{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-} {- | Copyright: (c) 2018-2019 Kowainik License: MIT Maintainer: Kowainik <xrom.xkov@gmail.com> Implements core data types and combinators for logging actions. -} module Colog.Core.Action ( -- * Core type and instances LogAction (..) , (<&) , (&>) -- * 'Semigroup' combinators , foldActions -- * Contravariant combinators -- $contravariant , cfilter , cmap , (>$<) , cmapMaybe , (Colog.Core.Action.>$) , cmapM -- * Divisible combinators -- $divisible , divide , conquer , (>*<) , (>*) , (*<) -- * Decidable combinators -- $decidable , lose , choose , (>|<) -- * Comonadic combinators -- $comonad , extract , extend , (=>>) , (<<=) , duplicate , multiplicate ) where import Control.Monad (when, (>=>)) import Data.Coerce (coerce) import Data.Foldable (fold, for_) import Data.List.NonEmpty (NonEmpty (..)) import Data.Monoid (Monoid (..)) import Data.Semigroup (Semigroup (..), stimesMonoid) import Data.Void (Void, absurd) #if MIN_VERSION_base(4,12,0) import qualified Data.Functor.Contravariant as Contravariant #endif {- $setup >>> import Colog.Core.IO -} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Core data type with instances ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- {- | Polymorphic and very general logging action type. * @__msg__@ type variables is an input for logger. It can be 'Text' or custom logging messsage with different fields that you want to format in future. * @__m__@ type variable is for monadic action inside which logging is happening. It can be either 'IO' or some custom pure monad. Key design point here is that 'LogAction' is: * 'Semigroup' * 'Monoid' * 'Data.Functor.Contravariant.Contravariant' * 'Data.Functor.Contravariant.Divisible.Divisible' * 'Data.Functor.Contravariant.Divisible.Decidable' * 'Control.Comonad.Comonad' -} newtype LogAction m msg = LogAction { unLogAction :: msg -> m () } {- | This instance allows you to join multiple logging actions into single one. For example, if you have two actions like these: @ logToStdout :: 'LogAction' IO String -- outputs String to terminal logToFile :: 'LogAction' IO String -- appends String to some file @ You can create new 'LogAction' that perform both actions one after another using 'Semigroup': @ logToBoth :: 'LogAction' IO String -- outputs String to both terminal and some file logToBoth = logToStdout <> logToFile @ -} instance Applicative m => Semigroup (LogAction m a) where (<>) :: LogAction m a -> LogAction m a -> LogAction m a LogAction action1 <> LogAction action2 = LogAction $ \a -> action1 a *> action2 a {-# INLINE (<>) #-} sconcat :: NonEmpty (LogAction m a) -> LogAction m a sconcat = foldActions {-# INLINE sconcat #-} stimes :: Integral b => b -> LogAction m a -> LogAction m a stimes = stimesMonoid {-# INLINE stimes #-} instance Applicative m => Monoid (LogAction m a) where mappend :: LogAction m a -> LogAction m a -> LogAction m a mappend = (<>) {-# INLINE mappend #-} mempty :: LogAction m a mempty = LogAction $ \_ -> pure () {-# INLINE mempty #-} mconcat :: [LogAction m a] -> LogAction m a mconcat = foldActions {-# INLINE mconcat #-} #if MIN_VERSION_base(4,12,0) instance Contravariant.Contravariant (LogAction m) where contramap = cmap {-# INLINE contramap #-} (>$) = (Colog.Core.Action.>$) {-# INLINE (>$) #-} #endif {- | Operator version of 'unLogAction'. Note that because of the types, something like: @ action <& msg1 <& msg2 @ doesn't make sense. Instead you want: @ action <& msg1 \>\> action <& msg2 @ In addition, because '<&' has higher precedence than the other operators in this module, the following: @ f >$< action <& msg @ is equivalent to: @ (f >$< action) <& msg @ -} infix 5 <& (<&) :: LogAction m msg -> msg -> m () (<&) = coerce {-# INLINE (<&) #-} {- | A flipped version of '<&'. It shares the same precedence as '<&', so make sure to surround lower precedence operators in parentheses: @ msg &> (f >$< action) @ -} infix 5 &> (&>) :: msg -> LogAction m msg -> m () (&>) = flip (<&) {-# INLINE (&>) #-} {- | Joins some 'Foldable' of 'LogAction's into single 'LogAction' using 'Semigroup' instance for 'LogAction'. This is basically specialized version of 'Data.Foldable.fold' function. -} foldActions :: (Foldable t, Applicative m) => t (LogAction m a) -> LogAction m a foldActions actions = LogAction $ \a -> for_ actions $ \(LogAction action) -> action a {-# INLINE foldActions #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldActions :: Applicative m => [LogAction m a] -> LogAction m a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldActions :: Applicative m => NonEmpty (LogAction m a) -> LogAction m a #-} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Contravariant combinators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- {- $contravariant Combinators that implement interface in the spirit of the following typeclass: @ __class__ Contravariant f __where__ contramap :: (a -> b) -> f b -> f a @ -} {- | Takes predicate and performs given logging action only if predicate returns 'True' on input logging message. -} cfilter :: Applicative m => (msg -> Bool) -> LogAction m msg -> LogAction m msg cfilter predicate (LogAction action) = LogAction $ \a -> when (predicate a) (action a) {-# INLINE cfilter #-} {- | This combinator is @contramap@ from contravariant functor. It is useful when you have something like @ __data__ LogRecord = LR { lrName :: LoggerName , lrMessage :: Text } @ and you need to provide 'LogAction' which consumes @LogRecord@ @ logRecordAction :: 'LogAction' m LogRecord @ when you only have action that consumes 'Text' @ logTextAction :: 'LogAction' m Text @ With 'cmap' you can do the following: @ logRecordAction :: 'LogAction' m LogRecord logRecordAction = 'cmap' lrMesssage logTextAction @ This action will print only @lrMessage@ from @LogRecord@. But if you have formatting function like this: @ formatLogRecord :: LogRecord -> Text @ you can apply it instead of @lrMessage@ to log formatted @LogRecord@ as 'Text'. -} cmap :: (a -> b) -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m a cmap f (LogAction action) = LogAction (action . f) {-# INLINE cmap #-} {- | Operator version of 'cmap'. >>> 1 &> (show >$< logStringStdout) 1 -} infixr 3 >$< (>$<) :: (a -> b) -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m a (>$<) = cmap {-# INLINE (>$<) #-} -- | 'cmap' for convertions that may fail cmapMaybe :: Applicative m => (a -> Maybe b) -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m a cmapMaybe f (LogAction action) = LogAction (maybe (pure ()) action . f) {-# INLINE cmapMaybe #-} {- | This combinator is @>$@ from contravariant functor. Replaces all locations in the output with the same value. The default definition is @contramap . const@, so this is a more efficient version. >>> "Hello?" &> ("OUT OF SERVICE" >$ logStringStdout) OUT OF SERVICE >>> ("OUT OF SERVICE" >$ logStringStdout) <& 42 OUT OF SERVICE -} infixl 4 >$ (>$) :: b -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m a (>$) b (LogAction action) = LogAction (\_ -> action b) {- | 'cmapM' combinator is similar to 'cmap' but allows to call monadic functions (functions that require extra context) to extend consumed value. Consider the following example. You have this logging record: @ __data__ LogRecord = LR { lrTime :: UTCTime , lrMessage :: Text } @ and you also have logging consumer inside 'IO' for such record: @ logRecordAction :: 'LogAction' IO LogRecord @ But you need to return consumer only for 'Text' messages: @ logTextAction :: 'LogAction' IO Text @ If you have function that can extend 'Text' to @LogRecord@ like the function below: @ withTime :: 'Text' -> 'IO' LogRecord withTime msg = __do__ time <- getCurrentTime pure (LR time msg) @ you can achieve desired behavior with 'cmapM' in the following way: @ logTextAction :: 'LogAction' IO Text logTextAction = 'cmapM' withTime myAction @ -} cmapM :: Monad m => (a -> m b) -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m a cmapM f (LogAction action) = LogAction (f >=> action) {-# INLINE cmapM #-} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Divisible combinators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- {- $divisible Combinators that implement interface in the spirit of the following typeclass: @ __class__ Contravariant f => Divisible f __where__ conquer :: f a divide :: (a -> (b, c)) -> f b -> f c -> f a @ -} {- | @divide@ combinator from @Divisible@ type class. >>> logInt = LogAction print >>> "ABC" &> divide (\s -> (s, length s)) logStringStdout logInt ABC 3 -} divide :: (Applicative m) => (a -> (b, c)) -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m c -> LogAction m a divide f (LogAction actionB) (LogAction actionC) = LogAction $ \(f -> (b, c)) -> actionB b *> actionC c {-# INLINE divide #-} {- | @conquer@ combinator from @Divisible@ type class. Concretely, this is a 'LogAction' that does nothing: >>> conquer <& "hello?" >>> "hello?" &> conquer -} conquer :: Applicative m => LogAction m a conquer = mempty {-# INLINE conquer #-} {- | Operator version of @'divide' 'id'@. >>> logInt = LogAction print >>> (logStringStdout >*< logInt) <& ("foo", 1) foo 1 >>> (logInt >*< logStringStdout) <& (1, "foo") 1 foo -} infixr 4 >*< (>*<) :: (Applicative m) => LogAction m a -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m (a, b) (LogAction actionA) >*< (LogAction actionB) = LogAction $ \(a, b) -> actionA a *> actionB b {-# INLINE (>*<) #-} {-| Perform a constant log action after another. >>> logHello = LogAction (const (putStrLn "Hello!")) >>> "Greetings!" &> (logStringStdout >* logHello) Greetings! Hello! -} infixr 4 >* (>*) :: Applicative m => LogAction m a -> LogAction m () -> LogAction m a (LogAction actionA) >* (LogAction actionB) = LogAction $ \a -> actionA a *> actionB () {-# INLINE (>*) #-} -- | A flipped version of '>*' infixr 4 *< (*<) :: Applicative m => LogAction m () -> LogAction m a -> LogAction m a (LogAction actionA) *< (LogAction actionB) = LogAction $ \a -> actionA () *> actionB a {-# INLINE (*<) #-} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Decidable combinators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- {- $decidable Combinators that implement interface in the spirit of the following typeclass: @ __class__ Divisible f => Decidable f __where__ lose :: (a -> Void) -> f a choose :: (a -> Either b c) -> f b -> f c -> f a @ -} -- | @lose@ combinator from @Decidable@ type class. lose :: (a -> Void) -> LogAction m a lose f = LogAction (absurd . f) {-# INLINE lose #-} {- | @choose@ combinator from @Decidable@ type class. >>> logInt = LogAction print >>> f = choose (\a -> if a < 0 then Left "Negative" else Right a) >>> f logStringStdout logInt <& 1 1 >>> f logStringStdout logInt <& (-1) Negative -} choose :: (a -> Either b c) -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m c -> LogAction m a choose f (LogAction actionB) (LogAction actionC) = LogAction (either actionB actionC . f) {-# INLINE choose #-} {- | Operator version of @'choose' 'id'@. >>> dontPrintInt = LogAction (const (putStrLn "Not printing Int")) >>> Left 1 &> (dontPrintInt >|< logStringStdout) Not printing Int >>> (dontPrintInt >|< logStringStdout) <& Right ":)" :) -} infixr 3 >|< (>|<) :: LogAction m a -> LogAction m b -> LogAction m (Either a b) (LogAction actionA) >|< (LogAction actionB) = LogAction (either actionA actionB) {-# INLINE (>|<) #-} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Comonadic combinators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- {- $comonad Combinators that implement interface in the spirit of the following typeclass: @ __class__ Functor w => Comonad w __where__ extract :: w a -> a duplicate :: w a -> w (w a) extend :: (w a -> b) -> w a -> w b @ -} {- | If @msg@ is 'Monoid' then 'extract' performs given log action by passing 'mempty' to it. >>> logPrint :: LogAction IO [Int]; logPrint = LogAction print >>> extract logPrint [] -} extract :: Monoid msg => LogAction m msg -> m () extract action = unLogAction action mempty {-# INLINE extract #-} -- TODO: write better motivation for comonads {- | This is a /comonadic extend/. It allows you to chain different transformations on messages. >>> f (LogAction l) = l ".f1" *> l ".f2" >>> g (LogAction l) = l ".g" >>> logStringStdout <& "foo" foo >>> extend f logStringStdout <& "foo" foo.f1 foo.f2 >>> (extend g $ extend f logStringStdout) <& "foo" foo.g.f1 foo.g.f2 >>> (logStringStdout =>> f =>> g) <& "foo" foo.g.f1 foo.g.f2 -} extend :: Semigroup msg => (LogAction m msg -> m ()) -> LogAction m msg -> LogAction m msg extend f (LogAction action) = LogAction $ \m -> f $ LogAction $ \m' -> action (m <> m') {-# INLINE extend #-} -- | 'extend' with the arguments swapped. Dual to '>>=' for a 'Monad'. infixl 1 =>> (=>>) :: Semigroup msg => LogAction m msg -> (LogAction m msg -> m ()) -> LogAction m msg (=>>) = flip extend {-# INLINE (=>>) #-} -- | 'extend' in operator form. infixr 1 <<= (<<=) :: Semigroup msg => (LogAction m msg -> m ()) -> LogAction m msg -> LogAction m msg (<<=) = extend {-# INLINE (<<=) #-} {- | Converts any 'LogAction' that can log single message to the 'LogAction' that can log two messages. The new 'LogAction' behaves in the following way: 1. Joins two messages of type @msg@ using '<>' operator from 'Semigroup'. 2. Passes resulted message to the given 'LogAction'. >>> :{ let logger :: LogAction IO [Int] logger = logPrint in duplicate logger <& ([3, 4], [42, 10]) :} [3,4,42,10] __Implementation note:__ True and fair translation of the @duplicate@ function from the 'Control.Comonad.Comonad' interface should result in the 'LogAction' of the following form: @ msg -> msg -> m () @ In order to capture this behavior, 'duplicate' should have the following type: @ duplicate :: Semigroup msg => LogAction m msg -> LogAction (Compose ((->) msg) m) msg @ However, it's quite awkward to work with such type. It's a known fact that the following two types are isomorphic (see functions 'curry' and 'uncurry'): @ a -> b -> c (a, b) -> c @ So using this fact we can come up with the simpler interface. -} duplicate :: forall msg m . Semigroup msg => LogAction m msg -> LogAction m (msg, msg) duplicate (LogAction l) = LogAction $ \(msg1, msg2) -> l (msg1 <> msg2) {-# INLINE duplicate #-} {- | Like 'duplicate' but why stop on a pair of two messages if you can log any 'Foldable' of messages? >>> :{ let logger :: LogAction IO [Int] logger = logPrint in multiplicate logger <& replicate 5 [1..3] :} [1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3] -} multiplicate :: forall f msg m . (Foldable f, Monoid msg) => LogAction m msg -> LogAction m (f msg) multiplicate (LogAction l) = LogAction $ \msgs -> l (fold msgs) {-# INLINE multiplicate #-} {-# SPECIALIZE multiplicate :: Monoid msg => LogAction m msg -> LogAction m [msg] #-} {-# SPECIALIZE multiplicate :: Monoid msg => LogAction m msg -> LogAction m (NonEmpty msg) #-}