Metadata revisions for leaky-0.2.0.1

Package maintainers and Hackage trustees are allowed to edit certain bits of package metadata after a release, without uploading a new tarball. Note that the tarball itself is never changed, just the metadata that is stored separately. For more information about metadata revisions, please refer to the Hackage Metadata Revisions FAQ.

No. Time User SHA256
-r1 (leaky-0.2.0.1-r1) 2015-01-28T00:46:58Z AndrewSeniuk 201227fe083b2c092bb9dac45a7314bc9c05490070bdc6fe826ad3312b87118d
  • Changed description from

    Robust space leak, and its strictification, for testing <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/deepseq-bounded deepseq-bounded> and <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/seqaid seqaid>.
    
    See also the project <http://www.fremissant.net/leaky homepage> for more information.
    
    Please share your comments on this <http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/2pscxh/ann_deepseqbounded_seqaid_leaky/ reddit> discussion.
    
    __Note:__ Ignore the anonymous rogue failed build report below (at least, it appeared on all versions I uploaded so far). If you examine the log it's clear that the problem is theirs, and nothing to do with this package or its dependencies. It's a shame this is so prominently displayed and impossible to remedy, it makes unbroken packages seem broken to visitors, and it exerts negative pressure on the use of cpphs (since one can make this rogue report go away by pretending cpphs never existed and depending on the ubiquity of a system-wide cpp).
    to
    Robust space leak, and its strictification, for testing <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/deepseq-bounded deepseq-bounded> and <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/seqaid seqaid>.
    
    See also the project <http://www.fremissant.net/leaky homepage> for more information.
    
    Please share your comments on this <http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/2pscxh/ann_deepseqbounded_seqaid_leaky/ reddit> discussion.
    
    NOTE: Ignore the anonymous rogue failed build report below (at least, it appeared on all versions I uploaded so far). If you examine the log it's clear that the problem is theirs, and nothing to do with this package or its dependencies. It's a shame this is so prominently displayed and impossible to remedy, it makes unbroken packages seem broken to visitors, and it exerts negative pressure on the use of cpphs (since one can make this rogue report go away by pretending cpphs never existed and depending on the ubiquity of a system-wide cpp).

-r0 (leaky-0.2.0.1-r0) 2015-01-28T00:45:33Z AndrewSeniuk 0e19120888646f3fec4a9ceb34df89c92f9f2feac7b96a7627410c55368b3923