{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} {-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-} {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-} {-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-} {-# LANGUAGE NoMonomorphismRestriction #-} {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-} {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} {-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-} {-# LANGUAGE Trustworthy #-} -- | Lazy state effect module Control.Eff.State.OnDemand where import Control.Eff import Control.Eff.Extend import Control.Eff.Writer.Lazy import Control.Eff.Reader.Lazy import qualified Control.Eff.State.Lazy as S import Control.Monad.Base import Control.Monad.Trans.Control -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- | State, lazy (i.e., on-demand) -- -- Extensible effects make it clear that where the computation is delayed -- (which I take as an advantage) and they do maintain the degree of -- extensibility (the delayed computation must be effect-closed, but the -- whole computation does not have to be). data OnDemandState s v where Get :: OnDemandState s s Put :: s -> OnDemandState s () Delay :: Eff '[OnDemandState s] a -> OnDemandState s a -- Eff as a transformer -- | Given a continuation, respond to requests instance Handle (OnDemandState s) (s -> r) where handle k Get s = k s s handle k (Put s) _ = k () s handle k (Delay m) s = let ~(x, s') = run $ handle_relay S.withState m s in k x s' instance ( MonadBase m m , LiftedBase m r ) => MonadBaseControl m (Eff (OnDemandState s ': r)) where type StM (Eff (OnDemandState s ': r)) a = StM (Eff r) (a,s) liftBaseWith f = do s <- get raise $ liftBaseWith $ \runInBase -> f (runInBase . runState s) restoreM x = do (a, s :: s) <- raise (restoreM x) put s return a -- | Return the current value of the state. The signatures are inferred {-# NOINLINE get #-} get :: Member (OnDemandState s) r => Eff r s get = send Get {-# RULES "get/bind" forall k. get >>= k = send Get >>= k #-} -- | Write a new value of the state. {-# NOINLINE put #-} put :: Member (OnDemandState s) r => s -> Eff r () put s = send (Put s) {-# RULES "put/bind" forall k v. put v >>= k = send (Put v) >>= k #-} {-# RULES "put/semibind" forall k v. put v >> k = send (Put v) >>= (\() -> k) #-} -- The purpose of the rules is to expose send, which is then being -- fuzed by the send/bind rule. The send/bind rule is very profitable! -- These rules are essentially inlining of get/put. Somehow GHC does not -- inline get/put, even if I put the INLINE directives and play with phases. -- (Inlining works if I use 'inline' explicitly). onDemand :: Member (OnDemandState s) r => Eff '[OnDemandState s] v -> Eff r v onDemand = send . Delay runState' :: s -> Eff (OnDemandState s ': r) w -> Eff r (w,s) runState' s m = handle_relay S.withState m s -- Since State is so frequently used, we optimize it a bit -- | Run a State effect runState :: s -- ^ Initial state -> Eff (OnDemandState s ': r) w -- ^ Effect incorporating State -> Eff r (w,s) -- ^ Effect containing final state and a return value runState s (Val x) = S.withState x s runState s0 (E q u0) = case decomp u0 of Right Get -> runState s0 (q ^$ s0) Right (Put s1) -> runState s1 (q ^$ ()) Right (Delay m1) -> let ~(x,s1) = run $ runState s0 m1 in runState s1 (q ^$ x) Left u -> E (singleK (\x -> runState s0 (q ^$ x))) u -- | Transform the state with a function. modify :: (Member (OnDemandState s) r) => (s -> s) -> Eff r () modify f = get >>= put . f -- | Run a State effect, discarding the final state. evalState :: s -> Eff (OnDemandState s ': r) w -> Eff r w evalState s = fmap fst . runState s -- | Run a State effect and return the final state. execState :: s -> Eff (OnDemandState s ': r) w -> Eff r s execState s = fmap snd . runState s -- | A different representation of State: decomposing State into mutation -- (Writer) and Reading. We don't define any new effects: we just handle the -- existing ones. Thus we define a handler for two effects together. runStateR :: s -> Eff (Writer s ': Reader s ': r) w -> Eff r (w,s) runStateR s (Val x) = S.withState x s runStateR s (E q u) = case decomp u of Right (Tell w) -> handle k (S.Put w) s Left u1 -> case decomp u1 of Right Ask -> handle k S.Get s Left u2 -> relay k u2 s where k s' x = qComp q (runStateR x) s' -- | Backwards state -- The overall state is represented with two attributes: the inherited -- getAttr and the synthesized putAttr. -- At the root node, putAttr becomes getAttr, tying the knot. -- As usual, the inherited attribute is the argument (i.e., the `environment') -- and the synthesized is the result of the handler |go| below. runStateBack0 :: Eff '[OnDemandState s] a -> (a,s) runStateBack0 m = let (x,s) = go s m in (x,s) where go :: s -> Eff '[OnDemandState s] a -> (a,s) go s (Val x) = (x,s) go s0 (E q u) = case decomp u of Right Get -> go s0 $ (q ^$ s0) Right (Put s1) -> let ~(x,sp) = go sp $ (q ^$ ()) in (x,s1) Right (Delay m1) -> let ~(x,s1) = go s0 m1 in go s1 $ (q ^$ x) Left _ -> error "Impossible happened: Union []" -- | Another implementation, exploring Haskell's laziness to make putAttr -- also technically inherited, to accumulate the sequence of -- updates. This implementation is compatible with deep handlers, and -- lets us play with different notions of `backwardness' runStateBack :: Eff '[OnDemandState s] a -> (a,s) runStateBack m = let (x,(_sg,sp)) = run $ go (sp,[]) m in (x,head sp) where go :: ([s],[s]) -> Eff '[OnDemandState s] a -> Eff '[] (a,([s],[s])) go s m' = handle_relay' S.withState (\k req ss0@(sg,sp) -> case req of Get -> k (head sg) ss0 Put s1 -> k () (tail sg,sp++[s1]) Delay m1 -> let ~(x,ss1) = run $ go ss0 m1 in k x ss1) m' s -- ^ A different notion of `backwards' is realized if we change the Put -- handler slightly. How?