{-# LANGUAGE NondecreasingIndentation #-} module Agda.TypeChecking.Rules.Application ( checkArguments , checkArguments_ , checkApplication , inferApplication , checkProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg , univChecks , suffixToLevel ) where import Prelude hiding ( null ) import Control.Applicative ( (<|>) ) import Control.Monad ( filterM, forM, forM_, guard, liftM2 ) import Control.Monad.Except ( ExceptT, runExceptT, MonadError, catchError, throwError ) import Control.Monad.Trans import Control.Monad.Trans.Maybe import Data.Bifunctor import Data.Maybe import Data.Void import qualified Data.Foldable as Fold import qualified Data.IntSet as IntSet import Agda.Interaction.Highlighting.Generate ( storeDisambiguatedConstructor, storeDisambiguatedProjection ) import qualified Agda.Syntax.Abstract as A import Agda.Syntax.Abstract.Views as A import qualified Agda.Syntax.Info as A import Agda.Syntax.Concrete.Pretty () -- only Pretty instances import Agda.Syntax.Common import Agda.Syntax.Internal as I import Agda.Syntax.Position import Agda.TypeChecking.Conversion import Agda.TypeChecking.Constraints import Agda.TypeChecking.Datatypes import Agda.TypeChecking.Free import Agda.TypeChecking.Implicit import Agda.TypeChecking.Injectivity import Agda.TypeChecking.InstanceArguments (postponeInstanceConstraints) import Agda.TypeChecking.Level import Agda.TypeChecking.MetaVars import Agda.TypeChecking.Modalities import Agda.TypeChecking.Names import Agda.TypeChecking.Pretty import Agda.TypeChecking.Primitive hiding (Nat) import Agda.TypeChecking.Monad import Agda.TypeChecking.Records import Agda.TypeChecking.Reduce import Agda.TypeChecking.Rules.Def import Agda.TypeChecking.Rules.Term import Agda.TypeChecking.Substitute import Agda.TypeChecking.Telescope import Agda.Utils.Either import Agda.Utils.Functor import Agda.Utils.Lens import Agda.Utils.List ( (!!!), initWithDefault ) import qualified Agda.Utils.List as List import Agda.Utils.List1 ( List1, pattern (:|) ) import qualified Agda.Utils.List1 as List1 import Agda.Utils.Maybe import Agda.Utils.Monad import Agda.Utils.Null import Agda.Syntax.Common.Pretty ( prettyShow ) import Agda.Utils.Size import Agda.Utils.Tuple import Agda.Utils.Impossible ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Applications ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- | Ranges of checked arguments, where present. type MaybeRanges = [Maybe Range] acHeadConstraints :: (Elims -> Term) -> ArgsCheckState a -> [Constraint] acHeadConstraints hd ACState{acElims = es, acConstraints = cs} = go hd es cs where go hd [] [] = [] go hd (e : es) (c : cs) = maybe id (\ c -> (lazyAbsApp c (hd []) :)) c $ go (hd . (e :)) es cs go _ [] (_:_) = __IMPOSSIBLE__ go _ (_:_) [] = __IMPOSSIBLE__ checkHeadConstraints :: (Elims -> Term) -> ArgsCheckState a -> TCM Term checkHeadConstraints hd st = do mapM_ solveConstraint_ (acHeadConstraints hd st) return $ hd (acElims st) -- | @checkApplication hd args e t@ checks an application. -- Precondition: @Application hs args = appView e@ -- -- @checkApplication@ disambiguates constructors -- (and continues to 'checkConstructorApplication') -- and resolves pattern synonyms. checkApplication :: Comparison -> A.Expr -> A.Args -> A.Expr -> Type -> TCM Term checkApplication cmp hd args e t = turnOffExpandLastIfExistingMeta hd $ postponeInstanceConstraints $ do reportSDoc "tc.check.app" 20 $ vcat [ "checkApplication" , nest 2 $ "hd = " <+> prettyA hd , nest 2 $ "args = " <+> sep (map prettyA args) , nest 2 $ "e = " <+> prettyA e , nest 2 $ "t = " <+> prettyTCM t ] reportSDoc "tc.check.app" 70 $ vcat [ "checkApplication (raw)" , nest 2 $ text $ "hd = " ++ show hd , nest 2 $ text $ "args = " ++ show (deepUnscope args) , nest 2 $ text $ "e = " ++ show (deepUnscope e) , nest 2 $ text $ "t = " ++ show t ] case unScope hd of -- Subcase: unambiguous projection A.Proj o p | Just x <- getUnambiguous p -> do checkUnambiguousProjectionApplication cmp e t x o hd args -- Subcase: ambiguous projection A.Proj o p -> do checkProjApp cmp e o (unAmbQ p) args t -- Subcase: unambiguous constructor A.Con ambC | Just c <- getUnambiguous ambC -> do -- augment c with record fields, but do not revert to original name con <- fromRightM (sigError (typeError $ AbstractConstructorNotInScope c)) $ getOrigConHead c checkConstructorApplication cmp e t con args -- Subcase: ambiguous constructor A.Con (AmbQ cs0) -> disambiguateConstructor cs0 args t >>= \ case Left unblock -> postponeTypeCheckingProblem (CheckExpr cmp e t) unblock Right c -> checkConstructorApplication cmp e t c args -- Subcase: pattern synonym A.PatternSyn n -> do (ns, p) <- lookupPatternSyn n p <- return $ setRange (getRange n) $ killRange $ vacuous p -- Pattern' Void -> Pattern' Expr -- Expand the pattern synonym by substituting for -- the arguments we have got and lambda-lifting -- over the ones we haven't. let meta r = A.Underscore $ A.emptyMetaInfo{ A.metaRange = r } -- TODO: name suggestion case A.insertImplicitPatSynArgs meta (getRange n) ns args of Nothing -> typeError $ BadArgumentsToPatternSynonym n Just (s, ns) -> do let p' = A.patternToExpr p e' = A.lambdaLiftExpr (map unArg ns) (A.substExpr s p') checkExpr' cmp e' t -- Subcase: macro A.Macro x -> do -- First go: no parameters TelV tel _ <- telView . defType =<< instantiateDef =<< getConstInfo x tTerm <- primAgdaTerm tName <- primQName -- Andreas, 2021-05-13, can we use @initWithDefault __IMPOSSIBLE__@ here? let argTel = init $ telToList tel -- last argument is the hole term -- inspect macro type to figure out if arguments need to be wrapped in quote/quoteTerm mkArg :: Type -> NamedArg A.Expr -> NamedArg A.Expr mkArg t a | unEl t == tTerm = (fmap . fmap) (A.App (A.defaultAppInfo (getRange a)) (A.QuoteTerm A.exprNoRange) . defaultNamedArg) a mkArg t a | unEl t == tName = (fmap . fmap) (A.App (A.defaultAppInfo (getRange a)) (A.Quote A.exprNoRange) . defaultNamedArg) a mkArg t a | otherwise = a makeArgs :: [Dom (String, Type)] -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> ([NamedArg A.Expr], [NamedArg A.Expr]) makeArgs [] args = ([], args) makeArgs _ [] = ([], []) makeArgs tel@(d : tel1) (arg : args) = case insertImplicit arg tel of NoInsertNeeded -> first (mkArg (snd $ unDom d) arg :) $ makeArgs tel1 args ImpInsert is -> makeArgs (drop (length is) tel) (arg : args) BadImplicits -> (arg : args, []) -- fail later in checkHeadApplication NoSuchName{} -> (arg : args, []) -- ditto (macroArgs, otherArgs) = makeArgs argTel args unq = A.App (A.defaultAppInfo $ fuseRange x args) (A.Unquote A.exprNoRange) . defaultNamedArg desugared = A.app (unq $ unAppView $ Application (A.Def x) $ macroArgs) otherArgs checkExpr' cmp desugared t -- Subcase: unquote A.Unquote _ | [arg] <- args -> do (_, hole) <- newValueMeta RunMetaOccursCheck CmpLeq t unquoteM (namedArg arg) hole t return hole | arg : args <- args -> do -- Example: unquote v a b : A -- Create meta H : (x : X) (y : Y x) → Z x y for the hole -- Check a : X, b : Y a -- Unify Z a b == A -- Run the tactic on H tel <- metaTel args -- (x : X) (y : Y x) target <- addContext tel newTypeMeta_ -- Z x y let holeType = telePi_ tel target -- (x : X) (y : Y x) → Z x y (Just vs, EmptyTel) <- mapFst allApplyElims <$> checkArguments_ CmpLeq ExpandLast (getRange args) args tel -- a b : (x : X) (y : Y x) let rho = reverse (map unArg vs) ++# IdS -- [x := a, y := b] equalType (applySubst rho target) t -- Z a b == A (_, hole) <- newValueMeta RunMetaOccursCheck CmpLeq holeType unquoteM (namedArg arg) hole holeType return $ apply hole vs where metaTel :: [Arg a] -> TCM Telescope metaTel [] = pure EmptyTel metaTel (arg : args) = do a <- newTypeMeta_ let dom = a <$ domFromArg arg ExtendTel dom . Abs "x" <$> addContext ("x" :: String, dom) (metaTel args) -- Subcase: defined symbol or variable. _ -> do v <- checkHeadApplication cmp e t hd args reportSDoc "tc.term.app" 30 $ vcat [ "checkApplication: checkHeadApplication returned" , nest 2 $ "v = " <+> prettyTCM v ] return v -- | Precondition: @Application hd args = appView e@. inferApplication :: ExpandHidden -> A.Expr -> A.Args -> A.Expr -> TCM (Term, Type) inferApplication exh hd args e | not (defOrVar hd) = do t <- workOnTypes $ newTypeMeta_ v <- checkExpr' CmpEq e t return (v, t) inferApplication exh hd args e = postponeInstanceConstraints $ do SortKit{..} <- sortKit case unScope hd of A.Proj o p | isAmbiguous p -> inferProjApp e o (unAmbQ p) args A.Def' x s | Just (sz, u) <- isNameOfUniv x -> inferUniv sz u e x s args _ -> do (f, t0) <- inferHead hd let r = getRange hd res <- runExceptT $ checkArgumentsE CmpEq exh (getRange hd) args t0 Nothing case res of Right st@(ACState{acType = t1}) -> fmap (,t1) $ unfoldInlined =<< checkHeadConstraints f st Left problem -> do t <- workOnTypes $ newTypeMeta_ v <- postponeArgs problem CmpEq exh r args t $ \ st -> unfoldInlined =<< checkHeadConstraints f st return (v, t) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Heads ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- inferHeadDef :: ProjOrigin -> QName -> TCM (Elims -> Term, Type) inferHeadDef o x = do -- Andreas, 2022-03-07, issue #5809: don't drop parameters of irrelevant projections. proj <- isRelevantProjection x rel <- getRelevance . defArgInfo <$> getConstInfo x let app = case proj of Nothing -> \ args -> Def x $ map Apply args Just p -> \ args -> projDropParsApply p o rel args mapFst applyE <$> inferDef app x -- | Infer the type of a head thing (variable, function symbol, or constructor). -- We return a function that applies the head to arguments. -- This is because in case of a constructor we want to drop the parameters. inferHead :: A.Expr -> TCM (Elims -> Term, Type) inferHead e = do case e of A.Var x -> do -- traceCall (InferVar x) $ do (u, a) <- getVarInfo x reportSDoc "tc.term.var" 20 $ hsep [ "variable" , prettyTCM x , "(" , text (show u) , ")" , "has type:" , prettyTCM a ] unless (usableRelevance a) $ typeError $ VariableIsIrrelevant x -- Andreas, 2019-06-18, LAIM 2019, issue #3855: -- Conor McBride style quantity judgement: -- The available quantity for variable x must be below -- the required quantity to construct the term x. -- Note: this whole thing does not work for linearity, where we need some actual arithmetics. unlessM ((getQuantity a `moreQuantity`) <$> viewTC eQuantity) $ typeError $ VariableIsErased x unless (usableCohesion a) $ typeError $ VariableIsOfUnusableCohesion x (getCohesion a) return (applyE u, unDom a) A.Def x -> inferHeadDef ProjPrefix x A.Def'{} -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ -- handled in checkHeadApplication and inferApplication A.Proj o ambP | Just d <- getUnambiguous ambP -> inferHeadDef o d A.Proj{} -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ -- inferHead will only be called on unambiguous projections A.Con ambC | Just c <- getUnambiguous ambC -> do -- Constructors are polymorphic internally. -- So, when building the constructor term -- we should throw away arguments corresponding to parameters. -- First, inferDef will try to apply the constructor -- to the free parameters of the current context. We ignore that. con <- fromRightM (sigError (typeError $ AbstractConstructorNotInScope c)) $ getOrigConHead c (u, a) <- inferDef (\ _ -> Con con ConOCon []) c -- Next get the number of parameters in the current context. Constructor{conPars = n} <- theDef <$> (instantiateDef =<< getConstInfo c) reportSLn "tc.term.con" 7 $ unwords [prettyShow c, "has", show n, "parameters."] -- So when applying the constructor throw away the parameters. return (applyE u . drop n, a) A.Con{} -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ -- inferHead will only be called on unambiguous constructors A.QuestionMark i ii -> inferMeta (newQuestionMark ii) i A.Underscore i -> inferMeta (newValueMeta RunMetaOccursCheck) i e -> do (term, t) <- inferExpr e return (applyE term, t) inferDef :: (Args -> Term) -> QName -> TCM (Term, Type) inferDef mkTerm x = traceCall (InferDef x) $ do -- getConstInfo retrieves the *absolute* (closed) type of x -- instantiateDef relativizes it to the current context d0 <- getConstInfo x d <- instantiateDef d0 reportSDoc "tc.term.def" 10 $ "inferDef" <+> prettyTCM x reportSDoc "tc.term.def" 30 $ " absolute type: " <+> inTopContext (prettyTCM $ defType d0) reportSDoc "tc.term.def" 30 $ " instantiated type:" <+> prettyTCM (defType d) -- Irrelevant defs are only allowed in irrelevant position. -- Erased defs are only allowed in erased position (see #3855). checkModality x d case theDef d of GeneralizableVar{} -> do -- Generalizable variables corresponds to metas created -- at the point where they should be generalized. Module parameters -- have already been applied to the meta, so we don't have to do that -- here. val <- fromMaybe __IMPOSSIBLE__ <$> viewTC (eGeneralizedVars . key x) sub <- checkpointSubstitution (genvalCheckpoint val) let (v, t) = applySubst sub (genvalTerm val, genvalType val) debug [] t v return (v, t) _ -> do -- since x is considered living in the top-level, we have to -- apply it to the current context vs <- freeVarsToApply x reportSDoc "tc.term.def" 30 $ " free vars:" <+> prettyList_ (map prettyTCM vs) let t = defType d v = mkTerm vs -- applies x to vs, dropping parameters -- Andrea 2019-07-16, Check that the supplied arguments -- respect the pure modalities of the current context. -- Pure modalities are based on left-division, so it does not -- rely on "position" like positional modalities. checkModalityArgs d0 vs debug vs t v return (v, t) where debug :: Args -> Type -> Term -> TCM () debug vs t v = do reportSDoc "tc.term.def" 60 $ "freeVarsToApply to def " <+> hsep (map (text . show) vs) reportSDoc "tc.term.def" 10 $ vcat [ "inferred def " <+> prettyTCM x <+> hsep (map prettyTCM vs) , nest 2 $ ":" <+> prettyTCM t , nest 2 $ "-->" <+> prettyTCM v ] -- | @checkHeadApplication e t hd args@ checks that @e@ has type @t@, -- assuming that @e@ has the form @hd args@. The corresponding -- type-checked term is returned. -- -- If the head term @hd@ is a coinductive constructor, then a -- top-level definition @fresh tel = hd args@ (where the clause is -- delayed) is added, where @tel@ corresponds to the current -- telescope. The returned term is @fresh tel@. -- -- Precondition: The head @hd@ has to be unambiguous, and there should -- not be any need to insert hidden lambdas. checkHeadApplication :: Comparison -> A.Expr -> Type -> A.Expr -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> TCM Term checkHeadApplication cmp e t hd args = do SortKit{..} <- sortKit sharp <- fmap nameOfSharp <$> coinductionKit conId <- getNameOfConstrained builtinConId pOr <- getNameOfConstrained builtinPOr pComp <- getNameOfConstrained builtinComp pHComp <- getNameOfConstrained builtinHComp pTrans <- getNameOfConstrained builtinTrans mglue <- getNameOfConstrained builtin_glue mglueU <- getNameOfConstrained builtin_glueU case hd of A.Def' c s | Just (sz, u) <- isNameOfUniv c -> checkUniv sz u cmp e t c s args -- Type checking #. The # that the user can write will be a Def, but the -- sharp we generate in the body of the wrapper is a Con. A.Def c | Just c == sharp -> checkSharpApplication e t c args -- Cubical primitives A.Def c | Just c == pComp -> defaultResult' $ Just $ checkPrimComp c A.Def c | Just c == pHComp -> defaultResult' $ Just $ checkPrimHComp c A.Def c | Just c == pTrans -> defaultResult' $ Just $ checkPrimTrans c A.Def c | Just c == conId -> defaultResult' $ Just $ checkConId c A.Def c | Just c == pOr -> defaultResult' $ Just $ checkPOr c A.Def c | Just c == mglue -> defaultResult' $ Just $ check_glue c A.Def c | Just c == mglueU -> defaultResult' $ Just $ check_glueU c _ -> defaultResult where defaultResult :: TCM Term defaultResult = defaultResult' Nothing defaultResult' :: Maybe (MaybeRanges -> Args -> Type -> TCM Args) -> TCM Term defaultResult' mk = do (f, t0) <- inferHead hd expandLast <- asksTC envExpandLast checkArguments cmp expandLast (getRange hd) args t0 t $ \ st@(ACState rs vs _ t1 checkedTarget) -> do let check = do k <- mk as <- allApplyElims vs pure $ k rs as t1 vs <- case check of Just ck -> do map Apply <$> ck Nothing -> do return vs v <- unfoldInlined =<< checkHeadConstraints f (st { acElims = vs }) coerce' cmp checkedTarget v t1 t -- Issue #3019 and #4170: Don't insert trailing implicits when checking arguments to existing -- metavariables. turnOffExpandLastIfExistingMeta :: A.Expr -> TCM a -> TCM a turnOffExpandLastIfExistingMeta hd | isExistingMeta = reallyDontExpandLast | otherwise = id where isExistingMeta = isJust $ A.metaNumber =<< metaInfo hd metaInfo (A.QuestionMark i _) = Just i metaInfo (A.Underscore i) = Just i metaInfo (A.ScopedExpr _ e) = metaInfo e metaInfo _ = Nothing ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Spines ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- traceCallE :: Call -> ExceptT e TCM r -> ExceptT e TCM r traceCallE call m = do z <- lift $ traceCall call $ runExceptT m case z of Right e -> return e Left err -> throwError err -- | If we've already checked the target type we don't have to call coerce. coerce' :: Comparison -> CheckedTarget -> Term -> Type -> Type -> TCM Term coerce' cmp NotCheckedTarget v inferred expected = coerce cmp v inferred expected coerce' cmp (CheckedTarget Nothing) v _ _ = return v coerce' cmp (CheckedTarget (Just pid)) v _ expected = blockTermOnProblem expected v pid -- | Check a list of arguments: @checkArgs args t0 t1@ checks that -- @t0 = Delta -> t0'@ and @args : Delta@. Inserts hidden arguments to -- make this happen. Returns the evaluated arguments @vs@, the remaining -- type @t0'@ (which should be a subtype of @t1@) and any constraints @cs@ -- that have to be solved for everything to be well-formed. checkArgumentsE :: Comparison -> ExpandHidden -> Range -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> Type -> Maybe Type -> ExceptT (ArgsCheckState [NamedArg A.Expr]) TCM (ArgsCheckState CheckedTarget) checkArgumentsE sComp sExpand sRange sArgs sFun sApp = do sPathView <- pathView' checkArgumentsE' S{ sChecked = NotCheckedTarget , sArgs = zip sArgs $ List.suffixesSatisfying visible sArgs , sArgsLen = length sArgs , sSizeLtChecked = False , sSkipCheck = DontSkip , .. } -- | State used by 'checkArgumentsE''. data CheckArgumentsE'State = S { sChecked :: CheckedTarget -- ^ Have we already checked the target? , sComp :: Comparison -- ^ Comparison to use if checking the target type. , sExpand :: ExpandHidden -- ^ Insert trailing hidden arguments? , sRange :: Range -- ^ Range of the function. , sArgs :: [(NamedArg A.Expr, Bool)] -- ^ Arguments, along with information about whether a given -- argument and all remaining arguments are 'visible'. , sArgsLen :: !Nat -- ^ The length of 'sArgs'. , sFun :: Type -- ^ The function's type. , sApp :: Maybe Type -- ^ The type of the application. , sSizeLtChecked :: !Bool -- ^ Have we checked if 'sApp' is 'BoundedLt'? , sSkipCheck :: !SkipCheck -- ^ Should the target type check be skipped? , sPathView :: Type -> PathView -- ^ The function returned by 'pathView''. } -- | Should the target type check in 'checkArgumentsE'' be skipped? data SkipCheck = Skip | SkipNext !Nat -- ^ Skip the given number of checks. | DontSkip checkArgumentsE' :: CheckArgumentsE'State -> ExceptT (ArgsCheckState [NamedArg A.Expr]) TCM (ArgsCheckState CheckedTarget) -- Case: no arguments, do not insert trailing hidden arguments: We are done. checkArgumentsE' S{ sArgs = [], .. } | isDontExpandLast sExpand = return $ ACState { acRanges = [] , acElims = [] , acConstraints = [] , acType = sFun , acData = sChecked } -- Case: no arguments, but need to insert trailing hiddens. checkArgumentsE' S{ sArgs = [], .. } = traceCallE (CheckArguments sRange [] sFun sApp) $ lift $ do sApp <- traverse (unEl <.> reduce) sApp (us, t) <- implicitArgs (-1) (expand sApp) sFun return $ ACState { acRanges = replicate (length us) Nothing , acElims = map Apply us , acConstraints = replicate (length us) Nothing , acType = t , acData = sChecked } where expand (Just (Pi dom _)) Hidden = not (hidden dom) expand _ Hidden = True expand (Just (Pi dom _)) Instance{} = not (isInstance dom) expand _ Instance{} = True expand _ NotHidden = False -- Case: argument given. checkArgumentsE' s@S{ sArgs = sArgs@((arg@(Arg info e), sArgsVisible) : args), .. } = traceCallE (CheckArguments sRange (map fst sArgs) sFun sApp) $ do lift $ reportSDoc "tc.term.args" 30 $ sep [ "checkArgumentsE" -- , " sArgs =" <+> prettyA sArgs , nest 2 $ vcat [ "e =" <+> prettyA e , "sFun =" <+> prettyTCM sFun , "sApp =" <+> maybe "Nothing" prettyTCM sApp ] ] -- First, insert implicit arguments, depending on current argument @arg@. let hx = getHiding info -- hiding of current argument mx :: Maybe ArgName mx = bareNameOf e -- name of current argument -- do not insert visible arguments expand NotHidden y = False -- insert a hidden argument if arg is not hidden or has different name -- insert an instance argument if arg is not instance or has different name expand hy y = not (sameHiding hy hx) || maybe False (y /=) mx reportSDoc "tc.term.args" 30 $ vcat [ "calling implicitNamedArgs" , nest 2 $ "sFun = " <+> prettyTCM sFun , nest 2 $ "hx = " <+> text (show hx) , nest 2 $ "mx = " <+> maybe "nothing" prettyTCM mx ] (nargs, sFun) <- lift $ implicitNamedArgs (-1) expand sFun -- Separate names from args. let (mxs, us) = unzip $ map (\ (Arg ai (Named mx u)) -> (mx, Apply $ Arg ai u)) nargs xs = catMaybes mxs -- We need a function type here, but we don't know which kind -- (implicit/explicit). But it might be possible to use injectivity to -- force a pi. sFun <- lift $ forcePiUsingInjectivity sFun -- We are done inserting implicit args. Now, try to check @arg@. ifBlocked sFun (\_ sFun -> throwError $ ACState { acRanges = replicate (length us) Nothing , acElims = us , acConstraints = replicate (length us) Nothing , acType = sFun , acData = map fst sArgs }) $ \_ sFun -> do -- What can go wrong? -- 1. We ran out of function types. let shouldBePi -- a) It is an explicit argument, but we ran out of function types. | visible info = lift $ typeError $ ShouldBePi sFun -- b) It is an implicit argument, and we did not insert any implicits. -- Thus, the type was not a function type to start with. | null xs = lift $ typeError $ ShouldBePi sFun -- c) We did insert implicits, but we ran out of implicit function types. -- Then, we should inform the user that we did not find his one. | otherwise = lift $ typeError $ WrongNamedArgument arg xs -- 2. We have a function type left, but it is the wrong one. -- Our argument must be implicit, case a) is impossible. -- (Otherwise we would have ran out of function types instead.) let wrongPi -- b) We have not inserted any implicits. | null xs = lift $ typeError $ WrongHidingInApplication sFun -- c) We inserted implicits, but did not find his one. | otherwise = lift $ typeError $ WrongNamedArgument arg xs let (skip, next) = case sSkipCheck of Skip -> (True, Skip) DontSkip -> (False, DontSkip) SkipNext n -> case compare n 1 of LT -> (False, DontSkip) EQ -> (True, DontSkip) GT -> (True, SkipNext (n - 1)) s <- return s { sRange = fuseRange sRange e , sArgs = args , sArgsLen = sArgsLen - 1 , sFun = sFun , sSkipCheck = next } -- Check the target type if we can get away with it. s <- lift $ case (sChecked, skip, sApp) of (NotCheckedTarget, False, Just sApp) | sArgsVisible -> do -- How many visible Π's (up to at most sArgsLen) does -- sFun start with? TelV tel tgt <- telViewUpTo' sArgsLen visible sFun let visiblePis = size tel -- The free variables less than visiblePis in tgt. freeInTgt = fst $ IntSet.split visiblePis $ freeVars tgt rigid <- isRigid s tgt -- The target must be rigid. case rigid of IsNotRigid reason -> -- Skip the next visiblePis - 1 - k checks. let skip k = s{ sSkipCheck = SkipNext $ visiblePis - 1 - k } dontSkip = s in return $ case reason of Permanent -> skip 0 Unspecified -> dontSkip AVar x -> if x `IntSet.member` freeInTgt then skip x else skip 0 IsRigid -> do -- Is any free variable in tgt less than -- visiblePis? let dep = not (IntSet.null freeInTgt) -- The target must be non-dependent. if dep then return s else do -- Andreas, 2019-03-28, issue #3248: -- If the target type is SIZELT, we need coerce, leqType is insufficient. -- For example, we have i : Size <= (Size< ↑ i), but not Size <= (Size< ↑ i). (isSizeLt, sApp, s) <- if sSizeLtChecked then return (False, sApp, s) else do sApp <- reduce sApp isSizeLt <- isSizeType sApp <&> \case Just (BoundedLt _) -> True _ -> False return ( isSizeLt , sApp , s{ sApp = Just sApp , sSizeLtChecked = True , sSkipCheck = if isSizeLt then Skip else DontSkip } ) if isSizeLt then return s else do let tgt1 = applySubst (strengthenS impossible visiblePis) tgt reportSDoc "tc.term.args.target" 30 $ vcat [ "Checking target types first" , nest 2 $ "inferred =" <+> prettyTCM tgt1 , nest 2 $ "expected =" <+> prettyTCM sApp ] chk <- traceCall (CheckTargetType (fuseRange sRange sArgs) tgt1 sApp) $ CheckedTarget <$> ifNoConstraints_ (compareType sComp tgt1 sApp) (return Nothing) (return . Just) return s{ sChecked = chk } _ -> return s -- sFun <- lift $ forcePi (getHiding info) -- (maybe "_" rangedThing $ nameOf e) sFun case unEl sFun of Pi (Dom{domInfo = info', domName = dname, unDom = a}) b | let name = bareNameWithDefault "_" dname, sameHiding info info' && (visible info || maybe True (name ==) mx) -> do u <- lift $ applyModalityToContext info' $ do -- Andreas, 2014-05-30 experiment to check non-dependent arguments -- after the spine has been processed. Allows to propagate type info -- from ascribed type into extended-lambdas. Would solve issue 1159. -- However, leaves unsolved type checking problems in the test suite. -- I do not know what I am doing wrong here. -- Could be extreme order-sensitivity or my abuse of the postponing -- mechanism. -- Andreas, 2016-02-02: Ulf says unless there is actually some meta -- blocking a postponed type checking problem, we might never retry, -- since the trigger for retrying constraints is solving a meta. -- Thus, the following naive use violates some invariant. -- if not $ isBinderUsed b -- then postponeTypeCheckingProblem (CheckExpr (namedThing e) a) (return True) else let e' = e { nameOf = (nameOf e) <|> dname } checkNamedArg (Arg info' e') a let c = case getLock info' of IsLock{} -> Just $ Abs "t" $ CheckLockedVars (Var 0 []) (raise 1 sFun) (raise 1 $ Arg info' u) (raise 1 a) _ -> Nothing lift $ reportSDoc "tc.term.lock" 40 $ text "lock =" <+> text (show $ getLock info') lift $ reportSDoc "tc.term.lock" 40 $ addContext (defaultDom $ sFun) $ maybe (text "nothing") (prettyTCM . absBody) c -- save relevance info' from domain in argument addCheckedArgs us (getRange e) (Apply $ Arg info' u) c $ checkArgumentsE' s{ sFun = absApp b u } | otherwise -> do reportSDoc "error" 10 $ nest 2 $ vcat [ text $ "info = " ++ show info , text $ "info' = " ++ show info' , text $ "absName b = " ++ absName b , text $ "nameOf e = " ++ show (nameOf e) ] wrongPi _ | visible info , PathType sort _ _ bA x y <- sPathView sFun -> do lift $ reportSDoc "tc.term.args" 30 $ text $ show bA u <- lift $ checkExpr (namedThing e) =<< primIntervalType addCheckedArgs us (getRange e) (IApply (unArg x) (unArg y) u) Nothing $ checkArgumentsE' s{ sChecked = NotCheckedTarget , sFun = El sort $ unArg bA `apply` [argN u] } _ -> shouldBePi where -- Andrea: Here one would add constraints too. addCheckedArgs us r u c rec = do st@ACState{acRanges = rs, acElims = vs} <- rec let rs' = replicate (length us) Nothing ++ Just r : rs cs' = replicate (length us) Nothing ++ c : acConstraints st return $ st { acRanges = rs', acElims = us ++ u : vs, acConstraints = cs' } `catchError` \ st@ACState{acRanges = rs, acElims = vs} -> do let rs' = replicate (length us) Nothing ++ Just r : rs cs' = replicate (length us) Nothing ++ c : acConstraints st throwError $ st { acRanges = rs', acElims = us ++ u : vs, acConstraints = cs' } -- | The result of 'isRigid'. data IsRigid = IsRigid -- ^ The type is rigid. | IsNotRigid !IsPermanent -- ^ The type is not rigid. If the argument is 'Nothing', then -- this will not change. If the argument is @'Just' reason@, then -- this might change for the given @reason@. -- | Is the result of 'isRigid' \"permanent\"? data IsPermanent = Permanent -- ^ Yes. | AVar !Nat -- ^ The result does not change unless the given variable is -- instantiated. | Unspecified -- ^ Maybe, maybe not. -- | Is the type \"rigid\"? isRigid :: CheckArgumentsE'State -> Type -> TCM IsRigid isRigid s t | PathType{} <- sPathView s t = -- Path is not rigid. return $ IsNotRigid Permanent isRigid _ (El _ t) = case t of Var x _ -> return $ IsNotRigid (AVar x) Lam{} -> return $ IsNotRigid Permanent Lit{} -> return $ IsNotRigid Permanent Con{} -> return $ IsNotRigid Permanent Pi dom _ -> return $ if visible dom then IsRigid else IsNotRigid Permanent Sort{} -> return $ IsNotRigid Permanent Level{} -> return $ IsNotRigid Permanent MetaV{} -> return $ IsNotRigid Unspecified DontCare{} -> return $ IsNotRigid Permanent Dummy{} -> return $ IsNotRigid Permanent Def d _ -> getConstInfo d <&> theDef <&> \case Axiom{} -> IsRigid DataOrRecSig{} -> IsRigid AbstractDefn{} -> IsRigid Function{funClauses = cs} -> if null cs then IsRigid else IsNotRigid Unspecified -- This Reason could perhaps be -- more precise (in some cases). Datatype{} -> IsRigid Record{} -> IsRigid Constructor{} -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ GeneralizableVar{} -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ Primitive{} -> IsNotRigid Unspecified PrimitiveSort{} -> IsNotRigid Unspecified -- | Check that a list of arguments fits a telescope. -- Inserts hidden arguments as necessary. -- Returns the type-checked arguments and the remaining telescope. checkArguments_ :: Comparison -- ^ Comparison for target -> ExpandHidden -- ^ Eagerly insert trailing hidden arguments? -> Range -- ^ Range of application. -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -- ^ Arguments to check. -> Telescope -- ^ Telescope to check arguments against. -> TCM (Elims, Telescope) -- ^ Checked arguments and remaining telescope if successful. checkArguments_ cmp exh r args tel = postponeInstanceConstraints $ do z <- runExceptT $ checkArgumentsE cmp exh r args (telePi tel __DUMMY_TYPE__) Nothing case z of Right (ACState _ args cs t _) | all isNothing cs -> do let TelV tel' _ = telView' t return (args, tel') | otherwise -> do typeError $ GenericError $ "Head constraints are not (yet) supported in this position." Left _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ -- type cannot be blocked as it is generated by telePi -- | @checkArguments cmp exph r args t0 t k@ tries @checkArgumentsE exph args t0 t@. -- If it succeeds, it continues @k@ with the returned results. If it fails, -- it registers a postponed typechecking problem and returns the resulting new -- meta variable. -- -- Checks @e := ((_ : t0) args) : t@. checkArguments :: Comparison -> ExpandHidden -> Range -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> Type -> Type -> (ArgsCheckState CheckedTarget -> TCM Term) -> TCM Term checkArguments cmp exph r args t0 t k = postponeInstanceConstraints $ do z <- runExceptT $ checkArgumentsE cmp exph r args t0 (Just t) case z of Right st -> k st -- vs = evaluated args -- t1 = remaining type (needs to be subtype of t) Left problem -> postponeArgs problem cmp exph r args t k -- if unsuccessful, postpone checking until t0 unblocks postponeArgs :: (ArgsCheckState [NamedArg A.Expr]) -> Comparison -> ExpandHidden -> Range -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> Type -> (ArgsCheckState CheckedTarget -> TCM Term) -> TCM Term postponeArgs (ACState rs us cs t0 es) cmp exph r args t k = do reportSDoc "tc.term.expr.args" 80 $ sep [ "postponed checking arguments" , nest 4 $ prettyList (map (prettyA . namedThing . unArg) args) , nest 2 $ "against" , nest 4 $ prettyTCM t0 ] $$ sep [ "progress:" , nest 2 $ "checked" <+> prettyList (map prettyTCM us) , nest 2 $ "remaining" <+> sep [ prettyList (map (prettyA . namedThing . unArg) es) , nest 2 $ ":" <+> prettyTCM t0 ] ] postponeTypeCheckingProblem_ (CheckArgs cmp exph r es t0 t $ \ (ACState rs' vs cs' t pid) -> k $ ACState (rs ++ rs') (us ++ vs) (cs ++ cs') t pid) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Constructors ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- | Check the type of a constructor application. This is easier than -- a general application since the implicit arguments can be inserted -- without looking at the arguments to the constructor. checkConstructorApplication :: Comparison -> A.Expr -> Type -> ConHead -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> TCM Term checkConstructorApplication cmp org t c args = do reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ vcat [ "entering checkConstructorApplication" , nest 2 $ vcat [ "org =" <+> prettyTCM org , "t =" <+> prettyTCM t , "c =" <+> prettyTCM c , "args =" <+> prettyTCM args ] ] cdef <- getConInfo c checkModality (conName c) cdef let paramsGiven = checkForParams args if paramsGiven then fallback else do reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ "checkConstructorApplication: no parameters explicitly supplied, continuing..." let Constructor{conData = d, conPars = npars} = theDef cdef reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ nest 2 $ "d =" <+> prettyTCM d -- Issue 661: t maybe an evaluated form of d .., so we evaluate d -- as well and then check wether we deal with the same datatype t0 <- reduce (Def d []) tReduced <- reduce t case (t0, unEl tReduced) of -- Only fully applied constructors get special treatment (Def d0 _, Def d' es) -> do let ~(Just vs) = allApplyElims es reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ nest 2 $ "d0 =" <+> prettyTCM d0 reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ nest 2 $ "d' =" <+> prettyTCM d' reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ nest 2 $ "vs =" <+> prettyTCM vs if d' /= d0 then fallback else do -- Issue 661: d' may take more parameters than d, in particular -- these additional parameters could be a module parameter telescope. -- Since we get the constructor type ctype from d but the parameters -- from t = Def d' vs, we drop the additional parameters. npars' <- getNumberOfParameters d' caseMaybe (sequenceA $ Pair (Just npars) npars') fallback $ \ (Pair n n') -> do reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ nest 2 $ text $ "n = " ++ show n reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ nest 2 $ text $ "n' = " ++ show n' when (n > n') -- preprocessor does not like ', so put on next line __IMPOSSIBLE__ let ps = take n $ drop (n' - n) vs ctype = defType cdef reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 20 $ vcat [ "special checking of constructor application of" <+> prettyTCM c , nest 2 $ vcat [ "ps =" <+> prettyTCM ps , "ctype =" <+> prettyTCM ctype ] ] let ctype' = ctype `piApply` ps reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 20 $ nest 2 $ "ctype' =" <+> prettyTCM ctype' -- get the parameter names let TelV ptel _ = telView'UpTo n ctype let pnames = map (fmap fst) $ telToList ptel -- drop the parameter arguments args' = dropArgs pnames args -- check the non-parameter arguments expandLast <- asksTC envExpandLast checkArguments cmp expandLast (getRange c) args' ctype' t $ \ st@(ACState _ _ _ t' targetCheck) -> do reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 20 $ nest 2 $ vcat [ text "es =" <+> prettyTCM es , text "t' =" <+> prettyTCM t' ] v <- checkHeadConstraints (Con c ConOCon) st coerce' cmp targetCheck v t' t _ -> do reportSDoc "tc.term.con" 50 $ nest 2 $ "we are not at a datatype, falling back" fallback where fallback = checkHeadApplication cmp org t (A.Con (unambiguous $ conName c)) args -- Check if there are explicitly given hidden arguments, -- in which case we fall back to default type checking. -- We could work harder, but let's not for now. -- -- Andreas, 2012-04-18: if all inital args are underscores, ignore them checkForParams args = let (hargs, rest) = break visible args notUnderscore A.Underscore{} = False notUnderscore _ = True in any (notUnderscore . unScope . namedArg) hargs -- Drop the constructor arguments that correspond to parameters. dropArgs [] args = args dropArgs ps [] = args dropArgs ps args@(arg : args') | Just p <- name, Just ps' <- namedPar p ps = dropArgs ps' args' | Nothing <- name, Just ps' <- unnamedPar h ps = dropArgs ps' args' | otherwise = args where name = bareNameOf arg h = getHiding arg namedPar x = dropPar ((x ==) . unDom) unnamedPar h = dropPar (sameHiding h) dropPar this (p : ps) | this p = Just ps | otherwise = dropPar this ps dropPar _ [] = Nothing -- | Return an unblocking action in case of failure. type DisambiguateConstructor = TCM (Either Blocker ConHead) -- | Returns an unblocking action in case of failure. disambiguateConstructor :: List1 QName -> A.Args -> Type -> DisambiguateConstructor disambiguateConstructor cs0 args t = do reportSLn "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ "Ambiguous constructor: " ++ prettyShow cs0 reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ vcat $ "Arguments:" : map (nest 2 . prettyTCM) args -- Get the datatypes of the various constructors let getData Constructor{conData = d} = d getData _ = __IMPOSSIBLE__ reportSLn "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ " ranges before: " ++ prettyShow (getRange cs0) -- We use the reduced constructor when disambiguating, but -- the original constructor for type checking. This is important -- since they may have different types (different parameters). -- See issue 279. -- Andreas, 2017-08-13, issue #2686: ignore abstract constructors ccons <- List1.rights <$> do forM cs0 $ \ c -> mapRight (c,) <$> getConForm c reportSLn "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ " reduced: " ++ prettyShow (map snd ccons) case ccons of [] -> typeError $ AbstractConstructorNotInScope $ List1.head cs0 [(c0,con)] -> do let c = setConName c0 con reportSLn "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ " only one non-abstract constructor: " ++ prettyShow c decideOn c (c0,_):_ -> do dcs :: [(QName, Type, ConHead)] <- forM ccons $ \ (c, con) -> do t <- defType <$> getConstInfo c def <- getConInfo con pure (getData (theDef def), t, setConName c con) -- Type error let badCon t = typeError $ DoesNotConstructAnElementOf c0 t -- Lets look at the target type at this point TelV tel t1 <- telViewPath t addContext tel $ do reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ nest 2 $ "target type: " <+> prettyTCM t1 -- If we don't have a target type yet, try to look at the argument types. ifBlocked t1 (\ b _ -> disambiguateByArgs dcs $ return $ Left b) $ \ _ t' -> caseMaybeM (isDataOrRecord $ unEl t') (badCon t') $ \ (d, _) -> do let dcs' = filter ((d ==) . fst3) dcs case map thd3 dcs' of [c] -> decideOn c [] -> badCon $ t' $> Def d [] -- If the information from the target type did not eliminate ambiguity fully, -- try to further eliminate alternatives by looking at the arguments. c:cs-> disambiguateByArgs dcs' $ typeError $ CantResolveOverloadedConstructorsTargetingSameDatatype d $ fmap conName $ c :| cs where decideOn :: ConHead -> DisambiguateConstructor decideOn c = do reportSLn "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ " decided on: " ++ prettyShow c storeDisambiguatedConstructor (conInductive c) (conName c) return $ Right c -- Look at simple visible arguments (variables (bound and generalizable ones) and defined names). -- From these we can compute an approximate type effortlessly: -- 1. Throw away hidden domains (needed for generalizable variables). -- 2. If the remainder is a defined name that is not blocked on anything, we take this name as -- approximate type of the argument. -- This gives us a skeleton @[Maybe QName]@. Compute the same from the constructor types -- of the candidates and see if we find any mismatches that allow us to rule out the candidate. disambiguateByArgs :: [(QName, Type, ConHead)] -> DisambiguateConstructor -> DisambiguateConstructor disambiguateByArgs dcs fallback = do -- Look for visible arguments that are just variables, -- so that we can get their type directly from the context -- without full-fledged type inference. askel <- visibleVarArgs reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ hsep $ "trying disambiguation by arguments" : map prettyTCM askel reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 80 $ hsep $ "trying disambiguation by arguments" : map pretty askel -- Filter out candidates with definitive mismatches. cands <- filterM (\ (_d, t, _c) -> matchSkel askel =<< visibleConDoms t) dcs case cands of [(_d, _t, c)] -> decideOn c _ -> fallback where -- @match@ is successful if there no name conflict (q ≠ q') -- and the argument skeleton is not longer thatn the constructor skeleton. match :: [Maybe QName] -- Specification (argument skeleton). -> [Maybe QName] -- Candidate (constructor skeleton). -> Bool match = curry $ \case ([], _ ) -> True (_ , []) -> False (Just q : ms, Just q' : ms') -> q == q' && match ms ms' (_ : ms, _ : ms') -> match ms ms' -- @match@ with debug printing. matchSkel :: [Maybe QName] -> [Maybe QName] -> TCM Bool matchSkel argsSkel conSkel = do let res = match argsSkel conSkel reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ vcat [ "matchSkel returns" <+> pretty res <+> "on:" , nest 2 $ pretty argsSkel , nest 2 $ pretty conSkel ] return res -- Only look at visible arguments that are variables or similar identifiers. -- For variables/symbols @Just getTypeHead@ else @Nothing@. visibleVarArgs :: TCM [Maybe QName] visibleVarArgs = forM (filter visible args) $ \ (arg :: NamedArg A.Expr) -> do let v = unScope $ namedArg arg reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ "is this a variable? :" <+> prettyTCM v reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 90 $ "is this a variable? :" <+> (text . show) v case v of -- We can readly grab the type of a variable from the context. A.Var x -> do t <- unDom . snd <$> getVarInfo x reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 40 $ "type of variable:" <+> prettyTCM t -- Just keep the name @D@ of type @D vs@ getTypeHead t -- We can also grab the type of defined symbols if we find them in the signature. A.Def x -> do getConstInfo' x >>= \case Right def -> getTypeHead $ defType def Left{} -> return Nothing _ -> return Nothing -- List of visible arguments of the constructor candidate. -- E.g. vcons : {A : Set} {n : Nat} (x : A) (xs : Vec A n) → Vec A (suc n) -- becomes vcons : ? → Vec → . visibleConDoms :: Type -> TCM [Maybe QName] visibleConDoms t = do TelV tel _ <- telViewPath t mapM (getTypeHead . snd . unDom) $ filter visible $ telToList tel -- | If type is of the form @F vs@ and not blocked in any way, return @F@. getTypeHead :: Type -> TCM (Maybe QName) getTypeHead t = do res <- ifBlocked t (\ _ _ -> return Nothing) $ \ nb t -> do case nb of ReallyNotBlocked -> do -- Drop initial hidden domains (only needed for generalizable variables). TelV _ core <- telViewUpTo' (0-1) (not . visible) t case unEl core of Def q _ -> return $ Just q _ -> return Nothing -- In the other cases, we do not get the data name. _ -> return Nothing reportSDoc "tc.check.term.con" 80 $ hcat $ "getTypeHead(" : prettyTCM t : ") = " : pretty res : [] return res --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Projections --------------------------------------------------------------------------- checkUnambiguousProjectionApplication :: Comparison -> A.Expr -> Type -> QName -> ProjOrigin -> A.Expr -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> TCM Term checkUnambiguousProjectionApplication cmp e t x o hd args = do let fallback = checkHeadApplication cmp e t hd args -- Andreas, 2021-02-19, issue #3289 -- If a postfix projection was moved to the head by appView, -- we have to patch the first argument with the correct hiding info. case (o, args) of (ProjPostfix, arg : rest) -> do -- Andreas, 2021-11-19, issue #5657: -- If @x@ has been brought into scope by e.g. @open R r@, it is no longer -- a projection even though the scope checker labels it so. -- Thus, @isProjection@ may fail. caseMaybeM (isProjection x) fallback $ \ pr -> do checkHeadApplication cmp e t hd (setArgInfo (projArgInfo pr) arg : rest) _ -> fallback -- | Inferring the type of an overloaded projection application. -- See 'inferOrCheckProjApp'. inferProjApp :: A.Expr -> ProjOrigin -> List1 QName -> A.Args -> TCM (Term, Type) inferProjApp e o ds args0 = do (v, t, _) <- inferOrCheckProjApp e o ds args0 Nothing return (v, t) -- | Checking the type of an overloaded projection application. -- See 'inferOrCheckProjApp'. checkProjApp :: Comparison -> A.Expr -> ProjOrigin -> List1 QName -> A.Args -> Type -> TCM Term checkProjApp cmp e o ds args0 t = do (v, ti, targetCheck) <- inferOrCheckProjApp e o ds args0 (Just (cmp, t)) coerce' cmp targetCheck v ti t -- | Checking the type of an overloaded projection application. -- See 'inferOrCheckProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg'. checkProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg :: Comparison -> A.Expr -> ProjOrigin -> List1 QName -> A.Args -> Type -> Int -> Term -> Type -> PrincipalArgTypeMetas -> TCM Term checkProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg cmp e o ds args0 t k v0 pt patm = do (v, ti, targetCheck) <- inferOrCheckProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg e o ds args0 (Just (cmp, t)) k v0 pt (Just patm) coerce' cmp targetCheck v ti t -- | Inferring or Checking an overloaded projection application. -- -- The overloaded projection is disambiguated by inferring the type of its -- principal argument, which is the first visible argument. inferOrCheckProjApp :: A.Expr -- ^ The whole expression which constitutes the application. -> ProjOrigin -- ^ The origin of the projection involved in this projection application. -> List1 QName -- ^ The projection name (potentially ambiguous). -> A.Args -- ^ The arguments to the projection. -> Maybe (Comparison, Type) -- ^ The expected type of the expression (if 'Nothing', infer it). -> TCM (Term, Type, CheckedTarget) -- ^ The type-checked expression and its type (if successful). inferOrCheckProjApp e o ds args mt = do reportSDoc "tc.proj.amb" 20 $ vcat [ "checking ambiguous projection" , text $ " ds = " ++ prettyShow ds , text " args = " <+> sep (map prettyTCM args) , text " t = " <+> caseMaybe mt "Nothing" prettyTCM ] let cmp = caseMaybe mt CmpEq fst -- Postpone the whole type checking problem -- if type of principal argument (or the type where we get it from) -- is blocked by meta m. postpone b = do tc <- caseMaybe mt newTypeMeta_ (return . snd) v <- postponeTypeCheckingProblem (CheckExpr cmp e tc) b return (v, tc, NotCheckedTarget) -- The following cases need to be considered: -- 1. No arguments to the projection. -- 2. Arguments (parameters), but not the principal argument. -- 3. Argument(s) including the principal argument. -- For now, we only allow ambiguous projections if the first visible -- argument is the record value. case filter (visible . snd) $ zip [0..] args of -- Case: we have no visible argument to the projection. -- In inference mode, we really need the visible argument, postponing does not help [] -> caseMaybe mt (refuseProjNotApplied ds) $ \ (cmp , t) -> do -- If we have the type, we can try to get the type of the principal argument. -- It is the first visible argument. TelV _ptel core <- telViewUpTo' (-1) (not . visible) t ifBlocked core (\ m _ -> postpone m) $ {-else-} \ _ core -> do ifNotPiType core (\ _ -> refuseProjNotApplied ds) $ {-else-} \ dom _b -> do ifBlocked (unDom dom) (\ m _ -> postpone m) $ {-else-} \ _ ta -> do caseMaybeM (isRecordType ta) (refuseProjNotRecordType ds Nothing ta) $ \ (_q, _pars, defn) -> do case defn of Record { recFields = fs } -> do case forMaybe fs $ \ f -> Fold.find (unDom f ==) ds of [] -> refuseProjNoMatching ds [d] -> do storeDisambiguatedProjection d -- checkHeadApplication will check the target type (, t, CheckedTarget Nothing) <$> checkHeadApplication cmp e t (A.Proj o $ unambiguous d) args _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ _ -> __IMPOSSIBLE__ -- Case: we have a visible argument ((k, arg) : _) -> do (v0, ta) <- inferExpr $ namedArg arg reportSDoc "tc.proj.amb" 25 $ vcat [ " principal arg " <+> prettyTCM arg , " has type " <+> prettyTCM ta ] inferOrCheckProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg e o ds args mt k v0 ta Nothing -- | Same arguments 'inferOrCheckProjApp' above but also gets the position, -- value and type of the principal argument. inferOrCheckProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg :: A.Expr -- ^ The whole expression which constitutes the application. -> ProjOrigin -- ^ The origin of the projection involved in this projection application. -> List1 QName -- ^ The projection name (potentially ambiguous). -> A.Args -- ^ The arguments to the projection. -> Maybe (Comparison, Type) -- ^ The expected type of the expression (if 'Nothing', infer it). -> Int -- ^ The position of the principal argument. -> Term -- ^ The value of the principal argument. -> Type -- ^ The type of the principal argument. -> Maybe PrincipalArgTypeMetas -- ^ The metas previously created for the principal argument's type, when -- picking up a postponed problem. 'Nothing', otherwise. -> TCM (Term, Type, CheckedTarget) -- ^ The type-checked expression and its type (if successful). inferOrCheckProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg e o ds args mt k v0 ta mpatm = do let cmp = caseMaybe mt CmpEq fst postpone b patm = do tc <- caseMaybe mt newTypeMeta_ (return . snd) v <- postponeTypeCheckingProblem (CheckProjAppToKnownPrincipalArg cmp e o ds args tc k v0 ta patm) b return (v, tc, NotCheckedTarget) -- ta should be a record type (after introducing the hidden args in v0) patm@(PrincipalArgTypeMetas vargs ta) <- case mpatm of -- keep using the previously created metas, when picking up a postponed -- problem - see #4924 Just patm -> return patm -- create fresh metas Nothing -> uncurry PrincipalArgTypeMetas <$> implicitArgs (-1) (not . visible) ta let v = v0 `apply` vargs ifBlocked ta (\ m _ -> postpone m patm) {-else-} $ \ _ ta -> do caseMaybeM (isRecordType ta) (refuseProjNotRecordType ds (Just v0) ta) $ \ (q, _pars0, _) -> do -- try to project it with all of the possible projections let try d = do reportSDoc "tc.proj.amb" 30 $ vcat [ text $ "trying projection " ++ prettyShow d , " td = " <+> caseMaybeM (getDefType d ta) "Nothing" prettyTCM ] -- get the original projection name def <- lift $ getConstInfo d let isP = isProjection_ $ theDef def reportSDoc "tc.proj.amb" 40 $ vcat $ text ( " isProjection = " ++ caseMaybe isP "no" (const "yes") ) : caseMaybe isP [] (\ Projection{ projProper = proper, projOrig = orig } -> [ text $ " proper = " ++ show proper , text $ " orig = " ++ prettyShow orig ]) -- Andreas, 2017-01-21, issue #2422 -- The scope checker considers inherited projections (from nested records) -- as projections and allows overloading. However, since they are defined -- as *composition* of projections, the type checker does *not* recognize them, -- and @isP@ will be @Nothing@. -- However, we can ignore this, as we only need the @orig@inal projection name -- for removing false ambiguity. Thus, we skip these checks: -- Projection{ projProper = proper, projOrig = orig } <- MaybeT $ return isP -- guard $ isJust proper let orig = caseMaybe isP d projOrig -- try to eliminate (dom, u, tb) <- MaybeT (projectTyped v ta o d `catchError` \ _ -> return Nothing) reportSDoc "tc.proj.amb" 30 $ vcat [ " dom = " <+> prettyTCM dom , " u = " <+> prettyTCM u , " tb = " <+> prettyTCM tb ] (q', pars, _) <- MaybeT $ isRecordType $ unDom dom reportSDoc "tc.proj.amb" 30 $ vcat [ " q = " <+> prettyTCM q , " q' = " <+> prettyTCM q' ] guard (q == q') -- Get the type of the projection and check -- that the first visible argument is the record value. let tfull = defType def TelV tel _ <- lift $ telViewUpTo' (-1) (not . visible) tfull reportSDoc "tc.proj.amb" 30 $ vcat [ text $ " size tel = " ++ show (size tel) , text $ " size pars = " ++ show (size pars) ] -- See issue 1960 for when the following assertion fails for -- the correct disambiguation. -- guard (natSize tel == natSize pars) guard =<< do isNothing <$> do lift $ checkModality' d def return (orig, (d, (pars, (dom, u, tb)))) cands <- List1.groupOn fst . List1.catMaybes <$> mapM (runMaybeT . try) ds case cands of [] -> refuseProjNoMatching ds (_:_:_) -> refuseProj ds $ fwords "several matching candidates can be applied." -- case: just one matching projection d -- the term u = d v -- the type tb is the type of this application [ (_orig, (d, (pars, (_dom,u,tb)))) :| _ ] -> do storeDisambiguatedProjection d -- Check parameters tfull <- typeOfConst d (_,_) <- checkKnownArguments (take k args) pars tfull -- Check remaining arguments let r = getRange e args' = drop (k + 1) args z <- runExceptT $ checkArgumentsE cmp ExpandLast r args' tb (snd <$> mt) case z of Right st@(ACState _ _ _ trest targetCheck) -> do v <- checkHeadConstraints (u `applyE`) st return (v, trest, targetCheck) Left problem -> do -- In the inference case: -- To create a postponed type checking problem, -- we do not use typeDontCare, but create a meta. tc <- caseMaybe mt newTypeMeta_ (return . snd) v <- postponeArgs problem cmp ExpandLast r args' tc $ \ st@(ACState _ _ _ trest targetCheck) -> do v <- checkHeadConstraints (u `applyE`) st coerce' cmp targetCheck v trest tc return (v, tc, NotCheckedTarget) -- | Throw 'AmbiguousProjectionError' with additional explanation. refuseProj :: List1 QName -> TCM Doc -> TCM a refuseProj ds reason = typeError . AmbiguousProjectionError ds =<< reason refuseProjNotApplied, refuseProjNoMatching :: List1 QName -> TCM a refuseProjNotApplied ds = refuseProj ds $ fwords "it is not applied to a visible argument" refuseProjNoMatching ds = refuseProj ds $ fwords "no matching candidate found" refuseProjNotRecordType :: List1 QName -> Maybe Term -> Type -> TCM a refuseProjNotRecordType ds pValue pType = do let dType = prettyTCM pType let dValue = caseMaybe pValue (return empty) prettyTCM refuseProj ds $ fsep $ ["principal argument", dValue, "has type", dType, "while it should be of record type"] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Sorts ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- checkUniv :: UnivSize -> Univ -> Comparison -> A.Expr -> Type -> QName -> Suffix -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> TCM Term checkUniv sz u cmp e t q suffix args = do (v, t0) <- inferUniv sz u e q suffix args coerce cmp v t0 t inferUniv :: UnivSize -> Univ -> A.Expr -> QName -> Suffix -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> TCM (Term, Type) inferUniv sz u e q s args = do univChecks u case sz of USmall -> inferLeveledSort u q s args ULarge -> inferUnivOmega u q s args univChecks :: Univ -> TCM () univChecks = \case UProp -> unlessM isPropEnabled $ typeError NeedOptionProp UType -> pure () USSet -> unlessM isTwoLevelEnabled $ typeError NeedOptionTwoLevel suffixToLevel :: Suffix -> Integer suffixToLevel = \case NoSuffix -> 0 Suffix n -> n inferLeveledSort :: Univ -- ^ The universe type. -> QName -- ^ Name of the universe, for error reporting. -> Suffix -- ^ Level of the universe given via suffix (optional). -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -- ^ Level of the universe given via argument (absent if suffix). -> TCM (Term, Type) -- ^ Universe and its sort. inferLeveledSort u q suffix = \case [] -> do let n = suffixToLevel suffix return (Sort (Univ u $ ClosedLevel n) , sort (Univ (univUniv u) $ ClosedLevel $ n + 1)) [arg] -> do unless (visible arg) $ typeError $ WrongHidingInApplication $ sort $ Univ u $ ClosedLevel 0 unlessM hasUniversePolymorphism $ genericError "Use --universe-polymorphism to enable level arguments to Set" l <- applyRelevanceToContext NonStrict $ checkLevel arg return (Sort $ Univ u l , sort (Univ (univUniv u) $ levelSuc l)) arg : _ -> typeError $ TooManyArgumentsToLeveledSort q inferUnivOmega :: Univ -- ^ The universe type. -> QName -- ^ Name of the universe, for error reporting. -> Suffix -- ^ Level of the universe given via suffix (optional). -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -- ^ Level of the universe given via argument (should be absent). -> TCM (Term, Type) -- ^ Universe and its sort. inferUnivOmega u q suffix = \case [] -> do let n = suffixToLevel suffix return (Sort (Inf u n) , sort (Inf (univUniv u) $ 1 + n)) arg : _ -> typeError $ TooManyArgumentsToUnivOmega q ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Coinduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- checkSharpApplication :: A.Expr -> Type -> QName -> [NamedArg A.Expr] -> TCM Term checkSharpApplication e t c args = do arg <- case args of [a] | visible a -> return $ namedArg a _ -> typeError $ GenericError $ prettyShow c ++ " must be applied to exactly one argument." -- The name of the fresh function. i <- fresh :: TCM Int let name = filter (/= '_') (prettyShow $ A.nameConcrete $ A.qnameName c) ++ "-" ++ show i kit <- coinductionKit' let flat = nameOfFlat kit inf = nameOfInf kit -- Add the type signature of the fresh function to the -- signature. -- To make sure we can type check the generated function we have to make -- sure that its type is \inf. The reason for this is that we don't yet -- postpone checking of patterns when we don't know their types (Issue480). forcedType <- do lvl <- levelType (_, l) <- newValueMeta RunMetaOccursCheck CmpLeq lvl lv <- levelView l (_, a) <- newValueMeta RunMetaOccursCheck CmpEq (sort $ Type lv) return $ El (Type lv) $ Def inf [Apply $ setHiding Hidden $ defaultArg l, Apply $ defaultArg a] wrapper <- inFreshModuleIfFreeParams $ setRunTimeModeUnlessInHardCompileTimeMode $ do -- Andreas, 2019-10-12: create helper functions in non-erased mode. -- Otherwise, they are not usable in meta-solutions in the term world. -- #4743: Except if hard compile-time mode is enabled. c' <- setRange (getRange c) <$> liftM2 qualify (killRange <$> currentModule) (freshName_ name) -- Define and type check the fresh function. mod <- currentModality abs <- asksTC (^. lensIsAbstract) let info = A.mkDefInfo (A.nameConcrete $ A.qnameName c') noFixity' PublicAccess abs noRange core = A.LHSProj { A.lhsDestructor = unambiguous flat , A.lhsFocus = defaultNamedArg $ A.LHSHead c' [] , A.lhsPats = [] } clause = A.Clause (A.LHS empty core) [] (A.RHS arg Nothing) A.noWhereDecls False i <- currentOrFreshMutualBlock -- If we are in irrelevant position, add definition irrelevantly. -- If we are in erased position, add definition as erased. -- TODO: is this sufficient? addConstant c' =<< do let ai = setModality mod defaultArgInfo lang <- getLanguage fun <- emptyFunction useTerPragma $ (defaultDefn ai c' forcedType lang fun) { defMutual = i } checkFunDef info c' [clause] reportSDoc "tc.term.expr.coind" 15 $ do def <- theDef <$> getConstInfo c' vcat $ [ "The coinductive wrapper" , nest 2 $ prettyTCM mod <> (prettyTCM c' <+> ":") , nest 4 $ prettyTCM t , nest 2 $ prettyA clause ] return c' -- The application of the fresh function to the relevant -- arguments. e' <- Def wrapper . map Apply <$> getContextArgs reportSDoc "tc.term.expr.coind" 15 $ vcat $ [ "The coinductive constructor application" , nest 2 $ prettyTCM e , "was translated into the application" , nest 2 $ prettyTCM e' ] blockTerm t $ e' <$ workOnTypes (leqType forcedType t) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- * Cubical ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- | "pathAbs (PathView s _ l a x y) t" builds "(\ t) : pv" -- Preconditions: PathView is PathType, and t[i0] = x, t[i1] = y pathAbs :: PathView -> Abs Term -> TCM Term pathAbs (OType _) t = __IMPOSSIBLE__ pathAbs (PathType s path l a x y) t = do return $ Lam defaultArgInfo t -- | @primComp : ∀ {ℓ} (A : (i : I) → Set (ℓ i)) (φ : I) (u : ∀ i → Partial φ (A i)) (a : A i0) → A i1@ -- -- Check: @u i0 = (λ _ → a) : Partial φ (A i0)@. -- checkPrimComp :: QName -> MaybeRanges -> Args -> Type -> TCM Args checkPrimComp c rs vs _ = do case vs of -- WAS: [l, a, phi, u, a0] -> do l : a : phi : u : a0 : rest -> do iz <- Arg defaultArgInfo <$> intervalUnview IZero let lz = unArg l `apply` [iz] az = unArg a `apply` [iz] ty <- el's (pure (unArg l `apply` [iz])) $ primPartial <#> pure (unArg l `apply` [iz]) <@> pure (unArg phi) <@> pure (unArg a `apply` [iz]) bAz <- el' (pure $ lz) (pure $ az) a0 <- blockArg bAz (rs !!! 4) a0 $ do equalTerm ty -- (El (getSort t1) (apply (unArg a) [iz])) (Lam defaultArgInfo $ NoAbs "_" $ unArg a0) (apply (unArg u) [iz]) return $ l : a : phi : u : a0 : rest _ -> typeError $ CubicalPrimitiveNotFullyApplied c -- | @primHComp : ∀ {ℓ} {A : Set ℓ} {φ : I} (u : ∀ i → Partial φ A) (a : A) → A@ -- -- Check: @u i0 = (λ _ → a) : Partial φ A@. -- checkPrimHComp :: QName -> MaybeRanges -> Args -> Type -> TCM Args checkPrimHComp c rs vs _ = do case vs of -- WAS: [l, a, phi, u, a0] -> do l : a : phi : u : a0 : rest -> do -- iz = i0 iz <- Arg defaultArgInfo <$> intervalUnview IZero -- ty = Partial φ A ty <- el's (pure (unArg l)) $ primPartial <#> pure (unArg l) <@> pure (unArg phi) <@> pure (unArg a) -- (λ _ → a) = u i0 : ty bA <- el' (pure $ unArg l) (pure $ unArg a) a0 <- blockArg bA (rs !!! 4) a0 $ do equalTerm ty -- (El (getSort t1) (apply (unArg a) [iz])) (Lam defaultArgInfo $ NoAbs "_" $ unArg a0) (apply (unArg u) [iz]) return $ l : a : phi : u : a0 : rest _ -> typeError $ CubicalPrimitiveNotFullyApplied c -- | @transp : ∀{ℓ} (A : (i : I) → Set (ℓ i)) (φ : I) (a0 : A i0) → A i1@ -- -- Check: If φ, then @A i = A i0 : Set (ℓ i)@ must hold for all @i : I@. -- checkPrimTrans :: QName -> MaybeRanges -> Args -> Type -> TCM Args checkPrimTrans c rs vs _ = do case vs of -- Andreas, 2019-03-02, issue #3601, why exactly 4 arguments? -- Only 3 are needed to check the side condition. -- WAS: -- [l, a, phi, a0] -> do l : a : phi : rest -> do iz <- Arg defaultArgInfo <$> intervalUnview IZero -- ty = (i : I) -> Set (l i) ty <- runNamesT [] $ do l <- open $ unArg l nPi' "i" primIntervalType $ \ i -> (sort . tmSort <$> (l <@> i)) a <- blockArg ty (rs !!! 1) a $ do equalTermOnFace (unArg phi) ty (unArg a) (Lam defaultArgInfo $ NoAbs "_" $ apply (unArg a) [iz]) return $ l : a : phi : rest _ -> typeError $ CubicalPrimitiveNotFullyApplied c blockArg :: HasRange r => Type -> r -> Arg Term -> TCM () -> TCM (Arg Term) blockArg t r a m = setCurrentRange (getRange $ r) $ fmap (a $>) $ blockTerm t $ m >> return (unArg a) checkConId :: QName -> MaybeRanges -> Args -> Type -> TCM Args checkConId c rs vs t1 = do case vs of args@[_, _, _, _, phi, p] -> do iv@(PathType s _ l a x y) <- idViewAsPath t1 let ty = pathUnview iv -- the following duplicates reduction of phi const_x <- blockTerm ty $ do equalTermOnFace (unArg phi) (El s (unArg a)) (unArg x) (unArg y) pathAbs iv (NoAbs (stringToArgName "_") (unArg x)) p <- blockArg ty (rs !!! 5) p $ do equalTermOnFace (unArg phi) ty (unArg p) const_x -- G, phi |- p = \ i . x return $ initWithDefault __IMPOSSIBLE__ args ++ [p] -- phi <- reduce phi -- forallFaceMaps (unArg phi) $ \ alpha -> do -- iv@(PathType s _ l a x y) <- idViewAsPath (applySubst alpha t1) -- let ty = pathUnview iv -- equalTerm (El s (unArg a)) (unArg x) (unArg y) -- precondition for cx being well-typed at ty -- cx <- pathAbs iv (NoAbs (stringToArgName "_") (applySubst alpha (unArg x))) -- equalTerm ty (applySubst alpha (unArg p)) cx -- G, phi |- p = \ i . x _ -> typeError $ CubicalPrimitiveNotFullyApplied c -- The following comment contains silly ' escapes to calm CPP about ∨ (\vee). -- May not be haddock-parseable. -- ' @primPOr : ∀ {ℓ} (φ₁ φ₂ : I) {A : Partial (φ₁ ∨ φ₂) (Set ℓ)} -- ' → (u : PartialP φ₁ (λ (o : IsOne φ₁) → A (IsOne1 φ₁ φ₂ o))) -- ' → (v : PartialP φ₂ (λ (o : IsOne φ₂) → A (IsOne2 φ₁ φ₂ o))) -- ' → PartialP (φ₁ ∨ φ₂) A@ -- ' -- ' Checks: @u = v : PartialP (φ₁ ∨ φ₂) A@ whenever @IsOne (φ₁ ∧ φ₂)@. checkPOr :: QName -> MaybeRanges -> Args -> Type -> TCM Args checkPOr c rs vs _ = do case vs of l : phi1 : phi2 : a : u : v : rest -> do phi <- intervalUnview (IMin phi1 phi2) reportSDoc "tc.term.por" 10 $ text (show phi) t1 <- runNamesT [] $ do [l,a] <- mapM (open . unArg) [l,a] psi <- open =<< intervalUnview (IMax phi1 phi2) pPi' "o" psi $ \ o -> el' l (a <..> o) tv <- runNamesT [] $ do [l,a,phi1,phi2] <- mapM (open . unArg) [l,a,phi1,phi2] pPi' "o" phi2 $ \ o -> el' l (a <..> (cl primIsOne2 <@> phi1 <@> phi2 <@> o)) v <- blockArg tv (rs !!! 5) v $ do -- ' φ₁ ∧ φ₂ ⊢ u , v : PartialP (φ₁ ∨ φ₂) \ o → a o equalTermOnFace phi t1 (unArg u) (unArg v) return $ l : phi1 : phi2 : a : u : v : rest _ -> typeError $ CubicalPrimitiveNotFullyApplied c -- | @prim^glue : ∀ {ℓ ℓ'} {A : Set ℓ} {φ : I} -- → {T : Partial φ (Set ℓ')} → {e : PartialP φ (λ o → T o ≃ A)} -- → (t : PartialP φ T) → (a : A) → primGlue A T e@ -- -- Check @φ ⊢ a = e 1=1 (t 1=1)@ or actually the equivalent: @(\ _ → a) = (\ o -> e o (t o)) : PartialP φ A@ check_glue :: QName -> MaybeRanges -> Args -> Type -> TCM Args check_glue c rs vs _ = do case vs of -- WAS: [la, lb, bA, phi, bT, e, t, a] -> do la : lb : bA : phi : bT : e : t : a : rest -> do let iinfo = setRelevance Irrelevant defaultArgInfo v <- runNamesT [] $ do [lb, la, bA, phi, bT, e, t] <- mapM (open . unArg) [lb, la, bA, phi, bT, e, t] let f o = cl primEquivFun <#> lb <#> la <#> (bT <..> o) <#> bA <@> (e <..> o) glam iinfo "o" $ \ o -> f o <@> (t <..> o) ty <- runNamesT [] $ do [lb, phi, bA] <- mapM (open . unArg) [lb, phi, bA] el's lb $ cl primPartialP <#> lb <@> phi <@> glam iinfo "o" (\ _ -> bA) let a' = Lam iinfo (NoAbs "o" $ unArg a) ta <- el' (pure $ unArg la) (pure $ unArg bA) a <- blockArg ta (rs !!! 7) a $ equalTerm ty a' v return $ la : lb : bA : phi : bT : e : t : a : rest _ -> typeError $ CubicalPrimitiveNotFullyApplied c -- | @prim^glueU : ∀ {ℓ} {φ : I} -- → {T : I → Partial φ (Set ℓ)} → {A : Set ℓ [ φ ↦ T i0 ]} -- → (t : PartialP φ (T i1)) → (a : outS A) → hcomp T (outS A)@ -- -- Check @φ ⊢ a = transp (\ i -> T 1=1 (~ i)) i0 (t 1=1)@ or actually the equivalent: -- @(\ _ → a) = (\o -> transp (\ i -> T o (~ i)) i0 (t o)) : PartialP φ (T i0)@ check_glueU :: QName -> MaybeRanges -> Args -> Type -> TCM Args check_glueU c rs vs _ = do case vs of -- WAS: [la, lb, bA, phi, bT, e, t, a] -> do la : phi : bT : bA : t : a : rest -> do let iinfo = setRelevance Irrelevant defaultArgInfo v <- runNamesT [] $ do [la, phi, bT, bA, t] <- mapM (open . unArg) [la, phi, bT, bA, t] let f o = cl primTrans <#> lam "i" (const la) <@> lam "i" (\ i -> bT <@> (cl primINeg <@> i) <..> o) <@> cl primIZero glam iinfo "o" $ \ o -> f o <@> (t <..> o) ty <- runNamesT [] $ do [la, phi, bT] <- mapM (open . unArg) [la, phi, bT] pPi' "o" phi $ \ o -> el' la (bT <@> cl primIZero <..> o) let a' = Lam iinfo (NoAbs "o" $ unArg a) ta <- runNamesT [] $ do [la, phi, bT, bA] <- mapM (open . unArg) [la, phi, bT, bA] el' la (cl primSubOut <#> (cl primLevelSuc <@> la) <#> (Sort . tmSort <$> la) <#> phi <#> (bT <@> cl primIZero) <@> bA) a <- blockArg ta (rs !!! 5) a $ equalTerm ty a' v return $ la : phi : bT : bA : t : a : rest _ -> typeError $ CubicalPrimitiveNotFullyApplied c