module Exitify ( exitifyProgram ) where {- Note [Exitification] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This module implements Exitification. The goal is to pull as much code out of recursive functions as possible, as the simplifier is better at inlining into call-sites that are not in recursive functions. Example: let t = foo bar joinrec go 0 x y = t (x*x) go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … We’d like to inline `t`, but that does not happen: Because t is a thunk and is used in a recursive function, doing so might lose sharing in general. In this case, however, `t` is on the _exit path_ of `go`, so called at most once. How do we make this clearly visible to the simplifier? A code path (i.e., an expression in a tail-recursive position) in a recursive function is an exit path if it does not contain a recursive call. We can bind this expression outside the recursive function, as a join-point. Example result: let t = foo bar join exit x = t (x*x) joinrec go 0 x y = jump exit x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … Now `t` is no longer in a recursive function, and good things happen! -} import GhcPrelude import Var import Id import IdInfo import CoreSyn import CoreUtils import State import Unique import VarSet import VarEnv import CoreFVs import FastString import Type import Util( mapSnd ) import Data.Bifunctor import Control.Monad -- | Traverses the AST, simply to find all joinrecs and call 'exitify' on them. -- The really interesting function is exitifyRec exitifyProgram :: CoreProgram -> CoreProgram exitifyProgram binds = map goTopLvl binds where goTopLvl (NonRec v e) = NonRec v (go in_scope_toplvl e) goTopLvl (Rec pairs) = Rec (map (second (go in_scope_toplvl)) pairs) -- Top-level bindings are never join points in_scope_toplvl = emptyInScopeSet `extendInScopeSetList` bindersOfBinds binds go :: InScopeSet -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr go _ e@(Var{}) = e go _ e@(Lit {}) = e go _ e@(Type {}) = e go _ e@(Coercion {}) = e go in_scope (Cast e' c) = Cast (go in_scope e') c go in_scope (Tick t e') = Tick t (go in_scope e') go in_scope (App e1 e2) = App (go in_scope e1) (go in_scope e2) go in_scope (Lam v e') = Lam v (go in_scope' e') where in_scope' = in_scope `extendInScopeSet` v go in_scope (Case scrut bndr ty alts) = Case (go in_scope scrut) bndr ty (map go_alt alts) where in_scope1 = in_scope `extendInScopeSet` bndr go_alt (dc, pats, rhs) = (dc, pats, go in_scope' rhs) where in_scope' = in_scope1 `extendInScopeSetList` pats go in_scope (Let (NonRec bndr rhs) body) = Let (NonRec bndr (go in_scope rhs)) (go in_scope' body) where in_scope' = in_scope `extendInScopeSet` bndr go in_scope (Let (Rec pairs) body) | is_join_rec = mkLets (exitifyRec in_scope' pairs') body' | otherwise = Let (Rec pairs') body' where is_join_rec = any (isJoinId . fst) pairs in_scope' = in_scope `extendInScopeSetList` bindersOf (Rec pairs) pairs' = mapSnd (go in_scope') pairs body' = go in_scope' body -- | State Monad used inside `exitify` type ExitifyM = State [(JoinId, CoreExpr)] -- | Given a recursive group of a joinrec, identifies “exit paths” and binds them as -- join-points outside the joinrec. exitifyRec :: InScopeSet -> [(Var,CoreExpr)] -> [CoreBind] exitifyRec in_scope pairs = [ NonRec xid rhs | (xid,rhs) <- exits ] ++ [Rec pairs'] where -- We need the set of free variables of many subexpressions here, so -- annotate the AST with them -- see Note [Calculating free variables] ann_pairs = map (second freeVars) pairs -- Which are the recursive calls? recursive_calls = mkVarSet $ map fst pairs (pairs',exits) = (`runState` []) $ do forM ann_pairs $ \(x,rhs) -> do -- go past the lambdas of the join point let (args, body) = collectNAnnBndrs (idJoinArity x) rhs body' <- go args body let rhs' = mkLams args body' return (x, rhs') --------------------- -- 'go' is the main working function. -- It goes through the RHS (tail-call positions only), -- checks if there are no more recursive calls, if so, abstracts over -- variables bound on the way and lifts it out as a join point. -- -- ExitifyM is a state monad to keep track of floated binds go :: [Var] -- ^ Variables that are in-scope here, but -- not in scope at the joinrec; that is, -- we must potentially abstract over them. -- Invariant: they are kept in dependency order -> CoreExprWithFVs -- ^ Current expression in tail position -> ExitifyM CoreExpr -- We first look at the expression (no matter what it shape is) -- and determine if we can turn it into a exit join point go captured ann_e | -- An exit expression has no recursive calls let fvs = dVarSetToVarSet (freeVarsOf ann_e) , disjointVarSet fvs recursive_calls = go_exit captured (deAnnotate ann_e) fvs -- We could not turn it into a exit joint point. So now recurse -- into all expression where eligible exit join points might sit, -- i.e. into all tail-call positions: -- Case right hand sides are in tail-call position go captured (_, AnnCase scrut bndr ty alts) = do alts' <- forM alts $ \(dc, pats, rhs) -> do rhs' <- go (captured ++ [bndr] ++ pats) rhs return (dc, pats, rhs') return $ Case (deAnnotate scrut) bndr ty alts' go captured (_, AnnLet ann_bind body) -- join point, RHS and body are in tail-call position | AnnNonRec j rhs <- ann_bind , Just join_arity <- isJoinId_maybe j = do let (params, join_body) = collectNAnnBndrs join_arity rhs join_body' <- go (captured ++ params) join_body let rhs' = mkLams params join_body' body' <- go (captured ++ [j]) body return $ Let (NonRec j rhs') body' -- rec join point, RHSs and body are in tail-call position | AnnRec pairs <- ann_bind , isJoinId (fst (head pairs)) = do let js = map fst pairs pairs' <- forM pairs $ \(j,rhs) -> do let join_arity = idJoinArity j (params, join_body) = collectNAnnBndrs join_arity rhs join_body' <- go (captured ++ js ++ params) join_body let rhs' = mkLams params join_body' return (j, rhs') body' <- go (captured ++ js) body return $ Let (Rec pairs') body' -- normal Let, only the body is in tail-call position | otherwise = do body' <- go (captured ++ bindersOf bind ) body return $ Let bind body' where bind = deAnnBind ann_bind -- Cannot be turned into an exit join point, but also has no -- tail-call subexpression. Nothing to do here. go _ ann_e = return (deAnnotate ann_e) --------------------- go_exit :: [Var] -- Variables captured locally -> CoreExpr -- An exit expression -> VarSet -- Free vars of the expression -> ExitifyM CoreExpr -- go_exit deals with a tail expression that is floatable -- out as an exit point; that is, it mentions no recursive calls go_exit captured e fvs -- Do not touch an expression that is already a join jump where all arguments -- are captured variables. See Note [Idempotency] -- But _do_ float join jumps with interesting arguments. -- See Note [Jumps can be interesting] | (Var f, args) <- collectArgs e , isJoinId f , all isCapturedVarArg args = return e -- Do not touch a boring expression (see Note [Interesting expression]) | not is_interesting = return e -- Cannot float out if local join points are used, as -- we cannot abstract over them | captures_join_points = return e -- We have something to float out! | otherwise = do { -- Assemble the RHS of the exit join point let rhs = mkLams abs_vars e avoid = in_scope `extendInScopeSetList` captured -- Remember this binding under a suitable name ; v <- addExit avoid (length abs_vars) rhs -- And jump to it from here ; return $ mkVarApps (Var v) abs_vars } where -- Used to detect exit expressoins that are already proper exit jumps isCapturedVarArg (Var v) = v `elem` captured isCapturedVarArg _ = False -- An interesting exit expression has free, non-imported -- variables from outside the recursive group -- See Note [Interesting expression] is_interesting = anyVarSet isLocalId $ fvs `minusVarSet` mkVarSet captured -- The arguments of this exit join point -- See Note [Picking arguments to abstract over] abs_vars = snd $ foldr pick (fvs, []) captured where pick v (fvs', acc) | v `elemVarSet` fvs' = (fvs' `delVarSet` v, zap v : acc) | otherwise = (fvs', acc) -- We are going to abstract over these variables, so we must -- zap any IdInfo they have; see Trac #15005 -- cf. SetLevels.abstractVars zap v | isId v = setIdInfo v vanillaIdInfo | otherwise = v -- We cannot abstract over join points captures_join_points = any isJoinId abs_vars -- Picks a new unique, which is disjoint from -- * the free variables of the whole joinrec -- * any bound variables (captured) -- * any exit join points created so far. mkExitJoinId :: InScopeSet -> Type -> JoinArity -> ExitifyM JoinId mkExitJoinId in_scope ty join_arity = do fs <- get let avoid = in_scope `extendInScopeSetList` (map fst fs) `extendInScopeSet` exit_id_tmpl -- just cosmetics return (uniqAway avoid exit_id_tmpl) where exit_id_tmpl = mkSysLocal (fsLit "exit") initExitJoinUnique ty `asJoinId` join_arity addExit :: InScopeSet -> JoinArity -> CoreExpr -> ExitifyM JoinId addExit in_scope join_arity rhs = do -- Pick a suitable name let ty = exprType rhs v <- mkExitJoinId in_scope ty join_arity fs <- get put ((v,rhs):fs) return v {- Note [Interesting expression] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We do not want this to happen: joinrec go 0 x y = x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … ==> join exit x = x joinrec go 0 x y = jump exit x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … because the floated exit path (`x`) is simply a parameter of `go`; there are not useful interactions exposed this way. Neither do we want this to happen joinrec go 0 x y = x+x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … ==> join exit x = x+x joinrec go 0 x y = jump exit x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … where the floated expression `x+x` is a bit more complicated, but still not intersting. Expressions are interesting when they move an occurrence of a variable outside the recursive `go` that can benefit from being obviously called once, for example: * a local thunk that can then be inlined (see example in note [Exitification]) * the parameter of a function, where the demand analyzer then can then see that it is called at most once, and hence improve the function’s strictness signature So we only hoist an exit expression out if it mentiones at least one free, non-imported variable. Note [Jumps can be interesting] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A jump to a join point can be interesting, if its arguments contain free non-exported variables (z in the following example): joinrec go 0 x y = jump j (x+z) go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … ==> join exit x y = jump j (x+z) joinrec go 0 x y = jump exit x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) The join point itself can be interesting, even if none if its arguments have free variables free in the joinrec. For example join j p = case p of (x,y) -> x+y joinrec go 0 x y = jump j (x,y) go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) y in … Here, `j` would not be inlined because we do not inline something that looks like an exit join point (see Note [Do not inline exit join points]). But if we exitify the 'jump j (x,y)' we get join j p = case p of (x,y) -> x+y join exit x y = jump j (x,y) joinrec go 0 x y = jump exit x y go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) y in … and now 'j' can inline, and we get rid of the pair. Here's another example (assume `g` to be an imported function that, on its own, does not make this interesting): join j y = map f y joinrec go 0 x y = jump j (map g x) go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … Again, `j` would not be inlined because we do not inline something that looks like an exit join point (see Note [Do not inline exit join points]). But after exitification we have join j y = map f y join exit x = jump j (map g x) joinrec go 0 x y = jump j (map g x) go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … and now we can inline `j` and this will allow `map/map` to fire. Note [Idempotency] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We do not want this to happen, where we replace the floated expression with essentially the same expression: join exit x = t (x*x) joinrec go 0 x y = jump exit x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … ==> join exit x = t (x*x) join exit' x = jump exit x joinrec go 0 x y = jump exit' x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … So when the RHS is a join jump, and all of its arguments are captured variables, then we leave it in place. Note that `jump exit x` in this example looks interesting, as `exit` is a free variable. Therefore, idempotency does not simply follow from floating only interesting expressions. Note [Calculating free variables] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We have two options where to annotate the tree with free variables: A) The whole tree. B) Each individual joinrec as we come across it. Downside of A: We pay the price on the whole module, even outside any joinrecs. Downside of B: We pay the price per joinrec, possibly multiple times when joinrecs are nested. Further downside of A: If the exitify function returns annotated expressions, it would have to ensure that the annotations are correct. We therefore choose B, and calculate the free variables in `exitify`. Note [Do not inline exit join points] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When we have let t = foo bar join exit x = t (x*x) joinrec go 0 x y = jump exit x go (n-1) x y = jump go (n-1) (x+y) in … we do not want the simplifier to simply inline `exit` back in (which it happily would). To prevent this, we need to recognize exit join points, and then disable inlining. Exit join points, recognizeable using `isExitJoinId` are join points with an occurence in a recursive group, and can be recognized (after the occurence analyzer ran!) using `isExitJoinId`. This function detects joinpoints with `occ_in_lam (idOccinfo id) == True`, because the lambdas of a non-recursive join point are not considered for `occ_in_lam`. For example, in the following code, `j1` is /not/ marked occ_in_lam, because `j2` is called only once. join j1 x = x+1 join j2 y = join j1 (y+2) To prevent inlining, we check for isExitJoinId * In `preInlineUnconditionally` directly. * In `simplLetUnfolding` we simply give exit join points no unfolding, which prevents inlining in `postInlineUnconditionally` and call sites. Note [Placement of the exitification pass] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I (Joachim) experimented with multiple positions for the Exitification pass in the Core2Core pipeline: A) Before the `simpl_phases` B) Between the `simpl_phases` and the "main" simplifier pass C) After demand_analyser D) Before the final simplification phase Here is the table (this is without inlining join exit points in the final simplifier run): Program | Allocs | Instrs | ABCD.log A.log B.log C.log D.log | ABCD.log A.log B.log C.log D.log ----------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------- fannkuch-redux | -99.9% +0.0% -99.9% -99.9% -99.9% | -3.9% +0.5% -3.0% -3.9% -3.9% fasta | -0.0% +0.0% +0.0% -0.0% -0.0% | -8.5% +0.0% +0.0% -0.0% -8.5% fem | 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% +0.0% | -2.2% -0.1% -0.1% -2.1% -2.1% fish | 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% +0.0% | -3.1% +0.0% -1.1% -1.1% -0.0% k-nucleotide | -91.3% -91.0% -91.0% -91.3% -91.3% | -6.3% +11.4% +11.4% -6.3% -6.2% scs | -0.0% -0.0% -0.0% -0.0% -0.0% | -3.4% -3.0% -3.1% -3.3% -3.3% simple | -6.0% 0.0% -6.0% -6.0% +0.0% | -3.4% +0.0% -5.2% -3.4% -0.1% spectral-norm | -0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.0% +0.0% | -2.7% +0.0% -2.7% -5.4% -5.4% ----------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------- Min | -95.0% -91.0% -95.0% -95.0% -95.0% | -8.5% -3.0% -5.2% -6.3% -8.5% Max | +0.2% +0.2% +0.2% +0.2% +1.5% | +0.4% +11.4% +11.4% +0.4% +1.5% Geometric Mean | -4.7% -2.1% -4.7% -4.7% -4.6% | -0.4% +0.1% -0.1% -0.3% -0.2% Position A is disqualified, as it does not get rid of the allocations in fannkuch-redux. Position A and B are disqualified because it increases instructions in k-nucleotide. Positions C and D have their advantages: C decreases allocations in simpl, but D instructions in fasta. Assuming we have a budget of _one_ run of Exitification, then C wins (but we could get more from running it multiple times, as seen in fish). Note [Picking arguments to abstract over] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When we create an exit join point, so we need to abstract over those of its free variables that are be out-of-scope at the destination of the exit join point. So we go through the list `captured` and pick those that are actually free variables of the join point. We do not just `filter (`elemVarSet` fvs) captured`, as there might be shadowing, and `captured` may contain multiple variables with the same Unique. I these cases we want to abstract only over the last occurence, hence the `foldr` (with emphasis on the `r`). This is #15110. -}