api-tools-0.9.0.0: DSL for generating API boilerplate and docs
Safe HaskellNone
LanguageHaskell2010

Data.API.Tutorial

Synopsis

    Introduction

    The api-tools library provides a compact DSL for describing an API. It uses Template Haskell to generate the corresponding data types and assorted tools for working with it, including code for converting between JSON and the generated types and writing unit tests. It supports maintaining a log of changes to the API and migrating data between different versions.

    The api DSL

    An API is a list of datatypes, which must be in one of five simple forms:

    • Records, which have one constructor but many fields
    • Unions, which have many constructors each with a single argument
    • Enumerations, which have many nullary constructors
    • Newtypes, which wrap a built-in basic type
    • Type synonyms

    To define an API, you can use the parseAPI function or the api quasi-quoter, like this:

    example :: API
    example = [api|
    
    rec :: MyRecord
       // A record type containing two fields
       = record
           x :: [integer]   // one field
           y :: ? [utc]     // another field
    
    chc :: MyChoice
        // A disjoint union
        = union
            | a :: MyRecord
            | b :: string
    
    enm :: MyEnum
        // An enumeration
        = enum
            | e1
            | e2
    
    str :: MyString
        // A newtype
        = basic string
    
    flg :: MyFlag
        // A type synonym
        = boolean
    
    |]

    The basic types available (and their Haskell representations) are string (Text), binary (Binary), integer (Int), boolean (Bool) and utc (UTCTime).

    The prefix (given before the :: on each type declaration) is used to name record fields and enumeration/union constructors in the generated Haskell code. It must be unique throughout the API. It is not a type signature, despite the appearance!

    Generating types for an API

    Once an API is defined, the generate function can be used in a Template Haskell splice to produce the corresponding Haskell datatype declarations. Thus $(generate example) will produce something like:

    data MyRecord = MyRecord { rec_x :: [Int]
                             , rec_y :: Maybe [UTCTime]
                             }
    
    data MyChoice = CHC_a MyRecord | CHC_b String
    
    data MyEnum = ENM_e1 | ENM_e2
    
    newtype MyString = MyString { _MyString :: String }
    
    type MyFlag = Bool

    The Template Haskell staging restriction means that example must be defined in one module and imported into another to call generate.

    Custom representation types

    For some types, it may be desirable to use a different datatype in the Haskell code, rather than relying on the generated datatype. For example, this allows collection types (such as sets) to be used in place of lists, or allows additional invariants to be enforced. The JSON serialization agrees with the schema (so the difference is invisible to non-Haskell clients). This is possible using a with clause in the schema DSL, which follows the type declaration and gives the names of a pair of conversion functions, like this:

    i :: IDSet
        = record
            ids :: [ID]
        with inj_IDSet, prj_IDSet

    When a with clause is used, the usual generated type (the representation type) will be given a REP__ prefix, so in this case generate will produce:

    data REP__IDSet = REP__IDSet { _i_ids :: [ID] }

    The Haskell code accompanying the call to generate should define a type called IDSet, and functions inj_IDSet :: Monad m => REP__IDSet -> m IDSet and prj_IDSet :: IDSet -> REP__IDSet, which will be used when converting to and from JSON. The monadic type allows parsing to fail if the representation type uses a value that is not permitted, but converting back must be a pure function.

    Generating tools for an API

    Once the Haskell datatypes have been created by generate, additional tools can be created with generateAPITools. See Data.API.Tools for a list of tools supplied with the library. For example, the call

    $(generateAPITools [enumTool, jsonTool, quickCheckTool] example)

    will define:

    • _text_MyEnum :: MyEnum -> Text for converting an enumeration to its textual representation;
    • _map_MyEnum :: Map Text MyEnum for converting a textual representation back to an enumeration; and
    • ToJSON, FromJSONWithErrs and Arbitrary instances for all the generated types.

    Note that generate must be used to create the datatypes first, otherwise generateAPITools will result in scope errors. Moreover, certain tools have dependencies, as described in the documentation for each tool in Data.API.Tools. Dependent tools must be generated in the same call to generateAPITools or a previous call; if they are missing unpleasant compilation errors will occur. For example, omitting enumTool in the above to give

    $(generateAPITools [jsonTool, quickCheckTool] example)

    will lead to errors about undefined symbols _text_MyEnum and _map_MyEnum in the generated code.

    Custom API tools

    An APITool is essentially just a function that consumes an API and produces some Template Haskell declarations. More generally, a Tool a consumes a value of type a and generates some declarations. The utilities in Data.API.Tools.Combinators make it slightly more convenient to construct such things. In particular, you can use apiNodeTool (apiSpecTool n r u e t) to build a tool that consumes an API out of tools that explain what to do for newtypes, records, unions, enumerations and type synonyms respectively.

    Typically, tools generate declarations or class instances based on each different node in the API. These generated declarations work with the datatypes generated by datatypesTool. The module Data.API.Tools.Datatypes provides functions to turn APINodes and their components into Template Haskell references to the generated datatypes.

    Data migration

    A key feature of api-tools is support for migrating data between different versions of an API. The apiWithChangelog quasi-quoter allows an API to be followed by a changelog in a formal syntax, providing a record of changes between versions. For example:

    example :: API
    exampleChangelog :: APIChangelog
    (example, exampleChangelog) = [apiWithChangelog|
    
    // ...api specification as before...
    
    changes
    
    version "0.3"
      added MyFlag boolean
    
    version "0.2"
      changed record MyRecord
        field added y :: ? [utc]
    
    // Initial version
    version "0.1"
    |]

    The migrateDataDump function can be used to migrate data, encoded with JSON, from a previous API version to a more recent version. The old and new APIs must be supplied, and the changes in the changelog must describe how to get from the old to the new API. The validateChanges function can be used to check that a changelog is sufficient.

    A changelog consists of the keyword changes and a list of version blocks. A version block consists of the keyword version starting in the leftmost column, a version number in double quotes, then a list of changes. The following changes are available:

    added <Type name> <Specification>
    removed <Type name>
    renamed <Source type> to <Target type>
    changed record <Type name>
      field added <field name> :: <Type> [default <value>]
      field removed <field name>
      field renamed <source field> to <target field>
      field changed <field name> :: <New type> migration <Migration name>
    changed union <Type name>
      alternative added <alternative name> :: <Type>
      alternative removed <alternative name>
      alternative renamed <source alternative> to <target alternative>
    changed enum <Type name>
      alternative added <value name>
      alternative removed <value name>
      alternative renamed <source value> to <target value>
    migration <Migration name>
    migration record <Type name> <Migration name>

    Custom migrations

    For more extensive changes to the API that cannot be expressed using the primitive changes, custom migrations can be used to migrate data between versions.

    Custom migrations can be applied to the whole dataset, a single type or an individual record field, thus:

    version "0.42"
      migration MigrateWholeDataset
      migration record Widget MigrateWidgetType
      changed record Widget where
        field changed foo :: String migration MigrateFooField

    The generateMigrationKinds function creates enumeration types corresponding to the custom migration names used in a changelog. These types should then be used to create a CustomMigrations record, which describes how to transform the data (and API, if appropriate) for each custom migration. For example,

    $(generateMigrationKinds myChangelog "DatabaseMigration" "TypeMigration" "FieldMigration")

    with the changelog fragment above would give

    data DatabaseMigration = MigrateWholeDatabase | ...
    data TypeMigration     = MigrateWidgetType    | ...
    data FieldMigration    = MigrateFooField      | ...

    Calls to migrateDataDump should include a suitable CustomMigrations record, which includes functions to perform the migrations on the underlying data, represented as an Aeson Value. For example, suppose the foo field of the Widget record previously contained a boolean: a suitable fieldMigration implementation might be:

    fieldMigration :: FieldMigration -> Value -> Either ValueError Value
    fieldMigration MigrateFooField (Bool b) = Right $ toJSON $ show b
    fieldMigration MigrateFooField v        = Left  $ CustomMigrationError "oops" v
    ...

    A field migration may change the type of the field by listing the new type in the changelog. Whole-database and individual-type migrations may describe the changes they make to the schema in the databaseMigrationSchema and typeMigrationSchema fields of the CustomMigrations record.

    In order to check that custom migrations result in data that matches the schema, the DataChecks parameter of migrateDataDump can be set to CheckCustom or CheckAll. This will validate the data against the schema after calling the custom migration code.

    Documenting a REST-like API

    A Call is a description of a web resource, intended to be generated in an application-specific way from the code of a web server. The callHtml function can be used to generate HTML documentation of individual resources, and dirHtml can be used to generate an index page for the documentation of a collection of resources.