agda-unused: Check for unused code in an Agda project.

[ dependent-types, library, mit, program ] [ Propose Tags ]
Versions [RSS] 0.1.0, 0.2.0, 0.3.0
Change log CHANGELOG.md
Dependencies aeson (>=2 && <2.2), Agda (>=2.6.2 && <2.6.3), agda-unused, base (>=4.13 && <4.18), containers (>=0.6.2 && <0.7), directory (>=1.3.6 && <1.4), filepath (>=1.4.2 && <1.5), mtl (>=2.2.2 && <2.4), optparse-applicative (>=0.15.1 && <0.18), text (>=1.2.4 && <2.1) [details]
License MIT
Author
Maintainer Matt Superdock <msuperdock@gmail.com>
Category Dependent types
Source repo head: git clone https://github.com/msuperdock/agda-unused.git
Uploaded by msuperdock at 2022-11-26T03:48:39Z
Distributions
Executables agda-unused
Downloads 392 total (3 in the last 30 days)
Rating (no votes yet) [estimated by Bayesian average]
Your Rating
  • λ
  • λ
  • λ
Status Docs available [build log]
Last success reported on 2022-11-26 [all 1 reports]

Readme for agda-unused-0.3.0

[back to package description]

agda-unused

agda-unused checks for unused code in an Agda project, including:

  • variables
  • definitions
  • postulates
  • data & record types
  • import statements
  • open statements
  • pattern synonyms

agda-unused takes a filepath representing an Agda code file and checks for unused code in that file and its dependencies. By default, agda-unused does not check public items that could be imported elsewhere. But with the --global flag, agda-unused treats the given file as a description of the public interface of the project, and additionally checks for unused files and unused public items in dependencies. (See below for more on --global.)

Supported Agda versions: >= 2.6.2 && < 2.6.3

Example

File ~/Test.agda:

module Test where

open import Agda.Builtin.Bool
  using (Bool; false; true)
open import Agda.Builtin.Unit

_∧_
  : Bool
  → Bool
  → Bool
false ∧ x
  = false
_ ∧ y
  = y

Command:

$ agda-unused Test.agda

Output:

/home/user/Test.agda:4,23-27
  unused imported item ‘true’
/home/user/Test.agda:5,1-30
  unused import ‘Agda.Builtin.Unit’
/home/user/Test.agda:11,9-10
  unused variable ‘x’

Usage

agda-unused - check for unused code in an Agda project

Usage: agda-unused FILE [-g|--global] [-j|--json]
  Check for unused code in FILE

Available options:
  -h,--help                Show this help text
  -g,--global              Check project globally
  -j,--json                Format output as JSON
  -i,--include-path DIR    Look for imports in DIR
  -l,--library LIB         Use library LIB
  --library-file FILE      Use FILE instead of the standard libraries file
  --no-libraries           Don't use any library files
  --no-default-libraries   Don't use default libraries

Global

If the --global flag is given, all declarations in the given file must be imports. The set of imported items is treated as the public interface of the project; these items will not be marked unused. The public items in dependencies of the given module may be marked unused, unlike the default behavior. We also check for unused files.

To perform a global check on an Agda project, first create a file that imports exactly the intended public interface of your project. For example:

File All.agda:

module All where

import A
  using (f)
import B
  hiding (g)
import C

Command:

$ agda-unused All.agda --global

JSON

If the --json flag is given, the output is a JSON object with two fields:

  • type: One of "none", "unused", "error".
  • message: A string, the same as the usual output of agda-unused.

The "none" type indicates that there is no unused code.

Approach

We make a single pass through the given Agda module and its dependencies:

  • When a new item (variable, definition, etc.) appears, we mark it unused.
  • When an existing item appears, we mark it used.

This means, for example, if we have three definitions (say f, g, h), each depending on the previous one, then f and g are considered used, while h is considered unused. If we remove h and run agda-unused again, it will now report that g is unused. This behavior is different from Haskell's built-in tool, which would report that all three identifiers are unused on the first run.

Limitations

We work with Agda's concrete syntax. This is a necessary choice, since Agda's abstract syntax doesn't distinguish between qualified and (opened) unqualified names, which would make it impossible to determine whether certain open statements are unused. However, using concrete syntax comes with several drawbacks:

  • We do not parse mixfix operators; if the parts of a mixfix operator are used in order in an expression, then we mark the mixfix operator as used.
  • We do not distinguish between overloaded constructors; if a constructor is used, then we mark all constructors in scope with the same name as used.

Additionally, we currently do not support the following Agda features:

agda-unused will produce an error if your code uses these language features.