -> Unique
varUnique CoreBndr
bndr
                , node_dependencies :: [Unique]
node_dependencies = VarSet -> [Unique]
forall elt. UniqSet elt -> [Unique]
nonDetKeysUniqSet VarSet
scope_fvs }
    -- It's OK to use nonDetKeysUniqSet here as stronglyConnCompFromEdgedVerticesR
    -- is still deterministic with edges in nondeterministic order as
    -- explained in Note [Deterministic SCC] in GHC.Data.Graph.Directed.
  where
    details :: NodeDetails
details = ND { nd_bndr :: CoreBndr
nd_bndr            = CoreBndr
bndr'
                 , nd_rhs :: WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
nd_rhs             = TailUsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
scope_uds CoreExpr
rhs'
                 , nd_inl :: VarSet
nd_inl             = VarSet
inl_fvs
                 , nd_simple :: Bool
nd_simple          = [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)] -> Bool
forall a. [a] -> Bool
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => t a -> Bool
null [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds Bool -> Bool -> Bool
&& [(Activation, VarSet)] -> Bool
forall a. [a] -> Bool
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => t a -> Bool
null [(Activation, VarSet)]
imp_rule_info
                 , nd_weak_fvs :: VarSet
nd_weak_fvs        = VarSet
weak_fvs
                 , nd_active_rule_fvs :: VarSet
nd_active_rule_fvs = VarSet
active_rule_fvs }

    bndr' :: CoreBndr
bndr' = CoreBndr
bndr CoreBndr -> Unfolding -> CoreBndr
`setIdUnfolding`      Unfolding
unf'
                 CoreBndr -> RuleInfo -> CoreBndr
`setIdSpecialisation` [CoreRule] -> RuleInfo
mkRuleInfo [CoreRule]
rules'

    -- NB: Both adj_unf_uds and adj_rule_uds have been adjusted to match the
    --     JoinArity rhs_ja of unadj_rhs_uds.
    unadj_inl_uds :: UsageDetails
unadj_inl_uds   = UsageDetails
unadj_rhs_uds UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
adj_unf_uds
    unadj_scope_uds :: UsageDetails
unadj_scope_uds = UsageDetails
unadj_inl_uds UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
adj_rule_uds
    scope_uds :: TailUsageDetails
scope_uds       = JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
rhs_ja UsageDetails
unadj_scope_uds
                   -- Note [Rules are extra RHSs]
                   -- Note [Rule dependency info]
    scope_fvs :: VarSet
scope_fvs = VarSet -> UsageDetails -> VarSet
udFreeVars VarSet
bndr_set UsageDetails
unadj_scope_uds
    -- scope_fvs: all occurrences from this binder: RHS, unfolding,
    --            and RULES, both LHS and RHS thereof, active or inactive

    inl_fvs :: VarSet
inl_fvs  = VarSet -> UsageDetails -> VarSet
udFreeVars VarSet
bndr_set UsageDetails
unadj_inl_uds
    -- inl_fvs: vars that would become free if the function was inlined.
    -- We conservatively approximate that by thefree vars from the RHS
    -- and the unfolding together.
    -- See Note [inl_fvs]


    --------- Right hand side ---------
    -- Constructing the edges for the main Rec computation
    -- See Note [Forming Rec groups]
    -- and Note [TailUsageDetails when forming Rec groups]
    -- Compared to occAnalNonRecBind, we can't yet adjust the RHS because
    --   (a) we don't yet know the final joinpointhood. It might not become a
    --       join point after all!
    --   (b) we don't even know whether it stays a recursive RHS after the SCC
    --       analysis we are about to seed! So we can't markAllInsideLam in
    --       advance, because if it ends up as a non-recursive join point we'll
    --       consider it as one-shot and don't need to markAllInsideLam.
    -- Instead, do the occAnalLamTail call here and postpone adjustTailUsage
    -- until occAnalRec. In effect, we pretend that the RHS becomes a
    -- non-recursive join point and fix up later with adjustTailUsage.
    rhs_env :: OccEnv
rhs_env = OccEnv -> OccEnv
rhsCtxt OccEnv
env
    WithTailUsageDetails (TUD JoinArity
rhs_ja UsageDetails
unadj_rhs_uds) CoreExpr
rhs' = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
rhs_env CoreExpr
rhs
      -- corresponding call to adjustTailUsage in occAnalRec and tagRecBinders

    --------- Unfolding ---------
    -- See Note [Join points and unfoldings/rules]
    unf :: Unfolding
unf = IdUnfoldingFun
realIdUnfolding CoreBndr
bndr -- realIdUnfolding: Ignore loop-breaker-ness
                               -- here because that is what we are setting!
    WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
unf_tuds Unfolding
unf' = OccEnv -> Unfolding -> WithTailUsageDetails Unfolding
occAnalUnfolding OccEnv
rhs_env Unfolding
unf
    adj_unf_uds :: UsageDetails
adj_unf_uds = Maybe JoinArity -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailArity (JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just JoinArity
rhs_ja) TailUsageDetails
unf_tuds
      -- `rhs_ja` is `joinRhsArity rhs` and is the prediction for source M
      -- of Note [Join arity prediction based on joinRhsArity]

    --------- IMP-RULES --------
    is_active :: Activation -> Bool
is_active     = OccEnv -> Activation -> Bool
occ_rule_act OccEnv
env :: Activation -> Bool
    imp_rule_info :: [(Activation, VarSet)]
imp_rule_info = ImpRuleEdges -> CoreBndr -> [(Activation, VarSet)]
lookupImpRules ImpRuleEdges
imp_rule_edges CoreBndr
bndr
    imp_rule_uds :: UsageDetails
imp_rule_uds  = [(Activation, VarSet)] -> UsageDetails
impRulesScopeUsage [(Activation, VarSet)]
imp_rule_info
    imp_rule_fvs :: VarSet
imp_rule_fvs  = (Activation -> Bool) -> VarSet -> [(Activation, VarSet)] -> VarSet
impRulesActiveFvs Activation -> Bool
is_active VarSet
bndr_set [(Activation, VarSet)]
imp_rule_info

    --------- All rules --------
    -- See Note [Join points and unfoldings/rules]
    -- `rhs_ja` is `joinRhsArity rhs'` and is the prediction for source M
    -- of Note [Join arity prediction based on joinRhsArity]
    rules_w_uds :: [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)]
    rules_w_uds :: [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds = [ (CoreRule
r,UsageDetails
l,Maybe JoinArity -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailArity (JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just JoinArity
rhs_ja) TailUsageDetails
rhs_tuds)
                  | (CoreRule
r,UsageDetails
l,TailUsageDetails
rhs_tuds) <- OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)]
occAnalRules OccEnv
rhs_env CoreBndr
bndr ]
    rules' :: [CoreRule]
rules'      = ((CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> CoreRule)
-> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)] -> [CoreRule]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map (CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> CoreRule
forall a b c. (a, b, c) -> a
fstOf3 [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds

    adj_rule_uds :: UsageDetails
adj_rule_uds = ((CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)
 -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails
-> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)]
-> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
forall {a}.
(a, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
add_rule_uds UsageDetails
imp_rule_uds [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds
    add_rule_uds :: (a, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
add_rule_uds (a
_, UsageDetails
l, UsageDetails
r) UsageDetails
uds = UsageDetails
l UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
r UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
uds

    -------- active_rule_fvs ------------
    active_rule_fvs :: VarSet
active_rule_fvs = ((CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> VarSet -> VarSet)
-> VarSet -> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)] -> VarSet
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> VarSet -> VarSet
add_active_rule VarSet
imp_rule_fvs [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds
    add_active_rule :: (CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> VarSet -> VarSet
add_active_rule (CoreRule
rule, UsageDetails
_, UsageDetails
rhs_uds) VarSet
fvs
      | Activation -> Bool
is_active (CoreRule -> Activation
ruleActivation CoreRule
rule)
      = VarSet -> UsageDetails -> VarSet
udFreeVars VarSet
bndr_set UsageDetails
rhs_uds VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
`unionVarSet` VarSet
fvs
      | Bool
otherwise
      = VarSet
fvs

    -------- weak_fvs ------------
    -- See Note [Weak loop breakers]
    weak_fvs :: VarSet
weak_fvs = ((CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> VarSet -> VarSet)
-> VarSet -> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)] -> VarSet
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> VarSet -> VarSet
add_rule VarSet
emptyVarSet [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails)]
rules_w_uds
    add_rule :: (CoreRule, UsageDetails, UsageDetails) -> VarSet -> VarSet
add_rule (CoreRule
_, UsageDetails
_, UsageDetails
rhs_uds) VarSet
fvs = VarSet -> UsageDetails -> VarSet
udFreeVars VarSet
bndr_set UsageDetails
rhs_uds VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
`unionVarSet` VarSet
fvs

mkLoopBreakerNodes :: OccEnv -> TopLevelFlag
                   -> UsageDetails   -- for BODY of let
                   -> [NodeDetails]
                   -> WithUsageDetails [LoopBreakerNode] -- with OccInfo up-to-date
-- See Note [Choosing loop breakers]
-- This function primarily creates the Nodes for the
-- loop-breaker SCC analysis.  More specifically:
--   a) tag each binder with its occurrence info
--   b) add a NodeScore to each node
--   c) make a Node with the right dependency edges for
--      the loop-breaker SCC analysis
--   d) adjust each RHS's usage details according to
--      the binder's (new) shotness and join-point-hood
mkLoopBreakerNodes :: OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> UsageDetails
-> [NodeDetails]
-> WithUsageDetails [LoopBreakerNode]
mkLoopBreakerNodes !OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
body_uds [NodeDetails]
details_s
  = UsageDetails
-> [LoopBreakerNode] -> WithUsageDetails [LoopBreakerNode]
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_uds (String
-> (NodeDetails -> CoreBndr -> LoopBreakerNode)
-> [NodeDetails]
-> [CoreBndr]
-> [LoopBreakerNode]
forall a b c.
HasDebugCallStack =>
String -> (a -> b -> c) -> [a] -> [b] -> [c]
zipWithEqual String
"mkLoopBreakerNodes" NodeDetails -> CoreBndr -> LoopBreakerNode
mk_lb_node [NodeDetails]
details_s [CoreBndr]
bndrs')
  where
    WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_uds [CoreBndr]
bndrs' = TopLevelFlag
-> UsageDetails -> [NodeDetails] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBndr]
tagRecBinders TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
body_uds [NodeDetails]
details_s

    mk_lb_node :: NodeDetails -> CoreBndr -> LoopBreakerNode
mk_lb_node nd :: NodeDetails
nd@(ND { nd_bndr :: NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr = CoreBndr
old_bndr, nd_inl :: NodeDetails -> VarSet
nd_inl = VarSet
inl_fvs }) CoreBndr
new_bndr
      = DigraphNode { node_payload :: SimpleNodeDetails
node_payload      = SimpleNodeDetails
simple_nd
                    , node_key :: Unique
node_key          = CoreBndr -> Unique
varUnique CoreBndr
old_bndr
                    , node_dependencies :: [Unique]
node_dependencies = VarSet -> [Unique]
forall elt. UniqSet elt -> [Unique]
nonDetKeysUniqSet VarSet
lb_deps }
              -- It's OK to use nonDetKeysUniqSet here as
              -- stronglyConnCompFromEdgedVerticesR is still deterministic with edges
              -- in nondeterministic order as explained in
              -- Note [Deterministic SCC] in GHC.Data.Graph.Directed.
      where
        WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
_ CoreExpr
rhs = NodeDetails -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
nd_rhs NodeDetails
nd
        simple_nd :: SimpleNodeDetails
simple_nd = SND { snd_bndr :: CoreBndr
snd_bndr = CoreBndr
new_bndr, snd_rhs :: CoreExpr
snd_rhs = CoreExpr
rhs, snd_score :: NodeScore
snd_score = NodeScore
score }
        score :: NodeScore
score  = OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> VarSet -> NodeDetails -> NodeScore
nodeScore OccEnv
env CoreBndr
new_bndr VarSet
lb_deps NodeDetails
nd
        lb_deps :: VarSet
lb_deps = VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
extendFvs_ VarEnv VarSet
rule_fv_env VarSet
inl_fvs
        -- See Note [Loop breaker dependencies]

    rule_fv_env :: IdEnv IdSet
    -- Maps a variable f to the variables from this group
    --      reachable by a sequence of RULES starting with f
    -- Domain is *subset* of bound vars (others have no rule fvs)
    -- See Note [Finding rule RHS free vars]
    -- Why transClosureFV?  See Note [Loop breaker dependencies]
    rule_fv_env :: VarEnv VarSet
rule_fv_env = VarEnv VarSet -> VarEnv VarSet
transClosureFV (VarEnv VarSet -> VarEnv VarSet) -> VarEnv VarSet -> VarEnv VarSet
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$ [(CoreBndr, VarSet)] -> VarEnv VarSet
forall a. [(CoreBndr, a)] -> VarEnv a
mkVarEnv ([(CoreBndr, VarSet)] -> VarEnv VarSet)
-> [(CoreBndr, VarSet)] -> VarEnv VarSet
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
                  [ (CoreBndr
b, VarSet
rule_fvs)
                  | ND { nd_bndr :: NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr = CoreBndr
b, nd_active_rule_fvs :: NodeDetails -> VarSet
nd_active_rule_fvs = VarSet
rule_fvs } <- [NodeDetails]
details_s
                  , Bool -> Bool
not (VarSet -> Bool
isEmptyVarSet VarSet
rule_fvs) ]

{- Note [Loop breaker dependencies]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The loop breaker dependencies of x in a recursive
group { f1 = e1; ...; fn = en } are:

- The "inline free variables" of f: the fi free in
  f's stable unfolding and RHS; see Note [inl_fvs]

- Any fi reachable from those inline free variables by a sequence
  of RULE rewrites.  Remember, rule rewriting is not affected
  by fi being a loop breaker, so we have to take the transitive
  closure in case f is the only possible loop breaker in the loop.

  Hence rule_fv_env.  We need only account for /active/ rules.
-}

------------------------------------------
nodeScore :: OccEnv
          -> Id        -- Binder with new occ-info
          -> VarSet    -- Loop-breaker dependencies
          -> NodeDetails
          -> NodeScore
nodeScore :: OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> VarSet -> NodeDetails -> NodeScore
nodeScore !OccEnv
env CoreBndr
new_bndr VarSet
lb_deps
          (ND { nd_bndr :: NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr = CoreBndr
old_bndr, nd_rhs :: NodeDetails -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
nd_rhs = WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
_ CoreExpr
bind_rhs })

  | Bool -> Bool
not (CoreBndr -> Bool
isId CoreBndr
old_bndr)     -- A type or coercion variable is never a loop breaker
  = (JoinArity
100, JoinArity
0, Bool
False)

  | CoreBndr
old_bndr CoreBndr -> VarSet -> Bool
`elemVarSet` VarSet
lb_deps  -- Self-recursive things are great loop breakers
  = (JoinArity
0, JoinArity
0, Bool
True)                   -- See Note [Self-recursion and loop breakers]

  | Bool -> Bool
not (OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> Bool
occ_unf_act OccEnv
env CoreBndr
old_bndr) -- A binder whose inlining is inactive (e.g. has
  = (JoinArity
0, JoinArity
0, Bool
True)                   -- a NOINLINE pragma) makes a great loop breaker

  | CoreExpr -> Bool
exprIsTrivial CoreExpr
rhs
  = JoinArity -> NodeScore
mk_score JoinArity
10  -- Practically certain to be inlined
    -- Used to have also: && not (isExportedId bndr)
    -- But I found this sometimes cost an extra iteration when we have
    --      rec { d = (a,b); a = ...df...; b = ...df...; df = d }
    -- where df is the exported dictionary. Then df makes a really
    -- bad choice for loop breaker

  | DFunUnfolding { df_args :: Unfolding -> [CoreExpr]
df_args = [CoreExpr]
args } <- Unfolding
old_unf
    -- Never choose a DFun as a loop breaker
    -- Note [DFuns should not be loop breakers]
  = (JoinArity
9, [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
forall a. [a] -> JoinArity
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => t a -> JoinArity
length [CoreExpr]
args, Bool
is_lb)

    -- Data structures are more important than INLINE pragmas
    -- so that dictionary/method recursion unravels

  | CoreUnfolding { uf_guidance :: Unfolding -> UnfoldingGuidance
uf_guidance = UnfWhen {} } <- Unfolding
old_unf
  = JoinArity -> NodeScore
mk_score JoinArity
6

  | CoreExpr -> Bool
forall {b}. Expr b -> Bool
is_con_app CoreExpr
rhs   -- Data types help with cases:
  = JoinArity -> NodeScore
mk_score JoinArity
5       -- Note [Constructor applications]

  | Unfolding -> Bool
isStableUnfolding Unfolding
old_unf
  , Bool
can_unfold
  = JoinArity -> NodeScore
mk_score JoinArity
3

  | OccInfo -> Bool
isOneOcc (CoreBndr -> OccInfo
idOccInfo CoreBndr
new_bndr)
  = JoinArity -> NodeScore
mk_score JoinArity
2  -- Likely to be inlined

  | Bool
can_unfold  -- The Id has some kind of unfolding
  = JoinArity -> NodeScore
mk_score JoinArity
1

  | Bool
otherwise
  = (JoinArity
0, JoinArity
0, Bool
is_lb)

  where
    mk_score :: Int -> NodeScore
    mk_score :: JoinArity -> NodeScore
mk_score JoinArity
rank = (JoinArity
rank, JoinArity
rhs_size, Bool
is_lb)

    -- is_lb: see Note [Loop breakers, node scoring, and stability]
    is_lb :: Bool
is_lb = OccInfo -> Bool
isStrongLoopBreaker (CoreBndr -> OccInfo
idOccInfo CoreBndr
old_bndr)

    old_unf :: Unfolding
old_unf = IdUnfoldingFun
realIdUnfolding CoreBndr
old_bndr
    can_unfold :: Bool
can_unfold = Unfolding -> Bool
canUnfold Unfolding
old_unf
    rhs :: CoreExpr
rhs        = case Unfolding
old_unf of
                   CoreUnfolding { uf_src :: Unfolding -> UnfoldingSource
uf_src = UnfoldingSource
src, uf_tmpl :: Unfolding -> CoreExpr
uf_tmpl = CoreExpr
unf_rhs }
                     | UnfoldingSource -> Bool
isStableSource UnfoldingSource
src
                     -> CoreExpr
unf_rhs
                   Unfolding
_ -> CoreExpr
bind_rhs
       -- 'bind_rhs' is irrelevant for inlining things with a stable unfolding
    rhs_size :: JoinArity
rhs_size = case Unfolding
old_unf of
                 CoreUnfolding { uf_guidance :: Unfolding -> UnfoldingGuidance
uf_guidance = UnfoldingGuidance
guidance }
                    | UnfIfGoodArgs { ug_size :: UnfoldingGuidance -> JoinArity
ug_size = JoinArity
size } <- UnfoldingGuidance
guidance
                    -> JoinArity
size
                 Unfolding
_  -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
cheapExprSize CoreExpr
rhs


        -- Checking for a constructor application
        -- Cheap and cheerful; the simplifier moves casts out of the way
        -- The lambda case is important to spot x = /\a. C (f a)
        -- which comes up when C is a dictionary constructor and
        -- f is a default method.
        -- Example: the instance for Show (ST s a) in GHC.ST
        --
        -- However we *also* treat (\x. C p q) as a con-app-like thing,
        --      Note [Closure conversion]
    is_con_app :: Expr b -> Bool
is_con_app (Var CoreBndr
v)    = CoreBndr -> Bool
isConLikeId CoreBndr
v
    is_con_app (App Expr b
f Expr b
_)  = Expr b -> Bool
is_con_app Expr b
f
    is_con_app (Lam b
_ Expr b
e)  = Expr b -> Bool
is_con_app Expr b
e
    is_con_app (Tick CoreTickish
_ Expr b
e) = Expr b -> Bool
is_con_app Expr b
e
    is_con_app (Let Bind b
_ Expr b
e)  = Expr b -> Bool
is_con_app Expr b
e  -- let x = let y = blah in (a,b)
    is_con_app Expr b
_          = Bool
False         -- We will float the y out, so treat
                                          -- the x-binding as a con-app (#20941)

maxExprSize :: Int
maxExprSize :: JoinArity
maxExprSize = JoinArity
20  -- Rather arbitrary

cheapExprSize :: CoreExpr -> Int
-- Maxes out at maxExprSize
cheapExprSize :: CoreExpr -> JoinArity
cheapExprSize CoreExpr
e
  = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go JoinArity
0 CoreExpr
e
  where
    go :: JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e | JoinArity
n JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
>= JoinArity
maxExprSize = JoinArity
n
           | Bool
otherwise        = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e

    go1 :: JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n (Var {})        = JoinArity
nJoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
+JoinArity
1
    go1 JoinArity
n (Lit {})        = JoinArity
nJoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
+JoinArity
1
    go1 JoinArity
n (Type {})       = JoinArity
n
    go1 JoinArity
n (Coercion {})   = JoinArity
n
    go1 JoinArity
n (Tick CoreTickish
_ CoreExpr
e)      = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e
    go1 JoinArity
n (Cast CoreExpr
e CoercionR
_)      = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e
    go1 JoinArity
n (App CoreExpr
f CoreExpr
a)       = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go (JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n CoreExpr
f) CoreExpr
a
    go1 JoinArity
n (Lam CoreBndr
b CoreExpr
e)
      | CoreBndr -> Bool
isTyVar CoreBndr
b         = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e
      | Bool
otherwise         = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go (JoinArity
nJoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
+JoinArity
1) CoreExpr
e
    go1 JoinArity
n (Let CoreBind
b CoreExpr
e)       = JoinArity -> [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
gos (JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e) (CoreBind -> [CoreExpr]
forall b. Bind b -> [Expr b]
rhssOfBind CoreBind
b)
    go1 JoinArity
n (Case CoreExpr
e CoreBndr
_ Type
_ [Alt CoreBndr]
as) = JoinArity -> [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
gos (JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e) ([Alt CoreBndr] -> [CoreExpr]
forall b. [Alt b] -> [Expr b]
rhssOfAlts [Alt CoreBndr]
as)

    gos :: JoinArity -> [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
gos JoinArity
n [] = JoinArity
n
    gos JoinArity
n (CoreExpr
e:[CoreExpr]
es) | JoinArity
n JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
>= JoinArity
maxExprSize = JoinArity
n
                 | Bool
otherwise        = JoinArity -> [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
gos (JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
go1 JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e) [CoreExpr]
es

betterLB :: NodeScore -> NodeScore -> Bool
-- If  n1 `betterLB` n2  then choose n1 as the loop breaker
betterLB :: NodeScore -> NodeScore -> Bool
betterLB (JoinArity
rank1, JoinArity
size1, Bool
lb1) (JoinArity
rank2, JoinArity
size2, Bool
_)
  | JoinArity
rank1 JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
< JoinArity
rank2 = Bool
True
  | JoinArity
rank1 JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
> JoinArity
rank2 = Bool
False
  | JoinArity
size1 JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
< JoinArity
size2 = Bool
False   -- Make the bigger n2 into the loop breaker
  | JoinArity
size1 JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
> JoinArity
size2 = Bool
True
  | Bool
lb1           = Bool
True    -- Tie-break: if n1 was a loop breaker before, choose it
  | Bool
otherwise     = Bool
False   -- See Note [Loop breakers, node scoring, and stability]

{- Note [Self-recursion and loop breakers]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If we have
   rec { f = ...f...g...
       ; g = .....f...   }
then 'f' has to be a loop breaker anyway, so we may as well choose it
right away, so that g can inline freely.

This is really just a cheap hack. Consider
   rec { f = ...g...
       ; g = ..f..h...
      ;  h = ...f....}
Here f or g are better loop breakers than h; but we might accidentally
choose h.  Finding the minimal set of loop breakers is hard.

Note [Loop breakers, node scoring, and stability]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To choose a loop breaker, we give a NodeScore to each node in the SCC,
and pick the one with the best score (according to 'betterLB').

We need to be jolly careful (#12425, #12234) about the stability
of this choice. Suppose we have

    let rec { f = ...g...g...
            ; g = ...f...f... }
    in
    case x of
      True  -> ...f..
      False -> ..f...

In each iteration of the simplifier the occurrence analyser OccAnal
chooses a loop breaker. Suppose in iteration 1 it choose g as the loop
breaker. That means it is free to inline f.

Suppose that GHC decides to inline f in the branches of the case, but
(for some reason; eg it is not saturated) in the rhs of g. So we get

    let rec { f = ...g...g...
            ; g = ...f...f... }
    in
    case x of
      True  -> ...g...g.....
      False -> ..g..g....

Now suppose that, for some reason, in the next iteration the occurrence
analyser chooses f as the loop breaker, so it can freely inline g. And
again for some reason the simplifier inlines g at its calls in the case
branches, but not in the RHS of f. Then we get

    let rec { f = ...g...g...
            ; g = ...f...f... }
    in
    case x of
      True  -> ...(...f...f...)...(...f..f..).....
      False -> ..(...f...f...)...(..f..f...)....

You can see where this is going! Each iteration of the simplifier
doubles the number of calls to f or g. No wonder GHC is slow!

(In the particular example in comment:3 of #12425, f and g are the two
mutually recursive fmap instances for CondT and Result. They are both
marked INLINE which, oddly, is why they don't inline in each other's
RHS, because the call there is not saturated.)

The root cause is that we flip-flop on our choice of loop breaker. I
always thought it didn't matter, and indeed for any single iteration
to terminate, it doesn't matter. But when we iterate, it matters a
lot!!

So The Plan is this:
   If there is a tie, choose the node that
   was a loop breaker last time round

Hence the is_lb field of NodeScore
-}

{- *********************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                  Lambda groups
*                                                                      *
********************************************************************* -}

{- Note [Occurrence analysis for lambda binders]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For value lambdas we do a special hack.  Consider
     (\x. \y. ...x...)
If we did nothing, x is used inside the \y, so would be marked
as dangerous to dup.  But in the common case where the abstraction
is applied to two arguments this is over-pessimistic, which delays
inlining x, which forces more simplifier iterations.

So the occurrence analyser collaborates with the simplifier to treat
a /lambda-group/ specially.   A lambda-group is a contiguous run of
lambda and casts, e.g.
    Lam x (Lam y (Cast (Lam z body) co))

* Occurrence analyser: we just mark each binder in the lambda-group
  (here: x,y,z) with its occurrence info in the *body* of the
  lambda-group.  See occAnalLamTail.

* Simplifier.  The simplifier is careful when partially applying
  lambda-groups. See the call to zapLambdaBndrs in
     GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.simplExprF1
     GHC.Core.SimpleOpt.simple_app

* Why do we take care to account for intervening casts? Answer:
  currently we don't do eta-expansion and cast-swizzling in a stable
  unfolding (see Historical-note [Eta-expansion in stable unfoldings]).
  So we can get
    f = \x. ((\y. ...x...y...) |> co)
  Now, since the lambdas aren't together, the occurrence analyser will
  say that x is OnceInLam.  Now if we have a call
    (f e1 |> co) e2
  we'll end up with
    let x = e1 in ...x..e2...
  and it'll take an extra iteration of the Simplifier to substitute for x.

A thought: a lambda-group is pretty much what GHC.Core.Opt.Arity.manifestArity
recognises except that the latter looks through (some) ticks.  Maybe a lambda
group should also look through (some) ticks?
-}

isOneShotFun :: CoreExpr -> Bool
-- The top level lambdas, ignoring casts, of the expression
-- are all one-shot.  If there aren't any lambdas at all, this is True
isOneShotFun :: CoreExpr -> Bool
isOneShotFun (Lam CoreBndr
b CoreExpr
e)  = CoreBndr -> Bool
isOneShotBndr CoreBndr
b Bool -> Bool -> Bool
&& CoreExpr -> Bool
isOneShotFun CoreExpr
e
isOneShotFun (Cast CoreExpr
e CoercionR
_) = CoreExpr -> Bool
isOneShotFun CoreExpr
e
isOneShotFun CoreExpr
_          = Bool
True

zapLambdaBndrs :: CoreExpr -> FullArgCount -> CoreExpr
-- If (\xyz. t) appears under-applied to only two arguments,
-- we must zap the occ-info on x,y, because they appear under the \z
-- See Note [Occurrence analysis for lambda binders] in GHc.Core.Opt.OccurAnal
--
-- NB: `arg_count` includes both type and value args
zapLambdaBndrs :: CoreExpr -> JoinArity -> CoreExpr
zapLambdaBndrs CoreExpr
fun JoinArity
arg_count
  = -- If the lambda is fully applied, leave it alone; if not
    -- zap the OccInfo on the lambdas that do have arguments,
    -- so they beta-reduce to use-many Lets rather than used-once ones.
    JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> Maybe CoreExpr
zap JoinArity
arg_count CoreExpr
fun Maybe CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall a. Maybe a -> a -> a
`orElse` CoreExpr
fun
  where
    zap :: FullArgCount -> CoreExpr -> Maybe CoreExpr
    -- Nothing => No need to change the occ-info
    -- Just e  => Had to change
    zap :: JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> Maybe CoreExpr
zap JoinArity
0 CoreExpr
e | CoreExpr -> Bool
isOneShotFun CoreExpr
e = Maybe CoreExpr
forall a. Maybe a
Nothing  -- All remaining lambdas are one-shot
            | Bool
otherwise      = CoreExpr -> Maybe CoreExpr
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just CoreExpr
e   -- in which case no need to zap
    zap JoinArity
n (Cast CoreExpr
e CoercionR
co) = do { CoreExpr
e' <- JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> Maybe CoreExpr
zap JoinArity
n CoreExpr
e; CoreExpr -> Maybe CoreExpr
forall a. a -> Maybe a
forall (m :: * -> *) a. Monad m => a -> m a
return (CoreExpr -> CoercionR -> CoreExpr
forall b. Expr b -> CoercionR -> Expr b
Cast CoreExpr
e' CoercionR
co) }
    zap JoinArity
n (Lam CoreBndr
b CoreExpr
e)   = do { CoreExpr
e' <- JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> Maybe CoreExpr
zap (JoinArity
nJoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
-JoinArity
1) CoreExpr
e
                           ; CoreExpr -> Maybe CoreExpr
forall a. a -> Maybe a
forall (m :: * -> *) a. Monad m => a -> m a
return (CoreBndr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. b -> Expr b -> Expr b
Lam (CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
zap_bndr CoreBndr
b) CoreExpr
e') }
    zap JoinArity
_ CoreExpr
_           = Maybe CoreExpr
forall a. Maybe a
Nothing  -- More arguments than lambdas

    zap_bndr :: CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
zap_bndr CoreBndr
b | CoreBndr -> Bool
isTyVar CoreBndr
b = CoreBndr
b
               | Bool
otherwise = CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
zapLamIdInfo CoreBndr
b

occAnalLamTail :: OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
-- ^ See Note [Occurrence analysis for lambda binders].
-- It does the following:
--   * Sets one-shot info on the lambda binder from the OccEnv, and
--     removes that one-shot info from the OccEnv
--   * Sets the OccEnv to OccVanilla when going under a value lambda
--   * Tags each lambda with its occurrence information
--   * Walks through casts
--   * Package up the analysed lambda with its manifest join arity
--
-- This function does /not/ do
--   markAllInsideLam or
--   markAllNonTail
-- The caller does that, via adjustTailUsage (mostly calls go through
-- adjustNonRecRhs). Every call to occAnalLamTail must ultimately call
-- adjustTailUsage to discharge the assumed join arity.
--
-- In effect, the analysis result is for a non-recursive join point with
-- manifest arity and adjustTailUsage does the fixup.
-- See Note [Adjusting right-hand sides]
occAnalLamTail :: OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env (Lam CoreBndr
bndr CoreExpr
expr)
  | CoreBndr -> Bool
isTyVar CoreBndr
bndr
  , let env1 :: OccEnv
env1 = OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> OccEnv
addOneInScope OccEnv
env CoreBndr
bndr
  , WithTailUsageDetails (TUD JoinArity
ja UsageDetails
usage) CoreExpr
expr' <- OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env1 CoreExpr
expr
  = TailUsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails (JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD (JoinArity
jaJoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
+JoinArity
1) UsageDetails
usage) (CoreBndr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. b -> Expr b -> Expr b
Lam CoreBndr
bndr CoreExpr
expr')
       -- Important: Keep the 'env' unchanged so that with a RHS like
       --   \(@ x) -> K @x (f @x)
       -- we'll see that (K @x (f @x)) is in a OccRhs, and hence refrain
       -- from inlining f. See the beginning of Note [Cascading inlines].

  | Bool
otherwise  -- So 'bndr' is an Id
  = let ([OneShotInfo]
env_one_shots', CoreBndr
bndr1)
           = case OccEnv -> [OneShotInfo]
occ_one_shots OccEnv
env of
               []         -> ([],  CoreBndr
bndr)
               (OneShotInfo
os : [OneShotInfo]
oss) -> ([OneShotInfo]
oss, CoreBndr -> OneShotInfo -> CoreBndr
updOneShotInfo CoreBndr
bndr OneShotInfo
os)
               -- Use updOneShotInfo, not setOneShotInfo, as pre-existing
               -- one-shot info might be better than what we can infer, e.g.
               -- due to explicit use of the magic 'oneShot' function.
               -- See Note [The oneShot function]

        env1 :: OccEnv
env1 = OccEnv
env { occ_encl = OccVanilla, occ_one_shots = env_one_shots' }
        env2 :: OccEnv
env2 = OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> OccEnv
addOneInScope OccEnv
env1 CoreBndr
bndr
        WithTailUsageDetails (TUD JoinArity
ja UsageDetails
usage) CoreExpr
expr' = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env2 CoreExpr
expr
        (UsageDetails
usage', CoreBndr
bndr2) = UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> (UsageDetails, CoreBndr)
tagLamBinder UsageDetails
usage CoreBndr
bndr1
    in TailUsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails (JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD (JoinArity
jaJoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
+JoinArity
1) UsageDetails
usage') (CoreBndr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. b -> Expr b -> Expr b
Lam CoreBndr
bndr2 CoreExpr
expr')

-- For casts, keep going in the same lambda-group
-- See Note [Occurrence analysis for lambda binders]
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env (Cast CoreExpr
expr CoercionR
co)
  = let  WithTailUsageDetails (TUD JoinArity
ja UsageDetails
usage) CoreExpr
expr' = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env CoreExpr
expr
         -- usage1: see Note [Gather occurrences of coercion variables]
         usage1 :: UsageDetails
usage1 = UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs UsageDetails
usage (CoercionR -> VarSet
coVarsOfCo CoercionR
co)

         -- usage2: see Note [Occ-anal and cast worker/wrapper]
         usage2 :: UsageDetails
usage2 = case CoreExpr
expr of
                    Var {} | OccEnv -> Bool
isRhsEnv OccEnv
env -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllMany UsageDetails
usage1
                    CoreExpr
_ -> UsageDetails
usage1

         -- usage3: you might think this was not necessary, because of
         -- the markAllNonTail in adjustTailUsage; but not so!  For a
         -- join point, adjustTailUsage doesn't do this; yet if there is
         -- a cast, we must!  Also: why markAllNonTail?  See
         -- GHC.Core.Lint: Note Note [Join points and casts]
         usage3 :: UsageDetails
usage3 = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail UsageDetails
usage2

    in TailUsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails (JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
ja UsageDetails
usage3) (CoreExpr -> CoercionR -> CoreExpr
forall b. Expr b -> CoercionR -> Expr b
Cast CoreExpr
expr' CoercionR
co)

occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env CoreExpr
expr = case OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal OccEnv
env CoreExpr
expr of
  WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage CoreExpr
expr' -> TailUsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails (JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
0 UsageDetails
usage) CoreExpr
expr'

{- Note [Occ-anal and cast worker/wrapper]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider   y = e; x = y |> co
If we mark y as used-once, we'll inline y into x, and the Cast
worker/wrapper transform will float it straight back out again.  See
Note [Cast worker/wrapper] in GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.

So in this particular case we want to mark 'y' as Many.  It's very
ad-hoc, but it's also simple.  It's also what would happen if we gave
the binding for x a stable unfolding (as we usually do for wrappers, thus
      y = e
      {-# INLINE x #-}
      x = y |> co
Now y appears twice -- once in x's stable unfolding, and once in x's
RHS. So it'll get a Many occ-info.  (Maybe Cast w/w should create a stable
unfolding, which would obviate this Note; but that seems a bit of a
heavyweight solution.)

We only need to this in occAnalLamTail, not occAnal, because the top leve
of a right hand side is handled by occAnalLamTail.
-}


{- *********************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                   Right hand sides
*                                                                      *
********************************************************************* -}

occAnalUnfolding :: OccEnv
                 -> Unfolding
                 -> WithTailUsageDetails Unfolding
-- Occurrence-analyse a stable unfolding;
-- discard a non-stable one altogether and return empty usage details.
occAnalUnfolding :: OccEnv -> Unfolding -> WithTailUsageDetails Unfolding
occAnalUnfolding !OccEnv
env Unfolding
unf
  = case Unfolding
unf of
      unf :: Unfolding
unf@(CoreUnfolding { uf_tmpl :: Unfolding -> CoreExpr
uf_tmpl = CoreExpr
rhs, uf_src :: Unfolding -> UnfoldingSource
uf_src = UnfoldingSource
src })
        | UnfoldingSource -> Bool
isStableSource UnfoldingSource
src ->
            let
              WithTailUsageDetails (TUD JoinArity
rhs_ja UsageDetails
usage) CoreExpr
rhs' = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env CoreExpr
rhs

              unf' :: Unfolding
unf' | OccEnv -> Bool
noBinderSwaps OccEnv
env = Unfolding
unf -- Note [Unfoldings and rules]
                   | Bool
otherwise         = Unfolding
unf { uf_tmpl = rhs' }
            in TailUsageDetails -> Unfolding -> WithTailUsageDetails Unfolding
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails (JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
rhs_ja (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllMany UsageDetails
usage)) Unfolding
unf'
              -- markAllMany: see Note [Occurrences in stable unfoldings]
        | Bool
otherwise          -> TailUsageDetails -> Unfolding -> WithTailUsageDetails Unfolding
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails (JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
0 UsageDetails
emptyDetails) Unfolding
unf
              -- For non-Stable unfoldings we leave them undisturbed, but
              -- don't count their usage because the simplifier will discard them.
              -- We leave them undisturbed because nodeScore uses their size info
              -- to guide its decisions.  It's ok to leave un-substituted
              -- expressions in the tree because all the variables that were in
              -- scope remain in scope; there is no cloning etc.

      unf :: Unfolding
unf@(DFunUnfolding { df_bndrs :: Unfolding -> [CoreBndr]
df_bndrs = [CoreBndr]
bndrs, df_args :: Unfolding -> [CoreExpr]
df_args = [CoreExpr]
args })
        -> TailUsageDetails -> Unfolding -> WithTailUsageDetails Unfolding
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails (JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
0 UsageDetails
final_usage) (Unfolding
unf { df_args = args' })
        where
          env' :: OccEnv
env'            = OccEnv
env OccEnv -> [CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
`addInScope` [CoreBndr]
bndrs
          (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage [CoreExpr]
args') = OccEnv -> [CoreExpr] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreExpr]
occAnalList OccEnv
env' [CoreExpr]
args
          final_usage :: UsageDetails
final_usage     = UsageDetails
usage UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
`addLamCoVarOccs` [CoreBndr]
bndrs UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
`delDetailsList` [CoreBndr]
bndrs
              -- delDetailsList; no need to use tagLamBinders because we
              -- never inline DFuns so the occ-info on binders doesn't matter

      Unfolding
unf -> TailUsageDetails -> Unfolding -> WithTailUsageDetails Unfolding
forall a. TailUsageDetails -> a -> WithTailUsageDetails a
WithTailUsageDetails (JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
0 UsageDetails
emptyDetails) Unfolding
unf

occAnalRules :: OccEnv
             -> Id               -- Get rules from here
             -> [(CoreRule,      -- Each (non-built-in) rule
                  UsageDetails,  -- Usage details for LHS
                  TailUsageDetails)] -- Usage details for RHS
occAnalRules :: OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)]
occAnalRules !OccEnv
env CoreBndr
bndr
  = (CoreRule -> (CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails))
-> [CoreRule] -> [(CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map CoreRule -> (CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)
occ_anal_rule (CoreBndr -> [CoreRule]
idCoreRules CoreBndr
bndr)
  where
    occ_anal_rule :: CoreRule -> (CoreRule, UsageDetails, TailUsageDetails)
occ_anal_rule rule :: CoreRule
rule@(Rule { ru_bndrs :: CoreRule -> [CoreBndr]
ru_bndrs = [CoreBndr]
bndrs, ru_args :: CoreRule -> [CoreExpr]
ru_args = [CoreExpr]
args, ru_rhs :: CoreRule -> CoreExpr
ru_rhs = CoreExpr
rhs })
      = (CoreRule
rule', UsageDetails
lhs_uds', JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
rhs_ja UsageDetails
rhs_uds')
      where
        env' :: OccEnv
env' = OccEnv
env OccEnv -> [CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
`addInScope` [CoreBndr]
bndrs
        rule' :: CoreRule
rule' | OccEnv -> Bool
noBinderSwaps OccEnv
env = CoreRule
rule  -- Note [Unfoldings and rules]
              | Bool
otherwise         = CoreRule
rule { ru_args = args', ru_rhs = rhs' }

        (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
lhs_uds [CoreExpr]
args') = OccEnv -> [CoreExpr] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreExpr]
occAnalList OccEnv
env' [CoreExpr]
args
        lhs_uds' :: UsageDetails
lhs_uds'         = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllManyNonTail (UsageDetails
lhs_uds UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
`delDetailsList` [CoreBndr]
bndrs)
                           UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
`addLamCoVarOccs` [CoreBndr]
bndrs

        (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
rhs_uds CoreExpr
rhs') = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal OccEnv
env' CoreExpr
rhs
                            -- Note [Rules are extra RHSs]
                            -- Note [Rule dependency info]
        rhs_uds' :: UsageDetails
rhs_uds' = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllMany (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
                   UsageDetails
rhs_uds UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
`delDetailsList` [CoreBndr]
bndrs
        rhs_ja :: JoinArity
rhs_ja = [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
forall a. [a] -> JoinArity
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => t a -> JoinArity
length [CoreExpr]
args -- See Note [Join points and unfoldings/rules]

    occ_anal_rule CoreRule
other_rule = (CoreRule
other_rule, UsageDetails
emptyDetails, JoinArity -> UsageDetails -> TailUsageDetails
TUD JoinArity
0 UsageDetails
emptyDetails)

{- Note [Join point RHSs]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
   x = e
   join j = Just x

We want to inline x into j right away, so we don't want to give
the join point a RhsCtxt (#14137).  It's not a huge deal, because
the FloatIn pass knows to float into join point RHSs; and the simplifier
does not float things out of join point RHSs.  But it's a simple, cheap
thing to do.  See #14137.

Note [Occurrences in stable unfoldings]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
    f p = BIG
    {-# INLINE g #-}
    g y = not (f y)
where this is the /only/ occurrence of 'f'.  So 'g' will get a stable
unfolding.  Now suppose that g's RHS gets optimised (perhaps by a rule
or inlining f) so that it doesn't mention 'f' any more.  Now the last
remaining call to f is in g's Stable unfolding. But, even though there
is only one syntactic occurrence of f, we do /not/ want to do
preinlineUnconditionally here!

The INLINE pragma says "inline exactly this RHS"; perhaps the
programmer wants to expose that 'not', say. If we inline f that will make
the Stable unfoldign big, and that wasn't what the programmer wanted.

Another way to think about it: if we inlined g as-is into multiple
call sites, now there's be multiple calls to f.

Bottom line: treat all occurrences in a stable unfolding as "Many".
We still leave tail call information intact, though, as to not spoil
potential join points.

Note [Unfoldings and rules]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Generally unfoldings and rules are already occurrence-analysed, so we
don't want to reconstruct their trees; we just want to analyse them to
find how they use their free variables.

EXCEPT if there is a binder-swap going on, in which case we do want to
produce a new tree.

So we have a fast-path that keeps the old tree if the occ_bs_env is
empty.   This just saves a bit of allocation and reconstruction; not
a big deal.

This fast path exposes a tricky cornder, though (#22761). Supose we have
    Unfolding = \x. let y = foo in x+1
which includes a dead binding for `y`. In occAnalUnfolding we occ-anal
the unfolding and produce /no/ occurrences of `foo` (since `y` is
dead).  But if we discard the occ-analysed syntax tree (which we do on
our fast path), and use the old one, we still /have/ an occurrence of
`foo` -- and that can lead to out-of-scope variables (#22761).

Solution: always keep occ-analysed trees in unfoldings and rules, so they
have no dead code.  See Note [OccInfo in unfoldings and rules] in GHC.Core.

Note [Cascading inlines]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By default we use an rhsCtxt for the RHS of a binding.  This tells the
occ anal n that it's looking at an RHS, which has an effect in
occAnalApp.  In particular, for constructor applications, it makes
the arguments appear to have NoOccInfo, so that we don't inline into
them. Thus    x = f y
              k = Just x
we do not want to inline x.

But there's a problem.  Consider
     x1 = a0 : []
     x2 = a1 : x1
     x3 = a2 : x2
     g  = f x3
First time round, it looks as if x1 and x2 occur as an arg of a
let-bound constructor ==> give them a many-occurrence.
But then x3 is inlined (unconditionally as it happens) and
next time round, x2 will be, and the next time round x1 will be
Result: multiple simplifier iterations.  Sigh.

So, when analysing the RHS of x3 we notice that x3 will itself
definitely inline the next time round, and so we analyse x3's rhs in
an ordinary context, not rhsCtxt.  Hence the "certainly_inline" stuff.

Annoyingly, we have to approximate GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils.preInlineUnconditionally.
If (a) the RHS is expandable (see isExpandableApp in occAnalApp), and
   (b) certainly_inline says "yes" when preInlineUnconditionally says "no"
then the simplifier iterates indefinitely:
        x = f y
        k = Just x   -- We decide that k is 'certainly_inline'
        v = ...k...  -- but preInlineUnconditionally doesn't inline it
inline ==>
        k = Just (f y)
        v = ...k...
float ==>
        x1 = f y
        k = Just x1
        v = ...k...

This is worse than the slow cascade, so we only want to say "certainly_inline"
if it really is certain.  Look at the note with preInlineUnconditionally
for the various clauses.


************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                Expressions
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************
-}

occAnalList :: OccEnv -> [CoreExpr] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreExpr]
occAnalList :: OccEnv -> [CoreExpr] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreExpr]
occAnalList !OccEnv
_   []    = UsageDetails -> [CoreExpr] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreExpr]
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
emptyDetails []
occAnalList OccEnv
env (CoreExpr
e:[CoreExpr]
es) = let
                          (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
uds1 CoreExpr
e') = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal OccEnv
env CoreExpr
e
                          (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
uds2 [CoreExpr]
es') = OccEnv -> [CoreExpr] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreExpr]
occAnalList OccEnv
env [CoreExpr]
es
                         in UsageDetails -> [CoreExpr] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreExpr]
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails (UsageDetails
uds1 UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
uds2) (CoreExpr
e' CoreExpr -> [CoreExpr] -> [CoreExpr]
forall a. a -> [a] -> [a]
: [CoreExpr]
es')

occAnal :: OccEnv
        -> CoreExpr
        -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr       -- Gives info only about the "interesting" Ids

occAnal :: OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal !OccEnv
_   expr :: CoreExpr
expr@(Lit Literal
_)  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
emptyDetails CoreExpr
expr

occAnal OccEnv
env expr :: CoreExpr
expr@(Var CoreBndr
_) = OccEnv
-> (CoreExpr, [CoreExpr], [CoreTickish])
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalApp OccEnv
env (CoreExpr
expr, [], [])
    -- At one stage, I gathered the idRuleVars for the variable here too,
    -- which in a way is the right thing to do.
    -- But that went wrong right after specialisation, when
    -- the *occurrences* of the overloaded function didn't have any
    -- rules in them, so the *specialised* versions looked as if they
    -- weren't used at all.

occAnal OccEnv
_ expr :: CoreExpr
expr@(Type Type
ty)
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails (UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs UsageDetails
emptyDetails (Type -> VarSet
coVarsOfType Type
ty)) CoreExpr
expr
occAnal OccEnv
_ expr :: CoreExpr
expr@(Coercion CoercionR
co)
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails (UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs UsageDetails
emptyDetails (CoercionR -> VarSet
coVarsOfCo CoercionR
co)) CoreExpr
expr
        -- See Note [Gather occurrences of coercion variables]

{- Note [Gather occurrences of coercion variables]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We need to gather info about what coercion variables appear, for two reasons:

1. So that we can sort them into the right place when doing dependency analysis.

2. So that we know when they are surely dead.

It is useful to know when they a coercion variable is surely dead,
when we want to discard a case-expression, in GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.rebuildCase.
For example (#20143):

  case unsafeEqualityProof @blah of
     UnsafeRefl cv -> ...no use of cv...

Here we can discard the case, since unsafeEqualityProof always terminates.
But only if the coercion variable 'cv' is unused.

Another example from #15696: we had something like
  case eq_sel d of co -> ...(typeError @(...co...) "urk")...
Then 'd' was substituted by a dictionary, so the expression
simpified to
  case (Coercion <blah>) of cv -> ...(typeError @(...cv...) "urk")...

We can only  drop the case altogether if 'cv' is unused, which is not
the case here.

Conclusion: we need accurate dead-ness info for CoVars.
We gather CoVar occurrences from:

  * The (Type ty) and (Coercion co) cases of occAnal

  * The type 'ty' of a lambda-binder (\(x:ty). blah)
    See addLamCoVarOccs

But it is not necessary to gather CoVars from the types of other binders.

* For let-binders, if the type mentions a CoVar, so will the RHS (since
  it has the same type)

* For case-alt binders, if the type mentions a CoVar, so will the scrutinee
  (since it has the same type)
-}

occAnal OccEnv
env (Tick CoreTickish
tickish CoreExpr
body)
  | SourceNote{} <- CoreTickish
tickish
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage (CoreTickish -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. CoreTickish -> Expr b -> Expr b
Tick CoreTickish
tickish CoreExpr
body')
                  -- SourceNotes are best-effort; so we just proceed as usual.
                  -- If we drop a tick due to the issues described below it's
                  -- not the end of the world.

  | CoreTickish
tickish CoreTickish -> TickishScoping -> Bool
forall (pass :: TickishPass).
GenTickish pass -> TickishScoping -> Bool
`tickishScopesLike` TickishScoping
SoftScope
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail UsageDetails
usage) (CoreTickish -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. CoreTickish -> Expr b -> Expr b
Tick CoreTickish
tickish CoreExpr
body')

  | Breakpoint XBreakpoint 'TickishPassCore
_ JoinArity
_ [XTickishId 'TickishPassCore]
ids <- CoreTickish
tickish
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails (UsageDetails
usage_lam UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` (CoreBndr -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr CoreBndr -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
addManyOcc UsageDetails
emptyDetails [CoreBndr]
[XTickishId 'TickishPassCore]
ids) (CoreTickish -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. CoreTickish -> Expr b -> Expr b
Tick CoreTickish
tickish CoreExpr
body')
    -- never substitute for any of the Ids in a Breakpoint

  | Bool
otherwise
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage_lam (CoreTickish -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. CoreTickish -> Expr b -> Expr b
Tick CoreTickish
tickish CoreExpr
body')
  where
    (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage CoreExpr
body') = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal OccEnv
env CoreExpr
body
    -- for a non-soft tick scope, we can inline lambdas only
    usage_lam :: UsageDetails
usage_lam = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllInsideLam UsageDetails
usage)
                  -- TODO There may be ways to make ticks and join points play
                  -- nicer together, but right now there are problems:
                  --   let j x = ... in tick<t> (j 1)
                  -- Making j a join point may cause the simplifier to drop t
                  -- (if the tick is put into the continuation). So we don't
                  -- count j 1 as a tail call.
                  -- See #14242.

occAnal OccEnv
env (Cast CoreExpr
expr CoercionR
co)
  = let  (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage CoreExpr
expr') = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal OccEnv
env CoreExpr
expr
         usage1 :: UsageDetails
usage1 = UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs UsageDetails
usage (CoercionR -> VarSet
coVarsOfCo CoercionR
co)
             -- usage2: see Note [Gather occurrences of coercion variables]
         usage2 :: UsageDetails
usage2 = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail UsageDetails
usage1
             -- usage3: calls inside expr aren't tail calls any more
    in UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage2 (CoreExpr -> CoercionR -> CoreExpr
forall b. Expr b -> CoercionR -> Expr b
Cast CoreExpr
expr' CoercionR
co)

occAnal OccEnv
env app :: CoreExpr
app@(App CoreExpr
_ CoreExpr
_)
  = OccEnv
-> (CoreExpr, [CoreExpr], [CoreTickish])
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalApp OccEnv
env ((CoreTickish -> Bool)
-> CoreExpr -> (CoreExpr, [CoreExpr], [CoreTickish])
forall b.
(CoreTickish -> Bool)
-> Expr b -> (Expr b, [Expr b], [CoreTickish])
collectArgsTicks CoreTickish -> Bool
forall (pass :: TickishPass). GenTickish pass -> Bool
tickishFloatable CoreExpr
app)

occAnal OccEnv
env expr :: CoreExpr
expr@(Lam {})
  = Maybe JoinArity
-> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
adjustNonRecRhs Maybe JoinArity
forall a. Maybe a
Nothing (WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr)
-> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$ OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env CoreExpr
expr -- mb_join_arity == Nothing <=> markAllManyNonTail

occAnal OccEnv
env (Case CoreExpr
scrut CoreBndr
bndr Type
ty [Alt CoreBndr]
alts)
  = let
      (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
scrut_usage CoreExpr
scrut') = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal (OccEnv -> [Alt CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
scrutCtxt OccEnv
env [Alt CoreBndr]
alts) CoreExpr
scrut
      alt_env :: OccEnv
alt_env = CoreExpr -> CoreBndr -> OccEnv -> OccEnv
addBndrSwap CoreExpr
scrut' CoreBndr
bndr (OccEnv -> OccEnv) -> OccEnv -> OccEnv
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$ OccEnv
env { occ_encl = OccVanilla } OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> OccEnv
`addOneInScope` CoreBndr
bndr
      ([UsageDetails]
alts_usage_s, [Alt CoreBndr]
alts') = (Alt CoreBndr -> (UsageDetails, Alt CoreBndr))
-> [Alt CoreBndr] -> ([UsageDetails], [Alt CoreBndr])
forall a b c. (a -> (b, c)) -> [a] -> ([b], [c])
mapAndUnzip (OccEnv -> Alt CoreBndr -> (UsageDetails, Alt CoreBndr)
do_alt OccEnv
alt_env) [Alt CoreBndr]
alts
      alts_usage :: UsageDetails
alts_usage  = (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> [UsageDetails] -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
orUDs UsageDetails
emptyDetails [UsageDetails]
alts_usage_s
      (UsageDetails
alts_usage1, CoreBndr
tagged_bndr) = UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> (UsageDetails, CoreBndr)
tagLamBinder UsageDetails
alts_usage CoreBndr
bndr
      total_usage :: UsageDetails
total_usage = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail UsageDetails
scrut_usage UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
alts_usage1
                    -- Alts can have tail calls, but the scrutinee can't
    in UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
total_usage (CoreExpr -> CoreBndr -> Type -> [Alt CoreBndr] -> CoreExpr
forall b. Expr b -> b -> Type -> [Alt b] -> Expr b
Case CoreExpr
scrut' CoreBndr
tagged_bndr Type
ty [Alt CoreBndr]
alts')
  where
    do_alt :: OccEnv -> Alt CoreBndr -> (UsageDetails, Alt CoreBndr)
do_alt !OccEnv
env (Alt AltCon
con [CoreBndr]
bndrs CoreExpr
rhs)
      = let
          (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
rhs_usage1 CoreExpr
rhs1) = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal (OccEnv
env OccEnv -> [CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
`addInScope` [CoreBndr]
bndrs) CoreExpr
rhs
          (UsageDetails
alt_usg, [CoreBndr]
tagged_bndrs) = UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> (UsageDetails, [CoreBndr])
tagLamBinders UsageDetails
rhs_usage1 [CoreBndr]
bndrs
        in                          -- See Note [Binders in case alternatives]
        (UsageDetails
alt_usg, AltCon -> [CoreBndr] -> CoreExpr -> Alt CoreBndr
forall b. AltCon -> [b] -> Expr b -> Alt b
Alt AltCon
con [CoreBndr]
tagged_bndrs CoreExpr
rhs1)

occAnal OccEnv
env (Let CoreBind
bind CoreExpr
body)
  = let
      body_env :: OccEnv
body_env = OccEnv
env { occ_encl = OccVanilla } OccEnv -> [CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
`addInScope` CoreBind -> [CoreBndr]
forall b. Bind b -> [b]
bindersOf CoreBind
bind
      (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
body_usage  CoreExpr
body')  = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal OccEnv
body_env CoreExpr
body
      (WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_usage CoreProgram
binds') = OccEnv
-> TopLevelFlag
-> ImpRuleEdges
-> CoreBind
-> UsageDetails
-> WithUsageDetails CoreProgram
occAnalBind OccEnv
env TopLevelFlag
NotTopLevel
                                                    ImpRuleEdges
noImpRuleEdges CoreBind
bind UsageDetails
body_usage
    in UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
final_usage (CoreProgram -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. [Bind b] -> Expr b -> Expr b
mkLets CoreProgram
binds' CoreExpr
body')

occAnalArgs :: OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> [CoreExpr] -> [OneShots] -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
-- The `fun` argument is just an accumulating parameter,
-- the base for building the application we return
occAnalArgs :: OccEnv
-> CoreExpr
-> [CoreExpr]
-> [[OneShotInfo]]
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalArgs !OccEnv
env CoreExpr
fun [CoreExpr]
args ![[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots
  = UsageDetails
-> CoreExpr
-> [CoreExpr]
-> [[OneShotInfo]]
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
go UsageDetails
emptyDetails CoreExpr
fun [CoreExpr]
args [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots
  where
    go :: UsageDetails
-> CoreExpr
-> [CoreExpr]
-> [[OneShotInfo]]
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
go UsageDetails
uds CoreExpr
fun [] [[OneShotInfo]]
_ = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
uds CoreExpr
fun
    go UsageDetails
uds CoreExpr
fun (CoreExpr
arg:[CoreExpr]
args) [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots
      = UsageDetails
-> CoreExpr
-> [CoreExpr]
-> [[OneShotInfo]]
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
go (UsageDetails
uds UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
arg_uds) (CoreExpr
fun CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. Expr b -> Expr b -> Expr b
`App` CoreExpr
arg') [CoreExpr]
args [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots'
      where
        !(WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
arg_uds CoreExpr
arg') = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal OccEnv
arg_env CoreExpr
arg
        !(OccEnv
arg_env, [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots')
            | CoreExpr -> Bool
forall {b}. Expr b -> Bool
isTypeArg CoreExpr
arg = (OccEnv
env, [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots)
            | Bool
otherwise     = OccEnv -> [[OneShotInfo]] -> (OccEnv, [[OneShotInfo]])
valArgCtxt OccEnv
env [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots

{-
Applications are dealt with specially because we want
the "build hack" to work.

Note [Arguments of let-bound constructors]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
    f x = let y = expensive x in
          let z = (True,y) in
          (case z of {(p,q)->q}, case z of {(p,q)->q})
We feel free to duplicate the WHNF (True,y), but that means
that y may be duplicated thereby.

If we aren't careful we duplicate the (expensive x) call!
Constructors are rather like lambdas in this way.
-}

occAnalApp :: OccEnv
           -> (Expr CoreBndr, [Arg CoreBndr], [CoreTickish])
           -> WithUsageDetails (Expr CoreBndr)
-- Naked variables (not applied) end up here too
occAnalApp :: OccEnv
-> (CoreExpr, [CoreExpr], [CoreTickish])
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalApp !OccEnv
env (Var CoreBndr
fun, [CoreExpr]
args, [CoreTickish]
ticks)
  -- Account for join arity of runRW# continuation
  -- See Note [Simplification of runRW#]
  --
  -- NB: Do not be tempted to make the next (Var fun, args, tick)
  --     equation into an 'otherwise' clause for this equation
  --     The former has a bang-pattern to occ-anal the args, and
  --     we don't want to occ-anal them twice in the runRW# case!
  --     This caused #18296
  | CoreBndr
fun CoreBndr -> Unique -> Bool
forall a. Uniquable a => a -> Unique -> Bool
`hasKey` Unique
runRWKey
  , [CoreExpr
t1, CoreExpr
t2, CoreExpr
arg]  <- [CoreExpr]
args
  , WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage CoreExpr
arg' <- Maybe JoinArity
-> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
adjustNonRecRhs (JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just JoinArity
1) (WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr)
-> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$ OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalLamTail OccEnv
env CoreExpr
arg
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage ([CoreTickish] -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
mkTicks [CoreTickish]
ticks (CoreExpr -> CoreExpr) -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$ CoreExpr -> [CoreExpr] -> CoreExpr
forall b. Expr b -> [Expr b] -> Expr b
mkApps (CoreBndr -> CoreExpr
forall b. CoreBndr -> Expr b
Var CoreBndr
fun) [CoreExpr
t1, CoreExpr
t2, CoreExpr
arg'])

occAnalApp OccEnv
env (Var CoreBndr
fun_id, [CoreExpr]
args, [CoreTickish]
ticks)
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
all_uds ([CoreTickish] -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
mkTicks [CoreTickish]
ticks CoreExpr
app')
  where
    -- Lots of banged bindings: this is a very heavily bit of code,
    -- so it pays not to make lots of thunks here, all of which
    -- will ultimately be forced.
    !(CoreExpr
fun', CoreBndr
fun_id')  = OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> (CoreExpr, CoreBndr)
lookupBndrSwap OccEnv
env CoreBndr
fun_id
    !(WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
args_uds CoreExpr
app') = OccEnv
-> CoreExpr
-> [CoreExpr]
-> [[OneShotInfo]]
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalArgs OccEnv
env CoreExpr
fun' [CoreExpr]
args [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots

    fun_uds :: UsageDetails
fun_uds = CoreBndr -> InterestingCxt -> JoinArity -> UsageDetails
mkOneOcc CoreBndr
fun_id' InterestingCxt
int_cxt JoinArity
n_args
       -- NB: fun_uds is computed for fun_id', not fun_id
       -- See (BS1) in Note [The binder-swap substitution]

    all_uds :: UsageDetails
all_uds = UsageDetails
fun_uds UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
final_args_uds

    !final_args_uds :: UsageDetails
final_args_uds = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail                              (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
                      Bool -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllInsideLamIf (OccEnv -> Bool
isRhsEnv OccEnv
env Bool -> Bool -> Bool
&& Bool
is_exp) (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
                      UsageDetails
args_uds
       -- We mark the free vars of the argument of a constructor or PAP
       -- as "inside-lambda", if it is the RHS of a let(rec).
       -- This means that nothing gets inlined into a constructor or PAP
       -- argument position, which is what we want.  Typically those
       -- constructor arguments are just variables, or trivial expressions.
       -- We use inside-lam because it's like eta-expanding the PAP.
       --
       -- This is the *whole point* of the isRhsEnv predicate
       -- See Note [Arguments of let-bound constructors]

    !n_val_args :: JoinArity
n_val_args = [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
forall b. [Arg b] -> JoinArity
valArgCount [CoreExpr]
args
    !n_args :: JoinArity
n_args     = [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
forall a. [a] -> JoinArity
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => t a -> JoinArity
length [CoreExpr]
args
    !int_cxt :: InterestingCxt
int_cxt    = case OccEnv -> OccEncl
occ_encl OccEnv
env of
                   OccEncl
OccScrut -> InterestingCxt
IsInteresting
                   OccEncl
_other   | JoinArity
n_val_args JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
> JoinArity
0 -> InterestingCxt
IsInteresting
                            | Bool
otherwise      -> InterestingCxt
NotInteresting

    !is_exp :: Bool
is_exp     = CheapAppFun
isExpandableApp CoreBndr
fun_id JoinArity
n_val_args
        -- See Note [CONLIKE pragma] in GHC.Types.Basic
        -- The definition of is_exp should match that in GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.prepareRhs

    one_shots :: [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots  = DmdSig -> JoinArity -> [[OneShotInfo]]
argsOneShots (CoreBndr -> DmdSig
idDmdSig CoreBndr
fun_id) JoinArity
guaranteed_val_args
    guaranteed_val_args :: JoinArity
guaranteed_val_args = JoinArity
n_val_args JoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
+ [OneShotInfo] -> JoinArity
forall a. [a] -> JoinArity
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => t a -> JoinArity
length ((OneShotInfo -> Bool) -> [OneShotInfo] -> [OneShotInfo]
forall a. (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]
takeWhile OneShotInfo -> Bool
isOneShotInfo
                                                         (OccEnv -> [OneShotInfo]
occ_one_shots OccEnv
env))
        -- See Note [Sources of one-shot information], bullet point A']

occAnalApp OccEnv
env (CoreExpr
fun, [CoreExpr]
args, [CoreTickish]
ticks)
  = UsageDetails -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail (UsageDetails
fun_uds UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
`andUDs` UsageDetails
args_uds))
                     ([CoreTickish] -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
mkTicks [CoreTickish]
ticks CoreExpr
app')
  where
    !(WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
args_uds CoreExpr
app') = OccEnv
-> CoreExpr
-> [CoreExpr]
-> [[OneShotInfo]]
-> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnalArgs OccEnv
env CoreExpr
fun' [CoreExpr]
args []
    !(WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
fun_uds CoreExpr
fun')  = OccEnv -> CoreExpr -> WithUsageDetails CoreExpr
occAnal (OccEnv -> [CoreExpr] -> OccEnv
addAppCtxt OccEnv
env [CoreExpr]
args) CoreExpr
fun
        -- The addAppCtxt is a bit cunning.  One iteration of the simplifier
        -- often leaves behind beta redexs like
        --      (\x y -> e) a1 a2
        -- Here we would like to mark x,y as one-shot, and treat the whole
        -- thing much like a let.  We do this by pushing some OneShotLam items
        -- onto the context stack.

addAppCtxt :: OccEnv -> [Arg CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
addAppCtxt :: OccEnv -> [CoreExpr] -> OccEnv
addAppCtxt env :: OccEnv
env@(OccEnv { occ_one_shots :: OccEnv -> [OneShotInfo]
occ_one_shots = [OneShotInfo]
ctxt }) [CoreExpr]
args
  | JoinArity
n_val_args JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
> JoinArity
0
  = OccEnv
env { occ_one_shots = replicate n_val_args OneShotLam ++ ctxt
        , occ_encl      = OccVanilla }
          -- OccVanilla: the function part of the application
          -- is no longer on OccRhs or OccScrut
  | Bool
otherwise
  = OccEnv
env
  where
    n_val_args :: JoinArity
n_val_args = [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity
forall b. [Arg b] -> JoinArity
valArgCount [CoreExpr]
args


{-
Note [Sources of one-shot information]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The occurrence analyser obtains one-shot-lambda information from two sources:

A:  Saturated applications:  eg   f e1 .. en

    In general, given a call (f e1 .. en) we can propagate one-shot info from
    f's strictness signature into e1 .. en, but /only/ if n is enough to
    saturate the strictness signature. A strictness signature like

          f :: C(1,C(1,L))LS

    means that *if f is applied to three arguments* then it will guarantee to
    call its first argument at most once, and to call the result of that at
    most once. But if f has fewer than three arguments, all bets are off; e.g.

          map (f (\x y. expensive) e2) xs

    Here the \x y abstraction may be called many times (once for each element of
    xs) so we should not mark x and y as one-shot. But if it was

          map (f (\x y. expensive) 3 2) xs

    then the first argument of f will be called at most once.

    The one-shot info, derived from f's strictness signature, is
    computed by 'argsOneShots', called in occAnalApp.

A': Non-obviously saturated applications: eg    build (f (\x y -> expensive))
    where f is as above.

    In this case, f is only manifestly applied to one argument, so it does not
    look saturated. So by the previous point, we should not use its strictness
    signature to learn about the one-shotness of \x y. But in this case we can:
    build is fully applied, so we may use its strictness signature; and from
    that we learn that build calls its argument with two arguments *at most once*.

    So there is really only one call to f, and it will have three arguments. In
    that sense, f is saturated, and we may proceed as described above.

    Hence the computation of 'guaranteed_val_args' in occAnalApp, using
    '(occ_one_shots env)'.  See also #13227, comment:9

B:  Let-bindings:  eg   let f = \c. let ... in \n -> blah
                        in (build f, build f)

    Propagate one-shot info from the demand-info on 'f' to the
    lambdas in its RHS (which may not be syntactically at the top)

    This information must have come from a previous run of the demand
    analyser.

Previously, the demand analyser would *also* set the one-shot information, but
that code was buggy (see #11770), so doing it only in on place, namely here, is
saner.

Note [OneShots]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When analysing an expression, the occ_one_shots argument contains information
about how the function is being used. The length of the list indicates
how many arguments will eventually be passed to the analysed expression,
and the OneShotInfo indicates whether this application is once or multiple times.

Example:

 Context of f                occ_one_shots when analysing f

 f 1 2                       [OneShot, OneShot]
 map (f 1)                   [OneShot, NoOneShotInfo]
 build f                     [OneShot, OneShot]
 f 1 2 `seq` f 2 1           [NoOneShotInfo, OneShot]

Note [Binders in case alternatives]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
    case x of y { (a,b) -> f y }
We treat 'a', 'b' as dead, because they don't physically occur in the
case alternative.  (Indeed, a variable is dead iff it doesn't occur in
its scope in the output of OccAnal.)  It really helps to know when
binders are unused.  See esp the call to isDeadBinder in
Simplify.mkDupableAlt

In this example, though, the Simplifier will bring 'a' and 'b' back to
life, because it binds 'y' to (a,b) (imagine got inlined and
scrutinised y).
-}

{-
************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                    OccEnv
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************
-}

data OccEnv
  = OccEnv { OccEnv -> OccEncl
occ_encl       :: !OccEncl      -- Enclosing context information
           , OccEnv -> [OneShotInfo]
occ_one_shots  :: !OneShots     -- See Note [OneShots]
           , OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> Bool
occ_unf_act    :: Id -> Bool          -- Which Id unfoldings are active
           , OccEnv -> Activation -> Bool
occ_rule_act   :: Activation -> Bool  -- Which rules are active
             -- See Note [Finding rule RHS free vars]

           -- See Note [The binder-swap substitution]
           -- If  x :-> (y, co)  is in the env,
           -- then please replace x by (y |> mco)
           -- Invariant of course: idType x = exprType (y |> mco)
           , OccEnv -> IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
occ_bs_env  :: !(IdEnv (OutId, MCoercion))
                   -- Domain is Global and Local Ids
                   -- Range is just Local Ids
           , OccEnv -> VarSet
occ_bs_rng  :: !VarSet
                   -- Vars (TyVars and Ids) free in the range of occ_bs_env
    }


-----------------------------
-- OccEncl is used to control whether to inline into constructor arguments
-- For example:
--      x = (p,q)               -- Don't inline p or q
--      y = /\a -> (p a, q a)   -- Still don't inline p or q
--      z = f (p,q)             -- Do inline p,q; it may make a rule fire
-- So OccEncl tells enough about the context to know what to do when
-- we encounter a constructor application or PAP.
--
-- OccScrut is used to set the "interesting context" field of OncOcc

data OccEncl
  = OccRhs         -- RHS of let(rec), albeit perhaps inside a type lambda
                   -- Don't inline into constructor args here

  | OccScrut       -- Scrutintee of a case
                   -- Can inline into constructor args

  | OccVanilla     -- Argument of function, body of lambda, etc
                   -- Do inline into constructor args here

instance Outputable OccEncl where
  ppr :: OccEncl -> SDoc
ppr OccEncl
OccRhs     = String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"occRhs"
  ppr OccEncl
OccScrut   = String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"occScrut"
  ppr OccEncl
OccVanilla = String -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => String -> doc
text String
"occVanilla"

-- See Note [OneShots]
type OneShots = [OneShotInfo]

initOccEnv :: OccEnv
initOccEnv :: OccEnv
initOccEnv
  = OccEnv { occ_encl :: OccEncl
occ_encl      = OccEncl
OccVanilla
           , occ_one_shots :: [OneShotInfo]
occ_one_shots = []

                 -- To be conservative, we say that all
                 -- inlines and rules are active
           , occ_unf_act :: CoreBndr -> Bool
occ_unf_act   = \CoreBndr
_ -> Bool
True
           , occ_rule_act :: Activation -> Bool
occ_rule_act  = \Activation
_ -> Bool
True

           , occ_bs_env :: IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
occ_bs_env = IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv
           , occ_bs_rng :: VarSet
occ_bs_rng = VarSet
emptyVarSet }

noBinderSwaps :: OccEnv -> Bool
noBinderSwaps :: OccEnv -> Bool
noBinderSwaps (OccEnv { occ_bs_env :: OccEnv -> IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
occ_bs_env = IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
bs_env }) = IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion) -> Bool
forall a. VarEnv a -> Bool
isEmptyVarEnv IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
bs_env

scrutCtxt :: OccEnv -> [CoreAlt] -> OccEnv
scrutCtxt :: OccEnv -> [Alt CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
scrutCtxt !OccEnv
env [Alt CoreBndr]
alts
  | Bool
interesting_alts =  OccEnv
env { occ_encl = OccScrut,   occ_one_shots = [] }
  | Bool
otherwise        =  OccEnv
env { occ_encl = OccVanilla, occ_one_shots = [] }
  where
    interesting_alts :: Bool
interesting_alts = case [Alt CoreBndr]
alts of
                         []    -> Bool
False
                         [Alt CoreBndr
alt] -> Bool -> Bool
not (Alt CoreBndr -> Bool
forall b. Alt b -> Bool
isDefaultAlt Alt CoreBndr
alt)
                         [Alt CoreBndr]
_     -> Bool
True
     -- 'interesting_alts' is True if the case has at least one
     -- non-default alternative.  That in turn influences
     -- pre/postInlineUnconditionally.  Grep for "occ_int_cxt"!

rhsCtxt :: OccEnv -> OccEnv
rhsCtxt :: OccEnv -> OccEnv
rhsCtxt !OccEnv
env = OccEnv
env { occ_encl = OccRhs, occ_one_shots = [] }

valArgCtxt :: OccEnv -> [OneShots] -> (OccEnv, [OneShots])
valArgCtxt :: OccEnv -> [[OneShotInfo]] -> (OccEnv, [[OneShotInfo]])
valArgCtxt !OccEnv
env []
  = (OccEnv
env { occ_encl = OccVanilla, occ_one_shots = [] }, [])
valArgCtxt OccEnv
env ([OneShotInfo]
one_shots:[[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots_s)
  = (OccEnv
env { occ_encl = OccVanilla, occ_one_shots = one_shots }, [[OneShotInfo]]
one_shots_s)

isRhsEnv :: OccEnv -> Bool
isRhsEnv :: OccEnv -> Bool
isRhsEnv (OccEnv { occ_encl :: OccEnv -> OccEncl
occ_encl = OccEncl
cxt }) = case OccEncl
cxt of
                                          OccEncl
OccRhs -> Bool
True
                                          OccEncl
_      -> Bool
False

addOneInScope :: OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> OccEnv
-- Needed for all Vars not just Ids
-- See Note [The binder-swap substitution] (BS3)
addOneInScope :: OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> OccEnv
addOneInScope env :: OccEnv
env@(OccEnv { occ_bs_env :: OccEnv -> IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
occ_bs_env = IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
swap_env, occ_bs_rng :: OccEnv -> VarSet
occ_bs_rng = VarSet
rng_vars }) CoreBndr
bndr
  | CoreBndr
bndr CoreBndr -> VarSet -> Bool
`elemVarSet` VarSet
rng_vars = OccEnv
env { occ_bs_env = emptyVarEnv, occ_bs_rng = emptyVarSet }
  | Bool
otherwise                  = OccEnv
env { occ_bs_env = swap_env `delVarEnv` bndr }

addInScope :: OccEnv -> [Var] -> OccEnv
-- Needed for all Vars not just Ids
-- See Note [The binder-swap substitution] (BS3)
addInScope :: OccEnv -> [CoreBndr] -> OccEnv
addInScope env :: OccEnv
env@(OccEnv { occ_bs_env :: OccEnv -> IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
occ_bs_env = IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
swap_env, occ_bs_rng :: OccEnv -> VarSet
occ_bs_rng = VarSet
rng_vars }) [CoreBndr]
bndrs
  | (CoreBndr -> Bool) -> [CoreBndr] -> Bool
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => (a -> Bool) -> t a -> Bool
any (CoreBndr -> VarSet -> Bool
`elemVarSet` VarSet
rng_vars) [CoreBndr]
bndrs = OccEnv
env { occ_bs_env = emptyVarEnv, occ_bs_rng = emptyVarSet }
  | Bool
otherwise                         = OccEnv
env { occ_bs_env = swap_env `delVarEnvList` bndrs }


--------------------
transClosureFV :: VarEnv VarSet -> VarEnv VarSet
-- If (f,g), (g,h) are in the input, then (f,h) is in the output
--                                   as well as (f,g), (g,h)
transClosureFV :: VarEnv VarSet -> VarEnv VarSet
transClosureFV VarEnv VarSet
env
  | Bool
no_change = VarEnv VarSet
env
  | Bool
otherwise = VarEnv VarSet -> VarEnv VarSet
transClosureFV ([(Unique, VarSet)] -> VarEnv VarSet
forall elt key. [(Unique, elt)] -> UniqFM key elt
listToUFM_Directly [(Unique, VarSet)]
new_fv_list)
  where
    (Bool
no_change, [(Unique, VarSet)]
new_fv_list) = (Bool -> (Unique, VarSet) -> (Bool, (Unique, VarSet)))
-> Bool -> [(Unique, VarSet)] -> (Bool, [(Unique, VarSet)])
forall (t :: * -> *) s a b.
Traversable t =>
(s -> a -> (s, b)) -> s -> t a -> (s, t b)
mapAccumL Bool -> (Unique, VarSet) -> (Bool, (Unique, VarSet))
bump Bool
True (VarEnv VarSet -> [(Unique, VarSet)]
forall key elt. UniqFM key elt -> [(Unique, elt)]
nonDetUFMToList VarEnv VarSet
env)
      -- It's OK to use nonDetUFMToList here because we'll forget the
      -- ordering by creating a new set with listToUFM
    bump :: Bool -> (Unique, VarSet) -> (Bool, (Unique, VarSet))
bump Bool
no_change (Unique
b,VarSet
fvs)
      | Bool
no_change_here = (Bool
no_change, (Unique
b,VarSet
fvs))
      | Bool
otherwise      = (Bool
False,     (Unique
b,VarSet
new_fvs))
      where
        (VarSet
new_fvs, Bool
no_change_here) = VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet -> (VarSet, Bool)
extendFvs VarEnv VarSet
env VarSet
fvs

-------------
extendFvs_ :: VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
extendFvs_ :: VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
extendFvs_ VarEnv VarSet
env VarSet
s = (VarSet, Bool) -> VarSet
forall a b. (a, b) -> a
fst (VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet -> (VarSet, Bool)
extendFvs VarEnv VarSet
env VarSet
s)   -- Discard the Bool flag

extendFvs :: VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet -> (VarSet, Bool)
-- (extendFVs env s) returns
--     (s `union` env(s), env(s) `subset` s)
extendFvs :: VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet -> (VarSet, Bool)
extendFvs VarEnv VarSet
env VarSet
s
  | VarEnv VarSet -> Bool
forall key elt. UniqFM key elt -> Bool
isNullUFM VarEnv VarSet
env
  = (VarSet
s, Bool
True)
  | Bool
otherwise
  = (VarSet
s VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
`unionVarSet` VarSet
extras, VarSet
extras VarSet -> VarSet -> Bool
`subVarSet` VarSet
s)
  where
    extras :: VarSet    -- env(s)
    extras :: VarSet
extras = (VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet) -> VarSet -> VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet
forall elt a key. (elt -> a -> a) -> a -> UniqFM key elt -> a
nonDetStrictFoldUFM VarSet -> VarSet -> VarSet
unionVarSet VarSet
emptyVarSet (VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet) -> VarEnv VarSet -> VarSet
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
      -- It's OK to use nonDetStrictFoldUFM here because unionVarSet commutes
             (VarSet -> CoreBndr -> VarSet)
-> VarEnv VarSet -> VarEnv CoreBndr -> VarEnv VarSet
forall elt1 elt2 elt3 key.
(elt1 -> elt2 -> elt3)
-> UniqFM key elt1 -> UniqFM key elt2 -> UniqFM key elt3
intersectUFM_C (\VarSet
x CoreBndr
_ -> VarSet
x) VarEnv VarSet
env (VarSet -> VarEnv CoreBndr
forall a. UniqSet a -> UniqFM a a
getUniqSet VarSet
s)

{-
************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
                    Binder swap
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************

Note [Binder swap]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The "binder swap" transformation swaps occurrence of the
scrutinee of a case for occurrences of the case-binder:

 (1)  case x of b { pi -> ri }
         ==>
      case x of b { pi -> ri[b/x] }

 (2)  case (x |> co) of b { pi -> ri }
        ==>
      case (x |> co) of b { pi -> ri[b |> sym co/x] }

The substitution ri[b/x] etc is done by the occurrence analyser.
See Note [The binder-swap substitution].

There are two reasons for making this swap:

(A) It reduces the number of occurrences of the scrutinee, x.
    That in turn might reduce its occurrences to one, so we
    can inline it and save an allocation.  E.g.
      let x = factorial y in case x of b { I# v -> ...x... }
    If we replace 'x' by 'b' in the alternative we get
      let x = factorial y in case x of b { I# v -> ...b... }
    and now we can inline 'x', thus
      case (factorial y) of b { I# v -> ...b... }

(B) The case-binder b has unfolding information; in the
    example above we know that b = I# v. That in turn allows
    nested cases to simplify.  Consider
       case x of b { I# v ->
       ...(case x of b2 { I# v2 -> rhs })...
    If we replace 'x' by 'b' in the alternative we get
       case x of b { I# v ->
       ...(case b of b2 { I# v2 -> rhs })...
    and now it is trivial to simplify the inner case:
       case x of b { I# v ->
       ...(let b2 = b in rhs)...

    The same can happen even if the scrutinee is a variable
    with a cast: see Note [Case of cast]

The reason for doing these transformations /here in the occurrence
analyser/ is because it allows us to adjust the OccInfo for 'x' and
'b' as we go.

  * Suppose the only occurrences of 'x' are the scrutinee and in the
    ri; then this transformation makes it occur just once, and hence
    get inlined right away.

  * If instead the Simplifier replaces occurrences of x with
    occurrences of b, that will mess up b's occurrence info. That in
    turn might have consequences.

There is a danger though.  Consider
      let v = x +# y
      in case (f v) of w -> ...v...v...
And suppose that (f v) expands to just v.  Then we'd like to
use 'w' instead of 'v' in the alternative.  But it may be too
late; we may have substituted the (cheap) x+#y for v in the
same simplifier pass that reduced (f v) to v.

I think this is just too bad.  CSE will recover some of it.

Note [The binder-swap substitution]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The binder-swap is implemented by the occ_bs_env field of OccEnv.
There are two main pieces:

* Given    case x |> co of b { alts }
  we add [x :-> (b, sym co)] to the occ_bs_env environment; this is
  done by addBndrSwap.

* Then, at an occurrence of a variable, we look up in the occ_bs_env
  to perform the swap. This is done by lookupBndrSwap.

Some tricky corners:

(BS1) We do the substitution before gathering occurrence info. So in
      the above example, an occurrence of x turns into an occurrence
      of b, and that's what we gather in the UsageDetails.  It's as
      if the binder-swap occurred before occurrence analysis. See
      the computation of fun_uds in occAnalApp.

(BS2) When doing a lookup in occ_bs_env, we may need to iterate,
      as you can see implemented in lookupBndrSwap.  Why?
      Consider   case x of a { 1# -> e1; DEFAULT ->
                 case x of b { 2# -> e2; DEFAULT ->
                 case x of c { 3# -> e3; DEFAULT -> ..x..a..b.. }}}
      At the first case addBndrSwap will extend occ_bs_env with
          [x :-> a]
      At the second case we occ-anal the scrutinee 'x', which looks up
        'x in occ_bs_env, returning 'a', as it should.
      Then addBndrSwap will add [a :-> b] to occ_bs_env, yielding
         occ_bs_env = [x :-> a, a :-> b]
      At the third case we'll again look up 'x' which returns 'a'.
      But we don't want to stop the lookup there, else we'll end up with
                 case x of a { 1# -> e1; DEFAULT ->
                 case a of b { 2# -> e2; DEFAULT ->
                 case a of c { 3# -> e3; DEFAULT -> ..a..b..c.. }}}
      Instead, we want iterate the lookup in addBndrSwap, to give
                 case x of a { 1# -> e1; DEFAULT ->
                 case a of b { 2# -> e2; DEFAULT ->
                 case b of c { 3# -> e3; DEFAULT -> ..c..c..c.. }}}
      This makes a particular difference for case-merge, which works
      only if the scrutinee is the case-binder of the immediately enclosing
      case (Note [Merge Nested Cases] in GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils
      See #19581 for the bug report that showed this up.

(BS3) We need care when shadowing.  Suppose [x :-> b] is in occ_bs_env,
      and we encounter:
         (i) \x. blah
             Here we want to delete the x-binding from occ_bs_env

         (ii) \b. blah
              This is harder: we really want to delete all bindings that
              have 'b' free in the range.  That is a bit tiresome to implement,
              so we compromise.  We keep occ_bs_rng, which is the set of
              free vars of rng(occc_bs_env).  If a binder shadows any of these
              variables, we discard all of occ_bs_env.  Safe, if a bit
              brutal.  NB, however: the simplifer de-shadows the code, so the
              next time around this won't happen.

      These checks are implemented in addInScope.
      (i) is needed only for Ids, but (ii) is needed for tyvars too (#22623)
      because if occ_bs_env has [x :-> ...a...] where `a` is a tyvar, we
      must not replace `x` by `...a...` under /\a. ...x..., or similarly
      under a case pattern match that binds `a`.

      An alternative would be for the occurrence analyser to do cloning as
      it goes.  In principle it could do so, but it'd make it a bit more
      complicated and there is no great benefit. The simplifer uses
      cloning to get a no-shadowing situation, the care-when-shadowing
      behaviour above isn't needed for long.

(BS4) The domain of occ_bs_env can include GlobaIds.  Eg
         case M.foo of b { alts }
      We extend occ_bs_env with [M.foo :-> b].  That's fine.

(BS5) We have to apply the occ_bs_env substitution uniformly,
      including to (local) rules and unfoldings.

(BS6) We must be very careful with dictionaries.
      See Note [Care with binder-swap on dictionaries]

Note [Case of cast]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider        case (x `cast` co) of b { I# ->
                ... (case (x `cast` co) of {...}) ...
We'd like to eliminate the inner case.  That is the motivation for
equation (2) in Note [Binder swap].  When we get to the inner case, we
inline x, cancel the casts, and away we go.

Note [Care with binder-swap on dictionaries]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This Note explains why we need isDictId in scrutBinderSwap_maybe.
Consider this tricky example (#21229, #21470):

  class Sing (b :: Bool) where sing :: Bool
  instance Sing 'True  where sing = True
  instance Sing 'False where sing = False

  f :: forall a. Sing a => blah

  h = \ @(a :: Bool) ($dSing :: Sing a)
      let the_co =  Main.N:Sing[0] <a> :: Sing a ~R# Bool
      case ($dSing |> the_co) of wild
        True  -> f @'True (True |> sym the_co)
        False -> f @a     dSing

Now do a binder-swap on the case-expression:

  h = \ @(a :: Bool) ($dSing :: Sing a)
      let the_co =  Main.N:Sing[0] <a> :: Sing a ~R# Bool
      case ($dSing |> the_co) of wild
        True  -> f @'True (True |> sym the_co)
        False -> f @a     (wild |> sym the_co)

And now substitute `False` for `wild` (since wild=False in the False branch):

  h = \ @(a :: Bool) ($dSing :: Sing a)
      let the_co =  Main.N:Sing[0] <a> :: Sing a ~R# Bool
      case ($dSing |> the_co) of wild
        True  -> f @'True (True  |> sym the_co)
        False -> f @a     (False |> sym the_co)

And now we have a problem.  The specialiser will specialise (f @a d)a (for all
vtypes a and dictionaries d!!) with the dictionary (False |> sym the_co), using
Note [Specialising polymorphic dictionaries] in GHC.Core.Opt.Specialise.

The real problem is the binder-swap.  It swaps a dictionary variable $dSing
(of kind Constraint) for a term variable wild (of kind Type).  And that is
dangerous: a dictionary is a /singleton/ type whereas a general term variable is
not.  In this particular example, Bool is most certainly not a singleton type!

Conclusion:
  for a /dictionary variable/ do not perform
  the clever cast version of the binder-swap

Hence the subtle isDictId in scrutBinderSwap_maybe.

Note [Zap case binders in proxy bindings]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From the original
     case x of cb(dead) { p -> ...x... }
we will get
     case x of cb(live) { p -> ...cb... }

Core Lint never expects to find an *occurrence* of an Id marked
as Dead, so we must zap the OccInfo on cb before making the
binding x = cb.  See #5028.

NB: the OccInfo on /occurrences/ really doesn't matter much; the simplifier
doesn't use it. So this is only to satisfy the perhaps-over-picky Lint.

-}

addBndrSwap :: OutExpr -> Id -> OccEnv -> OccEnv
-- See Note [The binder-swap substitution]
addBndrSwap :: CoreExpr -> CoreBndr -> OccEnv -> OccEnv
addBndrSwap CoreExpr
scrut CoreBndr
case_bndr
            env :: OccEnv
env@(OccEnv { occ_bs_env :: OccEnv -> IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
occ_bs_env = IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
swap_env, occ_bs_rng :: OccEnv -> VarSet
occ_bs_rng = VarSet
rng_vars })
  | Just (CoreBndr
scrut_var, MCoercion
mco) <- CoreExpr -> Maybe (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
scrutBinderSwap_maybe CoreExpr
scrut
  , CoreBndr
scrut_var CoreBndr -> CoreBndr -> Bool
forall a. Eq a => a -> a -> Bool
/= CoreBndr
case_bndr
      -- Consider: case x of x { ... }
      -- Do not add [x :-> x] to occ_bs_env, else lookupBndrSwap will loop
  = OccEnv
env { occ_bs_env = extendVarEnv swap_env scrut_var (case_bndr', mco)
        , occ_bs_rng = rng_vars `extendVarSet` case_bndr'
                       `unionVarSet` tyCoVarsOfMCo mco }

  | Bool
otherwise
  = OccEnv
env
  where
    case_bndr' :: CoreBndr
case_bndr' = CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
zapIdOccInfo CoreBndr
case_bndr
                 -- See Note [Zap case binders in proxy bindings]

scrutBinderSwap_maybe :: OutExpr -> Maybe (OutVar, MCoercion)
-- If (scrutBinderSwap_maybe e = Just (v, mco), then
--    v = e |> mco
-- See Note [Case of cast]
-- See Note [Care with binder-swap on dictionaries]
--
-- We use this same function in SpecConstr, and Simplify.Iteration,
-- when something binder-swap-like is happening
scrutBinderSwap_maybe :: CoreExpr -> Maybe (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
scrutBinderSwap_maybe (Var CoreBndr
v)    = (CoreBndr, MCoercion) -> Maybe (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just (CoreBndr
v, MCoercion
MRefl)
scrutBinderSwap_maybe (Cast (Var CoreBndr
v) CoercionR
co)
  | Bool -> Bool
not (CoreBndr -> Bool
isDictId CoreBndr
v)             = (CoreBndr, MCoercion) -> Maybe (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just (CoreBndr
v, CoercionR -> MCoercion
MCo (CoercionR -> CoercionR
mkSymCo CoercionR
co))
        -- Cast: see Note [Case of cast]
        -- isDictId: see Note [Care with binder-swap on dictionaries]
        -- The isDictId rejects a Constraint/Constraint binder-swap, perhaps
        -- over-conservatively. But I have never seen one, so I'm leaving
        -- the code as simple as possible. Losing the binder-swap in a
        -- rare case probably has very low impact.
scrutBinderSwap_maybe (Tick CoreTickish
_ CoreExpr
e) = CoreExpr -> Maybe (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
scrutBinderSwap_maybe CoreExpr
e  -- Drop ticks
scrutBinderSwap_maybe CoreExpr
_          = Maybe (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
forall a. Maybe a
Nothing

lookupBndrSwap :: OccEnv -> Id -> (CoreExpr, Id)
-- See Note [The binder-swap substitution]
-- Returns an expression of the same type as Id
lookupBndrSwap :: OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> (CoreExpr, CoreBndr)
lookupBndrSwap env :: OccEnv
env@(OccEnv { occ_bs_env :: OccEnv -> IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
occ_bs_env = IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
bs_env })  CoreBndr
bndr
  = case IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
-> CoreBndr -> Maybe (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
forall a. VarEnv a -> CoreBndr -> Maybe a
lookupVarEnv IdEnv (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
bs_env CoreBndr
bndr of {
       Maybe (CoreBndr, MCoercion)
Nothing           -> (CoreBndr -> CoreExpr
forall b. CoreBndr -> Expr b
Var CoreBndr
bndr, CoreBndr
bndr) ;
       Just (CoreBndr
bndr1, MCoercion
mco) ->

    -- Why do we iterate here?
    -- See (BS2) in Note [The binder-swap substitution]
    case OccEnv -> CoreBndr -> (CoreExpr, CoreBndr)
lookupBndrSwap OccEnv
env CoreBndr
bndr1 of
      (CoreExpr
fun, CoreBndr
fun_id) -> (CoreExpr -> MCoercion -> CoreExpr
mkCastMCo CoreExpr
fun MCoercion
mco, CoreBndr
fun_id) }

{- Historical note [Proxy let-bindings]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We used to do the binder-swap transformation by introducing
a proxy let-binding, thus;

   case x of b { pi -> ri }
      ==>
   case x of b { pi -> let x = b in ri }

But that had two problems:

1. If 'x' is an imported GlobalId, we'd end up with a GlobalId
   on the LHS of a let-binding which isn't allowed.  We worked
   around this for a while by "localising" x, but it turned
   out to be very painful #16296,

2. In CorePrep we use the occurrence analyser to do dead-code
   elimination (see Note [Dead code in CorePrep]).  But that
   occasionally led to an unlifted let-binding
       case x of b { DEFAULT -> let x::Int# = b in ... }
   which disobeys one of CorePrep's output invariants (no unlifted
   let-bindings) -- see #5433.

Doing a substitution (via occ_bs_env) is much better.

Historical Note [no-case-of-case]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We *used* to suppress the binder-swap in case expressions when
-fno-case-of-case is on.  Old remarks:
    "This happens in the first simplifier pass,
    and enhances full laziness.  Here's the bad case:
            f = \ y -> ...(case x of I# v -> ...(case x of ...) ... )
    If we eliminate the inner case, we trap it inside the I# v -> arm,
    which might prevent some full laziness happening.  I've seen this
    in action in spectral/cichelli/Prog.hs:
             [(m,n) | m <- [1..max], n <- [1..max]]
    Hence the check for NoCaseOfCase."
However, now the full-laziness pass itself reverses the binder-swap, so this
check is no longer necessary.

Historical Note [Suppressing the case binder-swap]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This old note describes a problem that is also fixed by doing the
binder-swap in OccAnal:

    There is another situation when it might make sense to suppress the
    case-expression binde-swap. If we have

        case x of w1 { DEFAULT -> case x of w2 { A -> e1; B -> e2 }
                       ...other cases .... }

    We'll perform the binder-swap for the outer case, giving

        case x of w1 { DEFAULT -> case w1 of w2 { A -> e1; B -> e2 }
                       ...other cases .... }

    But there is no point in doing it for the inner case, because w1 can't
    be inlined anyway.  Furthermore, doing the case-swapping involves
    zapping w2's occurrence info (see paragraphs that follow), and that
    forces us to bind w2 when doing case merging.  So we get

        case x of w1 { A -> let w2 = w1 in e1
                       B -> let w2 = w1 in e2
                       ...other cases .... }

    This is plain silly in the common case where w2 is dead.

    Even so, I can't see a good way to implement this idea.  I tried
    not doing the binder-swap if the scrutinee was already evaluated
    but that failed big-time:

            data T = MkT !Int

            case v of w  { MkT x ->
            case x of x1 { I# y1 ->
            case x of x2 { I# y2 -> ...

    Notice that because MkT is strict, x is marked "evaluated".  But to
    eliminate the last case, we must either make sure that x (as well as
    x1) has unfolding MkT y1.  The straightforward thing to do is to do
    the binder-swap.  So this whole note is a no-op.

It's fixed by doing the binder-swap in OccAnal because we can do the
binder-swap unconditionally and still get occurrence analysis
information right.


************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
\subsection[OccurAnal-types]{OccEnv}
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************

Note [UsageDetails and zapping]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On many occasions, we must modify all gathered occurrence data at once. For
instance, all occurrences underneath a (non-one-shot) lambda set the
'occ_in_lam' flag to become 'True'. We could use 'mapVarEnv' to do this, but
that takes O(n) time and we will do this often---in particular, there are many
places where tail calls are not allowed, and each of these causes all variables
to get marked with 'NoTailCallInfo'.

Instead of relying on `mapVarEnv`, then, we carry three 'IdEnv's around along
with the 'OccInfoEnv'. Each of these extra environments is a "zapped set"
recording which variables have been zapped in some way. Zapping all occurrence
info then simply means setting the corresponding zapped set to the whole
'OccInfoEnv', a fast O(1) operation.
-}

type OccInfoEnv = IdEnv OccInfo -- A finite map from ids to their usage
                -- INVARIANT: never IAmDead
                -- (Deadness is signalled by not being in the map at all)

type ZappedSet = OccInfoEnv -- Values are ignored

data UsageDetails
  = UD { UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env       :: !OccInfoEnv
       , UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many    :: !ZappedSet   -- apply 'markMany' to these
       , UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam  :: !ZappedSet   -- apply 'markInsideLam' to these
       , UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail :: !ZappedSet } -- apply 'markNonTail' to these
  -- INVARIANT: All three zapped sets are subsets of the OccInfoEnv

instance Outputable UsageDetails where
  ppr :: UsageDetails -> SDoc
ppr UsageDetails
ud = OccInfoEnv -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
flattenUsageDetails UsageDetails
ud))

-- | Captures the result of applying 'occAnalLamTail' to a function `\xyz.body`.
-- The TailUsageDetails records
--   * the number of lambdas (including type lambdas: a JoinArity)
--   * UsageDetails for the `body`, unadjusted by `adjustTailUsage`.
--     If the binding turns out to be a join point with the indicated join
--     arity, this unadjusted usage details is just what we need; otherwise we
--     need to discard tail calls. That's what `adjustTailUsage` does.
data TailUsageDetails = TUD !JoinArity !UsageDetails

instance Outputable TailUsageDetails where
  ppr :: TailUsageDetails -> SDoc
ppr (TUD JoinArity
ja UsageDetails
uds) = SDoc
lambda SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<> JoinArity -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr JoinArity
ja SDoc -> SDoc -> SDoc
forall doc. IsLine doc => doc -> doc -> doc
<> UsageDetails -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr UsageDetails
uds


-------------------
-- UsageDetails API

andUDs, orUDs
        :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
andUDs :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
andUDs = (OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo)
-> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
combineUsageDetailsWith OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
addOccInfo
orUDs :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
orUDs  = (OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo)
-> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
combineUsageDetailsWith OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
orOccInfo

mkOneOcc :: Id -> InterestingCxt -> JoinArity -> UsageDetails
mkOneOcc :: CoreBndr -> InterestingCxt -> JoinArity -> UsageDetails
mkOneOcc CoreBndr
id InterestingCxt
int_cxt JoinArity
arity
  | CoreBndr -> Bool
isLocalId CoreBndr
id
  = UsageDetails
emptyDetails { ud_env = unitVarEnv id occ_info }
  | Bool
otherwise
  = UsageDetails
emptyDetails
  where
    occ_info :: OccInfo
occ_info = OneOcc { occ_in_lam :: InsideLam
occ_in_lam  = InsideLam
NotInsideLam
                      , occ_n_br :: JoinArity
occ_n_br    = JoinArity
oneBranch
                      , occ_int_cxt :: InterestingCxt
occ_int_cxt = InterestingCxt
int_cxt
                      , occ_tail :: TailCallInfo
occ_tail    = JoinArity -> TailCallInfo
AlwaysTailCalled JoinArity
arity }

addManyOccId :: UsageDetails -> Id -> UsageDetails
-- Add the non-committal (id :-> noOccInfo) to the usage details
addManyOccId :: UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> UsageDetails
addManyOccId UsageDetails
ud CoreBndr
id = UsageDetails
ud { ud_env = extendVarEnv (ud_env ud) id noOccInfo }

-- Add several occurrences, assumed not to be tail calls
addManyOcc :: Var -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
addManyOcc :: CoreBndr -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
addManyOcc CoreBndr
v UsageDetails
u | CoreBndr -> Bool
isId CoreBndr
v    = UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> UsageDetails
addManyOccId UsageDetails
u CoreBndr
v
               | Bool
otherwise = UsageDetails
u
        -- Give a non-committal binder info (i.e noOccInfo) because
        --   a) Many copies of the specialised thing can appear
        --   b) We don't want to substitute a BIG expression inside a RULE
        --      even if that's the only occurrence of the thing
        --      (Same goes for INLINE.)

addManyOccs :: UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs :: UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs UsageDetails
usage VarSet
id_set = (CoreBndr -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
forall elt a. (elt -> a -> a) -> a -> UniqSet elt -> a
nonDetStrictFoldUniqSet CoreBndr -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
addManyOcc UsageDetails
usage VarSet
id_set
  -- It's OK to use nonDetStrictFoldUniqSet here because addManyOcc commutes

addLamCoVarOccs :: UsageDetails -> [Var] -> UsageDetails
-- Add any CoVars free in the type of a lambda-binder
-- See Note [Gather occurrences of coercion variables]
addLamCoVarOccs :: UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
addLamCoVarOccs UsageDetails
uds [CoreBndr]
bndrs
  = UsageDetails
uds UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
`addManyOccs` [Type] -> VarSet
coVarsOfTypes ((CoreBndr -> Type) -> [CoreBndr] -> [Type]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map CoreBndr -> Type
varType [CoreBndr]
bndrs)

delDetails :: UsageDetails -> Id -> UsageDetails
delDetails :: UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> UsageDetails
delDetails UsageDetails
ud CoreBndr
bndr
  = UsageDetails
ud UsageDetails -> (OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv) -> UsageDetails
`alterUsageDetails` (OccInfoEnv -> CoreBndr -> OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a -> CoreBndr -> VarEnv a
`delVarEnv` CoreBndr
bndr)

delDetailsList :: UsageDetails -> [Id] -> UsageDetails
delDetailsList :: UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
delDetailsList UsageDetails
ud [CoreBndr]
bndrs
  = UsageDetails
ud UsageDetails -> (OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv) -> UsageDetails
`alterUsageDetails` (OccInfoEnv -> [CoreBndr] -> OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a -> [CoreBndr] -> VarEnv a
`delVarEnvList` [CoreBndr]
bndrs)

emptyDetails :: UsageDetails
emptyDetails :: UsageDetails
emptyDetails = UD { ud_env :: OccInfoEnv
ud_env       = OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv
                  , ud_z_many :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many    = OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv
                  , ud_z_in_lam :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam  = OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv
                  , ud_z_no_tail :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail = OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv }

isEmptyDetails :: UsageDetails -> Bool
isEmptyDetails :: UsageDetails -> Bool
isEmptyDetails = OccInfoEnv -> Bool
forall a. VarEnv a -> Bool
isEmptyVarEnv (OccInfoEnv -> Bool)
-> (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv) -> UsageDetails -> Bool
forall b c a. (b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> a -> c
. UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env

markAllMany, markAllInsideLam, markAllNonTail, markAllManyNonTail
  :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllMany :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllMany          UsageDetails
ud = UsageDetails
ud { ud_z_many    = ud_env ud }
markAllInsideLam :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllInsideLam     UsageDetails
ud = UsageDetails
ud { ud_z_in_lam  = ud_env ud }
markAllNonTail :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail UsageDetails
ud = UsageDetails
ud { ud_z_no_tail = ud_env ud }

markAllInsideLamIf, markAllNonTailIf :: Bool -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails

markAllInsideLamIf :: Bool -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllInsideLamIf  Bool
True  UsageDetails
ud = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllInsideLam UsageDetails
ud
markAllInsideLamIf  Bool
False UsageDetails
ud = UsageDetails
ud

markAllNonTailIf :: Bool -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTailIf Bool
True  UsageDetails
ud = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail UsageDetails
ud
markAllNonTailIf Bool
False UsageDetails
ud = UsageDetails
ud


markAllManyNonTail :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllManyNonTail = UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllMany (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
forall b c a. (b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> a -> c
. UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTail -- effectively sets to noOccInfo

lookupDetails :: UsageDetails -> Id -> OccInfo
lookupDetails :: UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> OccInfo
lookupDetails UsageDetails
ud CoreBndr
id
  = case OccInfoEnv -> CoreBndr -> Maybe OccInfo
forall a. VarEnv a -> CoreBndr -> Maybe a
lookupVarEnv (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env UsageDetails
ud) CoreBndr
id of
      Just OccInfo
occ -> UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
doZapping UsageDetails
ud CoreBndr
id OccInfo
occ
      Maybe OccInfo
Nothing  -> OccInfo
IAmDead

usedIn :: Id -> UsageDetails -> Bool
CoreBndr
v usedIn :: CoreBndr -> UsageDetails -> Bool
`usedIn` UsageDetails
ud = CoreBndr -> Bool
isExportedId CoreBndr
v Bool -> Bool -> Bool
|| CoreBndr
v CoreBndr -> OccInfoEnv -> Bool
forall a. CoreBndr -> VarEnv a -> Bool
`elemVarEnv` UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env UsageDetails
ud

udFreeVars :: VarSet -> UsageDetails -> VarSet
-- Find the subset of bndrs that are mentioned in uds
udFreeVars :: VarSet -> UsageDetails -> VarSet
udFreeVars VarSet
bndrs UsageDetails
ud = VarSet -> OccInfoEnv -> VarSet
restrictFreeVars VarSet
bndrs (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env UsageDetails
ud)

restrictFreeVars :: VarSet -> OccInfoEnv -> VarSet
restrictFreeVars :: VarSet -> OccInfoEnv -> VarSet
restrictFreeVars VarSet
bndrs OccInfoEnv
fvs = VarSet -> OccInfoEnv -> VarSet
forall key b. UniqSet key -> UniqFM key b -> UniqSet key
restrictUniqSetToUFM VarSet
bndrs OccInfoEnv
fvs

-------------------
-- Auxiliary functions for UsageDetails implementation

combineUsageDetailsWith :: (OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo)
                        -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
combineUsageDetailsWith :: (OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo)
-> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
combineUsageDetailsWith OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
plus_occ_info UsageDetails
ud1 UsageDetails
ud2
  | UsageDetails -> Bool
isEmptyDetails UsageDetails
ud1 = UsageDetails
ud2
  | UsageDetails -> Bool
isEmptyDetails UsageDetails
ud2 = UsageDetails
ud1
  | Bool
otherwise
  = UD { ud_env :: OccInfoEnv
ud_env       = (OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo)
-> OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
forall a. (a -> a -> a) -> VarEnv a -> VarEnv a -> VarEnv a
plusVarEnv_C OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
plus_occ_info (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env UsageDetails
ud1) (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env UsageDetails
ud2)
       , ud_z_many :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many    = OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a -> VarEnv a -> VarEnv a
plusVarEnv (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many    UsageDetails
ud1) (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many    UsageDetails
ud2)
       , ud_z_in_lam :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam  = OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a -> VarEnv a -> VarEnv a
plusVarEnv (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam  UsageDetails
ud1) (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam  UsageDetails
ud2)
       , ud_z_no_tail :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail = OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a -> VarEnv a -> VarEnv a
plusVarEnv (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail UsageDetails
ud1) (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail UsageDetails
ud2) }

doZapping :: UsageDetails -> Var -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
doZapping :: UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
doZapping UsageDetails
ud CoreBndr
var OccInfo
occ
  = UsageDetails -> Unique -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
doZappingByUnique UsageDetails
ud (CoreBndr -> Unique
varUnique CoreBndr
var) OccInfo
occ

doZappingByUnique :: UsageDetails -> Unique -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
doZappingByUnique :: UsageDetails -> Unique -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
doZappingByUnique (UD { ud_z_many :: UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many = OccInfoEnv
many
                      , ud_z_in_lam :: UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam = OccInfoEnv
in_lam
                      , ud_z_no_tail :: UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail = OccInfoEnv
no_tail })
                  Unique
uniq OccInfo
occ
  = OccInfo
occ2
  where
    occ1 :: OccInfo
occ1 | Unique
uniq Unique -> OccInfoEnv -> Bool
forall a. Unique -> VarEnv a -> Bool
`elemVarEnvByKey` OccInfoEnv
many    = OccInfo -> OccInfo
markMany OccInfo
occ
         | Unique
uniq Unique -> OccInfoEnv -> Bool
forall a. Unique -> VarEnv a -> Bool
`elemVarEnvByKey` OccInfoEnv
in_lam  = OccInfo -> OccInfo
markInsideLam OccInfo
occ
         | Bool
otherwise                      = OccInfo
occ
    occ2 :: OccInfo
occ2 | Unique
uniq Unique -> OccInfoEnv -> Bool
forall a. Unique -> VarEnv a -> Bool
`elemVarEnvByKey` OccInfoEnv
no_tail = OccInfo -> OccInfo
markNonTail OccInfo
occ1
         | Bool
otherwise                      = OccInfo
occ1

alterUsageDetails :: UsageDetails -> (OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv) -> UsageDetails
alterUsageDetails :: UsageDetails -> (OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv) -> UsageDetails
alterUsageDetails !UsageDetails
ud OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
f
  = UD { ud_env :: OccInfoEnv
ud_env       = OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
f (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env       UsageDetails
ud)
       , ud_z_many :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many    = OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
f (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many    UsageDetails
ud)
       , ud_z_in_lam :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam  = OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
f (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam  UsageDetails
ud)
       , ud_z_no_tail :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail = OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
f (UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail UsageDetails
ud) }

flattenUsageDetails :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
flattenUsageDetails :: UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
flattenUsageDetails ud :: UsageDetails
ud@(UD { ud_env :: UsageDetails -> OccInfoEnv
ud_env = OccInfoEnv
env })
  = UD { ud_env :: OccInfoEnv
ud_env       = (Unique -> OccInfo -> OccInfo) -> OccInfoEnv -> OccInfoEnv
forall elt1 elt2 key.
(Unique -> elt1 -> elt2) -> UniqFM key elt1 -> UniqFM key elt2
mapUFM_Directly (UsageDetails -> Unique -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
doZappingByUnique UsageDetails
ud) OccInfoEnv
env
       , ud_z_many :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_many    = OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv
       , ud_z_in_lam :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_in_lam  = OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv
       , ud_z_no_tail :: OccInfoEnv
ud_z_no_tail = OccInfoEnv
forall a. VarEnv a
emptyVarEnv }

-------------------
-- See Note [Adjusting right-hand sides]
adjustTailUsage :: Maybe JoinArity
               -> CoreExpr           -- Rhs, AFTER occAnalLamTail
               -> TailUsageDetails   -- From body of lambda
               -> UsageDetails
adjustTailUsage :: Maybe JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailUsage Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity CoreExpr
rhs (TUD JoinArity
rhs_ja UsageDetails
usage)
  = -- c.f. occAnal (Lam {})
    Bool -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllInsideLamIf (Bool -> Bool
not Bool
one_shot) (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
    Bool -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTailIf (Bool -> Bool
not Bool
exact_join) (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails) -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
    UsageDetails
usage
  where
    one_shot :: Bool
one_shot   = CoreExpr -> Bool
isOneShotFun CoreExpr
rhs
    exact_join :: Bool
exact_join = Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity Maybe JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Eq a => a -> a -> Bool
== JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just JoinArity
rhs_ja

adjustTailArity :: Maybe JoinArity -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailArity :: Maybe JoinArity -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailArity Maybe JoinArity
mb_rhs_ja (TUD JoinArity
ud_ja UsageDetails
usage) =
  Bool -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
markAllNonTailIf (Maybe JoinArity
mb_rhs_ja Maybe JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Eq a => a -> a -> Bool
/= JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just JoinArity
ud_ja) UsageDetails
usage

markNonRecJoinOneShots :: JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
-- For a /non-recursive/ join point we can mark all
-- its join-lambda as one-shot; and it's a good idea to do so
markNonRecJoinOneShots :: JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
markNonRecJoinOneShots JoinArity
join_arity CoreExpr
rhs
  = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall {t}. (Eq t, Num t) => t -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
go JoinArity
join_arity CoreExpr
rhs
  where
    go :: t -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
go t
0 CoreExpr
rhs         = CoreExpr
rhs
    go t
n (Lam CoreBndr
b CoreExpr
rhs) = CoreBndr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
forall b. b -> Expr b -> Expr b
Lam (if CoreBndr -> Bool
isId CoreBndr
b then CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
setOneShotLambda CoreBndr
b else CoreBndr
b)
                           (t -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
go (t
nt -> t -> t
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
-t
1) CoreExpr
rhs)
    go t
_ CoreExpr
rhs         = CoreExpr
rhs  -- Not enough lambdas.  This can legitimately happen.
                            -- e.g.    let j = case ... in j True
                            -- This will become an arity-1 join point after the
                            -- simplifier has eta-expanded it; but it may not have
                            -- enough lambdas /yet/. (Lint checks that JoinIds do
                            -- have enough lambdas.)

markNonRecUnfoldingOneShots :: Maybe JoinArity -> Unfolding -> Unfolding
-- ^ Apply 'markNonRecJoinOneShots' to a stable unfolding
markNonRecUnfoldingOneShots :: Maybe JoinArity -> Unfolding -> Unfolding
markNonRecUnfoldingOneShots Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity Unfolding
unf
  | Just JoinArity
ja <- Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity
  , CoreUnfolding{uf_src :: Unfolding -> UnfoldingSource
uf_src=UnfoldingSource
src,uf_tmpl :: Unfolding -> CoreExpr
uf_tmpl=CoreExpr
tmpl} <- Unfolding
unf
  , UnfoldingSource -> Bool
isStableSource UnfoldingSource
src
  , let !tmpl' :: CoreExpr
tmpl' = JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr
markNonRecJoinOneShots JoinArity
ja CoreExpr
tmpl
  = Unfolding
unf{uf_tmpl=tmpl'}
  | Bool
otherwise
  = Unfolding
unf

type IdWithOccInfo = Id

tagLamBinders :: UsageDetails          -- Of scope
              -> [Id]                  -- Binders
              -> (UsageDetails,        -- Details with binders removed
                 [IdWithOccInfo])    -- Tagged binders
tagLamBinders :: UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> (UsageDetails, [CoreBndr])
tagLamBinders UsageDetails
usage [CoreBndr]
binders
  = UsageDetails
usage' UsageDetails
-> (UsageDetails, [CoreBndr]) -> (UsageDetails, [CoreBndr])
forall a b. a -> b -> b
`seq` (UsageDetails
usage', [CoreBndr]
bndrs')
  where
    (UsageDetails
usage', [CoreBndr]
bndrs') = (UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> (UsageDetails, CoreBndr))
-> UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> (UsageDetails, [CoreBndr])
forall (t :: * -> *) s a b.
Traversable t =>
(s -> a -> (s, b)) -> s -> t a -> (s, t b)
mapAccumR UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> (UsageDetails, CoreBndr)
tagLamBinder UsageDetails
usage [CoreBndr]
binders

tagLamBinder :: UsageDetails       -- Of scope
             -> Id                 -- Binder
             -> (UsageDetails,     -- Details with binder removed
                 IdWithOccInfo)    -- Tagged binders
-- Used for lambda and case binders
-- It copes with the fact that lambda bindings can have a
-- stable unfolding, used for join points
tagLamBinder :: UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> (UsageDetails, CoreBndr)
tagLamBinder UsageDetails
usage CoreBndr
bndr
  = (UsageDetails
usage2, CoreBndr
bndr')
  where
        occ :: OccInfo
occ    = UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> OccInfo
lookupDetails UsageDetails
usage CoreBndr
bndr
        bndr' :: CoreBndr
bndr'  = OccInfo -> CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
setBinderOcc (OccInfo -> OccInfo
markNonTail OccInfo
occ) CoreBndr
bndr
                   -- Don't try to make an argument into a join point
        usage1 :: UsageDetails
usage1 = UsageDetails
usage UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> UsageDetails
`delDetails` CoreBndr
bndr
        usage2 :: UsageDetails
usage2 | CoreBndr -> Bool
isId CoreBndr
bndr = UsageDetails -> VarSet -> UsageDetails
addManyOccs UsageDetails
usage1 (CoreBndr -> VarSet
idUnfoldingVars CoreBndr
bndr)
                               -- This is effectively the RHS of a
                               -- non-join-point binding, so it's okay to use
                               -- addManyOccsSet, which assumes no tail calls
               | Bool
otherwise = UsageDetails
usage1

tagNonRecBinder :: TopLevelFlag           -- At top level?
                -> UsageDetails           -- Of scope
                -> CoreBndr               -- Binder
                -> WithUsageDetails       -- Details with binder removed
                    IdWithOccInfo         -- Tagged binder

tagNonRecBinder :: TopLevelFlag
-> UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> WithUsageDetails CoreBndr
tagNonRecBinder TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
usage CoreBndr
binder
 = let
     occ :: OccInfo
occ     = UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> OccInfo
lookupDetails UsageDetails
usage CoreBndr
binder
     will_be_join :: Bool
will_be_join = TopLevelFlag -> UsageDetails -> NonEmpty CoreBndr -> Bool
decideJoinPointHood TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
usage (CoreBndr -> NonEmpty CoreBndr
forall a. a -> NonEmpty a
NE.singleton CoreBndr
binder)
     occ' :: OccInfo
occ'    | Bool
will_be_join = -- must already be marked AlwaysTailCalled
                              Bool -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
forall a. HasCallStack => Bool -> a -> a
assert (OccInfo -> Bool
isAlwaysTailCalled OccInfo
occ) OccInfo
occ
             | Bool
otherwise    = OccInfo -> OccInfo
markNonTail OccInfo
occ
     binder' :: CoreBndr
binder' = OccInfo -> CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
setBinderOcc OccInfo
occ' CoreBndr
binder
     usage' :: UsageDetails
usage'  = UsageDetails
usage UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> UsageDetails
`delDetails` CoreBndr
binder
   in
   UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> WithUsageDetails CoreBndr
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage' CoreBndr
binder'

tagRecBinders :: TopLevelFlag           -- At top level?
              -> UsageDetails           -- Of body of let ONLY
              -> [NodeDetails]
              -> WithUsageDetails       -- Adjusted details for whole scope,
                                        -- with binders removed
                  [IdWithOccInfo]       -- Tagged binders
-- Substantially more complicated than non-recursive case. Need to adjust RHS
-- details *before* tagging binders (because the tags depend on the RHSes).
tagRecBinders :: TopLevelFlag
-> UsageDetails -> [NodeDetails] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBndr]
tagRecBinders TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
body_uds [NodeDetails]
details_s
 = let
     bndrs :: [CoreBndr]
bndrs    = (NodeDetails -> CoreBndr) -> [NodeDetails] -> [CoreBndr]
forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
map NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr [NodeDetails]
details_s

     -- 1. See Note [Join arity prediction based on joinRhsArity]
     --    Determine possible join-point-hood of whole group, by testing for
     --    manifest join arity M.
     --    This (re-)asserts that makeNode had made tuds for that same arity M!
     unadj_uds :: UsageDetails
unadj_uds     = (NodeDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> [NodeDetails] -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
andUDs (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> (NodeDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> NodeDetails
-> UsageDetails
-> UsageDetails
forall b c a. (b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> a -> c
. NodeDetails -> UsageDetails
test_manifest_arity) UsageDetails
body_uds [NodeDetails]
details_s
     test_manifest_arity :: NodeDetails -> UsageDetails
test_manifest_arity ND{nd_rhs :: NodeDetails -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
nd_rhs=WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
tuds CoreExpr
rhs}
       = Maybe JoinArity -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailArity (JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just (CoreExpr -> JoinArity
joinRhsArity CoreExpr
rhs)) TailUsageDetails
tuds

     bndr_ne :: NonEmpty CoreBndr
bndr_ne = String -> [CoreBndr] -> NonEmpty CoreBndr
forall a. HasCallStack => String -> [a] -> NonEmpty a
expectNonEmpty String
"List of binders is never empty" [CoreBndr]
bndrs
     will_be_joins :: Bool
will_be_joins = TopLevelFlag -> UsageDetails -> NonEmpty CoreBndr -> Bool
decideJoinPointHood TopLevelFlag
lvl UsageDetails
unadj_uds NonEmpty CoreBndr
bndr_ne

     mb_join_arity :: Id -> Maybe JoinArity
     -- mb_join_arity: See Note [Join arity prediction based on joinRhsArity]
     -- This is the source O
     mb_join_arity :: CoreBndr -> Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity CoreBndr
bndr
         -- Can't use willBeJoinId_maybe here because we haven't tagged
         -- the binder yet (the tag depends on these adjustments!)
       | Bool
will_be_joins
       , let occ :: OccInfo
occ = UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> OccInfo
lookupDetails UsageDetails
unadj_uds CoreBndr
bndr
       , AlwaysTailCalled JoinArity
arity <- OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo OccInfo
occ
       = JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just JoinArity
arity
       | Bool
otherwise
       = Bool -> Maybe JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. HasCallStack => Bool -> a -> a
assert (Bool -> Bool
not Bool
will_be_joins) -- Should be AlwaysTailCalled if
         Maybe JoinArity
forall a. Maybe a
Nothing                   -- we are making join points!

     -- 2. Adjust usage details of each RHS, taking into account the
     --    join-point-hood decision
     rhs_udss' :: [UsageDetails]
rhs_udss' = [ Maybe JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> TailUsageDetails -> UsageDetails
adjustTailUsage (CoreBndr -> Maybe JoinArity
mb_join_arity CoreBndr
bndr) CoreExpr
rhs TailUsageDetails
rhs_tuds -- matching occAnalLamTail in makeNode
                 | ND { nd_bndr :: NodeDetails -> CoreBndr
nd_bndr = CoreBndr
bndr, nd_rhs :: NodeDetails -> WithTailUsageDetails CoreExpr
nd_rhs = WithTailUsageDetails TailUsageDetails
rhs_tuds CoreExpr
rhs }
                     <- [NodeDetails]
details_s ]

     -- 3. Compute final usage details from adjusted RHS details
     adj_uds :: UsageDetails
adj_uds   = (UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails)
-> UsageDetails -> [UsageDetails] -> UsageDetails
forall a b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
forall (t :: * -> *) a b.
Foldable t =>
(a -> b -> b) -> b -> t a -> b
foldr UsageDetails -> UsageDetails -> UsageDetails
andUDs UsageDetails
body_uds [UsageDetails]
rhs_udss'

     -- 4. Tag each binder with its adjusted details
     bndrs' :: [CoreBndr]
bndrs'    = [ OccInfo -> CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
setBinderOcc (UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> OccInfo
lookupDetails UsageDetails
adj_uds CoreBndr
bndr) CoreBndr
bndr
                 | CoreBndr
bndr <- [CoreBndr]
bndrs ]

     -- 5. Drop the binders from the adjusted details and return
     usage' :: UsageDetails
usage'    = UsageDetails
adj_uds UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> UsageDetails
`delDetailsList` [CoreBndr]
bndrs
   in
   UsageDetails -> [CoreBndr] -> WithUsageDetails [CoreBndr]
forall a. UsageDetails -> a -> WithUsageDetails a
WithUsageDetails UsageDetails
usage' [CoreBndr]
bndrs'

setBinderOcc :: OccInfo -> CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
setBinderOcc :: OccInfo -> CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
setBinderOcc OccInfo
occ_info CoreBndr
bndr
  | CoreBndr -> Bool
isTyVar CoreBndr
bndr      = CoreBndr
bndr
  | CoreBndr -> Bool
isExportedId CoreBndr
bndr = if OccInfo -> Bool
isManyOccs (CoreBndr -> OccInfo
idOccInfo CoreBndr
bndr)
                          then CoreBndr
bndr
                          else CoreBndr -> OccInfo -> CoreBndr
setIdOccInfo CoreBndr
bndr OccInfo
noOccInfo
            -- Don't use local usage info for visible-elsewhere things
            -- BUT *do* erase any IAmALoopBreaker annotation, because we're
            -- about to re-generate it and it shouldn't be "sticky"

  | Bool
otherwise = CoreBndr -> OccInfo -> CoreBndr
setIdOccInfo CoreBndr
bndr OccInfo
occ_info

-- | Decide whether some bindings should be made into join points or not, based
-- on its occurrences. This is
-- Returns `False` if they can't be join points. Note that it's an
-- all-or-nothing decision, as if multiple binders are given, they're
-- assumed to be mutually recursive.
--
-- It must, however, be a final decision. If we say `True` for 'f',
-- and then subsequently decide /not/ make 'f' into a join point, then
-- the decision about another binding 'g' might be invalidated if (say)
-- 'f' tail-calls 'g'.
--
-- See Note [Invariants on join points] in "GHC.Core".
decideJoinPointHood :: TopLevelFlag -> UsageDetails
                    -> NonEmpty CoreBndr
                    -> Bool
decideJoinPointHood :: TopLevelFlag -> UsageDetails -> NonEmpty CoreBndr -> Bool
decideJoinPointHood TopLevelFlag
TopLevel UsageDetails
_ NonEmpty CoreBndr
_
  = Bool
False
decideJoinPointHood TopLevelFlag
NotTopLevel UsageDetails
usage NonEmpty CoreBndr
bndrs
  | CoreBndr -> Bool
isJoinId (NonEmpty CoreBndr -> CoreBndr
forall a. NonEmpty a -> a
NE.head NonEmpty CoreBndr
bndrs)
  = Bool -> String -> SDoc -> Bool -> Bool
forall a. HasCallStack => Bool -> String -> SDoc -> a -> a
warnPprTrace (Bool -> Bool
not Bool
all_ok)
                 String
"OccurAnal failed to rediscover join point(s)" (NonEmpty CoreBndr -> SDoc
forall a. Outputable a => a -> SDoc
ppr NonEmpty CoreBndr
bndrs)
                 Bool
all_ok
  | Bool
otherwise
  = Bool
all_ok
  where
    -- See Note [Invariants on join points]; invariants cited by number below.
    -- Invariant 2 is always satisfiable by the simplifier by eta expansion.
    all_ok :: Bool
all_ok = -- Invariant 3: Either all are join points or none are
             (CoreBndr -> Bool) -> NonEmpty CoreBndr -> Bool
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => (a -> Bool) -> t a -> Bool
all CoreBndr -> Bool
ok NonEmpty CoreBndr
bndrs

    ok :: CoreBndr -> Bool
ok CoreBndr
bndr
      | -- Invariant 1: Only tail calls, all same join arity
        AlwaysTailCalled JoinArity
arity <- OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo (UsageDetails -> CoreBndr -> OccInfo
lookupDetails UsageDetails
usage CoreBndr
bndr)

      , -- Invariant 1 as applied to LHSes of rules
        (CoreRule -> Bool) -> [CoreRule] -> Bool
forall (t :: * -> *) a. Foldable t => (a -> Bool) -> t a -> Bool
all (JoinArity -> CoreRule -> Bool
ok_rule JoinArity
arity) (CoreBndr -> [CoreRule]
idCoreRules CoreBndr
bndr)

        -- Invariant 2a: stable unfoldings
        -- See Note [Join points and INLINE pragmas]
      , JoinArity -> Unfolding -> Bool
ok_unfolding JoinArity
arity (IdUnfoldingFun
realIdUnfolding CoreBndr
bndr)

        -- Invariant 4: Satisfies polymorphism rule
      , JoinArity -> Type -> Bool
isValidJoinPointType JoinArity
arity (CoreBndr -> Type
idType CoreBndr
bndr)
      = Bool
True

      | Bool
otherwise
      = Bool
False

    ok_rule :: JoinArity -> CoreRule -> Bool
ok_rule JoinArity
_ BuiltinRule{} = Bool
False -- only possible with plugin shenanigans
    ok_rule JoinArity
join_arity (Rule { ru_args :: CoreRule -> [CoreExpr]
ru_args = [CoreExpr]
args })
      = [CoreExpr]
args [CoreExpr] -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. [a] -> JoinArity -> Bool
`lengthIs` JoinArity
join_arity
        -- Invariant 1 as applied to LHSes of rules

    -- ok_unfolding returns False if we should /not/ convert a non-join-id
    -- into a join-id, even though it is AlwaysTailCalled
    ok_unfolding :: JoinArity -> Unfolding -> Bool
ok_unfolding JoinArity
join_arity (CoreUnfolding { uf_src :: Unfolding -> UnfoldingSource
uf_src = UnfoldingSource
src, uf_tmpl :: Unfolding -> CoreExpr
uf_tmpl = CoreExpr
rhs })
      = Bool -> Bool
not (UnfoldingSource -> Bool
isStableSource UnfoldingSource
src Bool -> Bool -> Bool
&& JoinArity
join_arity JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Ord a => a -> a -> Bool
> CoreExpr -> JoinArity
joinRhsArity CoreExpr
rhs)
    ok_unfolding JoinArity
_ (DFunUnfolding {})
      = Bool
False
    ok_unfolding JoinArity
_ Unfolding
_
      = Bool
True

willBeJoinId_maybe :: CoreBndr -> Maybe JoinArity
willBeJoinId_maybe :: CoreBndr -> Maybe JoinArity
willBeJoinId_maybe CoreBndr
bndr
  | CoreBndr -> Bool
isId CoreBndr
bndr
  , AlwaysTailCalled JoinArity
arity <- OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo (CoreBndr -> OccInfo
idOccInfo CoreBndr
bndr)
  = JoinArity -> Maybe JoinArity
forall a. a -> Maybe a
Just JoinArity
arity
  | Bool
otherwise
  = CoreBndr -> Maybe JoinArity
isJoinId_maybe CoreBndr
bndr


{- Note [Join points and INLINE pragmas]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
   f x = let g = \x. not  -- Arity 1
             {-# INLINE g #-}
         in case x of
              A -> g True True
              B -> g True False
              C -> blah2

Here 'g' is always tail-called applied to 2 args, but the stable
unfolding captured by the INLINE pragma has arity 1.  If we try to
convert g to be a join point, its unfolding will still have arity 1
(since it is stable, and we don't meddle with stable unfoldings), and
Lint will complain (see Note [Invariants on join points], (2a), in
GHC.Core.  #13413.

Moreover, since g is going to be inlined anyway, there is no benefit
from making it a join point.

If it is recursive, and uselessly marked INLINE, this will stop us
making it a join point, which is annoying.  But occasionally
(notably in class methods; see Note [Instances and loop breakers] in
GHC.Tc.TyCl.Instance) we mark recursive things as INLINE but the recursion
unravels; so ignoring INLINE pragmas on recursive things isn't good
either.

See Invariant 2a of Note [Invariants on join points] in GHC.Core


************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
\subsection{Operations over OccInfo}
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************
-}

markMany, markInsideLam, markNonTail :: OccInfo -> OccInfo

markMany :: OccInfo -> OccInfo
markMany OccInfo
IAmDead = OccInfo
IAmDead
markMany OccInfo
occ     = ManyOccs { occ_tail :: TailCallInfo
occ_tail = OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
occ_tail OccInfo
occ }

markInsideLam :: OccInfo -> OccInfo
markInsideLam occ :: OccInfo
occ@(OneOcc {}) = OccInfo
occ { occ_in_lam = IsInsideLam }
markInsideLam OccInfo
occ             = OccInfo
occ

markNonTail :: OccInfo -> OccInfo
markNonTail OccInfo
IAmDead = OccInfo
IAmDead
markNonTail OccInfo
occ     = OccInfo
occ { occ_tail = NoTailCallInfo }

addOccInfo, orOccInfo :: OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo

addOccInfo :: OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
addOccInfo OccInfo
a1 OccInfo
a2  = Bool -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
forall a. HasCallStack => Bool -> a -> a
assert (Bool -> Bool
not (OccInfo -> Bool
isDeadOcc OccInfo
a1 Bool -> Bool -> Bool
|| OccInfo -> Bool
isDeadOcc OccInfo
a2)) (OccInfo -> OccInfo) -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
                    ManyOccs { occ_tail :: TailCallInfo
occ_tail = OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo OccInfo
a1 TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo
`andTailCallInfo`
                                          OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo OccInfo
a2 }
                                -- Both branches are at least One
                                -- (Argument is never IAmDead)

-- (orOccInfo orig new) is used
-- when combining occurrence info from branches of a case

orOccInfo :: OccInfo -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
orOccInfo (OneOcc { occ_in_lam :: OccInfo -> InsideLam
occ_in_lam  = InsideLam
in_lam1
                  , occ_n_br :: OccInfo -> JoinArity
occ_n_br    = JoinArity
nbr1
                  , occ_int_cxt :: OccInfo -> InterestingCxt
occ_int_cxt = InterestingCxt
int_cxt1
                  , occ_tail :: OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
occ_tail    = TailCallInfo
tail1 })
          (OneOcc { occ_in_lam :: OccInfo -> InsideLam
occ_in_lam  = InsideLam
in_lam2
                  , occ_n_br :: OccInfo -> JoinArity
occ_n_br    = JoinArity
nbr2
                  , occ_int_cxt :: OccInfo -> InterestingCxt
occ_int_cxt = InterestingCxt
int_cxt2
                  , occ_tail :: OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
occ_tail    = TailCallInfo
tail2 })
  = OneOcc { occ_n_br :: JoinArity
occ_n_br    = JoinArity
nbr1 JoinArity -> JoinArity -> JoinArity
forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a
+ JoinArity
nbr2
           , occ_in_lam :: InsideLam
occ_in_lam  = InsideLam
in_lam1 InsideLam -> InsideLam -> InsideLam
forall a. Monoid a => a -> a -> a
`mappend` InsideLam
in_lam2
           , occ_int_cxt :: InterestingCxt
occ_int_cxt = InterestingCxt
int_cxt1 InterestingCxt -> InterestingCxt -> InterestingCxt
forall a. Monoid a => a -> a -> a
`mappend` InterestingCxt
int_cxt2
           , occ_tail :: TailCallInfo
occ_tail    = TailCallInfo
tail1 TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo
`andTailCallInfo` TailCallInfo
tail2 }

orOccInfo OccInfo
a1 OccInfo
a2 = Bool -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
forall a. HasCallStack => Bool -> a -> a
assert (Bool -> Bool
not (OccInfo -> Bool
isDeadOcc OccInfo
a1 Bool -> Bool -> Bool
|| OccInfo -> Bool
isDeadOcc OccInfo
a2)) (OccInfo -> OccInfo) -> OccInfo -> OccInfo
forall a b. (a -> b) -> a -> b
$
                  ManyOccs { occ_tail :: TailCallInfo
occ_tail = OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo OccInfo
a1 TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo
`andTailCallInfo`
                                        OccInfo -> TailCallInfo
tailCallInfo OccInfo
a2 }

andTailCallInfo :: TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo
andTailCallInfo :: TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo -> TailCallInfo
andTailCallInfo info :: TailCallInfo
info@(AlwaysTailCalled JoinArity
arity1) (AlwaysTailCalled JoinArity
arity2)
  | JoinArity
arity1 JoinArity -> JoinArity -> Bool
forall a. Eq a => a -> a -> Bool
== JoinArity
arity2 = TailCallInfo
info
andTailCallInfo TailCallInfo
_ TailCallInfo
_  = TailCallInfo
NoTailCallInfo