{
  "type" : "record",
  "name" : "UnionsNoNamespace",
  "doc" : "An example schema that has a union whose components are types with no namespace. This was causing problems with our JSON parsing code.",
  "fields" : [
    {
      "name" : "unionField",
      "type" : [
        {
          "type" : "record",
          "name" : "TypeA",
          "doc" : "TypeA is in the null namespace but has no leading dot in the schema.",
          "fields" : []
        },
        {
          "type" : "record",
          "name" : ".TypeB",
          "doc" : "Note the leading dot—semantically this is the same as having no namespace, but it caused parsing issues in the past.",
          "fields" : []
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}